White Single Mom goes Woke; gets Murdered

Here is the story of an American single mom Jamey Carney who followed her Irish roots and moved to a sleepy little Ireland town. She was proud of her Irish nationalist ancestors, and enjoyed the move from New York City to an all-White town.

Sound like a Trump supporter? No, just the opposite.

Jamey Carney had met Ahmed Alsaqer at a pro-Palestine rally in Killarney in September 2025 and then began dating him soon after. Jamey Carney was highly active in left-wing circles, and she had a particular focus on both the pro-Palestinian movement and immigrant advocacy. As such, her relationship with Al-Saqar seemed more than just romantic, it became part of her identity.

Jamey Carney’s social media accounts reflected her ‘progressive’ New York background and were heavily focused on her political activities. Her posts explicitly highlighted her opposition to immigration enforcement with her profile biographies prominently featuring anti-ICE statements and critiques of U.S. border control policies. She actively championed the rights of refugees and asylum seekers, frequently using her platform to lobby for open borders and greater financial assistance for foreign nationals arriving in Ireland. What’s more, her alignment with the left-wing pro-migration movement had bled into her personal life, and as a result she had converted to Islam, as such she regularly took part in Islamic marches, and frequently used Arabic cultural terms of endearment on her profiles.

This did not end well. He murdered her.

The article does not say how she got child custody from the dad.

There is an evolutionary psychology theory that women are sexually attracted to foreign invaders. She would see the Irish men as weak and effective for allowing foreign Third World migrants to take over. So she surrenders to the foreigner.

How the NY Times Hates Dads

I found this comment on how the NY Times celebrated Fathers Day:

The New York Times Unbelievable Attack on Fatherhood
Alex Berenson exposes a shocking trend in mainstream media: the cultural elite's apparent contempt for traditional fatherhood and masculinity. Looking closely at recent New York Times opinion pieces on being a dad, the authors included three women, a trans man [woman who sometimes dresses as a man], and two childless men, but not a single actual father.

The trans article was really strange. There was also a podcast interview of a man who wrote a book about his deceased father, and mostly complained that he had extramarital affairs.

NY Law abolishes terms Father, Mother

Snopes says this is true:

New York lawmakers passed a bill changing the words "mother" and "father" to "gestating parent" and "non-gestating parent" in parts of state law.

The reasons given do not even make any sense.

Under the updated text, "gestating parent" refers to a person who carries and gives birth to a child, while a "non-gestating parent" does not — such as the father or the non-carrying woman in a lesbian relationship. While parents share a legal bond with their children, they do not always share a biological one, as seen in cases of surrogacy or adoption.

We have had child adoption for centuries, so there is nothing new about parents not having a biological bond. Furthermore, in the case of surrogacy, the gestating parent is the pregnant surrogate, and not the legal parent.

Chicago Sends Black Dads to Jail

The Chicago Sun-Times reports:

For parents navigating family court in Cook County, falling behind on child support and other court-ordered payments can carry consequences that extend far beyond mounting debt.

It can mean going to jail.

Over the past decade, more than 2,500 people — nearly all of them men — have been locked up after Cook County judges found them in what’s called indirect civil contempt.

Most were detained for failing to comply with court-ordered payments to children or former spouses, according to Cook County sheriff’s records.

Those jailed spent an average of eight days in custody. But about 100 people were held for 50 days or longer. Of them, about 25 were locked up for more than 100 days, according to sheriff’s data from April 2016 to the end of March 2026.

One man, Steve Fanady, has been in jail for nearly four years.

A Chicago Sun-Times analysis of sheriff’s records exposes what some say is a punitive side of a system that civil rights advocates and some court observers say offers little legal help to those unable to afford a lawyer.

Unlike criminal defendants, people accused of violating support orders in civil court aren’t automatically entitled to legal representation even though they might face incarceration.

In Cook County’s sprawling domestic relations court system — which handles roughly 40,000 divorce and child-support cases each year — advocates estimate that at least half of the litigants come to court without a lawyer. Most are Black.

For nearly add debts, jail is not a possibility. A debtor can declare bankruptcy.

It is not so well known that child support is not required to be spent on the child. The mom can spend it as she pleases. In many or even most of these cases, the debt is not even to the mom, but to a welfare agency.

California Schools Overruled

Some conservatives announce:

U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Historic, Groundbreaking Victory for Parental Rights, Dismantles California’s Secret Gender Transition Regime

Supreme Court rules that California cannot hide children’s gender transitions from parents; landmark decision protects parental rights nationwide

It was amazing that California had a policy of secretly transgendering minor students, and concealing it from the parents.

The 6-3 Supreme Court decision is here.

England Abolishes Paternal Rights in Child Custody

The London Guardian reported in October:

The family courts will no longer work on the presumption that having contact with both parents is in the best interests of a child, in a landmark change that domestic abuse campaigners have said “will save so many children’s lives”.

The move has been heralded as “groundbreaking” by family lawyers and campaigners ...

The government confirmed on Tuesday that it would repeal the presumption of parental involvement from the act “when parliamentary time allows”. ...

The announcement means family court judges will no longer have to work from a starting point that parental involvement is in the child’s best interest, and instead will be directed to consider the evidence and assess a child’s wellbeing on a case-by-case basis.

Janice Fiamengo comments:

The article does not admit the well-documented fact that mothers are the most frequent perpetrators of child abuse and child homicide (see, for example, p. 65, perpetrators of child fatalities). Neither does the article acknowledge that women do indeed lie about abuse , precisely as a means to sway custody outcomes in their favor. Moreover, women do alienate children from their fathers, often with the assistance of family court orders. Alienation is a recognized form of child abuse.

Feminists quoted in the article admit that this is merely an important “first step” in their long march to total father-exclusion. ...

Many fathers’ groups have lobbied for decades to secure fathers’ legal right to be involved with their children, amassing peer-revied data showing that children do better with both parents present: they are less likely to experience mental illness and juvenile delinquency, less likely to commit crimes or join gangs, more likely to finish school, less likely to abuse alcohol and drugs, and less likely to commit suicide or self-harm. Against fierce opposition, such organizations have achieved significant success in the United States in helping to shepherd statutes through state legislatures that encourage judges to award shared custody to parents after divorce.

Britain used to be a great nation. This is more evidence of its suicide.

National women’s groups in America (including the National Organization for Women) have been vehement opponents of bills to encourage shared parenting, claiming that a presumption of father involvement empowers male abusers. Such advocates reject any implication that women owe anything to the fathers of their children (Radbord is incensed that a woman might be prevented from moving out of state by a father’s petition), and refuse to acknowledge the sincerity of fathers’ parenting aspirations.

Feminism is not about equality. It is more about eliminating fathers rights.

Online Debate on Child Spanking

Stefan Molyneux and Malcolm Collins have Debate: Is Hitting Children Good?!?. Molyneux subsequently posted his debate prep.

This is a funny topic. Among the general public, people overwhelmingly believe that spanking is beneficial, and even a necessary part of childrearing.

But among experts, meaning academics, child psychologists, and pediatricians, only opposition to all spanking is acceptable. Must never be done.

In the history of human civilation, all successful societies have used corporal punishment.

I have run across commentary by social scientists, where they are not only opposed to spanking, but do not understand the purpose to it. This baffles me. Social science researchers are supposed to be able to look at data, and deduce causes for behavior. If they want the reasons for spanking, they could just ask any parent. And yet they cannot figure it out. This causes me to doubt any research that they do.

Both Molyneux and Collins have unusual personal stories that color their views. Molyneux emphasizes Libertarian principles, while Collins talks a lot about evolutionary principles.

They do not talk about the published research much. It is mostly anti-spanking, but not really convincing as the studies not have good controls, and only really show that extreme and frequent beatings are harmful. They do not show that any method of discipline is better than any other.

They both have unusual and well-thought out philosphies that are worth considering, even if you disagree. Both have their own podcasts where they expound on their views at great length.

Wikipedia says:

The Collinses also employ corporal punishment in disciplining their children, which is based on Simone's personal observation of lions and tigers during a safari trip, despite clinical consensus that it impairs childhood development.

This is Wikipedia bias. His view is based on a great many things, including published research, as you can see in the debate. No, there is not a clinical consensus. Wikipedia is essentially saying that Collins is impairing his kids based on seeing lions on a safari.

Molyneux started to lose me when he talked about how abolishing spanking was a step in a multi-century project to adopt the Non-Aggression Principle and reach a libertarian utopia. Collins had more immediate concerns, such as keeping his child off the street.

One of the main arguments against spanking is that emotional manipulation is more effective. The idea is that mom smothers the baby with love and affection, and then discipline the child by withdrawing affection. Doing this makes the child loyal and obedient, better than spanking. That may be correct, but I do not agree with it.

The Danger in Being Red-pilled

Bill Maher had meme expert Aiden Walker explain:

The 14:06 red pill. So the red pill is a meme that emerges from the matrix which is from the '9s, 14:12 right? Um and that movie, you know, you offer the blue pill and the red pill and Keer Reeves takes the red pill to break out 14:19 of his re. What does it mean today when people see it? It means so what it means is if you take the red 14:24 pill then you've broken out of what they call kind of the oppressive reality of like you know mainstream society

It is not that complicated, but a lot of particles have been warning of the dangers of the red pill. Parents magazine writes:

“The term is frequently used within online communities and subcultures, particularly those associated with men's rights, ‘incel’ (involuntarily celebite) ideology, and white supremacy,” says Dr. Poncin. “This includes…adhering to heteronormative gender roles with ‘gender-typical roles’ for each.”

Redpill communities are explicitly sexist

Oftentimes, young men who join redpill communities on spaces like Reddit are exposed to misogynistic ideas, because a main tenet of the redpill belief system is that men are disenfranchised in a society that they feel favors women.

It then advises parents to be on the lookout for a son learning about the red pill, and:

Young men will need extra guidance from their parents and potentially a mental health professional if they become entrenched in online redpill forums

Similar articles were in USA Today and a mommy site.

This is crazy paranoid. Those red-pill site are primarily concerned with studying human nature, and presenting facts and evidence. Sure, some of it is anecdotal, but it is not inherently misogonystic. Women are also red-pilled. You do not send your child to a shrink just because he learns the truth about something. Later on, Maher said:

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

Glad to see a logic point explained.

These articles try to ostracize incels:

The Rise of Incels and the Real-World Violence It Fuels

A particularly dangerous corner of the Manosphere is the incel community. Incel is short for “involuntary celibate.” These are mostly young men who feel rejected, resentful, and entitled to sex and relationships. Incel ideology often blames women for male suffering, dehumanizes them, and glorifies violence as a form of revenge or reclamation of power.

Yes, incels feel rejected because they are rejected. But they are no more violent that anyone else, and attacking them like this is cruel.

Crazy Moms cause Transgender Kids

I found this 1991 study:

Mothers of Boys with Gender Identity Disorder: A Comparison of Matched Controls
SONIA MARANTZ, PH.D., AND SUSAN COATES, PH.D.

Abstract. This pilot study compared mothers of boys with gender identity disorder (GID) with mothers of normal boys to determine whether differences in psychopathology and child-rearing attitudes and practices could be identified. Results of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and the Beck Depression Inventory revealed that mothers of boys with GID had more symptoms of depression and more often met the criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder than the controls. Fifty-three percent of the mothers of boys with GID compared with only 6% of controls met the diagnosis for Borderline Personality Disorder on the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines or had symptoms of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory. Results of the Summers and Walsh Symbiosis Scale suggested that mothers of probands had child-rearing attitudes and practices that encouraged symbiosis and discouraged the development of autonomy. J . Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 1991, 30, 2:310-315.

A study like this would probably not get published today.

Is this any surprise? Yes of course crazy moms are the cause of gender confusion in boys.

The Argument for the Colorado LGBTQ Law

I mentioned that under Colorado law, if a child is confused or questioning about sexual orientation or identity, psychotherapy must push the child towards LGBTQ, while encouraging normal behavior is illegal. You might wonder who could defend such a law.

More than 20 states have similar laws, and courts have upheld them. Here is the brief defending the Colorado law, and it claims that all of the science and expert opinion is on its side:

As the record makes clear, the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence demonstrates that conversion therapy is an unsafe and in- effective treatment.

That conversion therapy inflicts harm has been confirmed by at least twelve research studies, four sys- tematic reviews of that research, and two independent evaluations of conversion therapy and the attendant research. D. Colo. Decl. of Dr. Judith Glassgold, Dkt. No. 45-1 (“Decl.”), ¶ 14. Conversion therapy’s docu- mented harms include depression, anxiety, loss of sex- ual feeling, negative self-esteem, negative changes in family relationships, loss of faith, and suicidality. Decl. ¶¶ 65-68, 72-84 (citing studies). A cross-sectional survey of over 27,000 transgender adults found that exposure to conversion therapy at any time in a transgender person’s life was associated with adverse mental health outcomes in adulthood that included se- vere psychological distress, suicidal thoughts, and su- icide attempts. Id. ¶ 78. The studies of adults who underwent voluntary conversion therapy also found that they experienced harms including shame, a loss of faith in religious institutions, and suicidal thoughts. Id. ¶¶ 70-71, 83 (citing studies).

In short, “[s]tudies dating across two decades have evaluated [conversion therapy] and identified it as a potentially harmful treatment.” Decl. ¶ 61. A sys- tematic review of this evidence led the American Psy- chiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and other professional health care provid- ers’ associations to recommend against the use of con- version therapy due to the evidence that it harms young people. Id. ¶ 19. Nothing in the Cass Review— cited for the first time in the Petition, see Pet. 3-4, 8-9, 282—challenges the evidence on conversion therapy’s harmful effects. Indeed, that Review states that “no LGBTQ+ group should be subjected to conversion practice,” Cass Review at 150 § 11.5, and observes that “[n]o formal science-based training in psychotherapy, psychology or psychiatry teaches or advocates conver- sion therapy.” Id. at 151 § 11.7. It advocates the ap- proach taken by the MCTL: “If an individual were to carry out such practices they would be acting outside of professional guidance, and this would be a matter for the relevant regulator.” Cass Review at 151 § 11.7.

I post this so that you can get both sides, but also so you can see how overwhelmingly corrupted the psychiatric establishment is. You could tell a confused child to try to go straight, and all the experts say not to do it.

The way it is written, it sounds as if the case for the law is overwhelming, but look closely, and it is all bogus. It cites a "survey of over 27,000 transgender adults" as if that is scientific. It is not. Any real study would have control groups, and look at treatment outcomes. They were calling people who rejected advice, and asking if the advice was bad.

It says treatments were associated with harms. That could be said about most medical treatments. Have you ever looked at the list of possible harmful effects of common prescription drugs? The above says nothing about whether the benefits outweigh the harms.

Nevertheless it is worth pointing out that the major psychiatric and psychological associations are fully on board with this Colorado law. Every parent who considered taking a child to psychotherapy should know that. That therapist is likely to believe in an ethical obligation to push the child to being LGBTQ, and believe that it is unethical to encourage the child to live a normal life.

Cancel Culture Victim gets Payoff

A GiveSendGo fundraiser:

My name is Shiloh and I have been put into a very dire situation. I recently had a kid steal from my 18month old sons diaper bag at a park. I called the kid out for what he was. Another man, who we recently found out has had a history with law enforcement, proceeded to record me and follow me to my car. He then posted these videos online which has caused my family, and myself, great turmoil. My SSN has been leaked. My address, and phone number have been given out freely. My family members are being attacked. My eldest child may not be going back to school. Even where I exercise has been exposed.

I am asking for your help to assist in protecting my family.

This young Minnesota mom was harassed by Somalians who called her a racist. As I write this, she has raised $675,000.

Online bullies, including a Somalian named Sharmake Omar, have tried to get her into trouble with police and CPS.

On Monday, May 5, the Rochester Police Department said they had passed their findings to the City Attorney's Office to review for "a charging decision"

No, I did not donate, but I think it is great that this mom is successfully fighting back against the Somalians who are trying to terrorize her.

I would think that the police and CPS would be smart enough to see that there is not even a complaint that she broke any law. The Somalian filmed himself using the word N***er, baiting the mom into saying the word, and accusing a child of being mentally retarded. Maybe he should be deported.

Pete Buttigieg talks about Black Babies

The gay Pink News reports:

The former US secretary of transportation and his husband, Chasten, adopted twins Penelope and Joseph in 2021. Appearing on Wednesday’s (23 April) episode of the Flagrant podcast, the Democratic politician described fatherhood as “the best thing”.

Asked about how he and Chasten imagined having conversations with their children, both of whom are mixed-race, about their experiences in the world and how those would differ from their own, Buttigieg replied: “We think about it all the time and it’s not like we have it all figured out.”

He also talked about their “surprise adoption scenario” – as prospective parents, they were “just on a list” so had no idea how many children they’d get or the youngsters’ racial identity.

“Contending with the hair is already a thing,” he said, when asked to give in a specific example, “especially from Black parents who see stuff on Instagram and they’re like: ‘Let me tell you how to do it’. Lots of advice.”

He could do what the White Hollywood actresses do, and raise the Black kids as transgender.

He explains that, at 2:20:00, because he said he was willing to adopt Black babies, he was on a shorter waiting list and paid a smaller fee. He cites this as proof that race is still a thing in the USA.

A few decades ago, homosexuals stayed in the closet, and most people objected to them adopting kids, and to Whites adopting Black kids.

2:21:44 their lives will be affected in some way by their racial all of ours are but um 2:21:50 one thing about being white is you don't have to think about the fact that when you're white your racial identity is not something that you're reminded of all 2:21:56 the time um in a way that they will be

A lot of people have made this remark that the White race is different from other races, in that Whites do not think about their racial identity, while non-whites think about their racial identity all the time. Some people go further, and use this to deny that there is any such thing as a White racial identity. Only non-white ones.

He announces at 2:25:10 that he is chickening out of running for the US Senate from Michigan, partially because he wants to spend more time with his family. But he is unemployed now, and says at 2:24:00 that he drops his 3.5 year old adopted kids off at school everyday.

No, that is not school. It is daycare. If he wanted to spend more time with them, he would not put them in daycare.

He hints that he will be running for President again. The Democrat Party is all about how many diversity boxes can be checked. That is, they hope people will vote for him because he is homosexual and adopted Black babies.

Therapist advised taking Non-binary Kid to Ireland

News:

Rosie O’Donnell has “no regrets” for choosing to leave the U.S. for Ireland with her child after President Donald Trump won the election.

The comedian told CNN’s The Situation Room Tuesday that she had already decided to leave the country if Trump won the presidency, saying that “not a day has gone by that I thought it was the wrong decision.”

“I knew after reading Project 2025 that if Trump got in, it was time for me and my non-binary child to leave the country,” she said. “And although I was not one of the celebrities who announced that that’s what I would do, I made the decision within my family and my therapist should he win.”

She said that her and her 12-year-old, Clay, who is non-binary and has autism, were “gone before he was inaugurated.”

So her therapist advised her to move to Ireland? And advised her to turn her child non-binary, I guess. This is really sick.

Optimizing Human Life

The term eugenics has always been a bad word at the NY Times, such as this story relating it to Hitler and other evils.

Now it publishes a pro-eugenics opinion, mirrored here.

Other advocates such as the Collinses believe widespread adoption of the screening could be a boon for public health by lowering health care spending on heritable diseases and, more controversially, for social ills such as violent crime by raising a society’s overall IQ. “Societies that have more intelligent people will have lower rates of crime, of rape, of violence, because intelligence correlates negatively with those societal blights,” Ms. Collins told me. Such population-level engineering, when done by a parent as opposed to the state, has been called liberal eugenics by its advocates.

This Harvard survey shows a lot of support for eugenic embryo screening.

Dems Say Deadnaming is Child Abuse

News:

A proposed bill in Colorado could transform a simple slip of the tongue — or even a deeply held personal belief — into a legal nightmare for parents, schools, and businesses.

The bill, HB25-1312 or the “Kelly Loving Act,” is sponsored by three state Democrats: Reps. Lorena García and Rebekah Stewart Faith Winter and Senator Chris Kolker. If passed, it would classify so-called “misgendering” or “deadnaming” as child abuse or “coercive control.” In other words, parents who don’t condone a child’s transgender self-identification will be subject to punishment — including but not limited to losing custody of their own children.

This is really sick. Fortunately, Pres. Trump is standing against this nonsense.

Haidt Diagnoses Today's Youth

Bill Gates makes his annual book recommendation, getting this review:

One of his recommended books might be pretty insightful. The Anxious Generation

We have raised a couple generations now that were over parented, protected from adversity while growing, never having a moment to grow, always adults lording over the kids to prevent any problem or harm. Where a mother is arrested for allowing her child to walk without an adult ensuring their safety. Where "free range" children are considered prima facie evidence of a crime and child abuse.

But allowed to watch shemale midget scat pR0n on the Smartphone they got when they turn 5 years old.

So it isn't terribly surprising that young people grow into physical adults, yet stuck in a strange childish funk, and need chemical assistance to deal with their depression. That in recent years, atypical antipsychotics are being normalized.

Life out of balance. Raising children requires two parents, usually one male, and usually one female. Today, the male input is largely subjugated, while the female is elevated. And the epidemic of single female parent households makes the childrearing with no male input at all - no male input wanted.

In a normal situation of bonded parents, the female excels at nurturing and keeping the children alive and healthy, The male provides protection and teaches boundaries that allow the children to become successful adults.

But in today's western world, males are considered useless, and are not needed, and females have the force of law, much of society, and especially media to enforce that. To the point that a growing number of young men are leaving to find mates in other countries where they are not considered the cause of all problems.

Witness the oncoming attacks with me daring to not tow the prevailing party line.

I have a number of friends that partnered with Philippinas, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, and a couple other nationalities. Not a divorce in the lot, and they treat each other like kings and queens.

Side note: so many American women who don't need a man are enraged by men that they reject leaving to find love elsewhere. You would think they would celebrate the enemy leaving them alone.

Point is, what we are doing is failing terribly.

Even now though, there are some interesting actions. The recent election was decidedly female versus male. The democrats were blindsided that a gynocentric campaign failed to attract males. They were shocked that young men didn't vote en masse for Harris, adding to the landslide that all females were going to vote for her.

They figured that the enemy (read the stereotype old white racist men) were going to vote for orange man, but young men were raised right and would join the curb stomping.

But these young guys, who were told that by virtue of brandishing a penis - they were the enemy, and they were the cause of every problem, and they were the oppressors, started finding it kind of odd that the oppressed victims were better educated, given preference i hiring and promotions, and given rights without responsibilities. So we could have a woman CEO playing victim to young guys who were raised on Ritalin, and living in their parents basement.

Finally, the over reach of sexual harassment has reached comical terms, not to mention a variable thing. Harassment is now determined by how attractive the guy is. Saying that you like a woman's ear rings is sexual harassment. Since it can end a man's career, the only winning move is to not play the game.

So make no mistake, orange man is probably not going to help these young guys very much at all. But they have experienced what Democrats, colleges, the media and the courts have done for some time now. Many of the young guys don't dislike Harris either, they dislike the direction things have taken. And while it isn't popular to note, there are women out in the wild who do not hate men. So the gynocentric campaign managed to blow through almost 2 billion to get landslided in the electoral college.

This is going to take along time to return to any sort of normalcy.

Another similar rant, also influenced by Haidt, is Why Matriarchies Fail.

Dad loses Son to Tranny Mania

News:>

A California judge has permanently stripped Texas father Jeffrey Younger of all parental rights to his twin sons, James and Jude, granting Younger’s ex-wife, Anne Georgulas, the authority to chemically and surgically transition their 12-year-old son, James, against his father’s wishes.

Younger, whose ex-wife, a pediatrician, began transitioning their son to a girl at just two and a half years old, has fought tooth and nail to protect his child. Despite video evidence supporting his concerns, courts in Texas and California have systematically stripped him of his parental rights.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that a video of James Younger when he was only 3 years old surfaced, revealing that his mother put dresses on him and painted his fingernails when the child was just an infant!

The abuse from the mother all started because James liked a toy from the movie ‘Frozen’ meant for little girls.

This is part of why Pres. Trump won the election. Decent people on the Right and Left agree that is is seriously sick and wrong.

The dad tweets:

I lost all parental rights to my sons. Goodbye, boys. ...

Let my story be a cautionary one for young men. Fathers have no rights to their children. Do not enter the family law system. ...

No parent should do supervised visitation. It’s bad for the children, bad for the father, and allows courts invent false findings to further endanger the father.

I agree that supervised visitaion is demoralizing, humiliating, harmful, and evil.

Andrew Anglin writes:

I wrote yesterday about the retardedness of referring to American democracy as “fascism.”

Would a fascist country steal a man’s son and cut his dick off? It’s nonsensical.

This is something that can and would only ever happen in a democracy. Stealing sons and chopping off their dicks is fundamentally a democracy action. ...

This situation is a prime example of the fact that America is the single most sickening and satanic shithole that has ever existed in history. Nothing even remotely comparable to this has ever happened.

This is Satan unleashed on an industrial scale. It is total separation from God in the name of Jewishness and feminism.

Anglin is widely censored for saying stuff like this.

Let Kids Walk Home

John Stossel reports:

Why Letting Your Kid Walk Home Alone Could Land You in Jail

A mother was ARRESTED for letting her 8-year-old son walk half a mile home. Prosecutors said she put her kid “in imminent danger of death.” Really?

Not just arrested, but charged with a felony and coerced into a plea bargain.

A comment:

The true villain here is the busy body who called police. This country is infested with hags.

When I was 8 years old, I walked farther than that from school to home every day.

Yes, the busybody is evil, but the police and prosecutors and judges are the ones in authority, and they should know better.

Here is a worse story:

A Prunedale [California] father has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for the negligent death of his autistic daughter.

Jermain Gonzalez, 43, agreed to plead no contest after being charged in the death of his daughter, who was killed when she was hit by a car while trying to cross Highway 101 in 2023.

Gonzalez was charged by the Monterey County district attorney's office with second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter and three counts of felony child abuse.

10 years in prison? That should be for real criminal. The story says authorities knew about a history of negligence, but if so, why aren't those authorities going to prison for 10 years? They could have acted if it were so serious. And if not so serious, why is he getting 10 years? I do not agree with criminalizing parenting mistakes.

Trans Families for Harris

Here is amazing clip from the trans families for Harris:

I've now obtained footage from a new one this is from the trans 11:37 families for Harris organization and um they had their own Zoom call and in this 11:43 call several parents said that they support KL Harris because they want the 11:48 ability to change their child's gender despite the fact that changing their child's gender is you know of course medically and scientifically impossible 11:55 here's one example this is a a a guy named Jeff Bender and and he says that his 11-year-old son is now a girl who 12:02 uses she her pronouns and it's all because of the wisdom of his son's 12:07 second grade teacher and now Jeff is going to take his son across state lines to Illinois which is more than three 12:13 hours away to begin a so-called gender affirming care watch

an important thing 12:20 happened to my daughter um we've always known that our daughter um ever since 12:27 she was born she uh was always who she 12:33 was and uh so it didn't come to a surpr a surprise for us to find out when she 12:38 chose to start using uh she her pronouns but the reason she chose she her 12:43 pronouns was because of her second grade teacher and when we limit our 12:49 teachers um access to our kids which they spend more time with our children than we do as parents when we limit that 12:57 access when we limit what they can do and how they can help our our kids grow 13:02 um I can only imagine the hurt and the struggles that some of these kids are going to end up going through but 13:09 because she had a second grade teacher that stepped up and let her know you 13:14 decide who you want to be it's not about what your parents say or your grandparents say you know you so From 13:21 This Moment forth in this school who do you want to be and in second grade my 13:26 daughter chose she her uh my daughter is now 11 and we have our very first 13:32 appointment for our um gender affirming care our Hospital our children's 13:38 hospital here in St Louis was shut down um our doctor was made to flee the state 13:44 and is now working somewhere else and our first appointment is at the end of this month in Peoria Illinois and if 13:52 you're not familiar with the area that is a three-hour drive from our 13:57 house

That's right. His school talked his son into wanting to be a girl. He is greteful to the teacher for usurping a parental role. He is traveling out of state to get the boy castrated.

This is sick on many levels. Usually the moms are the ones doing this, but this is a dad. A comment says:

If I allow my 9 year old grandson to play alone in the front yard, CPS will be at the door, but this is okay?

Matt Walsh says:

of all the pathetic men uh the most pathetic one 14:10 I've ever seen in my life

This is not just the story of one pathetic man. We have Kamala Harris, possibly the next President, who is firmly in favor of this child abuse.

Glenn Greenwald is not a right-winger, and he delevers this devastating criticism of Harris. She must be the most incompetent candidate ever.

Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing Up

Abigail Shrier‘s new book, Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing Up.

... the book is, in my view, superb, and should be read by every literate adult, whether or not you have children. For it offers not only guidelines for parenting, but also explains why young people in society (as well as adolescents, college students, and young adults) are showing higher rates of anxiety, depression, and mental illness. They are emotionally stuck at about age twelve. And that, says Shrier, is due to “bad therapy”: the rise of an American therapy culture in which every child is constantly assessed, supervised, and psychologized by parents, their schools, and doctors. (It is the schools and doctors, which include therapists, that have convinced parents that their children have psychological problems and need treatment.) The result is that we have one generation (I’d say two or more) that has grown up fragile, solipsistic, afraid to engage with the world, and socially inept.

Here, therapy means psychotherapy. I do not think anyone is criticizing physical or speech therapy.

I have not seen the book, but I do believe that child psychotherapy is almost entirely harmful. My advice is that parents should keep all children away from psychotherapists.