The Tragedy of the Commons

A few decades ago, there was a consensus on the Left that overpopulation was the chief threat to the environment, and to the quality of human life on Earth also.

As SciAm explains:

Fifty years ago, University of California professor Garrett Hardin penned an influential essay in the journal Science. Hardin saw all humans as selfish herders: we worry that our neighbors’ cattle will graze the best grass. So, we send more of our cows out to consume that grass first. We take it first, before someone else steals our share. This creates a vicious cycle of environmental degradation that Hardin described as the “tragedy of the commons.”

It's hard to overstate Hardin’s impact on modern environmentalism. His views are taught across ecology, economics, political science and environmental studies. His essay remains an academic blockbuster, with almost 40,000 citations. It still gets republished in prominent environmental anthologies.

The SciAm article goes on to launch a vicious political attack on Hardin.

Now the leading environmentalist organization, the Sierra Club, files lawsuits in order to expand the human migrations that are overpopulating the USA.

SciAm concludes:

Hardin lobbied Congress against sending food aid to poor nations, because he believed their populations were threatening Earth’s “carrying capacity.” ...

We must reject his pernicious ideas on both scientific and moral grounds. ...

The climate movement needs more people on this lifeboat, not fewer. We must make room for every human if we are going to build the political power necessary to face down the looming oil tankers and coal barges that send heavy waves in our direction. This is a commitment at the heart of proposals like the Green New Deal. ...

Instead of writing a tragedy, we must offer hope for every single human on Earth. Only then will the public rise up to silence the powerful carbon polluters trying to steal our future.

This is just crazy left-wing nonsense. Most of the increases in carbon pollution are coming from immigration and Third World development. The Green New Deal would require even more carbon pollution, because burning fossil fuels would have to replace nuclear power.

Our scientific institutions have sold us out. This article says that everyone on Earth has a right to have as many babies as they want, and then we must subsidize whatever parasitic lifestyle they choose.

Definition of American

The Webster's Dictionary 1828 defines:

American

AMER'ICAN, adjective Pertaining to America.

AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

The name American must always exalt the pride of patriotism. - Washington

When asked for his ethnic group, a White American might just say that he is American. Others might say Mexican-American, Chinese-American, or black American.

I occasionally hear people say that America was founded on a idea, or that anyone believing in certain ideals is an American. That was not the usage in 1828, according to this dictionary.

Note also that the dictionary makes no reference to citizenship.

If a non-Japanese person becomes a citizen in Japan, then he is still not considered Japanese. I am told that there are Koreans who have lived in Japan for generations, but they are still not considered Japanese.

It’s O.K. to be white

From a NY Times op-ed:

In October, senators voted in favor of a One Nation motion incorporating the white supremacist slogan “It’s O.K. to be white.” The government later blamed an administrative error for the vote, after having initially trumpeted the move as evidence of its opposition to “racism of any kind.”

The kindest interpretation of all this is that the coalition has been sloppy and inattentive to the problem of extremism, ...

Really? Saying “It’s O.K. to be white” is considered to be white supremacist and extremist!

Here is a video of Joe Biden saying that it is a good thing that massive non-white immigration is reducing whites to being a minority. The other Democrat presidential are taking more extreme anti-white positions, such as advocating whites paying reparations to non-whites.

Politics used to be aligned on a Right v. Left axis. Now it is Nationalist v. Globalist. Or between those who say it is okay to be White, and those working to exterminate Whites.

Charlize Theron is shockingly available

People mag reports:

Charlize Theron is looking to date but is only interested in those brave enough to ask.

The 43-year-old actress spoke about her dating life to Entertainment Tonight while at CinemaCon in Las Vegas on Thursday. Theron, who was promoting her upcoming film Long Shot, admitted finding a date wasn’t as easy as it looked.

“I’ve been single for 10 years, it’s not a long shot,” Theron said. “Somebody just needs to grow a pair and step up.”

She added, “I’m shockingly available.”

She was prime mating material, when her eggs were still good, and she was one of the most beautiful and popular stars in Hollywood. Now she is infertile and has two adopted black African kids, and is ashamed to travel with them in the USA.

One of the black African kids is a boy being raised as a girl.

Step up? No, she is discovering that she is just not that desirable anymore.

You might think that at least she gets the approval of her fellow leftists by adopting black African kids. Not necessarily:

The most blatantly racist people I have personally known are white parents who adopted black children. ...

The concept of transracial adoption is predicated upon the idea that we (the white adopters, in this case) have something that the parents of the children we are adopting lack. ...

In both cases, there exists a deprecating tone of white rescue — the new colonialism.

I am not sure about that, but there is something very strange about wanting to purchase kids of another race from another country.

CH tells her the brutal truth:

And she lies to herself and everyone around her when she says stuff like this:

“Once you have children, that’s who you are. There is no way around that. That’s who I am,” she explained back in 2017. “Once I had my kids, the first two years you’re so, you turn into such a mom. Your body almost switches off. It’s like I had no desire to date or anything.”

Charlize, dear, you didn’t have children. You adopted two random babies from the third world. You never gave birth. Your body never sustained life. Your vagina never expelled an infant of your own blood and soul. Your body didn’t “almost switch off” because your body never went through the childbirth process and your kids aren’t your own, which everyone including yourself knows but will never say out loud. You “love” your alien-looking kids marginally more than you love a complete stranger. You “turned into such a mom” only in your head, where your fantastical self-conception demanded that you be the mom which in your heart you don’t really feel you are.

You had no “desire to date” because no man who could meet your standards wanted to date a headcase single mom, so you hamsterly rationalized to yourself that it was your choice to drop out of the dating market.

Naturally, now that your once-hsmv is plummeting through the floor and your increasingly haggard face is made uglier by the swarthlets nipping at your heels, you have trouble finding a worthwhile man who will put up with your mental instability and District 9 home life. And just as naturally, you lash out at men and demean their manhood for not ignoring their own desires to placate your desire, which only adds to the reasons why men don’t want to be within a parsec of you after dropping a perfunctory protein torpedo in your infertile exhaust port.

And that is the truth I hope hurts you badly, because you deserve it.

If you want to know why Theron is so fucked in the head, here’s your reason:

She grew up on her parents’ farm in Benoni, near Johannesburg. On 21 June 1991, Theron’s father, an alcoholic, threatened both teenaged Charlize and her mother while drunk, physically attacking her mother. Theron’s mother then shot and killed him. The shooting was legally adjudged to have been self-defence, and her mother faced no charges.

It always comes back to daddy issues. Beta daddies, alcoholic daddies, violent daddies, weak daddies…..the West is in the midst of a Daddy Crisis, and our traitorous, mentally rekt women are the symptom.

Wow. She appears damaged beyond repair.

Israeli rocket crashes on the Moon

The London Guardian reports:

An Israeli spacecraft has crashed into the lunar surface, ending the first privately funded attempt to land on the moon.

About the size of a washing machine, the 585kg (1,290lb) robotic lander experienced an engine and communication failure in the last seconds of touchdown. ...

Its frame held a time capsule of digital files the size of coins containing the Torah, children’s drawings, dictionaries in 27 languages, Israeli songs, as well as memories of a Holocaust survivor.

Is this a joke? This Jewish stuff is too weird for me sometimes.

In 1969, the USA sent a man to the Moon to plant an American flag. Hollywood made a movie about it, but left out the flag. Now Israel crashes a washing machine robot with coins and Jewish Holocaust propaganda into the Moon!

Here is what Jewish atheist computer science professor Scott Aaronson says:

I was saddened about the results of the Israeli election. The Beresheet lander, which lost its engine and crashed onto the moon as I was writing this, seems like a fitting symbol for where the country is now headed. Whatever he was at the start of his career, Netanyahu has become the Israeli Trump ...

The original Zionist project — the secular, democratic vision of Herzl and Ben-Gurion and Weizmann and Einstein, which the Nazis turned from a dream to a necessity — matters more to me than most things in this world, and that was true even before I’d spent time in Israel and before I had a wife and kids who are Israeli citizens. It would be depressing if, after a century of wildly improbable victories against external threats, Herzl’s project were finally to eat itself from the inside. Of course I have analogous worries (scaled up by two orders of magnitude) for the US — not to mention the UK, India, Brazil, Poland, Hungary, the Philippines … the world is now engaged in a massive test of whether Enlightenment liberalism can long endure, or whether it’s just a metastable state between one Dark Age and the next. ...

I’m happy that my good friend Zach Weinersmith (legendary author of SMBC Comics), as well as the GMU economist Bryan Caplan (rabblerousing author of The Case Against Education, which I reviewed here), have a new book out: a graphic novel that makes a moral and practical case for open borders (!).

This is so deranged that it is hard to unravel.

If you google Aaronson, you will find that almost all of the attacks on him are from the Left. His views are about 99% the same as what you would expect from a Jewish atheist leftist academic, but he is slightly more centrist on some issues, so he is attacked mercilessly by SJWs.

But he learns nothing from it.

Even tho he is a non-religious American, he obvious identifies with Jews, Israel, and Zionism much more than America. He wants open borders for America, and a Jews-only policy for Israel.

The arguments for open borders belong in a comic book, they are so ridiculous. They only make sense if you are an America-hating and Trump-hating Jew who is planning to exit to Israel anyway. He does not need to make America better for his kids, because his kids are Israeli citizens.

I’m happy that Greta Thunberg, the 15-year-old Swedish climate activist, has attracted a worldwide following and might win the Nobel Peace Prize. I hope she does — and more importantly, I hope her personal story will help galvanize the world into accepting things that it already knows are true, as with the example of Anne Frank (or for that matter, Gandhi or MLK). Confession: back when I was an adolescent, I often daydreamed about doing exactly what Thunberg is doing right now, leading a worldwide children’s climate movement. I didn’t, of course. In my defense, I wouldn’t have had the charisma for it anyway — and also, I got sidetracked by even more pressing problems, like working out the quantum query complexity of recursive Fourier sampling. But fate seems to have made an excellent choice in Thunberg. She’s not the prop of any adult — just a nerdy girl with Asperger’s who formed the idea to sit in front of Parliament every day to protest the destruction of the world, because she couldn’t understand why everyone else wasn’t.

So she is a nerdy Asperger girl with the charisma to lead a worldwide children’s climate movement in the example of Anne Frank?! He seems to be trolling us with his weirdo nerdy Jewish views, but I am pretty sure that he is completely serious.

Genetically modified monkeys are smarter

Science news:

Scientists in southern China report that they've created several transgenic macaque monkeys with extra copies of a human gene suspected of playing a role in shaping human intelligence. "According to their findings, the modified monkeys did better on a memory test involving colors and block pictures, and their brains also took longer to develop -- as those of human children do," reports MIT Technology Review. "There wasn't a difference in brain size."

This has a lot of potential. The latest estimate of world IQ is 82.

China is in the process of colonizing Africa, but is frustrated that the locals are not smart enough to follow their orders. China is probably planning on genetically engineering better slaves.

The Great Awokening

Vox essay:

The Great Awokening

A hidden shift is revolutionizing American racial politics — and could transform the future of the Democratic Party.

By Matthew Yglesias on April 1, 2019 9:25 am

For all the attention paid to the politics of the far right in the Trump era, the biggest shift in American politics is happening somewhere else entirely.

In the past five years, white liberals have moved so far to the left on questions of race and racism that they are now, on these issues, to the left of even the typical black voter.

This change amounts to a “Great Awokening” — comparable in some ways to the enormous religious foment in the white North in the years before the American Civil War. It began roughly with the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri, when activists took advantage of ubiquitous digital video and routine use of social media to expose a national audience in a visceral way to what otherwise might have been a routine local news story.

I think that this is correct. We have seen a huge awokening on the far left, but not the far right.

He is using "white liberals" to include Jews. He is 3/4 Jewish himself, with a non-Jewish name.

Siding with the Ferguson protesters was really an extreme anti-White position. It meant siding with a black thug trying to kill a white cop. The protests were fueled by blacks, the Obama administration, and Jewish news media.

The whole thing leads me to believe that we could be headed for Civil War II. I don't see how there can be any compromise with millions of people who think that it is okay to attempt to murder white cops.

There are people who falsely blame Trump for identity politics. He plays identity politics far less than most politicians. The trends to identity politics were firmly in place before he entered politics. His political success was largely caused by voters being disgusted with the identity politics of the Democrats.

Pope wants to receive values from migrants

Essay:

There is only one plausible reason for elite-managed Third World invasion: demographic aggression against Europeans in retaliation for the horrors of WWII. For centuries, whites were subjected to evolutionary selective pressures that maximized the prevalence of beneficial traits, but removed maladaptive traits from the gene pool. Not only did IQs rise, but high trust cultures fostering social cohesion and co-operative behavior were established. As a result, Europeans were able to rapidly recover from tragedies like the Mongol invasions and the Black Death. In fact, if Europe had been destroyed by a devastating thermonuclear war, the surviving whites would have still been able to recover because of their enormous social and human capital. After a few generations, the population would return to replacement levels of fertility and Western civilization would flourish once again.

Is it possible that Mongol invasions, Black Death, and World War II were actually good things?

Yes, millions died, and these events are rated among the most terrible of all time.

So was the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs.

We only got to modern civilization by systematically killing criminals and fighting bloody wars.

I don't want to see another WWII, but what if it is essential to civilization?

Interestingly enough, the greater internal weaknesses of communist regimes like the Soviet Union made them far less dangerous than their globalist counterparts. The centrally planned economy’s inability to efficiently allocate resources, as well as military expenditures vastly in excess of consumer goods spending, among other reasons, led to Soviet collapse in 1991. Cultural Marxist propaganda combined with neo-liberal capitalism is far more economically sustainable than Soviet communism; this makes it far more dangerous. At least communist ideology did not ruin ordinary Russians by destroying their way of life and culture. The Soviet version of multiculturalism, the ethnofederal model, never dissolved Russian ethnic identity to replace it with a deracinated, faceless Homo sovieticus. On the other hand, the purpose of globalist multiculturalism is total destruction of Europe by erasing its indigenous culture and reducing indigenous whites to a minority, finally wiping them out through miscegenation and race war. If there is no anti-globalist revolution in the near future, this policy will continue indefinitely, until whites one day go extinct.

Maybe we are living thru a disaster on the level of the Mongol invasions. Will today's Europe recover?

Breitbart reports:

“Migrants are those who always bring us riches. Europe itself was made by migrants! The barbarians, the Celts…,” he said. “All these came from the north and brought their cultures with them. Europe grew in this way, with the contrast of cultures.” ...

“If I have a racist heart, I have to examine why and convert,” Francis said. “Migrants must be received, accompanied, integrated. Let them receive our values and let us receive theirs, an exchange of values.”

Does he think the same about the Mongol and Islamic invaders? Previous popes were opposed to Islamic invasions.

The current Pope just wants to surrender. I don't see how he can believe in Catholicism and also believe in submitting to the values of Islamic invaders.

Fired for bringing beer to husband

Think that Ben Shapiro and The Federalist are conservative? Look at why they fired a conservative writer,
here and here.

In brief, she got a lot of very hostile attacks on Twitter because of the way she said that she fetched her husband a beer while he was watching a basketball game on TV. Then she pushed back at one of her gay critics, suggesting that he is the one with peculiar ideas about sexual relationships.

So even conservative political organizations will fire you for so-called homophobia.

This form a political correctness is now called virtue signaling. Even tho Shapiro is against homosexuality and same-sex marriage, he has to prove that he is not a bigot by firing heterosexuals for their biased opinions. This shows how far conservative organizations have sunk.

They are also ostracizing Congressman Steve King by calling him "a longtime promoter of white supremacy". This is mainly because of Jewish groups that disagree with his political opinions to limit immigration.

Keep out all Muslim refugees

NPR Radio news reports:

Despite a global refugee crisis, the United States is closing its doors. Refugee resettlement is near record lows, even for minorities whose plight the Trump administration has highlighted. ...

Muslim refugees are down by 90 percent. Jenny Yang of World Relief says the sharp reduction in refugee admissions contradicts the administration's commitment to religious freedom.

They argue that Trump says he believes in religious freedom so he should import a lot more Moslems into the USA, because some say they suffer persecution.

It is crazy to even use Islam and religious freedom in the same sentence. Islam is the opposite of religious freedom. If you want to let Moslems be Moslems, the only way to do that is to leave them in Moslem countries. Bringing Moslem refugees into the USA is just a scheme to destroy Christian religious freedom.

Speaking of religious freedom, there is an organization that thinks what we really need is anti-religious freedom, and it promotes itself with a new ad:

In the ad, Pinker urges viewers to join the FFRF in its fight to prevent religion from creeping into U.S. government. Pinker has served as FFRF’s first honorary president since 2013.

“Hi, I’m Steve Pinker. In mhey book, Enlightenment Now, I show that the world has become a better place as reason has been overcoming superstition and tribalism. But the values of the Enlightenment are under attack. That’s why I’m a proud member of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the nation’s largest association of freethinkers, working to keep the state and church separate. Please join me in supporting the Freedom From Religion Foundation to ensure that our government is driven not by religion, but by reason.”

Pinker is one of the world’s premier intellects and cognitive psychologists, and serves as the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. He’s been named on the Time 100 list of the world’s “Most Influential People.” Among his other best-selling books are The Blank Slate, The Language Instinct and How the Mind Works.

Okay, but the "values of the Enlightenment" are White Christian values. They are not Jewish, Islamic, Oriental, Indian, or African values. Pinker's message is essentially the same as that of the White supremacists. If he meant what he is saying, he would get on the Trump train, and work to keep all the Moslems out. Instead, he presents himself as a Jewish atheist Canadian leftist Harvard professor.

Pinker's latest NY Times op-ed says:

The world’s best hydro sites are already dammed.

Small wonder that a growing response to these intimidating facts is, “We’re cooked.”

But we actually have proven models for rapid decarbonization with economic and energy growth: France and Sweden. ...

They did this with nuclear power. ...

This is a realistic solution to humanity’s greatest problem.

That is "dammed", not "damned". Remember, he is a religion-hating leftist atheist.

But again, this is a White supremacist message. He wants to run the world on nuclear energy, and it goes without saying that White people should be running the program.

Saying "humanity’s greatest problem" is just a metaphor. Remember, Pinker is a psychologist, not a climate or energy scientist. Humanity's greatest problem is the threat to Western Civilization from Islam and Third World population growth and migration. Pinker is saying that Whites need to take charge and run the show.

Jews will not replace us

The Jewish NY Times has another article whining about anti-semitism and blaming Whites:

Swastikas daubed on a Jewish cemetery in France. An anti-Semitic political campaign by Hungary’s far-right government. ...

The accumulated incidents in Europe and the United States have highlighted how an ancient prejudice is surging in the 21st century in both familiar and mutant ways, fusing ideologies that otherwise would have little overlap. ...

President Trump himself embodies the contradictions of the moment. Mr. Trump has openly courted white nationalists, saying they include “some very fine people,” even as they marched in the style of the Ku Klux Klan, gave stiff-armed Nazi salutes and chanted slogans like “Jews will not replace us.” ...

At the same time, the president has boasted close relations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and offered full-throated support to Israel, including moving the United States Embassy to Jerusalem, even absent progress toward a settlement with the Palestinians.

An essential part of the Jewish religion is constant whining about how Jews are persecuted.

These stories are almost entirely hoaxes, like the Jussie Smollett story. Jews are the most privileged ethnic group in the world.

Even tho Trump is an extremely pro-Jewish President, the Jews attack him with slander and fake news at every opportunity. Just look at the above. Trump never said that white nationalists include some very fine people. You can google the quote to check for yourself. He referred to people who were peacefully protesting the removal of some war monuments.

And of course the NY Times and other Jewish news media has been telling us for two years that Trump is going to be impeached for Russian collusion.

If there is an increase in anti-Jewish activities around the world, you have to ask what the Jews are doing to provoke it. Nobody picks on a small minority for no reason. The article does not address the root causes.

Apparently a lot of people have become convinced that there is a systematic Jewish plot to marginalize White Christians, and to replace them with non-whites and non-Christians. Resistance to such a plot is the meaning of the slogan “Jews will not replace us.”

Not all Jews, of course. It is mainly the 80% of them who vote Democrat, and the 95% in the news media who have Trump derangement syndrome.

With articles like this, the NY Times shows that it is firmly on the side of Jews replacing the White population. Anyone who objects to the program is to be ostracized in strongest way. That is why the NY Times and other Jewish publications are still complaining about those Charlottesville protests, a couple of years after the fact.

Here is another complaint about Jewish persecution:

The Jerusalem Post

reports that, during the sad but risible “Israel Apartheid Week” held annually at Columbia University, left-wing flyers appeared showing Israeli soldiers as devils with horns. This equation of Jews with Satan, depicted with horns, hooves, and deformities, is, of course a medieval anti-Semitic trope of which the students must surely have been aware. Or perhaps not, given their profound ignorance of “apartheid” and their kneejerk anti-Zionism. Wikipedia says this:

The portrayal of Jews as historic enemies of Christianity and Christendom constitutes the most damaging anti-Jewish stereotype reflected in the literature of the late tenth through early twelfth centuries. Jews were often depicted as satanic consorts, or as devils themselves and “incarnation[s] of absolute evil.”

The flyer does not even show the Israeli soldier as a devil with horns. This is just another example of weirdo Jewish paranoid beliefs about how they are being persecuted.

If Jews and Christians are enemies, it is because of Jews, not Christians. Polls consistently show Christians to be supportive of Jews and Israel. The Columbia Israel-haters are leftist non-Christians. It is the Jews who seek to undermine Christianity at every opportunity.

Beyond all that, there is nothing wrong with portraying a rival religion as being aligned with the devil. The religions have very different beliefs. To believe in one is to reject the other. Freedom of religion to affirm one's beliefs necessarily includes the freedom to say that the alternatives are devilish.

Preparing for Civil War II

CH speculates:

SunBakedSurburb: [Following a separation of Red and Blue America], Bluestans will also be characterized by constant ethnic friction, continued middle class white flight, Byzantine and corrupt governments, and eventually implosion. Here in California, I see your prophecy at work.

I agree with this, btw. Bluestans would be wealthier…for a while…until the low trust society that typically characterizes Diversitopias eats away at that blue-hued human and social capital. If Redstans encourage their Divershitty to abscond for Bluestans, and Bluestans continue clinging to their virtue signaling for social status points, then it wouldn’t take long for Bluestans to get overrun by dysfunction and overwhelmed by high taxes to pay the Danegeld to their vibrancy. The Bluestans would start richer, become poorer, and finish collapsed, while the Redstans would maintain an even keel of moderate economic health and very high social health. ...

This is why I predict that if there is a blood-drenched Civil War II, it will be the fault of White libs who won’t tolerate White cons attempting a peaceful separation from them. And, unlike Civil War I when White libs had a facsimile of moral high ground to prevent secession, this time around all the moral justification will be with the FreeWhites who just want to get out from under the yoke of White lib tyranny.

A Civil War II would be a disaster, and I hope everyone tries to avoid it.

That being said, the USA is being split in ways that will not get resolved anytime soon. The war could be red states v. blue states, or whites v. non-whites, or Christians v. non-Christians, or nationalists v. globalists, or traditionalists v. reformers. If the war comes, many will have to choose sides, even tho they do not entirely agree with either side.

Judge says marital rights are fundamental

RT reports:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

“I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

Apparently the husband, wife, and judge see nothing wrong with the marriage, but some social service agency does. How did we get to this point, where govt busybodies actively use the courts to intervene into the most intimate part of a marriage?

A legal dictionary defines:

marital rights
n. an old-fashioned expression for the rights of a husband (not rights of a wife) to sexual relations with his wife and to control her operation of the household. (See: consortium, loss of consortium)

This right is not mentioned in the Wikipedia article on Rights and responsibilities of marriages in the United States. There is a lot of gay stuff instead. Apparently feminists and gays have rewritten marriage law to make it all about receiving govt monetary benefits. Surveys show that young people are less sex than ever.

Evolutionist acknowledges sex differences

Leftist-atheist-evolutionist Jerry Coyne writes:

The answer to the ideological “sexes-must-be biologically-identical” argument is simple. We should, and must, give both sexes (and all ethnic groups) complete equality of opportunity as a moral principle — for such equality is the foundation of a good society. Average differences in behavior are just that — average differences — and do not justify differential treatment of individuals, whether their groups be based on sex or ethnicity. Somehow the “blank slaters” can’t grasp that simple principle.

To be fair, blank-slaters base their ideology on biological determinism being used in the past by bigots to suppress groups, but let us remember that blank-slateism remains not science but ideology, an ideology that is not only biologically misguided but whose fears can be overcome by changes in morality.

Yes, blank-slateism is an unscientific ideology, but I question his analysis of what blank-slaters do and do not grasp.

Some feminists argue against even the possibility of men being better than women at some brain functions, and then point to research saying that women are better than men at some things. Obviously such an argument is not following science, but just some sort of female advancement ideology.

Leftists have a blind spot when they say, "complete equality of opportunity as a moral principle ... is the foundation of a good society." They take this on faith, and it often leads them to socialist ideas if taken to logical conclusions. They never really explain how such a society is better than some other society that might be better at creating wealth or happiness.

Coyne endorses this book review:

So are female and male brains the same or different? We now know that the correct answer is “yes”: They are the same or similar on average in many respects, and they are different, a little to a lot, on average in many other respects. The neuroscience behind this conclusion is now remarkably robust, and not only won’t be going away, it will only grow.

The book is downright farcical when it comes to modern animal research, simply ignoring the vast majority of it. The enormous power of animal research, of course, is that it can establish sex influences in particular on mammalian brain function (such as sex differences in risk-taking, play behavior, and responses to social defeat as just three examples) that cannot be explained by human culture, (although they may well be influenced in humans by culture.) Rippon engages in what is effectively a denial of evolution, implying to her reader that we should ignore the profound implications of animal research (“Not those bloody monkeys again!”) when trying to understand sex influences on the human brain. She is right only if you believe evolution in humans stopped at the neck.

Coyne does make a point that it is counter-productive to tell girls that they are just as smart as boys. Since men greatly outnumber women among successful scientists, it only convinces them that career advancement in the sciences is thwarted by misogyny, sexism, and harassment. So they drop out for that reason. It would be better to just tell them the truth.

Closeted support for eugenics

The Slate Star Codex Jewish psychiatrist blogger writes:

RJ Zigerell (h/t Marginal Revolution) studies public support for eugenics. He finds that about 40% of Americans support some form of eugenics. The policies discussed were very vague, like “encouraging poor criminals to have fewer children” or “encouraging intelligent people to have more children”; they did not specify what form the encouragement would take. Of note, much lack of support for eugenics was a belief that it would not work; people who believed the qualities involved were heritable were much more likely to support programs to select for them. For example, of people who thought criminality was completely genetic, a full 65% supported encouraging criminals to have fewer children.

I was surprised to hear this, because I thought of moral opposition to eugenics was basically universal. If a prominent politician tentatively supported eugenics, it would provoke a media firestorm and they would get shouted down. This would be true even if they supported the sort of generally mild, noncoercive policies the paper seems to be talking about. How do we square that with a 40% support rate?

He goes on to argue that this is a good reason to censor pro-eugenics views.

Jews are preoccupied with eugenics:

Eugenics is alive and well in Israel, although the word ‘eugenic’ is typically avoided. Glad cites an expert suggesting that the first human clones will probably be in Israel; this will occur with the support of Orthodox Jews. Yael Hashioni-Dolevshows that Israeli geneticists and the Israeli public strongly favor eugenic practices. Israeli women are “heavily pressured to engage in selection of their embryos, or, in the ultra-Orthodox community, to marry according to ‘genetic compatibility.’” This can be seen as an aspect of racial Zionism that dominates contemporary Israeli political culture. ...

The fact that Jewish activists have dominated the anti-eugenics movement in the West and that they tend to hold hostile views toward the traditional people and culture of the West suggest that their opposition to eugenics may also have another motive lurking in the background besides their hatred for anything associated with National Socialism: facilitating the genetic decline of the West as an outgroup. Jewish promotion of massive non-White immigration may also be similarly motivated, although the negative effects of non-White immigration extend far beyond a population decline in IQ (e.g., loss of political power of Whites, less willingness to contribute to public goods like health care, increase in social strife and political alienation).

This is why Jews do not want anyone talking about eugenics.

Also from that source, there are attempts to censor Australian politician Fraser Annings for talking about the root causes of the New Zealand shooting.

Europe was violently invaded, 4k years ago

The London Daily Mail reports:

A brutish tribe of people who lived in the Neolithic era more than 4,000 years ago is being touted as the most violent and aggressive society to ever live.

A growing body of evidence is convincing archaeologists that the Yamnaya society ruthlessly massacred opposing societies.

It is believed the primitive society capitalised on disease, warfare and famine and unceremoniously swept through Europe, destroying entire civilisations and leaving destruction in their wake.

DNA evidence from several prehistoric burial sites has revealed hoards of these tall, muscular and violent warriors would overwhelm other societies on horseback.

They would murder men and sire their own children so that within a few generations the presence of the previous societies is all but eradicated. ...

They made their way to Britain and within a few generations there was no remains of the previous inhabitants who built Stonehenge in the genetic record

This is only the most violent because we don't have written records of the other invasions.

Yes, the invaders killed the men and raped the women. That is what invaders do.

The NY Times version of this story is that peaceful "egalitarian" "Iberian farmers" accepted immigrants in a "political process", including "intermarrying" with nomads.

Remember that the next time you read a NY Times story about a political process for assimilating immigrants and letting them intermarry with the natives. The newspaper might have a little different idea about how these things work.

Why Asian men are NOT seen as attractive

I just watched: Blackpill 101- The REAL reason why Asian men are NOT seen as attractive.

I was going to say that it was eye-opening, but maybe that would be offensive. Actually, the whole video is offensive.

It is about Orientals. It does not discuss those from Russia or India.

A lot of people see a White man with an Oriental woman, and assume that White men prefer Oriental women. As this video explains, the truth is the opposite. It is the Oriental women who prefer the White men.

The video is entirely about physical characteristics, but that is only part of the story. There are reasons of personality, family, and culture.

I have heard women say something like:

I would never marry a Chinese man. If you marry a Chinese man, you marry his whole family. His parents will move into the house. Nothing you do will ever be good enough for them. Your in-laws will run your life. It is better to marry some American white man who has abandoned his parents.

I suspect that this perception is a much bigger factor than those facial characteristics.

Latino rejects white women

A Latino of some sort writes a NY Times essay:

O.K., let me just get to it. I think I broke up with my last girlfriend because she’s white. Actually, no, I definitely broke up with her because she’s white. ...

But the real reason I think I can no longer date white women isn’t any of that. It’s because in today’s hashtag-woke society, there is mad pressure to be hashtag-woke. To be aware of the implications of whom you’re attracted to and why. Which means that in the eyes of others, the color of the women I date is a big deal. Like I’m the problem. Like I’m betraying my people if I date white women. ...

I started reading James Baldwin, Ta-Nehisi Coates and other black and brown authors looking for guidance, a road map, help on what it means to be a brown man in the world. Like: Yes, our bodies have been colonized. Yes, I am a child of blackness. ...

Before I was born, my mother told my father she was pregnant at 3 a.m. on a New York City subway platform. She and my pops made a commitment to give us children everything they never had, to strive and achieve and provide for us, and in response to their aspiration, some in their world thought they were leaving their roots behind and trying to become something else. Those folks said to them, “You trying to be white now?”

Increasingly, the word "woke" means anti-White.

Note that there is no mention of the damage he has done to whites by defiling their women. His only allegiances are to brown people.

The NY Times is always looking for ways to generate racial conflicts. It also has an editorial on how blackface "underwrote a white supremacist impulse that metastasized into every aspect of American life." No, this is just crazy Jewish propaganda to create racial divisions between blacks and whites.

Magazines attack neocon Ben Shapiro

Quillette is an online political magazine. Some people think that it is right-wing, because it is not overrun with leftist SJWs, but it is not. Currently it trashes Ben Shapiro's book:

This also allows Shapiro to skirt the obvious hostility the church showed toward intellectual inquiry for centuries. Shapiro writes as if the church had never banned a book or burned a heretic:

Contrary to popular opinion, new discoveries weren’t invariably seen as heretical or dangerous to the dominion of the Church; in fact, the Church often supported scientific investigation.

The Church was indeed the only place where any kind of inquiry could be conducted at the time. It was the only place where people were literate and enjoyed steady funding and access to instruments. But the Church only encouraged inquiry to the extent that it could reinforce and expand its own doctrine, which is a bit like the state telling you that you are free to make whatever art you like, just as long as you don’t criticize the regime. The first major scientific challenge to the Church was heliocentrism. ...

In fact, Copernicus had finished his treatise years earlier (there are records indicating that the manuscript had been completed as early as the 1530s), but he withheld it, aware that its publication could be life-threatening, and circulated only a few anonymous copies to his close friends.

No, this is just foolish anti-Catholic propaganda. The Copernicus story is rebutted here:

The myth that Copernicus feared religious persecution and delayed publication of his book as a result is nonsense. He was part of a late medieval/early modern culture that was already questioning the Ptolemaic and Aristotelian orthodoxy and looking for a more elegant and precise mathematical underpinning for astronomy. He did not keep his theories secret and was strongly encouraged and supported in his work by leading churchmen, including several bishops, three cardinals and the Pope. His hesitation came from his correct perception that Aristotelian scholastics would reject his thesis primarily on physical grounds, though their synthesis of that physics with theology would also be a motivator. Finally, when he did publish his work the religious objections were few and far outweighed by scientific ones until the discoveries of the seventeenth century slowly turned the consensus in the favour of heliocentrism.

As far as I know, the Church never did ban a book or burn a heretic. Some witches and other heretics were burned by the civil authorities in Catholic countries, but not by the Church.

The Copernicus book was placed on a list indicating that nine sentences were inconsistent with Church teachings. The book continued to be available in Catholic countries, with an understanding that those nine sentenced ought to be corrected.

The Church was more tolerant of adverse opinions than Facebook is today.

Meanwhile, Shapiro denies that he is alt-right. Reason mag explains:

My forthcoming book, Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump (pre-order here), includes an entire chapter on the alt-right. I covered some of their rallies and interviewed prominent members, including their best-known leader, Richard Spencer. In brief, the alt-right is a white nationalist movement that promotes an identitarian worldview: They think a person's worth is determined by his membership in a race-based group. ...

Needless to say, these are ugly and overtly racist beliefs. They are also at odds with what Shapiro, as a Jewish man, represents.

No, it is not at odds with Shapiro represents. Shapiro is very much a Jewish nationalist who promotes and identitarian worldview. To him, a person's worth is determined by his Jewishness.

It is true that Shapiro attacks identity politics in non-Jews, but most people care only about their own ethnic group, and do not support other ethnic divisions.

Most of the Left is also consumed with identity politics. So promoting an identitarian worldview is not what defines the alt-right. Most of the alt-right is much less identitarian than most Democrats, Jews, blacks, orientals, Mexicans, and others.

Shapiro is an orthodox Jew, and so is much more conservative that the more visible secular leftist Jews who control the Democrat party and the news media. So it is more accurate to call him Jewish neo-con than alt-right.

Finns are too nice for their own good

A new book says that Finns are too nice for their own good. Their leaders nearly sold them out to the Communists. They survived that, but now they are being sold out to the Moslem invaders, and their nation is being destroyed.

This isn't just a matter of differing religious beliefs. Finns have evolved to have a society that only works if they are kept free of certain types of predators.

If this book is right, then Finns have a choice: either expel the Moslems, or watch Moslems slowly take over and make Finland more Lebanon.

I have no idea what the Finns will do, but it seems likely that some European countries will go Moslem, and some will expel the Moslems. We are headed for war, unless someone figures out more sensible policies.

Facebook bans White pride

Mark Zuckerberg endorsed White Genocide.

Facebook announces:

Today we’re announcing a ban on praise, support and representation of white nationalism and separatism on Facebook and Instagram, which we’ll start enforcing next week. It’s clear that these concepts are deeply linked to organized hate groups and have no place on our services.

Our policies have long prohibited hateful treatment of people based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity or religion — and that has always included white supremacy. We didn’t originally apply the same rationale to expressions of white nationalism and separatism because we were thinking about broader concepts of nationalism and separatism — things like American pride and Basque separatism, which are an important part of people’s identity.

But over the past three months our conversations with members of civil society and academics who are experts in race relations around the world have confirmed that white nationalism and separatism cannot be meaningfully separated from white supremacy and organized hate groups. Our own review of hate figures and organizations – as defined by our Dangerous Individuals & Organizations policy – further revealed the overlap between white nationalism and separatism and white supremacy. Going forward, while people will still be able to demonstrate pride in their ethnic heritage, we will not tolerate praise or support for white nationalism and separatism.

So if you identify as Basque and prefer the company of other Basques, then FB welcomes you to use its platform to promote your goals.

But if you identify as White and prefer White culture, then FB will block you.

When the Chinese Communists censor Tibetan culture, the United Nations calls it genocide.

Soon the FB users will be using code words to get past the censors, and then the censors will be banning all sorts of innocuous postings, such as the OK sign.

Any anti-immigration opinion could be banned as White supremacist. So could any praise for Western Civilization. So could any argument that Christianity is superior to Islam.

I occasionally hear Silicon Valley leftists argue for Net Neutrality laws, because they say that no platform should impede anyone's content. But they approve of anti-White censorship.

At the same time it is becoming illegal to be a White nationalist, it is becoming illegal to oppose Jewish nationalism.

The Democrat Party is going full anti-White, and here is what Whites have to say to keep up:

The former vice-president Joe Biden condemned “a white man’s culture” on Tuesday night as he lashed out against violence against women and, more specifically, regretted his role in the supreme court confirmation hearings that undermined Anita Hill’s credibility nearly three decades ago.

Biden, a Democratic presidential prospect who often highlights his white working-class roots, said Hill, who is African American, should not have been forced to face a panel of “a bunch of white guys”.

“To this day I regret I couldn’t come up with a way to give her the kind of hearing she deserved,” he said, echoing comments he delivered last fall as the nation debated sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh amid his supreme court confirmation hearing.

Later in his Tuesday remarks, Biden called on Americans to “change the culture” that dates back centuries and allows pervasive violence against women. “It’s an English jurisprudential culture, a white man’s culture. It’s got to change,” Biden said.

Any disagreement with this crazy opinion is likely to be labeled white-supremacist by FB.

Biden is doomed, of course. Those polls make him look good because people think that he is a centrist Democrat who is electable. But if he runs, his faults will be apparent to all. All white men will despise him. So will MeToo women and non-whites. He will get destroyed in the primaries.

Update: A day after posting this, the MeToo attacks on Biden have begun.

Ireland and England abandon Christianity

Europe used to be Christian, but that is ending. See this:

Even throughout most of the 20th century, the Catholic Church and Ireland were so intertwined that in 1936, an updated preamble to the Irish constitution began: “In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority and to Whom, as our final end, all actions both of men and States must be referred…”

But in the past 20 or so years, all of that has changed. The Irish have collectively turned their backs on the Catholic Church. Gone are any references to the Trinity in the constitution. Church attendance is way down, as are vocations, and divorce is up.

And this:

The Church of Englandhas attacked the Home Office for using Bible quotes to argue that Christianity is not a peaceful religion in a bid to reject an asylum seeker.

The Iranian national, who has not been identified, claimed asylum in 2016 but his application was rejected after government officials said his conversion from Islam was “inconsistent” with his claim that Christianity is a peaceful religion.

In order to reiterate the point, the Home Office wrote a lengthy and “unbelievably offensive” refusal letter referencing six Bible passages and claiming that the book of Revelation is filled with “images of revenge, destruction, death and violence”.

The Home Office rejection, below the quoted verses concludes: “These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a 'peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge.”

I can understand rejecting an Iranian asylum seeking for many other reasons, but this is ridiculous. Islam believes in killing infidels, and Christianity does not. The entire history of Islam is to use violence to attack its enemies, while Christian use of violence has been in self-defense. It is absurd to rely on the book of Revelation for examples.

Mag says USA is White Supremacist

An Atlantic mag article makes a detailed case that the USA is a white supremacist nation, and always has been. It was so extreme that it was an inspiration to the German Nazis:

What the Nazis “found exciting about the American model didn’t involve just eugenics,” observes James Q. Whitman, a professor at Yale Law School and the author of Hitler’s American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law (2017). “It also involved the systematic degradation of Jim Crow, of American deprivation of basic rights of citizenship like voting.” Nazi lawyers carefully studied how the United States, despite its pretense of equal citizenship, had effectively denied that status to those who were not white. They looked at Supreme Court decisions that withheld full citizenship rights from nonwhite subjects in U.S. colonial territories. They examined cases that drew...arbitrary but hard lines around who could be considered “white.” The Nazis reviewed the infamous “one-drop rule,” which defined anyone with any trace of African blood as black, and “found American law on mongrelization too harsh to be embraced by the Third Reich.”

I also sometimes see the argument that the USA represented the idea that all people are equal.

Which is it?

I realize that the magazine is run by white-haters who are always looking for excuses to transfer wealth from whites to non-whites, but these articles might have the opposite effect.

If the USA has always been a white supremacist nation, with non-whites always being unwelcome visitors, then maybe it should expel all the non-whites. That might be the inference.

I think that is why the white-haters usually claim that the USA is dedicated to the equality of all people. But that seems to be changing. Now Democrat candidates are openly pushing for whites to pay reparations to non-whites.

Volvo announces:

Head of R&D Henrik Green said cameras will be installed on all Volvo models built on its SPA2 platform for larger cars, starting from the XC90 SUV in the early part of the next decade, before being added to smaller cars built on its CMA platform. Volvo said intervention if the driver is found to be drunk, tired or distracted by checking a mobile phone - among the biggest factors in accidents - could involve limiting the car's speed, alerting the Volvo on Call assistance service, or slowing down and parking the car.

Before long, these devices will also check for racist speech. Blacks will be allowed to use the N-word, but if a white driver uses it, then the car will slow down, park, lock the doors, and alert the authorities.

Aziz attacks Whites in NY Times

Muslim writer Omer Aziz writes this NY Times op-ed:

TORONTO — Whenever someone used to ask me if I was Muslim, I often gave an evasive answer, something like, “I was born Muslim” or “My parents are Muslim.”

It was a strange way to phrase it. I told myself that the purpose of this hairsplitting was intellectual clarity, despite the fact that I had attended a mosque my entire childhood, that I had read the Quran in both Arabic and English, and that I felt personally connected to the history of Islam. Perhaps this was the natural recourse for someone who came of age after 9/11 and was taught to retreat into invisibility because of the dangers of being Muslim. I knew, in my heart, that I was drawing the distinction only to appear safer to white people, ...

There was a time when I was ashamed of my religion, ashamed of my heritage. Now I am ashamed only of having once felt this way.

“If one is attacked as a Jew,” Hannah Arendt wrote, “one must defend oneself as a Jew.” When you are attacked as a Muslim, you must respond as a Muslim. And today, we are all Muslims

The strange thing is that he describes himself as having been born into a religion of hating white people.

His skin is not even particularly brown, and he is caucasian. He apparently identifies whites with Christians, and identifies as non-white for reasons similar to those of Jews who identify as non-white.

He doesn't say whether he believes in Allah or the Koran. He just says that he was born with a tribal loyalty to brown Muslims, and with a hatred for white people.

He does not say whether he is in favor of killing infidels.

This is what those who are suspicious of Muslims cannot grasp: that the definition of racism is an inability to discriminate between the old man with the skullcap and beard before you and the suicide-bomber you saw on TV.

And yet he goes on to blame peaceful white people for the violence of others.

And yet people with millions of online followers have been incessantly preaching that Islamophobia is not the problem; Islam is. The Canadian intellectual Jordan Peterson has said that Islamophobia is a “word created by fascists.” The neuroscientist Sam Harris called it an “intellectual blood libel” that serves only to shield Islam from criticism. After I wrote a series of articles critical of Mr. Harris, a young white man from California emailed me to tell me he carried a gun — what kind did I carry? he asked.

How did he know that the email sender was "a young white man"? If it were really an anonymous threat, I doubt that he identified his race.

No, Aziz just blames white men for everything he doesn't like.

Peterson actually said: "Islamophobia: a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons". Yes, Aziz is a coward trying to manipulate morons. Literally, Islamophobia is an irrational fear of Islam, but nobody has that.

Aziz really triggered Harris somehow. Harris spent hours trashing him on his podcast, and just posted another podcast trashing him. Harris recognizes Islam as evil, but throws a tantrum if not everyone respects his motives as being pure.

Listening to Aziz convinces me that he sides with all the evils of Islam, and hates white people. Listening to Harris convinces me that he is a dishonest jerk.

If Islam is the problem, perhaps we should keep an eye on these Muslims. Send patrols into their neighborhoods. Make them prove that they are not terrorists. Ban them, as President Trump wanted. Ideas are not harmless: They are taken seriously by thousands of people. If only one person applies these deranged ideas about the other to the real world, we get a mass-murder like the one we just witnessed.

Islamic ideas are especially harmful, and lead to the murder of millions.

The NY Times likes to publish rants like this against White Christians. It would never similarly attack another ethnic group, because of a belief that Jews should align with non-whites against whites.

Famous philosophers described European Christianity

A NY Times op-ed writes:

Popkin wrote that Voltaire challenged the biblical account of human history by asserting that only the Jews were descendants of Adam, and “everybody else pre-Adamites, though the non-European ones were degenerate or inferior to the European ones. Voltaire saw the Adamites as a major menace to European civilization, since they kept infecting it with what he considered the horrible immorality of the Bible. Voltaire therefore insisted that Europe should separate itself from the Adamites, and seek its roots and heritage and ideals in the best of the pre-Adamite world — for him, the Hellenic world.”

Polygenetic racists, such as Hume and Voltaire, regarded the differences between European Christians and others as immutable, because they derived from separate ancestry rather than contingent environmental factors.

Kant, too, thought that Jews had immutable traits that made them inferior to Christians. According to the scholar Michael Mack, “Though Kant emphasized the common origin of all men, to avoid attacking the biblical account of creation. … He set out to substantiate his notion of a ‘Jewish essence’ with recourse to the image of an inseparable tie that bound the Jews immutably to Jehovah.”

For Kant, this tie rendered Jews “heteronomous” or incapable of transcending material forces, which a moral order required. In this way, Jews are the opposite of autonomous, rational Christians, and are therefore incapable of being incorporated into an ethical Christian society. Mack, in his 2003 book “German Idealism and the Jew,” wrote that Kant “attempted to remove Christianity’s Judaic foundations” by recasting Christian history as a revolutionary or radical parting from Judaism. Mack noted that Kant, in his “Anthropology,” called the Jews “a nation of cheaters” and depicted them as “a group that has followed not the path of transcendental freedom but that of enslavement to the material world.” ...

The Harvard philosopher William Hocking is alleged to have said that “the Jewish mind could not properly interpret and teach the philosophy and history of Western Christian civilization.”

The author does not rebut any of these points, but implies that they make the subject hopelessly political.

If the differences were mutable, then I would expect that the centuries-old opinions to be comically irrelevant today. Probably some of them are.

I am sure these philosophers are overrated, and they were wrong on a lot of things. But if they were wrong, then prove them wrong. Instead it appears that they will just be banned because Jews don't like what they said about Jews.

NY Times confirms White Genocide

NY Times columnist and white-hater Farhad Manjoo writes:

“The Great Replacement” is a racist and misogynistic conspiracy theory that holds that white people face existential decline, even extinction, because of rising immigration in the West and falling birthrates among white women (caused, of course, by feminism). ...

“White genocide” was one branding possibility, but that label has failed to take off — perhaps because a claim of “genocide” requires unmistakable mass death, and what we’re talking about here is gradual, peaceful demographic change.

Actually the commonly accepted definitions of genocide do not require mass death:

Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people (usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group) in whole or in part. The hybrid word "genocide" is a combination of the Greek word γένος ("race, people") and the Latin suffix -caedo ("act of killing").[1] The United Nations Genocide Convention, which was established in 1948, defines genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".

Manjoo goes on to make these points: (1) white numbers will not decline so much if mixed race people identify as white; (2) whites are still doing much better than blacks; and (3) whites will still have a majority in the 2036 election.

Okay, I accept these points, but they do not rebut the argument that there is a systematic set of policies to destroy white people in part, and replace them with non-whites.

We need a new Black Death

Philip Greenspun writes:

Let’s consider the political goals of righteous Americans today:

• higher wages for the average person
• an improved environment with less human impact on the land
• less concentration of wealth in the hands of real property owners
• more affordable housing for the working class

While listening to An Economic History of the World since 1400 by Professor Donald J. Harreld, I learned that all of the above goals were achieved in the 14th century via the Black Death, which reduced the European population by approximately one third.

• wages for workers, including unskilled agricultural workers, increased as much as 40-50 percent
• food prices fell
• land and housing prices fell
• the least productive farmland was allowed to return to natural forest (contrast to conditions before, from the course notes: “By about 1300, Europeans had just about all arable land under cultivation, including marginal and poorly producing lands, to sustain the growing population”)

Is it fair to think of immigration as the reverse of the Black Death? We’re dramatically growing our population via immigrants and children of immigrants (see “Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S., Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065” (Pew)).

What seems surprising, then, is that the people who say that they want to see all of the economic results of the Black Death simultaneously say that they want to adjust U.S. demographics in precisely the opposite direction of the Black Death. Slowing or stopping immigration will not do the trick. We need something with the economic effect of the medieval Black Death.

Humans and chimps are not really so similar

From an Interview with a Geneticist:

My motivation started when I arrived here and was given the task of researching the human-chimpanzee similarity issue because people ask about this in churches. They hear the claim that humans and chimps are 98 to 99% similar. People want to know if that’s true. ...

It’s very important to theoretical evolutionists. ... Their statistical models need that 98 to 99% similarity. ...

Based on my work, I’m seeing not more than an 85% DNA similarity of chimpanzee to human, and that’s a maximum. It’s probably less than that. ...

There’ve been some recent biomedical researchers showing that any two human genomes could be 4.5% different from each other. We used to think that human genomes were only 99.9% similar to each other. But if we take the structural differences into account, there’s a 4.5% difference between humans. How then can we be 99% similar to a chimp? It’s totally nonsense.

You often hear that the human genome has been completely sequenced, but it has really been only 95% sequenced.

I got this from a creationist site, so you might want to confirm it with evolutionists.

I have cited that 98%+ similarity on this blog myself. I did not realize that the figure might be bogus. I was duped. I am happy to correct myself.

Yang goes for Neo-Nazi vote

Now that the White Supremacists have abandoned President Trump, many are switching to a Chinese-American:

Andrew Yang: White people will be shooting up Asian churches within a generation ...

Democratic presidential hopeful Andrew Yang is finding a growing surge of online grassroots support for his longshot campaign in the form of memes.

The 44-year-old serial entrepreneur’s online supporters, known as the Yang Gang, have started meme pages on Reddit, Twitter, and 4chan, placing Yang’s image on popular meme templates. The profile of Yang memes exploded last month after his appearance on the “Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, which is a favorite show within the meme community.

Yang’s popularity is attributable in part to his universal basic income proposal, the centerpiece of his campaign, which entails giving every adult in the country $1,000 a month. The policy proposal is popular among a mostly white and male meme and gamer culture which shares Yang’s concern for jobs being lost to automation.

Yang is obviously trolling us by saying White people will be shooting up Asian churches. It is so obviously ridiculous that he must be appealing to the moral superiority of White people.

Here is another tell:

Outsider presidential hopeful Andrew Yang’s latest idea is both literally and figuratively his most unorthodox yet: He’s taking a strong public stance against circumcision.

The Democratic candidate revealed in a little-noticed tweet last week that he was against the ritualized practice of cutting a newborn’s foreskin.

Yang does not dare criticize the Jews, so he says this instead. Being against circumcision is just another way of saying that the Jews are a barbaric and emasculating tribe. David Duke now supports Yang.

Islam is not like any other faith

I quoted the NY Times attacking Australian Senator Fraser Anning, but it is only fair to quote what he said:

"I am utterly opposed to any form of violence within our community and I totally condemn the actions of the gunman"

"However whilst this kind of violent vigilantism can never be justified what it highlights in the growing fear within our community, both in Australia and New Zealand, of the increasing muslim presence."

"As always, left-wing politicians and the media will rush to claim that the causes of today's shootings lie with gun laws or those who hold nationalist views but this is all cliched nonsense."

"The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim Fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place"

"Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators. World-wide, Muslims are killing people in the name of their faith on an industrial scale."

"The entire religion of Islam is simply the violent ideology of a sixth century despot masquerading as a religious leader, which justifies endless war against anyone who opposes it and calls for the murder of unbelievers and apostates."

"The truth is that Islam is not like any other faith. It is the religious equivalent of fascism. And just because the followers of this savage belief were not the killers in this instance does not make them blameless"

"As we read in Matthew 26:52, 'all they that take the sword, shall perish by the sword' and those who follow a violent religion that calls on them to murder us, cannot be too surprised when someone takes them at their word and responds in kind,.."

A copy is also here.

There is a war going on between Islam and Western Civilization, and for the most part, West Civ is not shooting back.

The killer's manifesto is not aimed at conservatives. He hates conservatives and has a low opinion of President Trump. His purpose is to trigger liberals in the news media, and they appear to be triggered exactly as he intended. They are following his wishes.

There are plenty of articles denouncing him, of course. The Wash. Post attacks him:

Sturtevant counted 18 references to the Middle Ages in the markings and writing on the arsenal that belonged to Brenton Harrison Tarrant, the 28-year-old Australian charged in Friday’s New Zealand rampage.

There is, of course, the sun wheel, or black sun, symbols seen in photos Tarrant allegedly posted to the Internet before the shooting. The symbol became associated with the Third Reich after Heinrich Himmler decorated a castle with it. ...

There were also numerous references on the suspected shooter’s weapons to medieval battles and figures, including four names of medieval Serbs who fought against the Muslim Ottomans, two Hungarian military leaders who fought the Ottomans, and numerous references to the Crusades, when Christian armies from Europe tried to seize the Holy Land from Muslims during the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries. ...

One name in particular stood out to Sturtevant: Charles Martel. Martel was a real person in history, credited with defeating the last organized army headed by a Muslim ruler to attempt to invade what is now France at the Battle of Tours in 732.

I kept reading to see if Tarrant or anyone else were misrepresenting these symbols. Instead it says:

“White supremacists imagine the Middle Ages as a time when Europe was all white, separated from its neighbors and in constant conflict with those that it deemed to be outsiders,” Sturtevant said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.”

In medieval Sicily, Christians, Muslims and Jews were “living and working together side by side,” Sturtevant said. In 7th-century England, the well-respected archbishop of Canterbury was from Turkey, ... Pilgrimage books listed travelers as hailing from “India” — though this was probably just a fill-in for anywhere in the Middle East.

Turkey was part of the Roman Empire. Travelers came from distant lands. What is the point?

So maybe Europe was only 98% White. Maybe some Muslims lived on a island somewhere. I guess that would disprove someone saying that Europe was 100% White or 100% Christian, but who said that?

I would think that when the Wash. Post tries to discredit white supremacists, it could do a better job than this. White supremacists are likely to just see this as confirmation of their beliefs.

Jews want to eliminate Amalek's modern heirs

One of the chief Jewish columnists at the NY Times tweeted:

This shabbat is called the sabbath of remembrance, in which Jews are asked to remember – and to blot out – the nation of Amalek, infamous for murdering the weakest, most defenseless Israelites. Among Amalek's modern heirs: The terrorists who gunned down innocents in New Zealand.

  — Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) March 15, 2019

What? Jews apparently have a belief that they should exterminate their enemy tribes. I never heard of Amaleks, but Jews have a myth that they did some harm to Jews 1000s of years ago, and now Jews must kill them all.

If the Amaleks have any modern heirs, then they have to be killed also. Weiss says they do -- the New Zealand shooter.

Okay, fine, Jews have always sought revenge killings, but the shooter was White and the targets were Moslem. What did Jews have to do with it?

It appears to me that she is saying that the Jews at the NY Times want to exterminate the White race. And it is all for some perceived grievance from 1000s of years ago.

Bishop convicted, 23 years later

The NY Times reports:

George Pell, an Australian cardinal who was the Vatican’s chief financial officer and an adviser to Pope Francis, was sentenced to six years in prison on Wednesday, for molesting two boys after Sunday Mass in 1996.

The cardinal was convicted on five counts in December, making him the most senior Catholic official — and the first bishop — to be found guilty in a criminal court for sexually abusing minors, according to BishopAccountability.org, which tracks cases of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy.

There is a lot of talk about allegations like this, but convictions are extremely rare.

Here is a very high profile case. But the conviction is based on the testimony of one anonymous kid who suddenly remembers it and files a claim 23 years later. There is no physical or objective evidence.

I don't know if he did it or not. But I don't see how anyone else can know either.

NY Times uses shooting to demonize whites

The NY Times hired a Moslem to complain about the New Zealand shooting:

In his manifesto, the gunman, who referred to himself as a “regular white man,” wrote that he was carrying out the attack to “directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves.”

The manifesto reveals an obsession with white supremacy, discussing the Battle of Vienna in 1683, which is glorified by white nationalists and Mr. Breivik as the critical moment when Europe staved off the Ottoman Empire’s advance and protected itself from Islam.

Not just white nationalists. If the Moslems had succeeded in invading Europe, then modern civilization as we know it today would not exist.

In 2015, a movement called Reclaim Australia organized protests against the “enforcing of Shariah law in Australia” and “the teaching of Islam in government schools.” The Conversation reported that placards displayed by the group at a rally read “Islam is an enemy of the West.” A key policy goal of the far-right political party Australian Liberty Alliance is to “stop the Islamization of Australia.” Its website warns, “Islam is not merely a religion, it is a totalitarian ideology with global aspirations.”

While Australia’s prime minister, Scott Morrison, described the suspect as “an extremist, right-wing, violent terrorist,” an Australian senator, Fraser Anning, responded to the Christchurch attack by blaming “the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place.”

If you are an Australian, you can be either for or against the Islamization of your nation. Being for it, means favoring the subjugation of your grandchildren. Being against it gets you labeled a far right extremist.

It is true that Islam is not merely a religion. Any follower of Islam will tell you that.

Among white nationalists’ major motivators is “the great replacement” conspiracy theory. They fear that Jews, blacks and Muslims will replace white people and eventually subordinate them. Jews are often viewed as the diabolical head of the cabal, the nerve center, who use their infinite wealth and power to reduce and weaken the white man.

Just read the NY Times, or any other Jewish news source. They advocate the replacement of white people every day.

Representative Steve King, an Iowa Republican, recently asked, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive? He once tweeted, “We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies,”

Yes, the Jews and Moslems plainly do want to replace our civilization with somebody else's babies.

These entities have worked together to reinforce the message that Muslims Americans are inherently radical and represent a “demographic time bomb” that will overtake the white population.

I am not so worried about the Moslem-Americans who are radicals. I am worried about the ones who believe the same things that Moslems have believed for a millennium.

New Zealand shooter's manifesto

The biggest news story is the New Zealand mosque attack, and everyone wants to know the reasons. Here is a shooter's manifesto:

Why did you carry out the attack?

To most of all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people.

To take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history.

To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers.

To take revenge for the thousands of European lives lost to terror attacks throughout European lands.

To take revenge for Ebba Akerlund.

To directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves.

To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result.

To incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil.

To avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up.

To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash.

To show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.A path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone.

To create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic,powerful and revolutionary action can occur.

To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought.

To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force.

Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.

This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream.

Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA’s ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again (where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe).

Ebba Akerlund was an 11-year-old Swede, murdered by Islamic terrorists.

I certainly do not agree with a terrorist attack like this, and it is hard to see how he is helping the cause that he claims to promote. I am just posting this because the news articles I saw did not explain the motives.

Update: It is also here.

Update: This is now banned in New Zealand:

New Zealand’s chief censor has banned a document shared by the man allegedly responsible for killing 50 people in two Christchurch mosques. Meanwhile, more than 1,000 people so far have opted to hand in their weapons following a ban on assault rifles and military-style semi-automatics (MSSAs).

David Shanks, the chief censor, officially classed the so-called manifesto as “objectionable” and told anyone in possession of it to destroy it.

“There is an important distinction to be made between ‘hate speech,’ which may be rejected by many right-thinking people, but which is legal to express, and this type of publication, which is deliberately constructed to inspire further murder and terrorism,” Shanks said in making his decision.

He said the document “crosses the line” by promoting, encouraging and justifying acts of murder and terrorist violence against identified groups of people.

“New Zealanders can all play a part in denying those who exhort hatred, killing and terror,” Shanks said. “Do not support the murderous objectives of its author by republishing or distributing it.”

I did not know that NZ had a "chief censor".

It appears to me that the NZ authorities are doing just what the killer wanted them to do. He said he wanted to create conflict over gun rights, and they are complying. Perhaps they don't want the public to know that.

Closet Neo-Nazi Public Intellectuals

Jerry Coyne wonders why Steve Pinker is hated so much, while he sees only admirable qualities.

I think I know. Suppose you are a neo-nazi. Neo-nazis exist only in the imagination of left-wingers, but pretend anyway. Who are you idols going be, with no public figures being neo-nazis?

You are going to admire the ones who emit neo-nazi dog whistles. The leaders are Steve Pinker, Presidential candidate Andrew Yang, and (pseudonymous) psychiatrist blogger Scott Alexander.

Yes, all three are leftists, but the original Nazis were left-wing socialists also.

I mentioned the possibility that Pinker could be a White supremacist. He denies it, of course, and so do Yang and Pinker. But they would have to, or their careers would be terminated.

Again, I don't believe these guys are neo-nazis. But they do demonstrate a willingness to deviate from leftist groupthink.

Apparently these guys already get a lot of heat from the Ctrl-Left for being neo-nazi sympathizers, or even just right-wing sympathizers, and I don't want to add to it. I commend them for being leftists who are willing to think for themselves.

Alexander, aka SlateStarCodex, writes:

This post is called “RIP Culture War Thread”, so you may have already guessed things went south. What happened? The short version is: a bunch of people harassed and threatened me for my role in hosting it, I had a nervous breakdown, and I asked the moderators to get rid of it.

I’ll get to the long version eventually, but first I want to stress that this isn’t just my story. It’s the story of everyone who’s tried to host a space for political discussion on the Internet. Take the New York Times, in particular their article Why No Comments? It’s A Matter Of Resources. Translated from corporate-speak, it basically says that unmoderated comment sections had too many “trolls”, so they decided to switch to moderated comment sections only, but they don’t have enough resources to moderate any controversial articles, so commenting on controversial articles is banned.

And it’s not just the New York Times. In the past five years, CNN, NPR, The Atlantic, Vice, Bloomberg, Motherboard, and almost every other major news source has closed their comments – usually accompanied by weird corporate-speak about how “because we really value conversations, we are closing our comment section forever effective immediately”.

He says this, even tho his commenters were overwhelmingly leftist, and comments were easy to moderate. The problem is that there will be some opinions that the Ctrl-Left cannot tolerate.