No Lack of Marriageable Men

From a WSJ book review:

‘The Two-Parent Privilege’ Review: Where Have All the Good Men Gone?

Children fare better when they grow up with both parents—no surprise. But sometimes mothers have no choice but to go it alone. ... Enter “The Two-Parent Privilege: How Americans Stopped Getting Married and Started Falling Behind,” Melissa Kearney’s clear-eyed look at the economic impact of having a second parent at home. ...

When it comes to the economic well-being of children, she argues, having two parents really is better than one—on average.

What is driving these changes? Among other factors, Ms. Kearney refers to the lack of “marriageable men,” ...

Overall, Ms. Kearney makes a compelling case that we should be concerned about the rising rate of single-parent households, at least from the perspective of child well-being. The solution is more complicated. Noting that “so many men seem to be less than ideal marriage partners,”

Blaming men for bad mothering gets tiresome. Most of the comments are negative, such as:

I take exception to the author's premise of "marriageable men." She fails to recognize that most of these women bring nothing to the relationship other than an unplanned baby, owning nothing more than an exceptionally low credit score and dependence on welfare assistance and EBT cards.

We can blame it on the dude looking for a little trim, but there is no reason to procreate when prophylactics are readily available. Duh, 99.99% of pregnancies are easily prevented if you have an IQ greater than 90.

Yeah, lack of “marriageable men”. That must be it. Surely the trashing and disrespecting of men for the last 50 years couldn’t have anything to do with it. Surely the government’s overt efforts to replace the father in families couldn’t have anything to do with it. Surely the anomie produced by unlimited illegal immigration couldn’t have anything to do with it. Surely the universities’ efforts to instill moral relativism in students couldn’t have anything to do with it. It must be those lousy unmarriageable men.

Albert Einstein here. You know what can significantly reduce the chances of a woman having to "go it alone?" This is deep but stay with me. Not having a child by a man who has no intention of being a positively-involved father.

Hmmmm ... so it's the men ... it's not the women having sex with the men and looking for baby-daddy's? And how is it that social-welfare isn't mentioned as part of the problem? A system that basically pays women to be single parents? Fixing families is complicated, I get that, but come on man. And it's not a money problem. More programs and more money isn't going to fix anything. At this point it's more of a culture issue. People are going to need to make personal choices to cut this out.

No, there is no lack of marriageable men. If you look at singles group or other indicators of people looking for marriage, men greatly exceed women in quantity and quality. The Hill reports:

More than 60 percent of young men are single, nearly twice the rate of unattached young women, signaling a larger breakdown in the social, romantic and sexual life of the American male. ...

As of 2022, Pew Research Center found, 30 percent of U.S. adults are neither married, living with a partner nor engaged in a committed relationship. Nearly half of all young adults are single: 34 percent of women, and a whopping 63 percent of men.  

Pretty much all marriageable women are able to find a husband, if they look. Not true about men. The rise of single parent households is almost entirely women rejecting fathers for various reasons. And yes, the kids are worse off for the mom making these poor decisions. Stop blaming the men.

The dating apps have exposed female hypergamy more clearly. Most women on them would rather be a mistress to an alpha man, then be married to a man closer to her station in life. More simply, the women reject the marriageable men. This is a consequence of human nature, feminism, and a breakdown of social norms.

Some men are turning to AI girlfriends:

The rise of virtual artificial intelligence (AI) girlfriends is enabling the silent epidemic of loneliness in an entire generation of young men. It is also having severe consequences for America’s future. ...

These virtual girlfriends can even be based on real people. One influencer created an AI bot of herself named Caryn, then gained over 1,000 users (i.e. real boyfriends) in less than a week and a waitlist of more than 15,000 people.

This is only happening because of a lack of suitable real girlfriends.

Jewish Group pushes LGBTQ Agenda

The Jewish ADL claims;

In recent years, extremists and antisemitic conspiracy theorists have capitalized on the spread of dangerous and offensive falsehoods about LGBTQ+ people – including false claims about “grooming” and gender-affirming medical care – using these lies to further their bigoted agendas. Some anti-LGBTQ+ fearmongering simultaneously lifts antisemitic stereotypes and conspiracy theories about the alleged Jewish role in promoting the so-called LGBTQ+ “agenda.”

Adherents believe that Jews hope to prompt the downfall of Christian or Western society by promoting “sexual immorality”, and popularize these “perversions” through control of the media, entertainment, academia and government. White supremacists often weave this narrative into their theories about so-called “white genocide,” and extremist Black nationalists incorporate these beliefs into their claims about population control.

These narratives draw on and reinforce the long history of antisemitic tropes about Jewish sexual “deviance” and immorality. In the Middle Ages, for example, antisemitic “Judensau” images carved on European church façades depicted Jews engaged in sexual acts with pigs. In the 19th and 20th centuries, Jewish men were often characterized as effeminate, while Jewish women were seen as unladylike and sexually aggressive. The Nazis viewed both Jews and LGBTQ+ people as a threat to the regime’s racial, reproductive and military goals.

The article goes on to detail on with a list of ways Jews promote the LGBTQ agenda. There is no attempt to rebut them, as the ADL is obviously proud to support the LGBTQ agenda.

Disney’s “hyper-political and almost entirely Jewish” leadership was responsible for “transsexual and homosexual propaganda being smuggled into” homes.

“Every single aspect of Disney child grooming is Jewish.”

WBC denounced members of a local synagogue in Kansas as “sinful, greedy, Hell-bound, money-grubbing sodomites” who “have dedicated their synagogue to be a gay and lesbian propaganda mill and recruiting depot, soliciting young people to sodomy.”

Louis Farrakhan has stated that “pedophilia, homosexuality, sex trafficking is the work of Talmudists” and that “it’s the wicked Jews, the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality.” Farrakhan claimed in 2018 that “the Jews were responsible for all of this filth and degenerate behavior that Hollywood is putting out: turning men into women, and women into men.”

Kevin MacDonald, claimed that Jews “have both orchestrated as well as funded the contemporary gay rights movement” and that “gays have been weaponized by Jews against traditional Americans.” The article alleged that “Jews are always quick to create and bolster radical social movements that prove ruinous to the racial and cultural health of Whites,” adding, “Jews largely support gay marriage and gay rights because they erode the moral fabric of traditionally Christian America” and “help to destabilize the nation.”

“Jews are the driving force behind the transgendermania being aggressively promoted to the young in the West. The goal - the breakdown of the family and the supremacy of the Jewish people to replace American hegemony.”

In her 2021 book, Trans, The Economist’s Helen Joyce claimed that the transgender “global agenda” is “shaped” by three wealthy individuals, including Soros and Pritzker. Though Joyce did not explicitly highlight their Jewish identity, her statements echo the frequent conspiracy theories which portray Soros as the mastermind behind plots to undermine or destabilize societies.

Antisemitism and anti-LGBTQ+ hate are often intertwined, and it is important to support Jewish and LGBTQ+ communities by combatting both forms of hate.

So they say speaking out against the LGBTQ+ agenda is antisemitism even if there is no mention of Jews. The Jewish organizations do not ask anyone to believe in God, or the Bible, or the Ten Commandments, or in free speech, or even in secular pluralism, but they do believe in using their power and influence to block criticism of child grooming and the LGBTQ+ agenda.

California is on board:

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a new law requiring foster parents to prove that they will support an LGBTQ child’s “sexual orientation or gender identity.”

The bill, SB 407, directs the Department of Social Services to amend the foster care vetting process to deny a family the right to foster children based on their beliefs about gender theory.

State Senator Scott Wiener introduced the legislation, ...

There were 53,371 youth in foster care in California as of October 1, 2022. An estimated 30 percent identify as LGBTQ.

Wow, 30% of foster kids have been turned queer already, and that is not enough, so this law requires 100% of foster parents to be pro-LGBTQ. Yes, Wiener is a gay Jew.

How ChatGPT is aligned

There is a lot of talk about AI alignment, but what is it? Aligning robots with human values, but not all humans have the same values. See this Joe Henrich tweet.

ChatGPT is programmed to align with White California liberals. The big tech companies have decided on it.

Pope Welcomes Moslem Invaders

One of the most important events in the history of the world was how the Roman Church helped organize Christendom to stop Moslems from invading Europe in the period of about 1100-1600. That made modern civilization possible.

Now the Pope has reversed course, and sided with Moslem invaders.

The NY Post reports:

Pope Francis challenged French President Emmanuel Macron and other European leaders to open their ports to people fleeing hardship and poverty, insisting Saturday that the continent isn’t facing a migration “emergency” but rather a long-term reality that governments must deal with humanely. ...

He called for migrants to have legal pathways to citizenship, and for the Mediterranean Sea that so many cross to reach Europe to be a beacon of hope, not a graveyard of desperation. ...

Nevertheless, Francis said talk of a migration “emergency” only fuels “alarmist propaganda” and stokes peoples’ fears.

“Those who risk their lives at sea do not invade, they look for welcome, for life,” he said. “As for the emergency, the phenomenon of migration is not so much a short-term urgency, always good for fueling alarmist propaganda, but a reality of our times.”

The migrants are about 95% Moslems. Their grandchildren will be killing those of Christian Europeans.

Islam is not really a religion like Christianity. Christians are Christians based on beliefs. Moslems are Moslems because their parents were. Islam exists for the purpose of subjugating others. Every country that has admitted large numbers of Moslems has eventually been subjugated.

Catholics are facing other changes:

In just over a week, nearly 450 people from around the world will gather in Rome for a month-long assembly, a Synod of Bishops on synodality, which is expected to discuss a range of important issues including women's ordination, LGBTQ inclusion and ministry, and priestly celibacy.

Not sure what the Roman Church stands for anymore.

A. Blinken, Warmonger

Holocaust denial is illegal in much of the free world, and I am not going to do it here. Why would anyone even care about what happened 80 years ago?

Our foreign policy is being led by Antony Blinken, and his wars in Afghanistan and Ukraine have been disasters. What motivates him?

He tells a personal story about his family and the Jewish Holocaust, and it is full of lies, according to this article. I do not know what to make of it, and I am not sure it is even legal to have a public discussion of it.

I am more interested in why we have such a destructive Ukraine policy. Biden and Blinken started the war, by inviting Ukraine into NATO and then daring Russia to do something about it. Then Biden and Blinken started a policy of supplying Ukraine with just enough weapons to get themselves destroyed.

Vivek Ramaswamy said:

“Am I religious? Yes, I am. I am Hindu. I am not Christian. And we are a nation founded on Judeo-Christian values,” he said in an interview with NewsNation that aired last week. “But here is what I can say with confidence: I share those same values in common. I believe I live by those values more so than many self-proclaimed Christian politicians.”

No, the USA was not founded on Judeo-Christian values. The founders were Christians and Deists, but not Jews. No Jewish values involved.

I heard him comment that Christians might not vote for him because Hindus will not make it to Heaven. Actually I don't think that is an issue. The issue is his underlying values. The President has immense power and can start a war. Christianity teaches a set of values that most voters are comfortable with. Secular Jews like Blinken have another set of values, and I don't like them. Other religions are probably even worse. Nobody was sure about Barack Obama's religion, and look what we got. Mitt Romney claimed to be a Christian, but he was really a Mormon, and had strange values. Ramaswamy seems like a good guy, but I do not know how to assess his Hinduism.

Women should pay Reparations to Men

From the full California report:

The Task Force recommends that the Legislature estimate the cost of health differences between African Americans and white non-Hispanic Californians and issue reparations according to that calculation, as follows:

1. Take the value of the individual’s statistical life (roughly $10,000,000) and divide it by the white non-Hispanic life expectancy in California (78.6 years in 2021), to obtain the value for each year of life absent anti-Black racial discrimination ($127,226).769

Then calculate the difference in average life expectancy in years between African American and white non-Hispanic Californians (7.6 years in 2021). 3. Then multiply the two to arrive at a total loss in value of life for each African American due to health disparities based on racial discrimination ($966,918).

Women live longer than men by almost 6 years, and this is partially attributed to women having better access to health care and preventive services than men. So every man should be paid about $700,000 in compensation.

Women have more personal wealth and consumer spending power than men, and men have more debt. This is true in spite of the fact that men do more work and earn most of the money. Obviously a systemic injustice.

The report also wants to compensate Blacks for spending more time in jail. But of course men on average spend much more time in jail than women, so White men should be compensated also.

The Task Force also recommends that the Legislature provide reparations for less quantifable harms. For example, pain and suffering from generations of discrimination represents real harm experienced by descendants.

Also, because in some instances, more data and research are required to calculate the just amount of reparations, the Task Force recommends that the Legislature make a substantial initial down payment on reparations, to be augmented over time with additional payments as new evidence becomes available. It should be communicated to the public that the substantial initial down payment is the beginning of a conversation about redressing the economic and societal harm of historical injustices, not the end of it.

Forget about any payment settling any issue. Any payment for reparations will just encourage demands for more.

The Origins of Woke

The Atlantic magazine has a hit piece about a new book:

This week, HarperCollins will publish a new work by the conservative intellectual Richard Hanania. Titled The Origins of Woke, it bills itself as the “definitive” account of the rise of identity politics. The book makes the case that contemporary “wokeness” is an ideology that has its origins in—and was in fact created by—changes to the legal system that began with the Civil Rights Act, in the 1960s. “Long before wokeness was a cultural phenomenon,” Hanania argues, “it was law.” The Origins of Woke offers a plausible defense of this claim, and it features a smattering of interesting observations about the historical relationship between the legal system, corporate and education policy, and identity politics.

Yet these fleeting virtues are an insufficient counterbalance to the fatal flaw at the heart of Hanania’s book: It is a racist, sexist fever dream, the product of an author whose not-inconsiderable intellect has been warped and distorted—like many young conservatives’—by a noxious mixture of racist pseudoscience and the casual misogyny of the extremely online right.

I tried to find what the author wrote that was so scandalous, and the worst I found was that he wrote this under a pen name:

“If the races are equal,” Hoste wrote, “why do whites always end up near the top and blacks at the bottom, everywhere and always?”

So why the hysterical attack on an obscure book about the origin of a political movement?

Wokeness is evil, and its success depends on a number of false premises. Those who point out the errors must be personally attacked and destroyed. This article does not try to show that he is wrong. Only that he is an enemy of Woke.

Another Atlantic article starts:

The most heavily anticipated economics book of the year makes a radical argument: Having married parents is good for kids.

I know, I know. It seems like a joke, right? Of course having two involved parents living in a stable home together is good for kids. Anyone who has considered having children with a partner or was ever a child themselves must know that. But for years, academics studying poverty, mobility, and family structures have avoided that self-evident truth, the economist Melissa Kearney writes in The Two-Parent Privilege, released this week. And while the wonks avoided the topic, the rise of single-parent households in America exacerbated inequality and contributed to astonishingly high rates of child poverty.

Everybody knows two-parent households do better, but the Left has attacked this for decades as a relic of the 1950s. Maybe the Woke and anti-marriage movements had the same origin. Anti-Christian Leftists.

Update: Quillette review:

For Hanania, “wokeness has three central pillars”: “The belief that disparities equal discrimination” (when those disparities favor the “advantaged” groups), “speech restrictions,” and “human resources (HR) bureaucracy.” These first two pillars have been called “equalitarianism” and “cancel culture,” respectively. It’s Hanania’s focus on the third—“how wokeness is enforced at an institutional level”—that makes his book distinctive.

Sam Harris has Trump Derangement

In this Sam Harris podcast, he explains that he is at an impasse with Trump supporters because they refuse to acknowledge the fact that Pres. Trump decline to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, and the fact that we did not have a peaceful transfer of power in Jan. 2021.

Harris is interviewing NY Times columnist David Brooks who mostly agree and similarly suffers Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The USA certainly did have a peaceful transfer of power. Bing Chat explains:

Yes, the United States had a peaceful transfer of power in January 2021. On January 20, 2021, Joseph R. Biden Jr. was inaugurated as the 46th President of the United States, succeeding Donald J. Trump 1. The transfer of power was conducted in accordance with established constitutional procedures and traditions, including the certification of the electoral college results by Congress and the swearing-in of the new president and vice president 2.

It is worth noting that there were concerns about potential disruptions to the transfer of power following the events of January 6, 2021, when a mob of supporters of then-President Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol building 3. However, despite these challenges, the transfer of power proceeded smoothly and without incident.

That is correct. An unarmed protest at the Capitol delayed accepted of the Electoral College votes for a couple of hours, but that's all. Trump did not call out the military or resist vacating the White House. No weapons were fired, except for the policeman who killed an unarmed women protesting. No use of force affected any votes. The Biden inauguration went exactly as scheduled.

Harris and Brooks give the impression of being educated, and yet they spout nonsense on the subject of Trump. They are both secular Jews, but that is probably just a coincidence.

The mainstream media says this stuff all the time. They are so self-deluded that they probably do not even realize it. Harris admits to trying to talk to Trump supporters, and them explaining the truth to him, and yet he cannot seem to hear it.

Harris talks like a preacher, dogmatically and moralistically pushing his ideology. He is also a (Jewish) atheist, denouncing Islam and Christianity, and probably Orthodox Judaism also. He also frequently argues that he has no free will, and not even a feeling that he can freely choose anything. He is a pre-programmed robot.

The Rise of Phony Scientists

New book:

The Deadly Rise of Anti-science: A Scientist's Warning
Hardcover – September 19, 2023
by Peter J. Hotez (Author)

This is a big rant against those who resist covid-19 vaccines.

He is Jewish leftist, and argues everyone should get the vaccine once it became available. He complains about anti-science aggression from the far right. He essentially equates any vaccine skeptic with Hitler.

There is no real science in the book. Just arguments that people should accept what scientific and medical experts recommend.

He was offered a platform to debated skeptics, and refused.

He leads up to an argument that scientists should create a Jewish Scientific Southern Poverty Law Center to root out and punish those who do not accept the current scientific/medical dogma. He sees his enemies as far right extremists, and regularly reports them to the Jewish Anti Defamation League.

This is crazy. The SPLC and ADL are leftist hate groups whose net effect is very destructive. Only a Jewish leftist would think this way.

He is giving scientists a bad name. The advice from leading experts about covid was terrible. Just consider this: They banned Novak Djokovic from playing in the top tennis tournaments because he did not have the vaccine. What did that accomplish?

Update: For how the world's covid experts 😊were wrong, see Sweden's story (or video).

NYC Crime is Black Crime

NY City has released crime data. Blacks are committing these crimes at 30 times the rate of Whites.

The academic view is that race is just a social construct:

According to Jones (2002) “race” is only based on a few phenotypic-related genes, not global genetic ancestry, since the few genes that determine skin color, hair texture, and facial features are not informative about other aspects of the genotype at the individual level. Advocates of the structural racism hypothesis frequently emphasize that race/ethnicity categorization “reflects neither biological nor cultural differences” and that race is “often conflated erroneously with biology and ancestry” (Adkins-Jackson et al., 2022, p. 540), that “race is a social construct and is distinct from ethnicity, genetic ancestry or biology” (O’Reilly, 2020, p. 2), that “social races bear little relationship to the reality of human biological diversity” (Smedley & Smedley, 2005, p. 22) and that race “is a social construct with no biological basis and stems from White supremacy” (Haeny et al., 2021, p. 889). While the phrase “race is a social construct” can have a range of meanings, a popular one, given by the American Sociological Association (2003), is that race is “a social invention that changes as political, economic, and historical contexts change”; this social invention is said to be important because “social and economic life is organized, in part, around race as a social construct.”

You should disregard any journal that publishes such nonsence. You can pay $100 to get your genes sequanced, and the lab will identify your race based on your genes. And the genetic race match the ordinary social definition. And race shows up in crime statistics. It is not imaginary. It is real. If Blacks and Hispanics were to move out of NY City, the police would not have much to do.

Even the NCAAP recognizes:

The Oakland NAACP has called on city leaders to declare a state of emergency due to rising crime, calling the situation a "crisis," and has urged residents across the city to speak out against it. ...

"Failed leadership, including the movement to defund the police, our District Attorney’s unwillingness to charge and prosecute people who murder and commit life-threatening serious crimes, and the proliferation of anti-police rhetoric have created a heyday for Oakland criminals," the letter states.

The politics of colorblind equality

Christopher F. Rufo writes:

As a practical matter, too, the politics of colorblind equality is vastly superior to the politics of “white identity.” Whatever one’s judgment on mass immigration, America is now a mixed, multiracial republic, and any successful political movement will need to build a coalition beyond any single racial group. The good news for conservatives — and a point against arguments for demographic determination — is that many racial minorities, most notably Latinos and Asians, oppose critical race theory-style discrimination, support the principle of colorblind equality, and have begun to shift politically to the right. By contrast, the advocates of “white racial consciousness” have a track record with the opposite results: from the late author Sam Francis to the website VDARE, such efforts have failed to garner an audience, much less a political coalition, beyond the fringes. Such a politics is perceived, rightly, as victim-oriented and antithetical to deeply held American principles.

The vision of racialists, whether on the left or right, is pessimistic: the first is driven by a spirit of vengeance, the second by a sense of inferiority. They are two sides of the same coin.

I think Rufo is right that it is much better for political movements to be colorblind, but I do not think he is being fair to Francis and VDARE.

We have an immigration policy that is systematically replacing Whites with non-whites. Some say that it is good, and some say that it is bad. Some pretend that it is not happening, but it is obvious from Census figures, or by just looking around.

Some say that it is racist to even have an opinion on the subject.

Most of the people at Vdare are not White nationalists. They merely disagree with the demographic changes. Discussing the subject necessarily draws attention to racial differences.

Colorblind politics is no longer possible. Whites are blamed for a great many things, and scheduled for extermination. I do not want a victim-oriented politics. I just want to defend good policies with facts.

Here is an example of an opinion from someone labeled a White nationalist:

There is a sense that we’ve said everything there is to say particularly on race. I want to quote something Rep. Cori Bush, a black Congressman, said a few days ago about Michael Brown. Brown died nine years ago, and it was his death that started the Black Lives Matter movement. Cori Bush said, “He would be alive today if the institutions of racism and white supremacy were eradicated.” Set aside whatever it would mean to eradicate the “institutions” of white supremacy. We all know “hands up, don’t shoot” was a lie. We all know Brown tried to take away an officer’s weapon and was charging him when he was killed.

Yet none of this matters. We can’t even say it was covered up by the media. The media reported it all accurately. It was Eric Holder’s Justice Department that found out the truth. However, people still believe nonsense, and even if the truth comes from an unimpeachably liberal source, they will keep believing it. BLM rhetoric hasn’t changed in nine years, and the movement has ever more support from the Great and the Good.

He is right, and Cori Bush is wrong. Brown would be dead if he were White. No racism or white supremacy was involved. If it takes white racial consciousness to tell the truth, then someone has to do it. The Brown hoax caused riots, destruction, and deaths. According to this study, 3000 murders.

The Misogyny Myth

Former NY Times columnist John Tierney writes:

Women aren’t discriminated against in twenty-first-century America—but men increasingly are. ...

There is overwhelming evidence of conscious, blatant, and widespread discrimination against boys and men in modern societies.

He mentions that there have been studies where sex info was removed from applications for jobs and promotions, and they show preferences for women. That is, women do worse of the applications are sex-blind.

These studies are ignored, and scholars dishonestly say the opposite. Some falsely claim that women do better in orchestra auditions if they are blind. Actually they do worse.

The article has a lot of facts. Too much to summarize.

I have posted about how systemic racism is all a big hoax. Nearly all of the racial discrimination is in favor of non-whites. Likewise nearly all of the sex discrimination is in favor of girls and women. All this should be obvious. Just look around.

Here is the most misogynist rant I have seen in a long time:

Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with the establishment (BLM, immigration, gun control, etc.). There are some women who go into conservative politics because they realize they can do the same thing – draw attention to themselves. ...

Women are not aware that other people exist, really. To every woman, the world revolves around her. Everything that happens only happens in relation to her and her feelings. ...

What we have seen in Western society is a feminization of men, where men prefer the feminine virtues of safety, comfort, and conformity. However, when men do accept these feminine values, and take on this role of choosing wealth over truth, they appear to be aware that they are doing this, and seem to have guilt over it when they are forced to acknowledge what they’ve done. Women do not have guilt over anything internal, as they are incapable of imagining that it is possible for them to do anything wrong. They do not appear to believe that they have control over their own behavior, and instead view their lives simply as a series of things being done to them by others. They cannot comprehend personal responsibility, let alone something much more abstract, such as honor or aspiration.

From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:

• A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
• A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.

We all know a lot of women, and none of us has ever experienced those things. Sometimes, a woman will say something interesting, and then you’ll try to develop that through conversation, and she will be incapable of doing so. Then, later, you find out she had previously been dating some interesting man, and so she’d picked up on some interesting thing he’d said and repeated it to you. ...

All of this makes women totally incapable of actually understanding politics, philosophy, or anything that involves a moral imperative. It also makes it obvious why the elite are comfortable with men becoming more like women, why they ban cigarettes but encourage the use of hard drugs and pornography.

That site has been banned by Jews and others for saying things like this. There is some truth to what it says. There has been a feminization of men. Of those women politicians and pundits on tv, such as Kamala Harris or Nikki Haley, I have never heard any of them say anything interesting.

Accept this, and you will accept anything

Snake Baker writes:

It hardly even seems real that they are just going around cutting the tits off of teenage girls. Like, it’s still hard to process that this is happening.

As Andrew Anglin has said many times, this tranny stuff is the worst possible thing that any government could ever do. Therefore, once people have accepted this, there is not a single thing they won’t accept. Once you say “yeah, it’s a good idea to chop teenage girls’ tits off,” there is no single thing you can look at and say, “now, this seems unreasonable.”

You’ve destroyed the possibility of anything being unreasonable, ever.

This is why this issue is so important to the government/media. They know that once everyone has been forced to accept it, the game is over, and no one will ever protest anything the government does ever again.

Washington Times:

A Nebraska woman who had her breasts removed at 16 has sued University of Nebraska Medical Center doctors for malpractice, saying she and her parents were manipulated into gender-transition medical treatments that “robbed her of her womanhood.”

Luka Hein, 21, said she underwent a double mastectomy in 2018 after just two counseling sessions as part of a “gender-affirming care” process without being fully informed of the risks in violation of the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act.

I do not believe that more than about 1% of the population sincerely believes in this tranny stuff. And yet it is being forced on everyone. Why? I am not sure I accept The above argument, but I do believe that they are deliberately sacrificing teenaged girls in order to promote social change.

History of Impeachments

Andrew Johnson. He fired a couple of cabinet secretaries. Everyone now agrees it was 100% legal, but he was hated because he was not punishing the South for the Civil War enough.

Richard Nixon. He concealed when he learned about the Watergate break-in, and resisted a wider criminal investigation. No one ever showed that he knew about it in advance, or that he benefitted from it.

Bill Clinton. He sexually harassed an intern, and lied about it under oath in a civil lawsuit.

Donald Trump. He asked Ukraine to investigate corruption with the Biden family, and possible held up arms aid for a couple of weeks. He also gave a speech on Jan. 6, 2021 suggesting follower protest peacefully to Congress.

Joe Biden. His son took bribes from shady players in Ukraine and China who were trying to buy influence with Joe. Joe denied knowing anything about it, and denied any responsibility to even find out. He also held up arms shipments to Ukraine, for political reasons.

I consider all of these offenses minor, compared to presidents who lied to get us into war, or who started wars without congressional approval, or who failed to protect our borders, or who violated the law to achieve some political end, or who wasted huge amounts of money, or who prosecuted political enemies on trumped up charges.

Democrats say that there is no evidence against Biden, but he covered up family bribery as much as Nixon covered up Watergate.

Apple aims to remove carbon

New Apple ad says:

Our aim is to permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere.

Apple is going to kill us all. Once carbon is removed from the atmosphere, all plant life on Earth will die.

The rest of the ad is worse. A Magic Negro is Mother Nature, and demands environmental sound bites. Tim Cook and some diverse actors say a lot of dopey things.

If you want to save the environment, it is never to pay big bucks for premium products. Everyone who gets a piece of that money is going to use it to consume resources. There is no way around that.

Apple also supports an assortment of destructive Leftist policies, such importing Third World folks into the USA where they will use 10x the resources.

California Mandates LGBTQ Books in Schools

The NY Post reports:

California lawmakers passed a bill last week prohibiting books from being banned in public school districts because of content related to gender or racial diversity, and now, the governor is expected to sign it into law.

Last Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom showed his support of the bill, suggesting he plans to make it law. ...

Under the bill, school districts would be fined for banning books.

The bill, which was introduced and authored by Assembly member Corey Jackson of Riverside, does not prohibit book banning, though it would impose a fine if books are banned because they contain “inclusive and diverse perspectives.” ...

Jackson’s bill threatens financial penalties against school boards that restrict access to classroom and library materials because they feature LGBTQ people or were written by LGBTQ authors, the bill reads, “discriminates against LGBTQ people and constitutes censorship in violation of California law and policy.”

So public schools have to have LGBTQ propaganda and grooming books for kindergartners.

This video says it offers "updates on the religious right’s war against trans people." It says that the only opposition to the Trans agenda is thinly-disguised religious bigotry. A comment says this is backwards, and that "Woke is a religion".

I agree with that comment. Freedom from religion should mean freedom from wokeness. The pro-LGBTQ lobby pushes their view on everyone with religious zeal. They are more dogmatic than my local preachers.

On the other hand, opposition to pro-LGBTQ books in K-12 schools, and to trans kids, is almost entirely non-religious. Those arguments are mostly about the harms to over-sexualizing children, to sexual grooming, and to medical harms of treatments.

The USA Democrat Party is 100% committed to exposing your kids to queer/tranny propaganda.

Jews are Grooming Young Schoolkids to be LBGTQIA+

As mentioned, here is new California law:

The California State Assembly passed legislation Friday that would require judges in child custody cases to consider whether a parent has affirmed a child’s belief that they are transgender.

AB 957 originally proposed that courts deciding custody cases must consider whether each parent were gender-affirming of the child in question. An amendment in June added to the state’s standard of what constitutes parental responsibility for child welfare, requiring that parents must be affirming of a child’s gender identity if they are to be judged fit for providing for "the health, safety, and welfare of the child" in a court of law.

The bill was sponsored by a homosexual Jew and a fat Black woman.

In case you don't believe that this is part of the Jewish agenda, consider this notice from the Boston Jewish Community Center:

Fostering Belonging. Join us for a virtual panel that bring together parents of LGBTQIA+ youth and dedicated educators, all passionate about supporting LGBTQIA+ and gender expansive students in elementary school.

That's right, they are grooming elementary school kids to become queers and trannies.

Perhaps you think that it is impossible for them to turn kids into queers. Then why are they trying so hard? Why are they so adamant about using the schools for indoctrination?

Some are resisting:

The Orange Unified School District became the latest district in California to approve a transgender notification policy following a packed meeting that grew heated at times Thursday night.

The policy requires the school to notify parents when their children under the age of 12 request to use different names or pronouns than what is on their birth certificate.

Prior to the meeting, school board members said they received an email from California Attorney General Rob Bonta threatening to take action to protect student civil rights. Meanwhile, students and their families anxiously awaited the fate of the proposed policy.

California sued another district for doing this.

Update: In a surprise move, California Gov. Newsom vetoed the tranny child custody law.

RadioLab: Not Born That Way

Here is the latest RadioLab episode:

Born This Way?

Today, the story of an idea. An idea that some people need, others reject, and one that will, ultimately, be hard to let go of.

It traces the notion that homosexuals and other LGBTQ folks are "born that way" and that the condition is immutable. it says that the belief was crucial to winning public acceptance of same sex marriage and other privileges, but not really backed by any hard science all scientific attempts to prove it has failed. The show suggests that people will continue to recite this belief in spite of the evidence and possible harms from the belief.

Genetic research has shown a large number of human behaviors that are correlated with a large number of genes. However the idea that some single gene is responsible for some complex human behavior has been proved wrong.

In other areas, genetic determinism is considered harmful and offensive. There is a lot of evidence that Black men have innate instincts to commit violent crimes. You will not learn about that in school. Being fat and lazy is heritable, but not commonly accepted as an excuse. People do have power to change their lives.

But "born that way" is just a hoax used to advance some political goals.

Actor Masterson to spend Life in Prison

Famous Hollywood actor Danny Masterson is a Scientologist, and got sucked into some Scientology controversies. He was just convicted of two 2003 rapes, and sentenced to life in prison. He will be eligible for parole after 30 years.

The women did not complain until 2017, and there was a first trial in which most jurors thought he was innocent. There was no objective evidence of a crime.

I never heard of him, and did not follow the case. But do I think our justice system was somehow able to determine what happened in 2003? Of course not. This is an extreme sentence, on the flimsiest of evidence. Our system is broken.

Here is video of Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis apologise for letters. This is pathetic. They were friends Masterson for 25 years, and laways thought that he was a find man, and now they apologize for saying so? They disgust me. Kunis is a Ukrainian Jew who was 14 years old when she was on a TV show with Masterson and Kutcher. She describes herself as a non-practicing Jew, but Jewish enough to hate Republicans. Now she is married to Kutcher. The apologiy talks about victims, they have no knowledge of any victims. These people are horrible.

Apparently Kutcher and Kunis had to make this apology video because one of Masterson's accusers threatened to also make accusations against them. So it was extertion. Kutcher and Kunis look like kidnapped prisoners reading a prepared statement. Kutcher has an estunated bet worth of $200 million. But he could lose it all and spend life in prison, if he triggers the wrong woman.

Black Woman on the Moon will be Expensive

the Artemis program is supposed to land the first woman and person of color on the Moon. And it is a massive boondoggle:

In a new report, the federal department charged with analyzing how efficiently US taxpayer dollars are spent, the Government Accountability Office, says NASA lacks transparency on the true costs of its Space Launch System rocket program.

Published on Thursday, the new report (see .pdf) examines the billions of dollars spent by NASA on the development of the massive rocket, which made a successful debut launch in late 2022 with the Artemis I mission. Surprisingly, as part of the reporting process, NASA officials admitted the rocket was too expensive to support its lunar exploration efforts as part of the Artemis program.

"Senior NASA officials told GAO that at current cost levels, the SLS program is unaffordable," the new report states.

Maybe NASA should focus more on science, and less on diversity politics.

New California Law Mandates Transgenderism

mentioned previously that california was passing a bill taking kids away from parents for not affirming transgenderism. The bill has now passed, and is waiting for the governor's signature.

Previous California laws drew the attention of fact-checkers who denied that the bill was so radical. So now California passed a more radical bill.

It is hard to say exactly how radical this is, because California law already gave judges the discretion to make child custody decision on just about anything they want. This just adds transgenderism to the list. And soon parents will lose their kids for not going along with perverted sex treatments.

Right to Criticize the Jewish Agenda

In understanding the Musk-ADL dispute, it is useful to look at the opinion of the world's worst anti-semite, the man that the ADL has had banned and deplatformed more than any other.

He writes:

Jewish Censorship is the Leading Cause of Anti-Semitism

... As explained above, there is no way to deny that the Jews, collectively, have an agenda and engage in a variety of behaviors to push this agenda. If we look at the ADL and the various other Jewish groups designed to push a Jewish agenda, we see that these Jews support:

Mass nonwhite immigration into white countries

Abortion and feminism more broadly

Homosexuality and the trans agenda, including child homosexuality and child trannies

“Civil rights” for the blacks, which now involve legalizing black crime

Sending huge amounts of American taxpayer dollars to fight various wars which are considered helpful to the interests of the Jews.

And most importantly:

Silencing any attempt to criticize these agendas, or to identify these agendas as fundamentally Jewish in nature.

It is that last thing that bothers people more than anything else. ...

The most obvious example is that the ADL has demanded that Elon Musk censor the account “Libs of TikTok,” which is run by a Jewish woman who supports Israel. She is simply opposed to the trans agenda, as well as other “far-left” agendas that most Jews support. She probably also, presumably, would support banning criticism of Israel.

There is no point in attempting to argue that you are not an “anti-Semite,” and there is no way to oppose the Jewish agenda while also attempting to avoid that label. This is because the label itself is designed to taint anyone who opposes the Jewish agenda. That is the only reason the term exists – it is a way for Jews to protect their agenda by destroying anyone who questions it.

In order for this civilization to survive, we have to be able to criticize the Jews.

We can say “I don’t hate the Jews,” but we cannot bargain with them for a right to oppose their agenda. They will not ever agree that any non-Jew has a right to criticize them, because they do not even believe we are human.

The ADL’s leader, Jonathan Greenblatt, does not attempt to disguise the fact that he believes he is better than other people because of his Jewishness, that he has a right to control other people because he is Jewish.

There is no free speech, as long as this man is banned from Twitter and the other major platforms. And yes, the Jewish agenda must be criticized.

Musk may Sue ADL for Defamation

The fight between Twitter and ADL continues:

X owner Elon Musk is threatening to sue the Anti-Defamation League for defamation, claiming that the nonprofit organization’s statements about rising hate speech on the social media platform have torpedoed X’s advertising revenue.

In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, Musk said US advertising revenue is “still down 60%, primarily due to pressure on advertisers by @ADL (that’s what advertisers tell us), so they almost succeeded in killing X/Twitter!”

Musk also claimed that since he took over the platform in October 2022, the ADL “has been trying to kill this platform by falsely accusing it & me of being anti-Semitic.”

For background, see People Should be Talking About the ADL’s Support for Extremist Racialist Policies in Israel. The author of that article has been banned from Twitter/X, just like Nick Fuentes, at the demand of ADL.

Anti-semitism is almost entirely a hoax perpetrated by the ADL, and like-minded Jews. They complain about it all the time, but it is almost impossible to find any example of it.

The Twitter debate has cited an Israeli movie on the subject, which you can watch at this banned site. The documentary details how Jews are taught anti-semitism myths so that they will hate gentiles, and support Jewish ethnic cohesion.

My guess is that most Jews do not agree with this strategy. But it very much is the strategy of the ADL, and of the Jews who are out to destroy free speech in America.

There is no free speech as long as the ADL can extort major platforms into banning people like Anglin and Fuentes. The ADL must be exposed for what it is.

No Bodies in Canada School Graves

The biggest Canada scandal of the last ten years was how Catholic schools abused and buried Indian and Eskimo children. It was all a hoax.

The London Daily Mail reports:

Doubts are growing about the scale of historic abuse at Canada's notorious residential schools for indigenous children after a dig at one of the country's most high-profile sites uncovered no bodies.

The country has set aside billions of dollars in compensation and declared a 'cultural genocide' in the treatment of indigenous children who were taken away from their families and placed at the schools for much of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Teams using ground-penetrating radar claim to have found mass graves in the last two years containing the remains of more than 1,000 children who were buried in secret.

But no bodies have since been recovered, and researchers have now confirmed that none have been found during a four-week dig in the basement of Our Lady of Seven Sorrows Catholic Church, on the site of the former Pine Creek Residential School, where the remains of more than 60 children were thought to be hidden.

'People believe things that are not true or improbable and they continue to believe it even when no evidence turns up,' said Tom Flanagan, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Calgary.

The Pope came to Canada and apologized. Dozens of Catholic churches were burned in retaliation.

Science discovers Timeline for Adam and Eve

AAAS Science magazine reports:

calculated the composite likelihood for present-day human genomic sequences of 3154 individuals. Results showed that human ancestors went through a severe population bottleneck with about 1280 breeding individuals between around 930,000 and 813,000 years ago. ... This bottleneck is congruent with a substantial chronological gap in the available African and Eurasian fossil record.

They are trying to say that the Garden of Eden was 900k years ago, and that is when humans started.

I don't see how this much info can be gleaned from DNA, but I did not read the paper.

Humans do have distinct characteristics that are quite different from apes. Not just big brains. The followers of the Aquatic ape hypothesis might say that those 1280 breeders could have lived in water, and undergone rapid evolutionary changes. Wikipedia says "Anthropologists do not take the hypothesis seriously", but the alternatives are not convincing either.

The status of the AAH depends on your philosophy of science. Some say that unless there is some direct evidence for it, such as a fossilized marine community, it is pseudoscience and should not be discussed seriously. Others say that it should be accepted as a working hypothesis as long it explains some evolutionary features, until someone finds a better explanation.

Jews Attack Musk and Twitter

The Jewish magazine Forward reports:

An anti-ADL campaign is erupting on Twitter and Elon Musk endorsed it

More than 89,000 of #BantheADL posts flooded Twitter as part of an ongoing effort by the far right to defame the organization

Not sure what is going on here. Twitter does not have free speech, and has mostly carried out the wishes of Jews at the ADL. The Groypers are banned, at the request of the ADL.

ADL stands for "anti-defamation", but all they do is defame people.

Some say that Musk was driven to buy Twitter because he sent his son to a fancy private school, and they turned him into a tranny communist who no longer talks to him. Maybe Musk is figuring out that the ADL is ruining Twitter also.

The article goes on to explain ADL preoccupation with a 1913 murder case.

Frank, a Jewish factory manager in Atlanta, was convicted of raping and murdering a 13-year-old girl who worked for him. After the governor commuted Frank’s death sentence to life in prison, Frank was dragged from his prison cell in Marietta and lynched by a mob.

The state’s failure to protect Frank while in custody led Georgia to posthumously pardon him in 1986. The pardon did not exonerate him, but contemporary experts who’ve examined the case believe a factory janitor committed the crime. ...

The ADL was founded the year Frank was convicted

The Black janitor probably did commit the crime, and framed Frank. Wikipedia editors insist on saying that Frank was "wrongfully convicted". Maybe so, but if you google the case, you will find sites with lots of authentic with evidence of Frank's guilt that convinced many people. There is certainly no consensus that Frank was innocent.

A Wikipedia reader may think it very strange that the article says Frank was wrongfully convicted, when 90% of the sources do not say that. Obviously there is a faction of editors with an axe to grind. The ADL has a big investment in promoting a myth that Frank was a victim of anti-semitism.

Much of today's Left insist that everyone accept facts, once a consensus of experts agree on them. This applies to global warming, wearing covid masks, getting vaccines, the 2020 election, Ukraine war, etc.