Saturday, August 31, 2019

A sample of today's NY Times lies

I have said here that the mainstream press lies about Pres. Trump on a daily basis. Here is an example from today's NY Times:
Pence is the chief bootlicker to a president who now sees himself in messianic terms, a president who tweets a description of himself as “the second coming of God.” As hard as it is to see God Part II boasting about grabbing a woman’s genitals, paying hush money to a porn actress, or calling neo-Nazis “very fine people,” millions of overtly religious Americans believe in some version of Jesus Trump, Superstar.
These are all lies. Pence is no more a bootlicker than any of our other recent VPs. Trump never described himself as “the second coming of God.” He never boast about grabbing a woman's genitals. His lawyer paid money to a blackmailer, and we don't know that Trump ever even met the port actress. Trump never called neo-Nazis very fine people.

Religious Americans support Trump for his policies, and not because they see him as a version of Jesus. But then here is what the article says about their religion:
White evangelical Christians, the rotting core of Trump’s base, profess to be guided by biblical imperatives. They’re not. Their religion is Play-Doh. ...

So, yes, people hate religion ... They hate religion because, at a moment to stand up and be counted on the right side of history, religion is used as moral cover for despicable behavior.
If you similarly criticize the Christian-hating religion of those who run the NY Times, you are called anti-Semitic and bigoted.

Another NY Times writer goes beserck with the Hitler-Trump analogies:
World War II began 80 years ago this Sunday after Nazi Germany ... On Nov. 3 of that year, Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister, gave Hitler a report of his trip to Poland. “Above all, my description of the Jewish problem gets [Hitler’s] full approval,” he wrote in his diary. “The Jew is a waste product. It is a clinical issue more than a social one.” ...

The political mind-set that turned human beings into categories, classes and races also turned them into rodents, insects and garbage. “Anti-Semitism is exactly the same as delousing,” Heinrich Himmler would claim in 1943. “Getting rid of lice is not a matter of ideology. It is a matter of cleanliness.” Watching Warsaw’s Jewish ghetto burn that year, a Polish anti-Semite was overheard saying: “The bedbugs are on fire. The Germans are doing a great job.”
The author seems to have been triggered by a news story about bedbugs in the NY Times building, followed by a joke about its Trump-hater columnists. He complains about "the conviction that an opponent embodies an irredeemable evil", but that is a conviction most commonly found on the Left today.

Friday, August 30, 2019

Why the Zuckerbergs believe in censorship

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg has a little sister who is a white-hating feminist scholar, and she writes in the Wash. Post:
As the editor of an online publication that runs articles about the intersections of classical antiquity and the modern world, often from a feminist and progressive perspective, I’ve gotten my fair share of “debate me” challenges. ... These modest men also identify with Socrates, the original “debate me” troll.

deplatforming white supremacists is a much more successful way to shut them down than insisting that “sunlight is the best disinfectant” and allowing them to air their hateful views in a structured debate setting.

… I believe there is little point in engaging with these people — and I’m not open to debating that topic further.
So Facebook, Youtube, etc censor the people they hate, especially White Christians and Trump supporters.

We now depend on Russian RT to speak up for free speech.

Thursday, August 29, 2019

Who benefited from slavery?

The Democrats, NY Times, and other leftists want to raise the issue of who benefited from slavery, and how much.

Sailer points out that it is doubtful that whites benefited from slavery, before the Civil War.

The Civil War surely wiped out any benefits. And the costs of the slave trade continue to be paid by Whites.

On the other hand, African-Americans were surely the biggest beneficiaries. American blacks are the richest blacks in the world. Being a slave in America was surely better than being a slave in Africa.

I am not trying to justify slavery, as I don't think that it was even a net benefit for White people. The whole thing was a big mistake. But if someone wants to go back and revisit the issue of who benefited economically, you would have to conclude that the African-Americans were the beneficiaries.

Maybe I am wrong, and some commission on slavery reparations will calculate all the costs and benefits of the slave trade. I hope that they look at what would have happened if the Africans had been left in Africa.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

NY Times complains about being held accountable

The NY Times publisher complains:
A note to staff by New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger calling attention ...

Dear Colleagues,

We published an article today revealing a coordinated campaign by President Trump’s allies to attack hundreds of journalists in retaliation for coverage of the administration. This unprecedented campaign appears designed to harass and embarrass anyone affiliated with independent news organizations that have asked tough questions and brought uncomfortable truths to light.

The New York Times, which has distinguished itself with fearless and fair coverage of the president, is one of the main targets of this assault. Unable to challenge the accuracy of our reporting, political operatives ...
This takes Jewish paranoia to a new level.

The accuracy of the NY Times reporting certainly is being challenged. They lie about Pres. Trump on a daily basis.

The biggest lie of the last couple of years was that Trump had committed impeachable offenses by colluding with the Russians to steal the 2016 election. It printed 100s of such stories. If it were honest, it would return the Pulitzer prizes it got for its bogus reporting.

And of course the newspaper brought us the Iraq War and many other disasters.

The NY Times has been particularly aggressive in trying to ostracize right-wingers by pulling old or out-of-context quotes and branding them racist or bigoted.

It turns out that a lot of NY Times employees deserve to be embarrassed, by that standard.

One Jewish Trump-hater NY Times columnist tried to get a professor fired for calling him a bedbug! Being analogized to an insect was just like the Jewish Holocaust, apparently.

The Wash. Post is just as bad:
Washington Post opinion writer Jennifer Rubin pushed for Americans to work together to "burn down the Republican party" in the hopes of extinguishing any trace of the enthusiasm for President Trump.

Rubin appeared on MSNBC's "AM Joy" Sunday and said that not only does Trump have to lose in 2020, but there must be a purging of "survivors" who still support the commander-in-chief.

"It's not only that Trump has to lose, but that all his enablers have to lose," she said. "We have to collectively, in essence, burn down the Republican Party."

"We have to level them because if there are survivors -- if there are people who weather this storm, they will do it again."
She is supposed to be their right-wing.conservative columnist. The supposed conservatives at the NY Times say similar things.

Face it, these people who dominate the news media are on a mission to destroy America as we know it. They will lead us to civil war, if necessary to enslave us.

Monday, August 26, 2019

The major new media hate-white-male machine

Jerry Coyne and Andrew Sullivan and left-wing Trump-haters. (Some people call Sullivan a "conservative", but I have been reading him for years, and I have never seen him express any conservative opinions, except for things like free speech.) They agree that the NY Times has switch from being a general newspaper to a propaganda organ for the Authoritarian Left:
I think that in the last bit Sullivan is referring to the New York Times‘s 1619 Project: a well-motivated but poorly executed journalistic series that is becoming into the greatest instance of media virtue-flaunting and mass shaming I’ve seen in my lifetime. ...

Now, one might expect New York Times reporters to believe that “racism and white supremacy [are] the foundation of all of the systems in the country,” but you can choose not to buy the Times. Public schools? Mandatory. This is where the real action is in “reframing” the entire idea of America.
So it is not just right-wingers like Ann Coulter who say that the NY Times is leftist propaganda. Even leftists are disgusted.

And the problem is not just the NY Times. They are media leaders, and the schools then require the same leftist propaganda.

When the NY Times attacks White supremacy, it really means Christian Whites, as the newspaper is run by Jews who do not identify as White.

Speaking of hating White males, NPR Radio reports:
A few years ago, TV celebrity Rachel Maddow was at Rockefeller University to hand out a prize that's given each year to a prominent female scientist. As Maddow entered the auditorium, someone overheard her say, "What is up with the dude wall?"

She was referring to a wall covered with portraits of scientists from the university who have won either a Nobel Prize or the Lasker Award, a major medical prize.

"One hundred percent of them are men. It's probably 30 headshots of 30 men. So it's imposing," says Leslie Vosshall, a neurobiologist with the university and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. ...

"It just sends the message, every day when you walk by it, that science consists of old white men," says Vosshall. "I think every institution needs to go out into the hallway and ask, 'What kind of message are we sending with these oil portraits and dusty old photographs?'"
So the white men and their accomplishments are being memory holed because of the dopey comment of some lesbian leftist MSNBC propagandist?

To answer the question, the message being sent is that we encourage and respect accomplishments. Yes, most worthwhile accomplishments have been by White men.

Sunday, August 25, 2019

NYT columnist has new book on Jewish paranoia

A NY Times opinion columnist just published a new book:
How to Fight Anti-Semitism Hardcover – September 10, 2019
by Bari Weiss ...

Tree of Life, the synagogue where Bari Weiss became a bat mitzvah, ...

Like many, Weiss long believed this country could escape the rising tide of anti-Semitism. But now the luckiest Jews in history are beginning to face a three-headed dragon known all too well to Jews of other times and places: the physical fear of violent assault, the moral fear of ideological vilification, and the political fear of resurgent fascism and populism.

No longer the exclusive province of the far right, the far left, and assorted religious bigots, anti-Semitism now finds a home in identity politics and the reaction against identity politics, in the renewal of America First isolationism and the rise of one-world socialism, and in the spread of Islamist ideas into unlikely places.
The NY Times is all identity politics, all the time. Every day it has many article encouraging conflicts between ethnic groups and other groups.

The "luckiest Jews in history" are the big promoters of identity politics. Weiss included. It is obvious that she thinks that Jews should run the world, and that any naysayers should be ostracized as anti-Semitic. And she was brainwashed into these views in a synagogue at an early age.

She particularly wants Jews to be sheltered from "the moral fear of ideological vilification". Note that she does not say anything about religious persecution. She may not be religious, for all I know. But she does share ideologies with liberal American Jews, and she does not want those views to be vilified.

The idea that NY Times opinion columnists need protection of ideological vilification is just laughable. The NY Times is the mainstream news, and it is always vilifying its enemies. Jews have higher status than any other ethnic group.

And I am not including the NY Times article on lesbian crime in space. It involved a child custody dispute between two lesbians, but it never mentions the word "lesbian" or "father".

Another female Jewish NY Times columnist, Michelle Goldberg, also acts as if she speaks for Jews. Her latest column says:
Obviously, American Jews have long leaned liberal, and have always been overrepresented in progressive movements. But there’s a difference between leftists who happen to be Jewish and explicitly Jewish left-wing activism. “People who may not have been that close to Jewishness, they feel suddenly like it’s very important to express who they are as Jews in the context of their activism and in the context of their collective memory,” said Arielle Angel, the editor of Jewish Currents.
Her complaint is that today's leftists have turned anti-Semitic, while most right-wingers are pro-Jewish and pro-Israel. She thinks that it is better for Jews to side with anti-Semitic leftists than with pro-Jewish right-wingers like Trump.

If you need proof that the NY Times distorts the news in order to create racial strife and blame Whites, just see Ann Coulter's latest column. You will never trust another NY Times crime story again.

Friday, August 23, 2019

Jews stoking White infighting

A NY Times op-ed:
White Supremacists Stole My Rabbi Husband’s Identity
The scheme, cooked up by 4chan trolls, sought to stoke Jewish infighting.
By Avital Chizhik-Goldschmidt
Ms. Chizhik-Goldschmidt is an editor at The Forward. [a Jewish publication] ...

It was a Twitter profile with the name “David Goldberg.” The bio read: “Orthodox Jew against the apartheid state of Israel.” But the photograph was of my Jerusalem-born husband, Benjamin. ...

In other words, these avatars with fringe views were created with the express purpose of stoking ferocious fighting within the Jewish community by highlighting its most sensitive topics: Israel, Donald Trump and anti-Zionist Jews. ...

Those who seek to exploit this tension seek to turn the American Jewish community against itself. They threaten to permanently damage the communal consensus that fostered the emerging state of Israel in 1948, as Jews worldwide rallied for the right to a homeland in the wake of the Holocaust. And they shake the core of the very community that banded together, across all political and religious differences, to demand freedom for Soviet Jewry, an effort which allowed my own parents to escape from behind the Iron Curtain to freedom in 1979.
She is obviously a Jewish supremacist who thinks Jews should have more rights than anyone else. She says Jews have a right to a homeland, but not Whites. She thinks Soviet Jews had a right to emigrate, but not others.

One guy makes fun of her husband on Twitter, and she launches into a hysterical attack on some White conspiracy.

And she thinks Jews should stick together in their fights with White people.

If some White guy ever expresses the opinion that Whites should stick together, the NY Times and Jewish publications will attack him with their highest lever of ferocity.

If there is one common thread to NY Times editorial policy, it is to seek ethnic conflict and infighting among non-Jews. It does this on a daily basis. For example:
LexisNexis shows results for 190 NYT articles referring to African American enslavement in 2012. That number grew to 805 in 2018.
Why all the slavery articles? Just think about that.

This op-ed is just a complaint that such a policy would be used against Jews.

But no one is allowed to criticize the Jews. The Canadian Press reports:
The editor of a Toronto-based publication was handed the maximum one-year jail sentence on Thursday for promoting hatred against women and Jews.

In sentencing James Sears, Ontario court Judge Richard Blouin said he would have handed down a much stiffer sentence had the law allowed.
Here is the offending site. Some of it is funny. It is not clear how serious he is. In the USA, he would be protected under the First Amendment.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

What Jews have learned from diasporic living

NY Times Jewess opinion writer Bari Weiss writes:
The major debate tearing apart the American Jewish community on this particular Wednesday is whether or not the 45th president of the United States just accused them — us — of disloyalty to Israel and the Jewish people or of disloyalty to the Republican Party and the man who has remade it in his image. ...

I’ve been around enough tables with pro-Trump Jews to strongly suspect ...

If 2,000 years of diasporic living has taught the Jews anything, it’s that an existence that is contingent upon the kindness of strangers is never too safe or too long lasting. ...

The Jews of America are in the midst of a political crisis, sped along at breakneck speed by a president asking us, bluntly, to choose. Vote for a party whose base seems increasingly in thrall with newbie politicians who are unapologetic supporters of the B.D.S. movement, a new face of old anti-Semitism, even as the party’s leadership remains pro-Israel. Or vote for the party led by [Trump] ...

To preserve all that has ever made American Jews — and America — great, we cannot allow this man to tear us apart.
So Trump is the most pro-Jewish President we have ever had, lots of Jews are pro-Trump, the Democrat Party is being taken over by anti-Semites, and Jews don't trust non-Jews for anything.

But Jews have to stick together, and that means opposing Trump.

Of course this does not really explain why so many influential Jews hate Trump so much. I am just posting it as the NY Times Jewish explanation.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

How Anthropology became Cultural Marxism

NPR Radio reports:
The Renegade Anthropologists Who Reinvented How We Think About Race & Gender

In his new book, 'Gods of the Upper Air,' Charles King tells the story of Franz Boas, Margaret Mead and the other 20th century anthropologists who challenged outdated notions of race, class and gender.
This is about how Jewish-led anthropologists help make white-hatred academically respectable, in the last century. They kept using terms like "outdated" to describe the views that prevailed previously, but they never found any scientific evidence that those views were shown to be wrong.

They studied primitive tribes, but it was all a ruse for making commentary on American society, and promoting their weirdo political and social ideas, according to the author.

The author also described bisexuality and infidelity on the part of Mead, and how she cooked up stories about primitive tribes in order to justify her feminist politics.

These were the most respected anthropologists of the XX century. The more I learn about these academic frauds, the harder it is to take the subject seriously.

What the interview does not address is why Jews would be so committed to this Boasian ideology, and why such quackery would be academically respected.

For alternate views, see Metapedia or Kevin MacDonald. They say, for example, that Boas was opposed to genetic research, as that could disprove his silly ideas about human nature.

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Jews are paranoid about green cartoon frogs

The NY Times reports:
HONG KONG — Ask the Anti-Defamation League, and they will tell you Pepe the Frog is a hate symbol, a cheerleader of racism and anti-Semitism, a friend of alt-right extremists. The sad, green frog is widely viewed as toxic across the world, a signal of a sinister and dangerous worldview.

So it can be a bit jarring to see Pepe in his new role: a pro-democracy freedom fighter in the Hong Kong protests, siding with the people in their struggle against an authoritarian state. The protesters here hold signs with his image, use stickers of him in messaging apps and discussion forums, and even spray paint his face on walls. ...

Few Hong Kongers have shown awareness online about Pepe’s sinister side.
I post this as an example of weirdo Jewish thinking. The Jews at the Anti-Defamation League and the NY Times have some kind of paranoid obsession with green cartoon frogs and other such symbols. There is no other group that would raise a fuss about a few people on the other side of the world drawing cartoon frogs. It is bizarre.

Hating white people at the farmers market

A NY Times article doxes and harasses some farmers at a market:
Schooner Creek’s owners deny being white supremacists, and say they keep their political beliefs out of the market. They have said on social media that they are being harassed, demonized and hounded out of the farmers’ market by left-wing activists because of “a handful of mildly pro-white comments.” They have not been accused of any wrongdoing or violence, and say they are the ones who have become victims of “the cult of the left.”
This is an amazing story of white people being hated for their skin color. Nobody would criticize non-whites for similar views.

As the Jewish media keeps expanding its definition of white supremacy, it appears that the entire farmers market business is white supremacist. Primarily liberal white people attend farmers markets. My hunch is that a lot of them go there specifically because they wish to shop in a community of white people.

Monday, August 19, 2019

The ancient Egyptians were Caucasians

From a NY Times essay last year:
Among the most important to Douglass was Morton’s claim that ancient Egyptians were white. To support his claim that black people were inferior, Morton needed to explain away the fact that ancient Egyptians were Africans, since if they were, it meant that people of African descent had the potential for similar greatness. As proof, Morton noted that the Bible made no mention of Egyptians’ color.

Douglass would have none of it.

He cited text after text, all written by respected European scientists, that noted that ancient Egyptians bore a striking resemblance to modern-day Africans. But more important, he argued that racial descriptors were not mentioned in the Bible because, at that historical moment, race did not exist. It was, as we now say, a social construct, something better understood as a product of history rather than of science.
The article strongly implies that Douglass was right, and the pseudoscientific slavery apologists of his day were wrong.

But he was not right. See the Wikipedia articles on DNA history of Egypt and Ancient Egyptian race controversy. The ancient Egyptians might be classified as MENA today, and more caucasian than today's Egyptians, according to DNA tests. They were not negroes.

Wikipedia does discount these findings by saying:
Since the second half of the 20th century, most anthropologists have rejected the notion of race as having any validity in the study of human biology.
This is like saying ornithologists (bird scientists) refuse to accept the division of birds into species. So what would they be studying, if they won't classify birds into groups?

Thursday, August 15, 2019

China forces Moslems into re-education camps

The Wikipedia article on the Chinese Xinjiang re-education camps says:
In July 2019, the United Nations ambassadors from 22 nations, including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom,[42] signed a letter condemning China's mistreatment of the Uyghurs as well as its mistreatment of other minority groups, urging the Chinese government to close the camps.[43][44] On the other hand, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Egypt, Russia, North Korea, the Philippines, Pakistan, Iran, Syria and Palestine[45] are among 50 other states supported China's policy in Xinjiang.[42][46] The crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, has applauded China for its public safety and counter-terrorism measures, saying that it has a "right to fight against terrorism."[47]
So Western countries are poking into Chinese internal matters and sticking up for Chinese Moslems, while the Moslem countries are siding with the Chinese government?

Something is fishy here. China may believe that Islam is a long-term threat. It may be right. Maybe Western countries want to undermine China by encouraging religious conflict. I don't know.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Murray wants to abolish the SAT

Charles Murray has probably done more than anyone to convince the public about the importance of IQ tests, as he argued in The Bell Curve that they were correlated with success in many ways.

Now he argues for abolishing them:
Hence the final reason for getting rid of the SAT: knowing those scores is too dispiriting for those who do poorly and too inspiriting for those who do well. In an age when intellectual talent is increasingly concentrated among young people who are also privileged economically and socially, the last thing we need are numbers that give these very, very lucky kids a sense of entitlement.
That SAT test has already become less of an IQ test.

Note that this is not the argument that some make that IQ tests are meaningless. His argument is based on IQ tests being too important.

There are similar sorts of arguments against genetic testing. Some say the tests are useless, while others are frightened of the possibility that the tests will tell them more than they want to know about themselves.

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Jews force Anglicans to rewrite prayers

The Canada Jewish News reports:
The Anglican Church of Canada’s move to expunge a prayer for the conversion of the Jews from its liturgy is being hailed as a milestone. ...

Changing the prayer exhorts Anglicans “to acknowledge and repent of the church’s participation in anti-Semitism, to stop singling out Jews as a target for our evangelistic efforts, and to assume a humble and reconciliatory stance with our Jewish elders in the faith,” Rev. Myers said in a statement. “It also invites Anglicans to be ever mindful of Christianity’s deep Jewish roots.” ...

The prayer “For reconciliation with the Jews” was a joint effort between the Anglican Church, the Prayer Book Society of Canada, and the Canadian Rabbinic Caucus, an affiliate of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.
This is astounding. What religion would ever allow another religion to rewrite its prayers?

I found this on the Daily Stormer, which denigrates Jews all the time. It appears to be right this time. Currently it also reports that 72 American congressmen on a trip to Israel to show their "unconditional" and "unwavering" support for the Jewish state.

Jews not only forced the old language removed, but insert new language that is incredibly offensive. I cannot understand why the Anglican would tolerate this.

No other religion, besides Judaism, would ever do anything this offensive. Do other religions in Canada take orders from the Jews?

They say it is anti-Semitic to attribute power to Jews, but this is way more power than I thought anyone had.

Monday, August 12, 2019

Dems want to eliminate our American culture

The top NY Times story reports:
A few days after, Rush Limbaugh issued a grim prognosis to his millions of radio listeners: If the immigrants from Central America weren’t stopped, the United States would lose its identity. “The objective is to dilute and eventually eliminate or erase what is known as the distinct or unique American culture,” Mr. Limbaugh said, adding: “This is why people call this an invasion.”

There is a striking degree of overlap between the words of right-wing media personalities and the language used by the Texas man who confessed to killing 22 people at a Walmart in El Paso this month. In a 2,300-word screed posted on the website 8chan, the killer wrote that he was “simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion.”
If ten people say that it is raining, then maybe it is because it really is raining.

Here is a typical NY Times essay advocating replacing the American White population with non-whites. This view now permeates all the Democrat presidential candidates. They seek to use immigration and other means to invade America and replace Whites.

I am against killing people at Walmart, of course, but you have to expect Americans to describe what is happening.

Note how it deceptively says "screed posted on the website 8chan". The killer posted the essay on Instagram, a part of Facebook, and not to 8chan. The NY Times wants to ban free speech sites like 8chan, while Facebook gets a pass as long as it is run by leftists who promise to censor right-wingers.

Sunday, August 11, 2019

BDS argument is just Leftist Buzzwords

The Nation is the most respectable far-left American publication. I assume that it is run by Jewish Commies. It reads that way.

Now it has an article by Omar Barghouti on Why Americans Should Support BDS
BDS categorically opposes all forms of racism, including anti-Semitism. ...

H.Res. 246 also includes a specific smear against me that has been pushed by Israel lobby groups like AIPAC by quoting a single, out-of-context sentence from a talk I gave in 2013. The same false assertion is repeated in a similar Senate Resolution, S. Res. 120.

In that talk, I advocated for a single democratic state that recognizes and accepts Jewish Israelis as equal citizens and full partners in building and developing a new shared society, free from all colonial subjugation and racial discrimination and separating church and state. Everyone, including repatriated Palestinian refugees, would be entitled to equal rights regardless of ethnic, religious, gender, sexual, or other identity. Any exclusionary, supremacist “Muslim state,” “Christian state,” or “Jewish state,” I argued, would by definition deny equal rights to citizens of different identities and foreclose the possibility of a true democracy, which are conditions for a just and sustainable peace.
He is some sort of Arab who moved to Israel when he married an Israeli Arab. I guess he would be a citizen of Israel if he were Jewish.

Of course this is just Leftist doublespeak. There is no actual argument here. It takes advantage of people being conditioned to like or dislike certain buzzwords. If Israel were a "true democracy" and majority Muslim, then it would be an exclusionary supremacist Muslim state. This has been proved over 1000 years and in 50+ countries.

Jewish Leftists go along with these ridiculous arguments because they think that America is a Christian state that must be destroyed. If nothing else, BDS has forced Israel to explicitly defend being a Jewish state.

The NY Times and other mainstream publications regularly have watered-down versions of these arguments. Currently, the NY
Times has an essay co-authored by Commie Angela Davis about some black woman who just died:
Her canon demonstrates the absolute and destructive absurdity of any position that would claim others lesser than or unequal. ...

In 1995, she compelled us to heed the signs of people who “construct an internal enemy as both focus and diversion” and who “isolate and demonize that enemy by unleashing and protecting the utterance of overt and coded name-calling and verbal abuse.” These, she warned, were the first steps toward “a final solution.” ...

During the 2008 presidential campaign, she endorsed Barack Obama, expressing her admiration for his “creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom.”
Really? Is that why blacks voted for Obama?

Saturday, August 10, 2019

White supremacy is a hoax

From the Huff Post:
Fox News host Tucker Carlson announced on Tuesday that America doesn’t have a white supremacist problem and called the very notion a “hoax.”

CNN’s Don Lemon couldn’t believe it.

Lemon rolled a clip of Carlson’s rant, in which he claimed “the whole thing is a lie” and insisted that white supremacy is “not a real problem in America.”

Lemon came back from the clip with nothing to say. After six seconds of silence, he let out an exasperated sigh.

“Was that not the dumbest thing you’ve ever heard?” he finally asked.
Tucker is right. White supremacy is a hoax, like the hoax that Russia interfered with our election. There are no white supremacists in the public eye.

The video clip showed the Russian Jewish Trump-hater Max Boot saying that Trump cannot now condemn white supremacy (as Trump just did).

I think that the problem here is that the Left has gone berserk with name-calling. Anyone who is against open borders is compared to Hitler and called a white supremacist. Likewise for anyone who praises George Washington or our Constitution.

The Democrats have chosen to make the 2020 election all about race. You either hate White men and vote Democrat, or you are a Nazi and vote Republican. Biden and the other Dems now openly say that they want to replace the White population with non-whites and Third World migrants.

Central to the debate is the issue is what America is all about. Many say that America is an idea, and should be open to anyone embracing the idea. If so, what is that idea? According to the Dems today, America was founded on the idea of white supremacy. If that were true, then we should have some white supremacist policies. But of course the Dems argue that they are anti-American in that sense, and they want to transform America into something else.

Friday, August 09, 2019

Feminists blame manosphere for shootings

From an article in The Atlantic:
The idea that feminism is decadent, and is destroying Western civilization; the idea that women’s natural role is to have children, and to be subservient to men; the idea that strong men are needed to save the world through violence — all of these arguments are found across extremist websites, and in the words of shooters themselves. Anti-feminist rhetoric is a powerful gateway to violent white nationalism, and it is calculated to appeal to the demographic overwhelmingly responsible for mass shootings: young white men.

The 28-year-old man awaiting trial over the Christchurch massacre wrote a self-justifying screed titled “The Great Replacement.” It begins: “It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates.” ...

Then there’s the sexual revolution. Put simply, Western women are largely choosing for themselves whom to have sex with, rather than having their lives dictated by families, religion, or the state. ...

Finally, anti-feminist ideology has the capacity to become a 360-degree conspiracy theory, similar to the kind of anti-Semitic ideas that flourish online. Feminists are presumed to influence all government decisions, even though women are still underrepresented at every level of elected office. Across the fractured, diverse outposts of the manosphere, “one of the few things they will agree on is a conspiratorial view of feminism,” Murdoch says. “They don’t consider that it was ever a movement for gender equality. They think it was a guise to assert control over men.”
Dalrock adds:
The article doesn’t even try to tie mass shooters to any manosphere sites. Instead, it equates antifeminism in general with mass murderers. Ironically it simultaneously claims that:

By definition being antifeminist is a heretical radical fringe position. All right minded people today enthusiastically support feminism, and only dangerous and insane people would dare to oppose feminism. 
Feminism is not a powerful force in our society. If you believe it is a powerful force in our society you are peddling an insane conspiracy theory because as feminism teaches us, women are powerless in our patriarchal society.
This is just part of a hot new trend to blame white males for everything.

Gillette attacked masculinity in a controversial ad campaign a few months ago, and now the results are in -- it cost the company $8 billion!

I don't know how much of this is real, but this site gives examples of Jews blaming whites for everything, and then saying that they are Jewish, not white. They pretend to be oppressed minorities, whenever that is politically advantageous. As an example of this nonsense, actress Rosanna Arquette tweeted that she was ashamed of white people, whines about being a victim, and goes on the blame Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein. She should admit that she is ashamed of being Jewish, not white.

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

Democrats are extremely racially divisive

Obama official Susan Rice writes in a NY Times op-ed:
The president’s appalling goal, quite simply, is to pit Americans against one another for crass political purposes as well as, it seems, to vent his unabashed personal prejudice.
This is crazy. The Dems keep bringing up issues like slavery reparations, forced racial busing, white privilege, censoring the internet for racial opinions, etc.

Trump hardly says anything about race, except when he is forced to. That is, unless you equate any opposition to open borders to be white supremacist, which is where the Dems are headed.

Biden is the Democrat frontrunner, even tho he has nothing going for him except that he was VP to a half-black President. Kamala Harris has even less going for her, except her oddball racial background.

The white candidates act embarrassed to be white, such as Gillibrand saying in the debate:
And I can talk to those white women in the suburbs that voted for Trump and explain to them what white privilege actually is, that when their son is walking down a street with a bag of M&Ms in his pocket, wearing a hoodie, his whiteness is what protects him from not being shot.
I get the impression that her audience will be happier if more white guys get shot.

According to reports, the El Paso shooter was not triggered by anything Trump said, but by the Democrat debate where they all promised free health care for illegal aliens.

Rice's son is president of the Stanford College Republicans.

The Democrat racial divisiveness seeks to elect Democrats, of course. Along the way, they seek gun control, open borders, and censored speech.

As an example of the latter, 8chan has been shut down, even tho none of the shooters is known to have posted to 8chan or even read anything there. It is just a discussion site.

Here is another example of censorship:
On Friday I appeared live on Red Ice TV’s YouTube channel and was informed that due to YouTube’s increasingly censorious policies, I must refrain from using the “R” word—“replacement”—when referring to the fact that only European-majority nations are being forced to dilute their ethnic majorities with nonwhite immigration. It’s been said a billion times, but no one in authority is calling for Africa to become less black or for China to become less Chinese.
He goes on to give examples of Twitter and Wikipedia blocking discussion of immigrants replacing natives.

Tuesday, August 06, 2019

Leftist professors under mind control

Left-wing intellectuals are really hard to understand sometimes. Here is an example of strange thinking.

Leftist-atheist-evolutionist professor Jerry Coyne writes:
1.) You are always acting under compulsion, whether someone holds a gun to your head, you’re mentally ill, or you’re acting according to what your brain has made you do. As Sam Harris notes, your deciding to drink a glass of milk was just as compelled as your doing something bad under external force. You don’t feel compelled when you do something like walk one way to work rather than another, but you are, because you’re simply following the logic of your brain circuitry and the “decision” it’s spit out.

4.) The concept of “moral responsibility” is injurious because it underlies a vindictive and retributive view of punishment.
At least he believes in free speech. That makes him better than a lot of other professors.

Outside academia, if someone says that voices in his head are making his decisions, then he gets diagnosed with schizophrenia.

I believe that Coyne and Harris are sincere when they say that they are compelled to do what they do. That means that they are compelled to convince everyone else that they have no free will either.

Monday, August 05, 2019

El Paso Walmart Manifesto

CNN was babbling about white supremacy all day, and trying to find ways to blame it on Pres. Trump. The root of the issue was the El Paso Walmart manifesto. (Also here.)

The document is not really about white supremacy or Trump at all. Here are excerpts:
This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion. ...

In short, America is rotting from the inside out, and peaceful means to stop this seem to be nearly impossible. The inconvenient truth is that our leaders, both Democrat AND Republican, have been failing us for decades. They are either complacent or involved in one of the biggest betrayals of the American public in our history. The takeover of the United States government by unchecked corporations. ...

In short, immigration can only be detrimental to the future of America. Continued immigration will make one of the biggest issues of our time, automation, so much worse. Some sources say that in under two decades, half of American jobs will be lost to it. ...

Even though new migrants do the dirty work, their kids typically don’t. They want to live the AmericanDream which is why they get college degrees and fill higher-paying skilled positions. This is why corporations lobby for even more illegal immigration even after decades of it of happening. They need to keep replenishing the low-skilled labor pool. ...

The American lifestyle affords our citizens an incredible quality of life. However, our lifestyle is destroying the environment of our country. The decimation of the environment is creating a massive burden for future generations. Corporations are heading the destruction of our environment by shamelessly overharvesting resources. ...

America can only be destroyed from the inside-out. If our country falls, it will be the fault of traitors. ...

I am against race mixing because it destroys genetic diversity and creates identity problems. Also because it’s completely unnecessary and selfish. ... The best solution to this for now would be to divide America into a confederacy of territories with at least 1 territory for each race. This physical separation would nearly eliminate race mixing and improve social unity by granting each race self-determination within their respective territory(s). ...

I putting this here because some people will blame the President or certain presidential candidates for the attack. This is not the case. I know that the media will probably call me a white supremacist anyway and blame Trump’s rhetoric. The media is infamous for fake news. Their reaction to this attack will likely just confirm that.
Yes, the media reaction confirms that.

It seems crazy to have these views and think that shooting up a Walmart will advance the cause. But it also seems crazy for CNN to read this and invite Trump-haters to talk about censoring white supremacists all day. The Ohio shooter turned out to be a leftist Satanist. The Gilroy garlic shooter also seemed to be some sort of Satanist.

If they want to talk about what motivated the El Paso shooting, then they should address what he had to say. It appears to me that they have no defense against his arguments.

I agree with the guy that automation will destroy a lot of jobs, and that immigration will make the problem worse. In a few years, people will wonder why we imported millions of people to do low skill jobs, just as those jobs were being automated. I have expressed that opinion on this blog.

I don't know whether to call him right-wing or left-wing. His main complaints are against unchecked corporations and environmental destruction, and those are usually left-wing issues.

Sometimes I wonder what CNN is trying to do. Anyone can download the manifesto and see that CNN is lying about it. But then anyone can download the Mueller report and see that CNN has been lying about that investigation for a couple of years. Sometimes I think that CNN is trying to provoke a civil war, because it would be good for business.

Sunday, August 04, 2019

Brooks falls for a wacky new-age nutcase

A Jewish mag reports:
NEW YORK (JTA) — Had she received a better Jewish education, Marianne Williamson says, she might have become a rabbi.

Instead, Williamson has become one of the country’s best-known New Age self-help gurus, reaching millions of people over more than three decades in the public eye. She counts Oprah and Deepak Chopra among her pals.

Now Williamson, the author of a dozen books — four of them New York Times best-sellers — wants to extend her influence to the highest office in the land: She has announced a bid to run for the Democratic nomination for president of the United States.
She denies that she is a “wacky new-age nutcase”, but she would be our least educated and least experienced President ever.

NY Times columnist David Brooks eats the dog food:
Marianne Williamson Knows How to Beat Trump

We need an uprising of decency. ...

This election is about who we are as a people, our national character. This election is about the moral atmosphere in which we raise our children.

Trump is a cultural revolutionary, not a policy revolutionary. He operates and is subtly changing America at a much deeper level. ...

The Democrats have not risen to the largeness of this moment. They don’t know how to speak on this level. They don’t even have the language to articulate what Trump represents and what needs to be done.
Brooks said the same thing on PBS TV and NPR radio.

This is just crazy Jew-speak. No one else talks this way.

When he says "we are as a people, our national character", he talking about Jewish control. And "moral atmosphere" refers to his anti-Christian beliefs.

I have been reading and listening to Brooks's anti-Trump rants for several years now, and it is usually like this. He babbles in bland generalities, with no specifics. It is as if Brooks is part of some elitist plan to take over America, and he is just upset that Trump is standing in the way.

Fellow Jewish Trump-hater NY Times columnist Roger Cohen wrote a similar column, and it is more explicitly anti-white-Christian.

Saturday, August 03, 2019

Critiquing White Genocide

Thomas Dalton writes:
Of late, much has been made in the alt-right press of the idea of “White genocide” as an existential threat posed by mainstream society, aimed at the obliteration of Whites in their formerly dominant homelands in Europe and North America. ...

While it is true that White rule in many nations is under threat, I think it is premature—at least in the coming decades—to decry the physical elimination of Whites anywhere. ... Real threats to White interests risk getting subsumed by bogus — or at least exaggerated — dangers.
He describes the commonly accepted definitions of the term "genocide", and goes on to propose a series of policies that would avert a White genocide.

Where he is not convincing is in his saying that his proposals are plausible. They would result in Civil War 2.0.

But then maybe we are headed for Civil War 2.0 anyway. The Democrats are promising open borders, and free health care for illegals. Those proposals would also have catastrophic consequences.

I think Dalton is on the wrong path, but so is everyone else. We need open public debate on these issues to get some constructive resolution.

Update: Dalton responds to critics.

Friday, August 02, 2019

Defining Nationality


1828 Webster's Dictionary

National character; also, the quality of being national, or strongly attached to ones own nation.

1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica

A somewhat vague term, used strictly in international law (see International Law, Private) for the status of membership in a nation or state (for the conditions of which see State, Allegiance, Naturalization, Alien), and in a more extended sense in political discussion to denote an aggregation of persons claiming to represent a racial, territorial or some other bond of unity, though not necessarily recognized as an independent political entity. In this latter sense the word has often been applied to such people as the Irish, the Armenians and the Czechs. A "nationality" in this connexion represents a common feeling and an organized claim rather than distinct attributes which can be comprised in a strict definition.

2019 Wikipedia

Nationality is a legal relationship between an individual person and a state. Nationality affords the state jurisdiction over the person and affords the person the protection of the state. What these rights and duties are varies from state to state.

(As noted by Vox Day.)

Thursday, August 01, 2019

Fight against Whites is the defining issue

The Democrats are turning the USA non-white, and they have apparently decided that we have reached a turning point. They just don't need Whites anymore, and they can win by going full anti-White. All they need to do is the pick up the new non-white voters.

NY Times op-ed:
Today, there is still great ambivalence about making the fight against [White people] a defining issue in the 2020 election. ...

In every presidential election for the past 50 years, a majority of white voters have voted against the Democratic nominee, and the overwhelming majority of people of color have sided with the Democrats. ...

As people of color become a bigger portion of the voting population, the number of white votes required to win steadily shrinks. In fact, a group of think tanks released a report last year showing that if all of the country’s racial groups replicate in 2020 their voter turnout and partisan preferences of 2016 — essentially a “do-over” — the Democrats would win Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, just because of the demographic changes over the past four years.

By doubling down on racial diversity and standing strong against [White people], Democrats would align with population changes and be able to expand the electoral map by credibly contesting the key Southern and Southwestern states of North Carolina, Georgia and Arizona, among others. ...

America is getting browner by the hour, given that every single day, as of 2016 data, the United States population increases by 8,000 people and 90 percent of that growth comes from people of color. Moreover, an additional seven million teenagers of color will have turned 18 since the 2016 election. With this demographic revolution transforming the country, Democrats do not actually have to increase their level of white support