How England Cops Killed Henry Nowak

Wikipedia:

On 3 December 2025, Henry Nowak, a white 18‑year‑old British university student, was murdered by Vickrum Digwa in Southampton, England. Digwa, a 23-year-old British Sikh man, cut and stabbed Nowak five times with a dagger. When police officers from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary arrived, Digwa accused Nowak of assault, and officers handcuffed Nowak. Police body‑worn camera showed Nowak repeatedly telling officers that he had been stabbed and pleading for help. He died shortly after being handcuffed. ...

The jury convicted Digwa of murder on 28 May 2026.

Britain has imported Third World migrants, and given Sikhs special permission to carry deadly knives.

Here is the part that is hard to understand. Apparently a non-white can attack a White boy, and when the cops show up, the non-white can cry racism, and the cops will arrest the White. In this case, the White boy bled to death as the cops were handcuffing him and reading his rights.

People are comparing to George Floyd. Like Nowak, Floyd died while being arrest, with video evidence posted. But Floyd was guilty of a crime and dying of drug overdose, and cops had called an ambulance to get him medical care.

By contrast, Nowak was an innocent victim, and cops ignored how he was bleeding to death while they believed the racist accusations from his killer.

Nobody ever showed that the Floyd cops had any racial animosity. A couple of them were not even White. But Nowak was arrested for being accused of racism, and only Whites are arrested for that.

60 years ago, Britain was an all-White nation. Now the non-whites apparently know that they can accuse Whites of racism, and possibly get away with murder. Britain has betrayed its own citizens, and adopted an assortment of anti-White laws and policies.

Elon Musk tweeted:

The West has created an utterly evil state religion where an accusation of “racism” is the gravest offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder!

So if police show up at a crime scene and a British boy is bleeding out and an immigrant says the British boy is racist the cops will cuff the dying British boy.

Democrats reject Womens Museum being for Women

AP reports:

What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits. ...

One change added a mission scope that states, “The Museum shall be dedicated to preserving, researching, and presenting the history, achievements, and lived experiences of biological women in the United States.”

It also adds a prohibition which states, “The Museum may not identify, present, describe, or otherwise depict any biological male as a female.”

It is amazing that the Democrats are now 100% to honoring women, but only if they include men who call themselves transgender.

Canada may ban Residential school denialism

Canada has no free speech, and criminalizes facts:

Bill C-9 amended to criminalize "residential school denialism"

On Monday evening, a Senate committee added a controversial amendment to criminalize "residential school denialism" with a penalty of up to two years in prison.

Never heard of it? Wikipedia has a whole article on it:

Residential school denialism is negationist ideology that trivializes, downplays, or misrepresents the effects of the Canadian Indian residential school system. Despite decades of recognition and acknowledgments, denialist claims remain a factor within Canadian society. Residential school denialism often includes claims that the number of reported deaths has been inflated by the "reconciliation industry", that there were only isolated cases of child sexual abuse, and that many survivors are untrustworthy or are merely seeking compensation.

It ends with an example:

In 2025, Dallas Brodie made posts on X that read in part: "The number of confirmed child burials at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School site is zero. Zero. No one should be afraid of the truth. Not lawyers, their governing bodies, or anyone else." The Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs responded with a statement condemning the posts and calling on Brodie to apologize "for promoting abhorrent rhetoric which minimizes the harms of Residential Schools and for misleading and emboldening the public against Indigenous people". On March 7, 2025, Brodie was removed from the Conservative Party of BC caucus as a result of her decision to publicly mock and belittle testimony from former residential school students.

It is true that the number is zero. Even if any are found, they are almost certainly from children who died of natural causes. The whole story is known as the "Mass Grave Hoax".

What went Wrong with Polygenism

I read that polygenism is pseudo-science, so I looked up some definitions:

Polygenism is a theory of human origins which posits the view that humans are of different origins (polygenesis).

Polygenism is the theory that the human races originated from multiple independent ancestral lines rather than descending from a common progenitor population.

So why is this wrong? Apparently because it competes with Out of Africa.

The Out of Africa theory is really two theories. The original Out of Africa I, which is considered disproved. And Out of Africa II, which is commonly accepted.

I found the explanations confusing and contradictory. Here is what I could figure out.

The human races did develop separately on separate continents, and racial differences are attributable to this separate development. To this extent, polygenism is true. Where it goes wrong is to say that human similarities are from convergent evolution. It is believed that those similarities are from common genes, as inherited from common ancestors.

Humans are believed to have descended from African apes who lived 5 million years ago. Out of Africa I said that all humans are direct descendants from Africans who migrated out 200K years ago. This cannot be right because of genetic evidence of interbreeding with European Neanderthals and Asian Denisovans.

Out of Africa II scales these claims back, and says that humans have mostly African ancestry, from a migration about 50K years ago. This is an attempt to salvage some of the Out of Africa I theory. Maybe 60% of your ancestry came from that migration, we do not know.

These theories are interesting to the extent that they help define what it means to be human, but they leave a lot of questions unanswered.

Africa appears to have had some apes walking upright, but those were not really human.

The main point of the Out of Africa theories was to explain (1) why humans have all the same potential; (2) why other human species like Neanderthals went extinct; and (3) why there has been no human evolution in the last 50K years. But all of this is now known to be false.

We still do not know why human ancestors evolved language and intelligence. It appears that Neanderthals evolved big brains about 1M years ago, long before the Out of Africa II migrations. And there appear to be some fossil gaps and population bottlenecks in the last 1M years. That may be when our ancestors became distinctly human.

We also do not know if it means anything to be mostly of African descent. The Neanderthal-African hybrids seemed to be more successful than either the Neanderthals or the Africans. So it is unknown which genes were more important.

Some people who write on this subject want to emphasize human similarities, and even similarities with apes. Others want to emphasize differences. We need both for an accurate scientific picture.

Chicago Sends Black Dads to Jail

The Chicago Sun-Times reports:

For parents navigating family court in Cook County, falling behind on child support and other court-ordered payments can carry consequences that extend far beyond mounting debt.

It can mean going to jail.

Over the past decade, more than 2,500 people — nearly all of them men — have been locked up after Cook County judges found them in what’s called indirect civil contempt.

Most were detained for failing to comply with court-ordered payments to children or former spouses, according to Cook County sheriff’s records.

Those jailed spent an average of eight days in custody. But about 100 people were held for 50 days or longer. Of them, about 25 were locked up for more than 100 days, according to sheriff’s data from April 2016 to the end of March 2026.

One man, Steve Fanady, has been in jail for nearly four years.

A Chicago Sun-Times analysis of sheriff’s records exposes what some say is a punitive side of a system that civil rights advocates and some court observers say offers little legal help to those unable to afford a lawyer.

Unlike criminal defendants, people accused of violating support orders in civil court aren’t automatically entitled to legal representation even though they might face incarceration.

In Cook County’s sprawling domestic relations court system — which handles roughly 40,000 divorce and child-support cases each year — advocates estimate that at least half of the litigants come to court without a lawyer. Most are Black.

For nearly add debts, jail is not a possibility. A debtor can declare bankruptcy.

It is not so well known that child support is not required to be spent on the child. The mom can spend it as she pleases. In many or even most of these cases, the debt is not even to the mom, but to a welfare agency.

The Unabomber Predicted the AI Age

The possibility that AI machines will take over the world has been considered by science fiction authors, and now by the Pope.

A serious analysis was given by the 1995 Unabomber Manifesto:

171. But suppose now that industrial society does survive the next several decades and that the bugs do eventually get worked out of the system, so that it functions smoothly. What kind of system will it be? We will consider several possibilities.

172. First let us postulate that the computer scientists succeed in developing intelligent machines that can do all things better than human beings can do them. In that case presumably all work will be done by vast, highly organized systems of machines and no human effort will be necessary. Either of two cases might occur. The machines might be permitted to make all of their own decisions without human oversight, or else human control over the machines might be retained.

173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines' decisions.

As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and as machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more and more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better results than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machine off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.

174. On the other hand it is possible that human control over the machines may be retained. In that case the average man may have control over certain private machines of his own, such as his car or his personal computer, but control over large systems of machines will be in the hands of a tiny elite — just as it is today, but with two differences. Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite.

Or, if the elite consists of softhearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that everyone's physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes "treatment" to cure his "problem." Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or to make them "sublimate" their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they most certainly will not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.

175. But suppose now that the computer scientists do not succeed in developing artificial intelligence, so that human work remains necessary. Even so, machines will take care of more and more of the simpler tasks so that there will be an increasing surplus of human workers at the lower levels of ability. (We see this happening already. There are many people who find it difficult or impossible to get work, because for intellectual or psychological reasons they cannot acquire the level of training necessary to make themselves useful in the present system.) On those who are employed, ever-increasing demands will be placed: They will need more and more training, more and more ability, and will have to be ever more reliable, conforming and docile, because they will be more and more like cells of a giant organism. Their tasks will be increasingly specialized, so that their work will be, in a sense, out of touch with the real world, being concentrated on one tiny slice of reality. The system will have to use any means that it can, whether psychological or biological, to engineer people to be docile, to have the abilities that the system requires and to "sublimate" their drive for power into some specialized task.

This is a brilliant analysis, and it should be considered, just like the doomsday predictions of Eliezer Yudkowsky.

Source of Modern Civilization

This map is amazing.

In the last century, most of the accomplishments have come from the USA.

I have posted various theories for this. Sometimes it is referred to as the success of Western Civilization, or White culture, or Christendom, or Christian Enlightenment. But those terms are much broader than the above hexagon. Maybe a better term is needed.

Everybody likes the wealth and quality of life generated by Western Civilization. To make it continue, we need to understand why it happened, and to continue those conditions.

Trump did not Recommend Injecting Bleach

I occasionally argue with Trump-haters, and they nearly always bring up some totally false allegation that is disproved easily by googling it. Last time it was that Pres. Trump recommended that people inject bleach into their bodies. Here is the official transcript:

ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: "we’re talking about nonporous surfaces: door handles, stainless steel. ... you inject summer — the sunlight into that. You inject UV rays into that. ... We’re also testing disinfectants readily available. We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids. And I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, ..."

As you can see, he is talking about disinfecting a steel surface. Trump just adds an innocuous comment.

THE PRESIDENT: Right. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it [the coronavirus] gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me.

So we’ll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s — that’s pretty powerful.

In case there is any doubt, a question makes it clear that the bleach is for cleaning a surface, not injecting into the body.

Q But I — just, can I ask about — the President mentioned the idea of cleaners, like bleach and isopropyl alcohol you mentioned. There’s no scenario that that could be injected into a person, is there? I mean —

ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: No, I’m here to talk about the findings that we had in the study. We won’t do that within that lab and our lab. So —

THE PRESIDENT: It wouldn’t be through injection. We’re talking about through almost a cleaning, sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work. But it certainly has a big effect if it’s on a stationary object.

Trump does also have a speculative comment about testing ultraviolet light on the body. But nothing about injecting bleach into the body or anything like that. It is all a fiction from Trump-haters.

Female Mating Strategies have Changed

I always thought that men were instinctly more interested in promiscuous sexual encounters, placing a high value on a woman's sexual attractiveness. Woman were the opposite, and looked for long-term mate values, stability, fidelity, resources, marriage, and eventually children.

There is both empirical and theoretical evidence from evolutionary psychology. A man can have more offspring by being promiscuous, while a woman cannot.

Now I think that I have been wrong.

Surveys now say that boys are more interested in marriage and family than girls.

Studies of online dating sites show that women are much more fixated on physical appearance than men. Women only swipe right on the top 1% of men, based on a photo.

Promiscuity now appears to be a lot more common in women than men. There are lots of 25yo men who have never had sexual relations, while the typical 25yo woman has had 10+ sex partners.

Marriage norms have relaxed a lot since the 1950s in the USA. I would have thought that women would be the complainers about this trend, as their instincts would be to stay married to a husband even if he is unfaithful.

I now believe female instincts are not towards monogamous marriage at all.

Given the choice, many women prefer to be one of several mistresses to an alpha man, than to have a husband of her own.

Every girl's favorite fairy tale is Cinderella. Their favorite movies are about slutty girls and prostitutes. The poor girl throws herself at the alpha man, and no one else is good enough for her. So lots of girls spend their 20s chasing and seducing alpha men, and postponing marriage.

An example in the news is the Call Her Daddy host, whose wildly popular podcast celebrated female promiscuity. Now that she is 32yo, she has married a Hollywood movie producer and is expecting a child. I listened to one of her episodes once, where she and a guest discussed playing for a girls soccer team. It gave the impression that the main topic of conversation in a girls locker room is discussing their latest venereal diseases.

The dating apps are all going bankrupt, because women no longer use them to find long-term mates. The women mainly seek flings with alpha men.

Popular advice for women is to have loose morals and adultery fantasies:

Well, you’re not alone. In an article in New York magazine headlined “The Secret to a Great Marriage? Crushes on Other People” the female writer makes the argument that fancying other people is not just inevitable but healthy for a relationship.

Many wealthy countries now have low fertility rates, and the leading explanation is that middle-class women do not want to have kids. It is not that they cannot afford kids, as the lower income groups have kids at higher rates.

I am not sure if feminism is the cause or the effect. Not wanting kids is correlated with feminist views.

Update: This new Heather MacDonald interview discusses trends in female attitudes.

RIP Mark Fuhrman

Mark Fuhrman has died. He was the cop famous for finding the OJ Simpson bloody glove, and then denying under oath having used the N-word in the past ten years. The trial popularized that euphemism. A recorded interviewed proved that he had used it 9.5 years earlier.

During his closing argument, defense attorney Johnnie Cochran called Fuhrman "a lying, perjuring, genocidal racist", likening him to Adolf Hitler. He argued that Fuhrman had planted the bloody glove on Simpson's estate as part of a racially motivated plot against Simpson, which could be traced back to Fuhrman's first encounter with the interracial couple in 1985.

I thought that he would be allowed to explain that use in a Hollywood role-playing interview was harmless, but he was prosecuted for perjury. Some say that his use of the N-word was the main reason OJ was acquitted.

The blood evidence against OJ was overwhelming. His blood was found at the scene of the crime, and his victims' blood was found on his possessions. Complaining about the N-word was just a way of rationalizing the acquittal. Fuhrman was the only one convicted.

A 2020 court case found:

Not only is the word "nigger" undoubtedly the most hateful and inflammatory racial slur in the contemporary American lexicon; …; but it is probably the single most offensive word in the English language. See, e.g., Ayissi-Etoh v. Fannie Mae (D.C. Cir. 2013) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) ("[The] epithet ['nigger'] has been labeled, variously, a term that 'sums up … all the bitter years of insult and struggle in America,' [L. Hughes, The Big Sea: An Autobiography], 'pure anathema to African-Americans,' Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass (4th Cir. 2001), and 'probably the most offensive word in English.' [Random House Webster's College Dictionary]. See generally [A. Haley, Roots: The Saga of an American Family]; [H. Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird]…. No other word in the English language so powerfully or instantly calls to mind our country's long and brutal struggle to overcome racism and discrimination against African-Americans."); R. Kennedy, The David C. Baum Lecture: 'Nigger!' as a Problem in the Law, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 935 (although "[t]he American language is (and has long been) rife with terms of ethnic, racial, and national insult: kike, mick, wop, nip, gook, honkie, wetback, chink, [etc.] … 'nigger is now probably the most offensive word in English'"); Dictionary.com, available at https://www.dictionary.com/browse/nigger?s=t ("The term nigger is now probably the most offensive word in English. Its degree of offensiveness has increased markedly in recent years, although it has been used in a derogatory manner since at least the Revolutionary War.").

The word is not really a 'pure anathema to African-Americans,' as they use the word all the time. I suspect that 99% of usage today is not actually offensive.

How New York is being Destroyed

Headline from a few months ago:

Mayor Mamdani: South Africa is the model for New York

The new mayor said at his inauguration that Nelson Mandela's 'Freedom Charter' was his blueprint

Myth of the Islamic Golden Age

Scholars often argue that Islam is not inherently bad, and their proof is that Islam once had a Golden Age. That was 800-1200 AD in the Mid East, and somewhat later in Spain. Islam just needs to be reformed, to return to its former glory.

Winston Marshall refutes this in this interview. He says that Islam expanded by force, not by trade, and by subjugating Christians, Jews, and others. The supposed great accomplishments under Islam were really from non-Moslems whose culture contined under Islamic rule. Eventually Islam completely took over in those countries, and that golden age ended.

Spain/Portugal was the exception, as there the Christians eventually expelled the Moslems. Spain and Portugal then became great naval empires.

Kars4Kids is a Jewish Scam

News:

f you’ve ever heard the “1-8-7-7-KARS-4-KIDS” jingle, you’ve probably heard it a million times. In states where this car-donation charity operates, it’s been running obnoxiously repetitive singing-kids ads for decades with the intensity of a shock-and-awe military campaign. But after all those years of operation, one disgruntled donor took it to court and got a judge to kick Kars4Kids off California airwaves for practicing “an actionable strategy of deception.”

From the court ruling:

The Defendant’s case included the testimony of Kars4Kids’ Chief Operating Officer (COO), Esti Landau’s strikingly candid testimony. She admitted that the 30-second advertisement, which has been running for two decades, “does not say anything” about the charity’s specific nature. She confirmed: that Kars4Kids is a Jewish organization, yet the word “Jewish” is absent from the ad.; that the primary function of Kars4Kids is to fund Oorah, an organization dedicated to Jewish heritage and summer camps in New York and New Jersey; that while 25% of revenue is derived from California, Kars4Kids has no functional programs in California beyond a “backpack giveaway” characterized as a branding exercise;  over 60% of the funds of Kars4kids go to Oorah, approximately 30% is spent on further advertising, and another 6% on administrative expenses; that the website states, “Because kids are our future. Learn how you can make a difference in the life of a child” as a central element of the Kars4Kids advertising campaign, but it is not found in the 30-second jingle.

You should not have to hear that dishonest jingle again.

The Woke Mind Virus Killed my Son

So says Elon Musk, referring to transgenderism.

He lost his case against Openai today, on a technicality. The jury said that he waited too long to sue, because he knew Openai was going non-profit long before it did.

How Three French Philosophers Ruined Us

Is France responsible for all the evils of the modern world. I don't think so, but read this:

Brivael Le Pogam
@brivael
Translated from French
I want to offer my apologies, on behalf of the French, for giving birth to French Theory (which in turn gave birth to the worst of all ideological monstrosities: wokism).

We gave the world Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. And then, in the intellectual ruins of post-1968, we gave Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Three brilliant men who forged, in the elegance of our language, the ideological weapon that today paralyzes the West.

We must understand what they did. Foucault taught that truth does not exist, that there are only power relations disguised as knowledge. That science, reason, justice, the medical institution, the school, the prison, sexuality—everything is merely a staging of domination. Derrida taught that texts have no stable meaning, that every signifier slips away, that every reading is a betrayal, that the author is dead and the reader reigns supreme. Deleuze taught that we should prefer the rhizome to the tree, the nomad to the sedentary, desire to the law, becoming to being, difference to identity.

Taken individually, these are debatable theses. Combined, exported, and popularized, they form a system. And that system is a poison.

For here’s what happened. These texts, unreadable in France, crossed the Atlantic. The departments of Yale, Berkeley, and Columbia absorbed them in the 1980s. They found there a soil that did not exist among us: American Puritanism, its racial guilt, its obsession with identity. French Theory married this substratum, and the child of that union is called wokism.

Judith Butler reads Foucault and invents performative gender. Edward Said reads Foucault and invents academic postcolonialism. Kimberlé Crenshaw inherits the framework and invents intersectionality. At every step, the matrix is French: there is no truth, there is only power, so every hierarchy is suspect, every institution is oppressive, every norm is violence, every identity is constructed and thus negotiable, every majority is guilty.

That’s how three Parisian philosophers, who probably never imagined their practical consequences, provided the operating software to an entire generation of activists, university bureaucrats, HR managers, journalists, and legislators. That’s how we ended up with a civilization that no longer knows how to say whether a woman is a woman, whether its own history is worth defending, whether merit exists, whether truth can be distinguished from opinion.

It’s shit for one simple reason, and it must be stated calmly. A civilization stands on three pillars: the belief that there exists a truth accessible to reason, the belief that there exists a good distinct from evil, the belief that there exists a heritage to be transmitted. French Theory set out to dynamite all three. Not out of malice. Out of intellectual play, fascination with suspicion, hatred of the bourgeoisie that had nurtured them. But the result is there. An entire generation learned to deconstruct and never learned to build. An entire generation knows how to suspect and no longer knows how to admire. An entire generation sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere.

I apologize because we French bear a particular responsibility. It’s our language, our universities, our publishers, our prestige that gave this nihilism its chic packaging. Without the legitimacy of the Sorbonne and Vincennes, these ideas would never have crossed the ocean. We exported doubt the way others export weapons.

What is being built now, in Silicon Valley, in AI labs, in startups, in workshops, in all the places where people still make things instead of deconstructing them — that is the response. A civilization is rebuilt by builders, not by commentators. By those who believe that truth exists and is worth devoting oneself to. By those who embrace a hierarchy of the beautiful, the true, the good, and are not ashamed to transmit it.

So, forgive us. And back to work.

Harvey Weinstein gets another Hung Jury

Harvey Weinstein is widely hated for being a sex criminal, but a third NY jury failed to convict him. He has dozens of accusers, including Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife.

I think it is clear that Ronan Farrow and the NY Times sold us some bogus stories. Weinstein is sleazy, but there is very little evidence he committed crimes.

The Origins of Human DNA

Popular explanations of DNA percentages can be very confusing. Biologists say we have 98% the same as chimps, and 50% the same as each of your parents. And 50% with bananas, and 2% with Neanderthals. It is all nonsense.

From a New Scientist video:

Homo sapiens aren’t as unique as we once thought. In fact, only about 1.5 to 7 per cent of our DNA originated in our species alone. Everything else we share with our ancestors and those human species we once coexisted with, including Neanderthals, Denisovans and even some yet-to-be-identified "ghost populations". This rewrites the story we have told ourselves about our species. We just aren’t that unique.

When our ancestors met these other human species, they didn't just compete with them: they mated with them. And those encounters left a permanent record in our DNA. In other words, those ancient humans we thought had vanished didn't necessarily disappear... Some of them are still here inside you.

No, our ancestors did not mate with other species. Our ancestors were those Neanderthals and other humans.

It does explain at 9:37 that the widely held Out Of Africa theory has been proved wrong.

No, Israelis are not using Dogs for Torture

If you want to know the evils of the Jews, you have to read the Jewish and Israeli publications. Now the NY Times is reporting that the Israel army is using specially trained dogs to rape and torture Gaza Arab prisoners.

This sounds very unlikely to me.

Jews control the NY Times. Why is it publishing this stuff?

For years, Jews has indignantly made outrageous claims of anti-semitism, blood libel, ancient prejudice, conspiracy, genocide, racism, Nazi, war crimes, etc.

Now everyone makes these accusations against the Jews.

Negative Correlation between Looks and Talent

Here is a good point about correlations:

The paper claims "Across the highest adult performance levels, peak performance is negatively correlated with early performance." This is a classic example of Berkson's paradox.

Here is a simplified example to understand this: Assume that to be a successful actor you have to be either extremely good looking or extremely talented. Assume also that talent and looks are independent in the population. However, among sucessful actors you will observe a negative correlation between looks and talent. This doesn't meant anything beyond the selection process and should not be extrapolated.

My favorite example-joke of this is that basketball points scored is negatively associated with height among NBA players. (because to be an NBA player you have to be very tall OR be very good at scoring).

It refers to this AAAS Science paper, mirrored here. More discussion here.

The paper concerns comparing elite adult performance to elite youth performance. The top performing adults come from the top performing youths. But if you look at the correlation the wrong way, as in this paper, you might wrongly conclude the opposite.

Update: David Epstein brags about this paper as confirming his books on the subject. He makes the same statistical error.

One Battle After Another

The movie One Battle After Another won the top awards at the recent Oscar ceremony. I did not see it. I thought it was a war movie.

Actually it is about leftist terrorists fighting White supremacists. The major subplot is about a Black woman who sexually manipulates and betrays two White men on opposite sides of the battles. One of them is a White supremacist who is eventually killed for having a child with the Black woman.

That was a spoiler. I am skipping the movie.

Jefferson on Slavery causing War

Thomas Jefferson wrote a well-known letter to John Holmes on April 22, 1820, expressing deep alarm over the Missouri Compromise debates and warning that the slavery issue threatened the Union. In the letter, Jefferson famously described the crisis as "like a fire bell in the night" that "awakened and filled me with terror."

He was predicting the Civil War.

He helped abolish the slave trade, and wanted to expatriate Negroes to Sierra Leone Africa or other such places. Such a move would have been costly, but a lot cheaper than a war. He did not believe that freed Negroes and Whites would co-exist peacefully.

I wonder what he would have thought about the USA today, importing millions of people that will never be assimilated. Are we headed for war? Is there any plan that might avoid it?

I keep seeing articles on the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, and how we are still trying to live up to the vision of Jeffersona and Lincoln. Eg, see this. Not everyone realizes that Jefferson and Lincoln were very much opposed to the social and political equality of Negroes and Indians. They wanted to ship the Negroes to Africa.

When they said all men were created equal, they mean White Anglo Saxon Protestant law-abiding property-owning native-born adult citizens.

LA Cops Banned from Petty Traffic Stops

The NY Post reports:

Los Angeles City Council just threw its full weight behind a crack down on LAPD’s pretextual stops.

In a unanimous 14-0 vote, lawmakers moved to rein in the traffic stops, a routine tool officers have long used to pull drivers over for minor violations and probe for bigger crimes. ...

“This is a big down payment,” he said, signaling more changes ahead. The vote caps six years of City Hall buildup that began in the wake of the George Floyd protests.

Cops would stop you for a broken tail light, and then discover evidence of more serious crimes.

Apparently this disproportionately affected Black and Brown drivers.

The NY Times reports

What Are 'Teen Takeovers' and Why Are Police Struggling to Stop Them?

Across the country, police and city officials are trying to crack down on sometimes violent youth gatherings, but the teens themselves say they need some way to socialize and blow off steam ...

“There was a lot of dog whistling there about the fact that these are Black kids who are gathering together in these large groups, and we should be afraid of them,” Mr. Steinberg said.

Black and Latino youth gatherings are more likely to be assumed as criminal, said Kristin Henning, a Georgetown University law professor who specializes in juvenile justice. White children in skate parks in the 1980s and 1990s did not generate nearly the same level of surveillance and arrests as Black gatherings, she said.

Why would Black/Latino youth gangs get more scrutiny that Whites in skate parks? No one wants to say the obvious.

An AI LLM Wrote the South Africa AI Policy

People wonder how a super-smart AI LLM could take over the world. The humans would always be in control of the AI policies.

South Africa has already been taken over by Commie Blacks, and the Blacks have been taken over by AI. A local paper reports:

Minister of communications and digital technologies Solly Malatsi has withdrawn the draft AI policy which was open for public comment.

It turned out to be written by an AI LLM.

Inferior Whites have Neanderthal Blood

From a South African Black man, posted on X/Twitter:

The problem that South Africans have right now is that we don't understand white people. White people are inferior species to us. We are homo sapiens. They've got Neanderthal blood in them. This is the science. And this is not science that was done by black people. It was done by them. You understand?

Abutl, Dobby Lewis, they were eugenicists. They studied this and they realized that they're inferior to blacks. The white population is shrinking and shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. For us, it makes no sense to descend into the savagery that they have. Whatever land that they're holding on to, either way, their numbers are dwindling. Whatever leadership that they had is dying out as well. And you know about wealth disappearing after the third generation that it's passed down to, you know.

So, we are they're on the last generation. We're dealing with the weakest whites that the world has ever seen. So we expect to have ubundu humanity. Unfortunately, by the strictest definition of what a human being is. White people are just below human beings. You are negotiating with an animal. A wild dog that you're trying to train to be tamed, to be who guards your house. You can never do that.

So we're expecting Ubuntu from them. We're like, you stole our land. You you butchered our people and everything else, and we just want justice. We're not out for your blood. We're not chopping off your heads. is not doing anything. Why don't you guys understand that? Why don't you guys have Ubunt? Why don't you guys have a heart? They don't because they're incapable of that. You cannot expect the same behavior of a human being that you're expecting of.

The word Ubuntu is a Nguni Bantu term from Southern Africa. At its core, Ubuntu is a philosophical concept that translates to "I am because we are" or "humanity towards others."

It is true that it is common for White anthropologists to say that European Neanderthals were inferior to Black African homo sapiens. And also that White numbers are dwindling, compared to non-whites.

South Africa has more racial laws today that they ever had under White rule. The Black commies have taken over, and ruined the country.

Kamala Harris Leads the 2026 Race

Kamala Harris . leads in all the polls for 2028 nomination. The betting market has her tied with AOC, behind Newson. In the betting market, Newsom, Harris, AOC lead.

Here is her 26-year-old step daughter Ella Emhoff:

...I'm just sitting here crocheting, waiting for a friend, and I was just listening to this podcast that The Wall Street Journal put out about SSRIs and anti-anxiety meds and kind of the over-prescription of them in America.

And it was making me think a lot because I've been on SSRIs for over a decade, almost fifteen years probably, and they were calling out the lack of research on long-term use of these things. ...

But I've noticed that every time I've gone off of it for a week or missed it or for whatever reason, like, it has been really hard for me, and I've had a really hard time.

The video shows her with several visible ugly tattoos.

So she has been on those drugs continually since age 11? Without considering the consequences?

I do not want to pick on this girl, as she is a product of the culture. And I do not know whether Harris personally approved the drugs and tattoos.

Update: Matt Walsh broadcast The Dark Side Of Mental Health | Ep. 1776. In short, no one knows how SSRIs work, and they probably do more harm than good. In particular, they do not correct a chemical imbalance in the brain.

Blacks and Crazy White Liberal Women

In the last ten years, White Liberal Women have become much more leftist, and more crazy. Here is a Black podcaster, who does not appreciate them:

The Great Feminization: How White Guilt Replaced Black Fathers

Is the relationship between White Liberal Women and the Black community based on progress, or is it a psychological & Sinister Sympathy? Today we look at the data, from Pew Research to Yale studies, to uncover how a "Maternal Matriarchy" is trading Black manhood for White Guilt.

In this video, we discuss:

Why 56% of young White Liberal women are spiraling while Black self-esteem is at an all-time high.

The "Great Feminization" of American institutions and the removal of Black fathers.

How DEI is a shell game where White women win the seats and Black people get the lollipops.

The "Black Lexapro": Using victimhood as a psychological antidepressant.

I also enjoy this channel with funny skits on White Liberal News.

Court Rules Against Racial Gerrymandering

The Atlantic magazine posts:

“What the Roberts Court is making possible,” @AdamSerwer argues, “is a country where white people can maintain their political dominance at the expense of Americans who are not white.” He examines what to expect following the Voting Rights Act ruling: https://theatln.tc/Pg529ZdA

So I figured that whoever is writing this crap must be a Black or a Jew. It turns out he is both!

Serwer has received awards from the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), ... His father is of Polish Jewish descent, and his mother is African-American. ... His work there has focused on white supremacy, race in America, and the Trump administration. ... He practices Judaism and lives in San Antonio, Texas.

He refers to a ruling against Louisiana racially segregating Congressional districts. They tried to concentrate the Blacks into two gerrymandered districts, for the explicit purpose of electing two Black Congressmen. The theory was that this was not racism, because it was a remedy for Blacks having to drink from separate fountains, a century earlier.

The magazine is controlled by Jews whose main purpose seems to be to stir up racial animosity.

Non-whites are the chief beneficiaries of White supremacy. All over the world, non-whites are seeking to move to countries with White political dominance. There are not court ruling "at the expense of Americans who are not white."

How Canada has Fallen Behind

Ten years ago, the Canada standard of living was comparable to the USA in many ways. Then Canada embarked on a serious of liberal policies and mass immigration. Now Canada has fallen far behind.

See Behind Canada's decade of decline and "This Is Where Canada Is Heading Right Now" - Jordan Peterson.

If anyone tells you that immigration is good for economic growth, explain Canada. The immigration has been a disaster.

Rock Music is Completely Dead

There is currently a Great Replacement of Whites by other races. It is argued that this has not had any adverse consequences yet, because there are still millions of Whites around.

Matt Walsh argues in this podcast that it has already killed Rock music.

Rock music is absent from recent lists of top music, musicians, hits, songwriters, etc. If there is any Rock, it is from decades ago.

We used to have lots of bands where teenagers get together with their friends in a garage, and made new music. They wrote their own songs, and composed the music. They were mostly White, and performed for mostly White audiences.

No more.

What happened? There could be several factors at work. Maybe some are purely economic. It appears that the decline of White culture is a big factor.

There are still White pop stars, like Taylor Swift. But she is not like the Rock bands of the 60s to 90s.

Walsh refers to the recently published NY Times list of the greatest living American songwriters. There is no new Rock music on the list. See also The NYT "Greatest Songwriters" List is an Absolute Disaster.

Walsh works for The Daily Wire, currently sinking:

The far-right Daily Wire faced mass layoffs this week — gutting the team of the long-prominent outlet initially founded by conservative activist Ben Shapiro.

I would call them center-right. Shapiro is their star, and his popularity has sharply declined since his support of the Iran War. He is an Orthodox Jew, and he gives the impression that his primary loyalties are to Israel. He is pretty good, when he is not talking about Israel.

Hate Group Attacks Christian Republicans

From a pro-Islam hate group:

The findings of this report document a sustained, escalating, and coordinated campaign of hate and bigotry against Muslim Americans by Republican elected officials, amplified through social media. What began with a single gubernatorial repost in February 2025 has grown, within thirteen months, into an operation involving 89 Republican elected officials, including 86 members of Congress across three reinforcing tracks: 1,111 social media posts by 46 elected officials, eight pieces of legislation across both chambers of Congress, and a formal congressional caucus with 62 members. This represents an unprecedented level of coordinated anti-Muslim bigotry by elected officials in the U.S.

No, this was not started by a single post a year ago. Christians wised up to Mohammedans trying to kill them about 1300 years ago.

They want to equate Christianity with bigotry. Christians do not agree with Islam for a lot of very good reasons.

The Decline of the Pride Flag

News:

On April 9, 2026, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee (R) signed House Joint Resolution 182, officially designating June 2026 as “Nuclear Family Month” in the state. Lee signed House Joint Resolution 182, which passed the House in April 2025 and the Senate last month, on April 9.

It is a departure from the national recognition of June as Pride Month.

The pushback against Pride displays is taking place across the country.

The woke Mayor of Boise, Idaho, Lauren McLean (D), was finally forced to remove the rainbow LGBT “pride” flag from its City Hall following implementation of a new flag law.

Multiple states, including Florida, Texas, and Alabama, have passed or proposed restrictions on Pride events in public schools, government buildings, or taxpayer-funded spaces.

In 2023, Target began removing some LGBTQ+ merchandise from its Pride Month collection amid nationwide backlash.

Cracker Barrel removed its Pride page, which listed the Nashville Pride Parade it sponsored. The page’s website link now redirects to Cracker Barrel’s “Culture and Belonging” site.

In 2025, Anheuser-Busch, the brewing company known for brands like Bud Light and Budweiser, ended its sponsorship of San Francisco Pride following the beer giant’s loss of over $27 billion in market value in 2023 after partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney and becoming the target of a conservative boycott.

Pride flags are still all over California schools and public buildings.

Weinstein Accuser Testifies

Harvey Weinstein has about a hundred accusers, so surely one can tell a convincing story to convict him. Nope. AP reports on his third trial:

Mann met Weinstein at a Los Angeles-area party around early 2013. She had done some acting work but was hoping for a big break.

Their subsequent get-togethers bounced between professional advice, invites to glitzy industry events and advances that Mann said made her uncomfortable but that she didn’t refuse, though she had an emotional “meltdown” during an episode involving Weinstein and another woman.

Still, Mann decided to have a consensual sexual liaison with the then-married producer.

She explained Tuesday that she had been taught to expect such behavior from men and thought she might feel better about it if she was in a relationship with Weinstein.

Among many consensual encounters, she said that one was not.

Mann told no one at the time. She went through with the planned breakfast, accepted Weinstein’s invitation to extend her trip, attend a movie screening and have tea with him and his daughter.

“I just wanted everyone to act like everything was normal,” she said.

She continued consensual sexual encounters and friendly email exchanges with Weinstein. He helped the financially struggling Mann get hired at a hair salon, though she declined an envelope from him that she believed contained $1,000 in cash: “It felt wrong,” she told jurors.

I am wondering how any of this would convince a jury. If he really committed a crime against her, she would not have continued the relationship.

Swedes have to Baby their Cats

Sweden is famous for being a feminist paradise, so they have lots of nanny state laws about pets. Example:

Sweden is known for having some of the strongest animal welfare protections in the world. Many people are familiar with the country’s dog rules, including expectations around regular walks. Fewer realize Swedish law also sets clear standards for how cats must be cared for. Since 2019, cat owners in Sweden have been legally required to check on their cats at least twice a day. The rule applies whether a cat lives indoors, outdoors, or on a farm. It is not simply a recommendation. It is part of the country’s animal welfare framework.

Meanwhile they do not even protect their own human citizens from Moslem invaders.

Cats survived for millions of years before humans coddled them. I am not sure Swedish culture will survive much longer.

The Invention of Gender Dysphoria

The term "gender dysphoria" was coined in 1973 by psychiatrist Norman M. Fisk. If you go back a century or more, there is no record of anyone with gender dysphoria. Here is the timeline:

1973: Fisk proposed "gender dysphoria" (sometimes called "gender dysphoria syndrome") to describe the distress from incongruence between one's experienced gender and biological sex. This was in the context of early work on transsexualism by figures like Harry Benjamin (who treated patients in the 1950s–1960s).

1979: The Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (later WPATH) used the term in its first Standards of Care.

1980: DSM-III introduced "gender identity disorder" (and "transsexualism") as official psychiatric diagnoses, not "gender dysphoria." Earlier DSM editions (1952, 1968) had no equivalent.

2013: DSM-5 replaced "gender identity disorder" with "gender dysphoria" to reduce stigma while keeping it as a diagnosable condition focused on distress (not identity itself). It was moved out of sexual disorders into its own category.

The whole point to the term is to get insurance and welfare agencies to pay for it.

Meaning of the Statue of Liberty

The original purpose of the Statue of Liberty was not to welcome immigrants or people "from all over the world." That idea developed later.

Original Intent (1865–1886)

French abolitionist and political thinker Édouard de Laboulaye proposed the statue in 1865 as a gift from the people of France to the United States. The goals included:

• Commemorating the centennial of American independence (1776).

• Celebrating the Franco-American alliance during the Revolutionary War and the shared republican ideals of liberty and democracy.

• Honoring the abolition of slavery after the U.S. Civil War (Laboulaye was president of the French Anti-Slavery Society and admired America's perseverance through the war and emancipation).

Sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi designed it as "Liberty Enlightening the World" — a symbol of liberty spreading enlightenment, not a greeter for newcomers. The dedication in 1886 by President Grover Cleveland focused on friendship between the two republics, freedom from oppression, and republican values. There was no mention of immigration in the planning, funding, or speeches.

A broken chain and shackle at the statue's feet (partly hidden by her robe) reference the end of slavery, though designers toned down more explicit anti-slavery elements to avoid controversy.

How the "Welcoming Immigrants" Idea Emerged

The association with immigration came after the statue was built:

• Its location in New York Harbor placed it near Ellis Island (the main U.S. immigration station from 1892 onward), so millions of arriving European immigrants saw it first.

• In 1883, poet Emma Lazarus wrote "The New Colossus" ("Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...") for a fundraiser. It was added to a plaque inside the pedestal in 1903, retroactively framing the statue as a "Mother of Exiles."

• Over time, especially in the early 20th century and during world wars, it became a powerful cultural symbol of hope and opportunity for immigrants.

Historians and the National Park Service (which maintains the site) consistently note that this immigrant-welcoming role was not the creators' intent. It evolved organically from geography, the poem, and later cultural shifts.

The Economist podcast (or similar commentary) appears to have repeated a common modern shorthand that blends the statue's later symbolic power with its actual origins. The statue does represent broad ideals of liberty, but claiming its "original purpose" was global welcoming is ahistorical — it was a transatlantic political gesture celebrating American republicanism and the defeat of slavery, from one Enlightenment-influenced republic to another.

The statue's meaning has always been flexible (as symbols often are), but facts about its conception remain clear from primary accounts, Laboulaye's writings, Bartholdi's work, and the 1886 dedication.

Young Women get Tattoos

@notcomplex_

Tattoos have become far more popular over time, especially among women, who are now more tattooed than men.

Dead Son or a Live Daughter?

Parents of gender confused children are often bullied into medical treatment with an argument that such treatments are necessary to prevent suicide. Most people will go along with expert medical opinion.

It is all nonsense. The research shows the opposite. Getting professional gender identity services makes adolescents and young adults worse.

What’s clear is that GD [gender dysphoria] is associated with psychiatric disorders, though it may not be causal, and that gender reassignment does not improve mental health compared to dysphoric subjects who didn’t get reassigned. All this suggests that “affirmative care” that puts GD subjects on the path to GR [gender reassignment] doesn’t, at least in this study, have the salubrious effects that are touted—as measured by the intensity of psychiatric treatment. Gender-reassigned subjects continue to suffer from mental disorders at a rate threefold to fivefold that of controls without gender dysphoria, so GR doesn’t come close to giving subjects the mental stability of controls.

Use common sense. Your medical professional may be more psychologically disturbed than your child.

Famous Computer Scientist Died

News:

Rabin has sadly just passed away at 94. This is a short piece on honoring him immediately. More is planned for the future.

His work has touched key areas of mathematics as well as central areas of computer theory. Without his work theory would be completely different today.

Besides what is mentioned, he developed a method of public key cryptography similar to RSA. He got it about the same time, and may have even been first.

It is a quirk of history that RSA caught on. For technical reasons, the Rabin method is trickier to use, but people could have figured out how to use it safely.

RSA was inspired by the Diffie-Hellman (DH) method. The elliptic curve variant of DH is now the most common used. It has the advantages of small keys, signatures, and idiot-proof key generation.

These are all quite secure, except for the possibility of quantum computers, which could break them all.

Canada Eskimos Join Alphabet People

Newsweek reports:

MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ is an acronym used primarily in Canada. ...

The acronym stands for: Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls, and Two‑Spirit (a term that is used by some First Nations to describe people who embody both masculine and feminine spirits), Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual people. ...

The full acronym has been used for years in government, advocacy, and community contexts to emphasize intersectionality. It is intentionally lengthy in order to name everyone who has historically been left out of national conversations about violence, justice, and safety.

No, it is lengthy to emphasize that it is excluding straight White men.

See also this video, which complains about people mocking the term and taking it "out of context".

Feds Crack Down on SPLC

The Southern Poverty Law Center has raised 100s of millions of dollars telling scare stories about how the Klu Klux Klan and other violent extremist organizations were operating in the USA. According to a new federal indictment, it has been a big scam. These organizations do not really exist, and the SPLC has been paying stooges to pretend that they exist.

Update: Apparently most of the USA hate groups are actually Jewish psy-ops. Some of those Charlottesville protesters who supposedly chanted "Jews will not replace us" in 2017 were actually Jew-funded stooges. The SPLC profited by about a billion dollars.