Sunday, November 17, 2019

Revenge of the Deep State

NY Times opinion headline:
Trump Demeaned Bureaucrats. This Is Their Revenge.
Ahh, that is what impeachment is all about. Deep State bureaucrats with foreign ethnic allegiances seemed to have gotten authority over policy with Ukraine, but Pres. Trump upset their plans. A female Russian-American had her feelings hurt when she was reassigned. Now they are getting their revenge by testifying against Trump at the Schiff hearings. From a NY Times editorial:
Representative Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, interrupted the questioning to let the ambassador know that the president was attacking her.

After reading Ms. Yovanovitch one of the belligerent tweets, Mr. Schiff asked: “What effect do you think that has on other witnesses’ willingness to come forward and expose wrongdoing?”

“Well, it’s very intimidating,” she said, visibly shaken.

Mr. Schiff assured her that “some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously.”

Translation: The president may just have earned himself an article of impeachment.
Really? Trump tweets a criticism of a traitorous incompetent Democrat stooge, Schiff reads it to her during her testimony, and the NY Times says that this is grounds for impeaching Trump!

News reports of this criticism cited other examples of Trump criticizing his enemies, as if there is something wrong with that.

If Trump has erred, it has been in tolerating his enemies much more than he should. Apparently his administration is filled with swamp-dwellers who actively work to undermine his agenda.

Saturday, November 16, 2019

NY Times versus Western Civ

The NY Times token bisexual black opinion columnist writes:
“When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization — any kind of civilization — disappears.” ...

VDARE is preoccupied with “white genocide” — the myth that nonwhites are working to destroy white people through immigration and intermarriage ...

“the parallels” between Pope Francis’s pro-refugee statements and “The Camp of the Saints,” a 1973 novel by the French author Jean Raspail. In the book, an influx of Indian refugees — described as subhuman and led by a feces-eating demagogue — storm France, killing, stealing and rampaging until they’ve completely occupied the country. Other migrants follow and eventually overrun western Europe, turning white Europeans into a subject class. The book is popular with white nationalists and is mentioned frequently on VDARE and the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website. ...

Republicans stuck with President Trump in 2017 when he defended the “Unite the Right” protesters in Charlottesville, Va., and they stuck with him in 2018 when he denounced “shithole” countries. They stuck with him through family separation, and they’re sticking with him as he keeps thousands of children in detention.
Black people do not read the NY Times. This guy has a job because he is attacking Pres. Trump, and Western Civ.

It is amusing to see the NY Times publish plugs for Daily Stormer and VDARE, and calling White Genocide a myth.

Of course the lede stories in the paper are on how some pathetic Russian-American diplomat had her feelings hurt when some Ukrainians spread some rumors that she was disloyal to the President. I don't know whether someone was being mean to her, but her testimonty leaves no doubt that she is disloyal. Again and again she found ways to badmouth Trump when she never met him or had any first-hand knowledge about him. She admitted that she has no actual knowledge of any wrongdoing by Trump, and does not even know why she was reassigned to a different job.

This attempted coup is a national disgrace. All sensible people are sticking with Trump.

Friday, November 15, 2019

Impeachment testimony is fourth-hand

Here is the lead NY Times impeachment story from the top of page 1:
Impeachment Hearings Open With Revelation on Trump’s Ukraine Pressure

As public hearings began, William B. Taylor Jr., the top American diplomat in Ukraine, said he was told President Trump cared more about investigating Joe Biden than he did about Ukraine.

WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives opened historic impeachment hearings on Wednesday and took startling new testimony from a senior American diplomat that further implicated President Trump ...

Mr. Taylor testified to the House Intelligence Committee that he learned only recently of a July telephone call overheard by one of his aides in which the president was preoccupied with Ukraine’s willingness to say it would look into Mr. Biden and work by his son Hunter Biden for a Ukrainian energy firm. Immediately afterward, Mr. Taylor said, the aide had been informed that Mr. Trump cared more about “investigations of Biden” than he did about Ukraine.

A powerful witness for Democrats, Mr. Taylor appeared as Congress embarked on the third set of presidential impeachment hearings in modern times.
Got that? The best evidence is fourth-hand hearsay.

Tayloy said that he had "authority" over the "regular channel" of communications to Ukraine, but was unhappy that Trump had used others for informal communications. Last week, one of Taylor's aides said that he heard Sondland express an opinion in July about Trump cares more about exposing Biden's corruption than advancing the Deep State agenda for reviving the Cold War.

Let's hope so. Some polls have indicated that Joe Biden is the frontrunner to be elected President in 2020. If he is a crook, we need to know that before he gets back into the White House.

Taylor has spent much of his career trying to revive the Cold War by putting troops on the Russian border in order to justify State Dept. budgets. Let's hope that Trump does not care to agree.

But only Trump knows what he cares about. Unless Sondland is a mindreader, he does not know Trump's state of mind. Any such opinion from Sondland is just second-hand hearsay. Taylor's aide is third-hand, and Taylor's testimony is fourth-hand.

If I went to the White House or anywhere else to push for some pet project of him, and didn't get what I wanted, then I might very well grumble that someone cares more about something else. Such grumbling could not possibly be evidence of wrongdoing.

And the pro-impeachment NY Times gushes that this is "startling new testimony"!

This is just a coup by Schiff-Nadler-Schumer, NYTimes-WashPost-CNN, and the Deep State Cold Warriors.

Schiff now claims that he doesn't know who the so-called whistleblower is, even tho Eric Ciaramella's name seems to be known to everyone else, and Schiff is known to have helped him write the complaint.

YouTube and Facebook said they would block people from identifying the government official thought to be the whistle-blower, so I may have to edit the previous paragraph. This is very strange, as I have never heard of a political accuser being protected in this way.

This will go down as the lamest impeachment attempt in American history.

The NY Times has a couple of articles that exemplify Jewish thinking.

David Brooks writes In Praise of Washington Insiders. He is an authoritarian of a sort that is common among Jews. He praises institutions making policy without much public accountability. He gives the impression that his ideal form of government is the Communist politburo.
We don’t celebrate these people. Trumpian conservatives say that Washington insiders are unelected bureaucrats, denizens of the swamp, the cesspool or a snake pit. Some progressives call Washington insiders the establishment, the power elite, the privileged structures of the status quo. ...

In reality, institutions are the only vehicles for legislative change. That’s because they are the way to wield power safely.
He is a Trump-hater, and he thinks it was great that Taylor and Kent were part of an institutional effort to undermine Presidential policy.

I am not sure what makes these views so common among Jews, but they are essential to impeachment. The whole basis for impeachment is the ideology that the President should submit to the Cold War policies of the Deep State instead of the voters who do not want to provoke war with Russia.

A NY Times op-ed exhibits such crazy Jewish thinking that it appears to be a parody:
I am a young, gay, left-wing Jew. Yet I am called an “apartheid-enabler,” a “baby killer” and a “colonial apologist.” ...

so many young Jews, myself included, can’t imagine being anything other than political progressives. As a gay abortion rights advocate and environmentalist, my place in such circles has always been welcomed and accepted. ...

I am a Zionist. It is because I, like 95 percent of American Jews, support Israel. ...

I viewed — and still view — the establishment of the state of Israel as a fundamentally just cause: the most persecuted people in human history finally gaining the right of self-determination after centuries of displacement, intimidation, violence and genocide. ...

At many American universities, mine included, it is now normal for student organizations to freely call Israel an imperialist power and an outpost of white colonialism with little pushback or discussion ...

While white supremacists plot to murder Jews across this country, “anti-Zionists” on college campuses seek to marginalize us as white supremacists. Consider the fact that at the University of Virginia — where white supremacists marched through campus shouting “Jews will not replace us!” — it was Jewish students who were barred from joining a minority student coalition to fight white supremacy (that decision is under review).
This is so sick, I don't know where to start. Why does someone identify himself as "a gay abortion rights advocate"? Gays don't get pregnant.

How can he think that Jews are "the most persecuted people in human history". Jews are the least persecuted people. Jews have more power, money, and influence that any other group, per capita.

While he spreads myths about white supremacists, he is obviously a Jewish supremacist. He believes Jews should advance policies to replace whites with non-whites.

His main annoyance is that other leftists lump together Jewish supremacists with White supremacists, while he an anti-White Jew. His distinctions don't make any sense to his fellow non-Jewish students.

Anyway, I post this as an example of Jewish thinking. There are no non-Jews who say stuff like this.

Thursday, November 14, 2019

Mention Coolidge, get branded a Nazi

A popular leftist law professor blogger writes
So the architect of Trump's immigration policies, Stephen Miller, is a Nazi after all
Miller is Jewish, and is engaged to a Jewish woman. So I am pretty sure he is not a Nazi.

Here is the Nazi connection:
Miller refers to President Calvin Coolidge multiple times in emails to Breitbart. Coolidge signed the Immigration Act of 1924. ... In “Mein Kampf,” Hitler portrayed the U.S. law as a potential model for the Nazis in Germany.
Wow, the leftist pro-immigration lobby has gone nuts.

Daily Wire editor and Ben Shapiro employee Josh Hammer writes:
Jew-hatred is inherent in European DNA.
Really? How does that work? Is this like sexual preference is supposed to be, and innate?

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

How America Ends

Atlantic article:
“Our radical Democrat opponents are driven by hatred, prejudice, and rage,” Trump told the crowd at his reelection kickoff event in Orlando in June. “They want to destroy you and they want to destroy our country as we know it.” This is the core of the president’s pitch to his supporters: He is all that stands between them and the abyss.

In October, with the specter of impeachment looming, he fumed on Twitter, “What is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!” For good measure, he also quoted a supporter’s dark prediction that impeachment “will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.”

Trump’s apocalyptic rhetoric matches the tenor of the times.
Yes, the rhetoric on the Left is even more apocalyptic.

The impeachment is just a Deep State coup. Victor Davis Hanson explains Ten Reasons Why Impeachment Is Illegitimate.
Within the living memory of most Americans, a majority of the country’s residents were white Christians. That is no longer the case, and voters are not insensate to the change—nearly a third of conservatives say they face “a lot” of discrimination for their beliefs, as do more than half of white evangelicals. But more epochal than the change that has already happened is the change that is yet to come: Sometime in the next quarter century or so, depending on immigration rates and the vagaries of ethnic and racial identification, nonwhites will become a majority in the U.S. For some Americans, that change will be cause for celebration; for others, it may pass unnoticed.
Yes, various leftists, non-whites, and non-Christians are celebrating the demise of White Americans.

Those are the only publicly acceptable positions -- to either celebrate the change, or pretend not to notice.

Do the White-Christian-haters have the power to oust President Trump today? Or will they have to wait a few years before executing their plan to destroy America? We shall soon see.

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Voices for dignity, intelligence and gravitas

Sometimes it is hard to tell whether the news media is serious with its anti-Trump bias. This NY Times op-ed letter has me stumped:
To the Editor:

A plea from 33 writers: Please use language that will clarify the issues at hand.

Please stop using the Latin phrase “quid pro quo” regarding the impeachment inquiry. Most people don’t understand what it means, and in any case it doesn’t refer only to a crime. Asking for a favor is not a criminal act; we frequently demand things from foreign countries before giving them aid, like asking them to improve their human rights record.

That is not a crime; ... But using this neutral phrase — which means simply “this for that” ... Please use words that refer only to criminal behavior here. ...

Please also stop using the phrase “dig up dirt.” This slang has unsavory connotations. ... Words make a difference.

These are parlous times, and we look to public voices for dignity, intelligence and gravitas. Please use precise and forceful language that reveals the struggle in which we now find ourselves. It’s a matter of survival.
Is this letter a spoof or not?

It is almost as if the letter read: "Please stop calling him President Trump, as that gives him too much respect, and start calling him the criminal-in-chief! Also, Deep State has unsavory connotations."

This is from 33 writers showing off their writing skills. Okay, I am impressed that they fooled the NY Times.

Monday, November 11, 2019

Democrats trying to destroy America

Shikha Dalmia writes at;?"aaaaaaaa'/as'a''''
California Sen. Kamala Harris' bid for the Democratic presidential nomination is imploding even before President Donald Trump could think up an insulting nickname for her. Once regarded as the Democrats' best hope to take down Trump, Harris has seen her polls collapse, her donations tumble, and her campaign in shambles. She claims her woes show that the country is just "not ready for a woman of color" to be president. ...

What kind of "quality of life" crimes did she crack down on? Panhandling, prostitution, graffiti, loitering, driving under the influence, and living in an unapproved homeless encampment. ...

Her most notorious "quality of life" crusade was against school truancy. She first launched it as the district attorney of San Francisco, an office she won after defeating her truly progressive boss, who had alienated police unions with his alleged softness on crime, and then scaled it up when she became California's attorney general.

On the theory that high school dropouts are more likely to become criminals, Harris personally championed a 2011 state law that made it a criminal misdemeanor for parents to let kids in kindergarten through eighth grade miss more than 10 percent of school days without a valid excuse. As if that was not bad enough, she also persuaded the state legislature to back the law with such harsh penalties as a minimum of $2,500 in fines and a one-year jail sentence. To prevent criminality in the future, she criminalized parents here and now. ...

If Harris didn't spare parents, there was no way she was going to go easy on less sympathetic offenders, such as sex workers. In fact, on the pretext of stopping human trafficking, she ramped up stings in immigrant communities and aggressively targeted websites such as Backpage on trumped up charges of child sex trafficking—even though Backpage, Brown reports, was one of the few venues where sex workers could seek clients without having to roam the streets. And although Harris now says she's in favor of decriminalizing sex work, she doggedly opposed the idea previously.
Support for Harris was almost entirely based on her being a woman with an unusual racial background, as the Democrat Party is all identity politics, all the time. She made a big deal in an early debate about how she was for forced racial school busing. She looks somewhat black, but she isn't. Her father is Jamaican, and his mother Hindu. She was a mistress to a black politician, but now she is married to a Jewish man, and has no kids.

She also wants to expand the public schools into all-day day-care centers. She is a creep with no appeal outside California.

Bernie Sanders used to be the most anti-immigrant of all the Democrat candidates. He personally moved to Vermont to get away from non-white immigrants. But now he has signed onto the Democrat open borders platform.

Fox News reports:
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on Thursday released a sweeping immigration plan that would impose a moratorium on deportations, "break up" existing immigration enforcement agencies, grant full welfare access to illegal immigrants and welcome a minimum of 50,000 “climate migrants” in the first year of a Sanders administration.

The plan effectively establishes Sanders at the far left of the immigration debate, as he aims to energize a base that helped drive his 2016 primary campaign amid competition from other liberal candidates in the field this time around. ...

The plan was written in conjunction with several illegal immigrants who were shielded from deportation by former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

In the plan, Sanders pledges to extend legal status to those eligible under the DACA program, as well as to grant relief for their parents. He also promises to use executive authority to allow illegal immigrants who have lived in the country for five or more years to stay “free from threat of deportation.”

On day one of a Sanders presidency, he would also place a moratorium on deportations until there was a full audit of "current and past practices and policies." He would also end the so-called Trump travel ban, as well as other Trump policies such as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), action against sanctuary cities and the public charge rule that restricts green cards to those immigrants deemed likely to rely on welfare.
Sanders is a Jewish Leftist, ie, Commie, so what do you expect?

He obviously hates blacks, Moslems, latinos, etc, but he is ideologically committed to destroying White Christian America. Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden are Whites, but they have signed onto the same program to get Democrat votes and Jewish donors.

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Bogus research on divorce finances

Nelson Rosit writes a critique of sociology:
One result of this groupthink is falsified research that takes years to uncover and decades to refute. An egregious example is Lenore Weitzman’s study on the economic consequences of divorce. Weitzman, a radical Jewish feminist, published a study that reported a 73 percent decline in women’s standard of living after a divorce while men’s standard of living increased by 42 percent.[4] “Her study won the ASA 1986 Book Award for ‘Distinguish Contribution to Scholarship.’ It was reviewed in at least 22 social science journals and 11 law reviews. Weitzman’s findings were cited in more than 170 newspapers and magazine articles, 348 social science articles, 250 law review articles, 24 state court cases, and one US Supreme Court decision” (100).

At least one sociologist, Richard Peterson, remained highly skeptical of Weitzman’s findings and wanted to review her data which she refused to make available. After nearly 10 years of stonewalling “the National Science Foundation, which had funded Weitzman’s research, finally threatened to list her as ineligible for future research funding if she did not release her dataset to Peterson – so she did” (98). What Peterson found was a mess of ‘inaccuracies,” “inconsistencies,” and a large amount of missing data. He replicated the study as best he could and found only a 27 percent decrease in standard of living for women and only a 10 percent increase for men. Meanwhile, another larger, better designed study found that both women and men suffered economic decline after a divorce.

Smith points out that this research on divorce was not merely an academic debate. It had real-world consequences. Weitzman’s findings were used by courts and legislatures to rewrite divorce laws, and men suffered real financial losses as a result. “In the end, the admitted huge errors in her research – which helped shape major legal and cultural changes on divorce, including some that profoundly affected divorced men – have not hurt Weitzman’s career. She is currently the Clarence J. Robinson Professor of Sociology and Law at George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia” (101). And here the final kicker, nearly twenty years after they were discredited, “Weitzman’s erroneous findings continue to be cited today in the best-selling Introduction to Sociology textbook on the market” (104).
I remember reading about that study, incredulous that people accepted it as fact.

In most cases of divorce, especially when there are kids, the couple suddenly has to support two households on the same income that previously supported one. Of course they suffer an economic decline. Only a radical Jewish feminist could get some other conclusion.

The problem is not just bad research. It is an academic culture that promotes radical Jewish feminists writing fraudulent papers.

This particular Weitzman erroneous finding probably caused many billions in damages.

The real test of the integrity of an academic field is not whether it has charlatans. The test is what happens to those charlatans once they get exposed.

Saturday, November 09, 2019

How the Church made Europe great

What made Western Europe leapfrog ahead of all the other world civilizations in the last millennium?

There is a theory that the Roman Catholic Church played a crucial role, as it could make decisions about what was good for society as a whole, as no one makes today.

The top science journal, AAAS Science, published research endorsing the theory:
We test these predictions at three levels. Globally, we show that countries with longer historical exposure to the medieval Western Church or less intensive kinship (e.g., lower rates of cousin marriage) are more individualistic and independent, less conforming and obedient, and more inclined toward trust and cooperation with strangers (see figure). Focusing on Europe, where we compare regions within countries, we show that longer exposure to the Western Church is associated with less intensive kinship, greater individualism, less conformity, and more fairness and trust toward strangers. ...

This research suggests that contemporary psychological patterns, ranging from individualism and trust to conformity and analytical thinking, have been influenced by deep cultural evolutionary processes, including the Church’s peculiar incest taboos, family policies, and enduring kin-based institutions.
It is still the case today that nuclear families are primarily found among those of Western European Christian descent.

Update: I await the studies on how Chinese, African, Hindu, and other groups were genetically influenced by the religious and cultural forces that shaped them over the last millennia.

Friday, November 08, 2019

Midst of a vast social experiment

NY Times columnist and Trump-hater David Brooks writes:
The short answer is: immigration. Trump, like global populists everywhere, understands that we’re in the middle of a vast social experiment. Waves of migration are transforming societies across the globe. The U.S. will have no majority group in three decades. Sweden could be between 20 and 30 percent Muslim by 2050, according to Pew Research projections.

As the saying goes, everybody is now everywhere. ...

91.3 percent of white Hillary Clinton voters with graduate degrees said it’s racist to want less immigration for ethnic and cultural reasons.
Yes, we are in the midst of a vast social experiment to replace Whites with non-whites. And if you object, then you are a racist, according to those who are in on the plan.

Okay, all immigration opinions are racist. The various sides of the issue are looking to preserve or destroy various ethnic and cultural groups. There is no way around that fact. The natural reaction of most people is to stick up for their own group, when it runs into conflict with others. Whites are the least racist people in the world, but there are limits to what they will tolerate.

Brooks is Jewish, so of course he spends the rest of the column arguing that Trump is wrong to want to limit immigration, and that non-Jewish Whites should just "enjoy the adventure of pluralism" and accept that "God’s truth is radically dispersed." As for Jews, he is very pro-Israel.

Thursday, November 07, 2019

Your opinions can lose your medical services

Paul Joseph Watson reports:
A National Health Service (NHS) trust in the UK has announced that it will deny treatment to patients it deems are ‘racists’ or ‘sexists’.

No, this is not the Onion.

The North Bristol NHS Trust said that “threatening and offensive language,” as well as “racist or sexist language, gestures or behaviour” and “malicious allegations” would all be punishable offenses.

Patients who commit such an infraction will be subject to a “sports-style disciplinary yellow card and then final red card in which treatment would be withdrawn as soon as is safe.”

“We have staff from many different backgrounds, from all over the world, and we pride ourselves on our commitment to equality which is a fundamental value of the NHS,” said Andrea Young, Chief Executive for North Bristol NHS Trust.

“We’re sending a strong signal that any racism or discrimination is completely unacceptable – we want staff to challenge and report it and we want everyone to know that it will have consequences,” she added.

The problem here of course is that the definition of what constitutes ‘racism’ or ‘sexism’ gets broader with each passing day.

As Jack Montgomery highlights, “In late 2017 an NHS patient who requested a female nurse to carry out a cervical smear complained when the hospital sent a person with “an obviously male appearance… close-cropped hair, a male facial appearance and voice, large number of tattoos and facial stubble” who insisted “My gender is not male. I’m a transsexual”.

Foster parents have also had children removed from their care by the state because they were supporters of UKIP and not vehement supporters of “multiculturalism.”

The University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust also ordered that the British flag be removed from security staff stab vests after one person complained that it was “offensive.”

This is even worse than China’s social credit score, which to my knowledge doesn’t yet punish people by withdrawing medical treatment if they engage in wrongthink.
I cannot confirm that, but this is where the Ctrl-Left is headed, if not there already.

Women are the ones who request female gynecologists. What used to be a feminist statement is now a bigoted opinion deserving of punishment.

I think that the only solution is for as many people as possible to say many offensive things.

The Daily Stormer just posted a rant about Watson. I don't know if that makes him a good guy or a bad guy, but I am in favor of free speech.

Wednesday, November 06, 2019

Mormons want fairness for foreigners, not Americans

I have criticized some religious groups that are working to destroy America, but I don't want to overlook the Mormons. Here is a Senate immigration bill, sponsored by Senators from Mormon states:
Summary: S.386 — 116th Congress (2019-2020)

Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019

This bill increases the per-country cap on family-based immigrant visas from 7% of the total number of such visas available that year to 15%, and eliminates the 7% cap for employment-based immigrant visas. It also removes an offset that reduced the number of visas for individuals from China.
It is also co-sponsored by creeps like Kamala Harris.

Why are Mormons so eager for "fairness" for foreigners?

Mormons used to be pro-American, but not anymore. Congress used to be pro-American.

America now has a whole set of policies that are systematically replacing its high-tech workforce with foreigners. Why?

I am not sure what it is about the Mormon religion that makes them all cuckservatives. Not literally all, of course, but a very large percentage of them are never-Trump Republicans.

Tuesday, November 05, 2019

Not Replace Us, explained

Sam Harris interviewed NY Times columnist Bari Weiss on anti-semitism for his Making Sense podcast. Weiss explained why Jews are so offended by the Charlottesville chant, "Jews will not replace us."

It does not refer to Jews taking jobs from Whites. The "us" means Americans, and "replace" means deliberately changing American demographics by importing Third World migrants and refugees. Weiss said that she and other Jews very much believe in doing just that. So yes, Jews plan to replace us Americans with foreign non-whites. In the interview, she makes a big deal out of belonging to a synagogue that actively works to import non-white foreigners.

She wrote a whole book in anti-semitism, but her gripes consisted of (1) NY city blacks who commit crimes against whomever they find, notably orthodox Jews; (2) leftists who have become anti-Israel; (3) Moslems who follow teachings that Jews are monkeys and pigs; and (4) right-wingers who oppose Jewish policies of demographic replacement of Americans.

Harris is a leftist atheist Jew, and often denounces right-wingers, but he has to admit that the right-wingers are not really his enemies. Right-wingers are mostly pro-Jewish, and differ from Jews on only a few policy issues, such as whether Whites should be systematically replaced with non-whites.

Harris is often accused of being a closet white-supremacist. So is Steven Pinker, a Jewish psychology professor who writes against the Ctrl-Left:
Still worse, intolerance on campus is corroding the credibility of university research on vital topics ...

A final danger to allowing universities to repress open debate is that it sets off equal and opposite backlashes. The regressive left is an incubator of the alt-right. I’ve seen it happen, including to former students. When they see that certain opinions are unexpressable, when they see speakers being deplatformed and people being assaulted or demonized for citing certain facts or advancing certain ideas, they conclude, “You can’t handle the truth!” ...

So we must safeguard the truth and rationality promoting mission of universities precisely because we are not living in a post-truth era. Humans indeed are often irrational, but not always and everywhere. The rational angels of our nature can and must be encouraged by truth-promoting norms and institutions.
Harris, Weiss, and Pinker say they oppose the Alt-Right, but they are exposing the Ctrl-Left, and that is the main thing the Alt-Right wants to do.

It is funny how Harris, Weiss, and Pinker are all pre-occupied with religion.

Weiss never mentioned God or expressed any belief in spiritual values, but every single opinion of her is explicitly based on what is good for the Jews, and bad for gentiles. She is a Jewish supremacist. Maintaining her Jewish racial identity is more important than anything else.

She is more explicitly supremacist than any White supremacist I have heard.

Harris is really a convert to Buddhism. He writes books on the evils of Christianity and Islam, and on the virtues of Buddhist meditation. He still identifies as a Jew, and very much promotes a Jewish style of thinking.

Pinker is also active in exposing the supposed evils of Christianity, and in pushing Jewish ideas about what is good for the world.

They are all Trump-haters, of course. Much as I disagree with most of what they say, it is refreshing to listen to them. They are like the Jewish equivalents of David Duke.

Monday, November 04, 2019

Bisexual congresswoman resigns after sex scandal

NY Post reports:
Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has come out swinging for “throuple” Rep. Katie Hill — saying her intense “public shaming” highlights a double standard for female politicians.

Sen. Harris told Buzzfeed News that Hill, a close political ally, was the victim of a “campaign of harassment and intimidation” and “cyber exploitation” after naked photos of her were released to the media.

“It was clearly meant to embarrass her,” Harris told the outlet.

“There’s so much that people do about women and their sexuality that’s about shaming them.”

“It just sends a signal to other women that’s discouraging them from running for office.”

Harris revealed that she had a “personal conversation” with Hill since the scandal broke over alleged trysts with staffers.

She told the site that she “respected” Hill’s decision to resign from Congress because “she has to do what’s best for her and her constituents.”

“But, you know, let’s also speak the truth that men and women are not held to the same standards,” she said.
Of course men and women are not held to the same standards. Harris got her political start by being a mistress to a married man, who was a very powerful politician.

Harris and Hill participated in false accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.

National Review reports:
Steven Wilson said all students should find ‘intellectual joy’ at school. An online mob slammed his ‘white supremacist rhetoric,’ and he lost his job.
The definition of white supremacism keeps expanding. Now anyone seeking academic excellence is a white supremacist.

The Wash. Post reports:
[Lt. Col. Vindman] told lawmakers that he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy …
I guess the Wash. Post is now admitting that this is all a Jewish coup.

The President was elected by the people, and he sets foreign policy until his term expires. It is impossible for the President to subvert foreign policy. Only some anti-American Jewish ideologue would say anything else. I don't doubt that Vindman has some sincere beliefs about what Ukraine policy ought to be, but he was not elected President.

Sunday, November 03, 2019

NY Times is working for genocide

Along with the sharply partisan impeachment resolution, the House just passed a resolution to recognize the Armenian genocide, and to resist all other genocide denial.

So no one should be denying White Genocide anymore?

In case you doubt it, read about the efforts to eliminate majority-white towns in the USA.

Breitbart reports:
More refugees must be resettled across the United States to fill a “void of cultural diversity” in towns that are made up of a majority of white Americans, a New York Times report states.

As President Trump is set to lower refugee admissions for the third year, keeping his 2o16 campaign promise to significantly reform the program after almost four decades, the New York Times published a report this week detailing how Congolese refugees already living in the U.S. are looking to bring their foreign relatives to the country through the refugee resettlement program.

Those who support expanding refugee resettlement, the New York Times reports, say doing so is necessary for bringing “cultural diversity” to majority-white American towns like Missoula, Montana, which is more than 89 percent white and three percent Hispanic.

The New York Times reports:
To supporters like Mr. Engen, the Congolese are filling a void of cultural diversity in a town that is nearly 90 percent white. In the 1980s, Hmong refugees from Laos settled in Missoula. The children of immigrant families are usually the few students of color in city classrooms, while their parents work long hours at businesses eager for the help. [Emphasis added]
The New York Times has previously claimed that “nearly all white” states like New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine pose “an array of problems for new arrivals” to the U.S., as Breitbart News noted.
There is something sick about searching out mostly White towns in Montana, and then flooding them with Congolese refugees.

White people need to realize that there is a systematic effort to replace them, just as there are attempts at ethnic cleansing in Tibet and other parts of the world.

Saturday, November 02, 2019

Jewish columnist proud to be human scum

The Intercept posts a rant against Trump:
Take Trump’s tweet on September 28:
Can you imagine if these Do Nothing Democrat Savages, people like Nadler, Schiff, AOC Plus 3, and many more, had a Republican Party who would have done to Obama what the Do Nothings are doing to me. Oh well, maybe next time!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 28, 2019
To be clear: More than 200 House Democrats have signed onto an impeachment inquiry and yet the president chose to target only three of them by name, two of whom are Jewish: Adam Schiff and Jerrold Nadler, chairs of the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees. The third target was — surprise! — a woman of color, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Shamefully, he attacked all of them as “savages.”

How is such rhetoric not racist?

On October 2, Trump escalated his brazenly anti-Semitic attack on Schiff. “We don’t call him ‘Shifty Schiff’ for nothing,” the president told reporters in the Oval Office. “He’s a shifty, dishonest guy.” ...

(Can you imagine the reaction if Omar had called, say, Trump’s Jewish Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin “shifty” or a “savage”?) ... There’s nothing funny or cute about the president’s mocking of “shifty” Schiff or his mainstreaming of crazy conspiracy theories.
Those two Jewish congressmen are the two House impeachment leaders. Schumer in the leader in the Senate.

AOC is known mostly for things besides "color". She is a light-skinned Puerto Rican American.

It is really bizarre that the Trump-haters can't find anything Trump did wrong, and instead complain that he criticizes those who are trying to destroy him.

Schiff has been holding secret hearings in order to try to frame Trump on impeachment charges. He lied about his handling of Eric Ciaramella, the supposed CIA whistleblower. This is not something that any Christian congressman has ever done. "Shifty" is a mild word for it.

Jewish (and Israeli) NY Times columnist Bret Stephens says he is proud to be called "human scum" for being a Republican never-Trumper, but I don't think that term was aimed at Jews. Mormons or feminists, maybe. He says Trump will be morally defeated if four Republican Trump-hater senators join an entirely partisan impeachment effort.

They are human scum if they vote, as Stephens suggests, against Trump out of pure hatred for Trump. Stephens doesn't even mention the possibility of evidence of Trump committing a crime. His main gripe against Trump is "the coarseness of speech and crudeness of character".

Again, are there any non-Jews with such ridiculous reasoning? This is a Jewish coup in progress.

If the NY Times and CNN were run by Mormons, and Mormons were chairing the committees to impeach Trump, and if a Mormon ideology were the basis for impeachment, then I would be complaining about a Mormon coup. But the Mormon Trump-haters are just spectators, and Jews are running the impeachment show.

The above Intercept article starts with this joke:
“Prime Directive: Always Blame the Jews for Everything.”

That was one of the especially disturbing headlines in a 17-page “style guide” written by Andrew Anglin, editor of the neo-Nazi website the Daily Stormer.

“As Hitler says, people will become confused and disheartened if they feel there are multiple enemies,” Anglin argued, according to a copy of the document obtained by HuffPost in December 2017. “As such, all enemies should be combined into one enemy, which is the Jews.”
Anglin is a troll, and he says stuff like that to be funny. It is not meant to be taken literally. Obviously there are also non-Jews trying to impeach Trump, and not every stupid impeachment argument originated with Jews. Trump's ex-lawyer Cohen is obviously Jewish, and so are the lawyers who wrote the Mueller report. Alan Dershowitz is very Jewish, and he says the impeachment is bogus.

Update: To give an insight to what is euphemistically called "the New York media clique", see this NY Times article about ostracizing anyone not conforming to the Ctrl-Left:
In May 2016, Mandy Stadtmiller wrote a first-person essay about her husband being a supporter of Donald Trump. She was inundated with messages urging her to divorce him. She lost a couple of “close” friends. She grew increasingly disillusioned from the New York media clique she was once eager to join.

“It was crazy-making to have a lot of people telling me, ‘You’re wrong, you’re wrong, you’re wrong,’” Ms. Stadtmiller said.

She also experienced a “chill in work,” she said.
She wasn't even supporting Trump, but merely choosing to remain married to a Trump supporter. The NY Times makes Anglin seem broad-minded.

Update: Here is another Jewish conservative never-Trumper. He says that Trump is innocent of any crime, but should apologize anyway. Is that some kind of a weirdo Jewish thing, to force gentiles to apologize? That Jews want to subjugate him to the Deep State? Strange.

Update: Here is a Trump-hater immigrant presenting Jewish opinion as it it were evidence against Trump:
First, as discussed below, Vindman’s testimony about the July 25 call between the two presidents does not add any new facts. So, what does he say? He offers his opinions about the wisdom of the call. That’s it. His testimony about the substance of that call consists of five sentences at the end of his prepared testimony. Those five sentences basically comprise two opinions.

Here is what he said: “I was concerned by the call. [1] I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine. [2] I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation ...
Vindman is in on the Jewish coup. We should be using loyal Americans in these jobs.

Friday, November 01, 2019

End of California as We Know It

NY Times opinion columnist Farhad Manjoo writes:
It’s the End of California as We Know It

The fires and the blackouts are connected to a larger problem in this state: a failure to live sustainably.

But lately my affinity for my home state has soured. Maybe it’s the smoke and the blackouts, but a very un-Californian nihilism has been creeping into my thinking. I’m starting to suspect we’re over. It’s the end of California as we know it. I don’t feel fine.

It isn’t just the fires — although, my God, the fires. ...

Now choking under the smoke of a changing climate, California feels stuck. We are BlackBerry after the iPhone, Blockbuster after Netflix: We’ve got the wrong design, we bet on the wrong technologies, we’ve got the wrong incentives, and we’re saddled with the wrong culture. The founding idea of this place is infinitude — mile after endless mile of cute houses connected by freeways and uninsulated power lines stretching out far into the forested hills. Our whole way of life is built on a series of myths — the myth of endless space, endless fuel, endless water, endless optimism, endless outward reach and endless free parking.

One by one, those myths are bursting into flame. We are running out of land, housing, water, road space and now electricity. Fixing all this requires systemic change, but we aren’t up to the task.
Yes, California is doomed. He does not even mention the biggest problems.

He is an Indian from South Africa. California has the wrong culture, in part, because it imported millions of people like him.

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Some people might call that espionage

Jewish publications get all upset when a Jew's loyalty is questions. Here is an example from Forward:
Refugee Jewish Vet Testifying On Impeachment Has Loyalty Questioned On Fox, CNN

After reports emerged that National Security Council member Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was set to testify to Congress about his discomfort with President Trump’s Ukraine policy and actions, conservative commentators began implying that Vindman, a Jewish former refugee from Ukraine, was disloyal to the United States.

“Here we have a U.S. national security official, who is advising Ukraine while working inside the White House, apparently against the president’s interests, and usually they spoke in English,” Fox News Channel host Laura Ingraham said on Monday, referring to Vindman’s interactions with Ukrainian officials who asked him for advice on how to handle Trump. “Isn’t that kind of an interesting angle on the story?”

“I find that astounding,” replied former George W. Bush administration official John Yoo. “And some people might call that espionage.”
I am still figuring out all the players here, as the impeachment hearing are being held by Democrats in secret.

Impeachment is being led by Schiff, Nadler, and Schumer. There is not even a pretense of fair play, or following rule of law.

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Hating Trump is good for business

Two NY Times columnists admit:
Bret Stephens: Hi, Gail. Bad news: The White House has canceled its subscriptions to The Times and The Washington Post. Will our business survive? Will the Republic?

Gail Collins: Bret, the one lonely good thing I can say about our president is that he’s been good for business.

Bret: At last count, we’re at 4.7 million subscribers, up from three million when Donald Trump was elected. Thank you, Mr. President!
Okay, I get it now. This is the why the NY Times lies about Pres. Trump on a daily basis. It has a subscriber base of Jewish Trump haters.

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Warren needs approval from 9yo mentally ill girl

A Quillette essay says It’s Time for ‘LGB’ and ‘T’ to Go Their Separate Ways. There is a logic to this, but I doubt it.

The social justice warriors require that all other SJWs be fully onboard with all of their causes. They won't stop until they have changes all our pronouns and and subjected us to their sick ideologies.

A gay mag reports
Warren got the most response, though, for her interactions with 9-year-old trans boy Jacob Lemay, attending with his mother, Mimi. “What will you do in your first week as president to make sure that kids like me feel safer in schools?” asked Jacob, who became an immediate hit with the audience and on the internet. “And what do you think schools need to do better to make sure that I don't have to worry about anything but my homework?”

The senator replied that she’d pick a good secretary of Education, someone who’s not Betsy DeVos, Trump’s appointee, but she’d have her nominee meet with Jacob and get his approval. “Does that sound good?” she said. Jacob seemed satisfied.
Really? Pres. Warren will have to get approval from a 9-year-old girl being raised as a trans boy for her cabinet appointment.

If you told me 5 years ago that a presidential candidate would say something so silly, I would not have believed it. But Warren leads in some polls, and such statements now seem normal for those owned by the Ctrl-Left. The Dems are on their way to nominating a lunatic. Reelecting Trump will be the only sane course of action.

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Ignore hyphenated names and celebrate Holloween

There are a lot of people who don't like Halloween, from Christians who think that it is Satanic, to parents who think that it is unsafe. But NPR Radio complains that it is too offensive for other reasons:
MIA MOODY-RAMIREZ: They wonder, what's the big deal? Why are people getting upset over this?

FADEL: She's the chair of Baylor University's Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media. She says people might think a costume is funny or beautiful. The big deal, though, is it's a dominant culture taking elements of a minority culture with disregard.

MOODY-RAMIREZ: So it's the idea of people wearing something without really knowing the history of whatever it is that they're wearing. Or also, if it's something that's from an oppressed group and people are benefiting financially from using that product or wearing that attire but they're not actually showing respect for that culture.
No, this is crazy.

Halloween is celebrated in White Christian countries. If there is any cultural appropriation going on, it is non-whites celebrating Halloween. Those people should celebrate their own holidays instead of complaining about ours.

Baylor U. is paying Mia Moody-R. to teach White hatred. She should learn to respect White culture.

Saturday, October 26, 2019

Zizek appears to be a nut

Jordan Peterson debated an eastern European leftist intellectual named Zizek. I never heard of him. It turns out that he has a substantial following, altho many others believe that he is either evil or a phony. I am referring to Zizek, altho the same could be said of Peterson.

Read this leftist critique of Zizek, and you probably won't read any more. Here is a sample:
In short, Žižek’s views on (Muslim) immigrants and refugees can be roughly summarized as follows: despite the fact that the majority of immigrants are inherently predisposed towards fascism, pedophilia, the subordination of women and the hatred of free speech, Europe should, nevertheless, open its doors to them and guarantee their “dignified survival”.
It is amazing how many distinguished academic scholars are really crackpots.

Friday, October 25, 2019

Wacky Jewish ideas on sovereignty

It is anti-Semitic to say that Jews are taking over the world, but it is also anti-Semitic to oppose Jews taking over the world. Here is a Jewish opinion:
Sovereignism is nothing but the new name of anti-Semitism. Jews and Muslims, who are both threatened by it, must unite against the fantasies of the great replacement.
Having sovereign nations makes it harder for Jews and Muslims to take over, I guess. And while Jews hate the Muslims and Muslims hate the Jews, they both seek to undermine European sovereignty.
Islam is not a threat to France; it is a component since the eighth century. It is through it, and through Jewish philosophers, that Greek thought arrived in France at the turn of the first millennium. And never has the world been better off than when Judaism, Christianity, and Islam worked together to make reason triumph over obscurantism. ...

[France] must not fall for the fantasies of the ‘great replacement,’ remember that she carries the name of an invading people, and that she is, from her origin, a foremost place for the settlement of innumerable peoples which every Frenchman, wherever he comes from, is the heir to. ...

“We can imagine, we can dream of Jerusalem as the capital of the planet, which will one day be united around a world-government. It would be a fine place for a world-government.”
This is so foolish, I don't know where to start. What we understand as "reason triumph over obscurantism" is almost entirely a Christian invention. Jerusalem would be the worst place for a world capital.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Madness leads to Civil War

Wash. Examiner reports:
Partisan political division and the resulting incivility has reached a low in America, with 67% believing that the nation is nearing civil war, according to a new national survey.

“The majority of Americans believe that we are two-thirds of the way to being on the edge of civil war. That to me is a very pessimistic place,” said Mo Elleithee, the executive director of Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service.
I agree with that. We are headed for civil war, unless ppl come to their senses.

There are many issues where there is no reasonable compromise, such as yesterday's post on court-endorsed non-genetic mom sexually mutilating a 7-year-old boy.
It found that 84% believe that “behavior that used to be seen as unacceptable is now accepted as normal behavior.”
I believe the reverse is worse -- behavior that used to be normal is now seen as unacceptable.

Douglas Murray has written a new book titled "The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Identity, Morality." He is a British gay atheist, and he is restrained in his condemnations, but he is right that our society has gone mad.

The NY Times now admits that the so-called impeachment inquiry is really a Deep State coup. There is no longer any pretense of this being a prosecution for some recognized crime. A faction of the CIA and State Dept are unhappy about some foreign policy decisions, such as not supporting some Cold War and endless mideast war policies. It is just a question of how much these anonymous backstabbers hate Trump, and whether Congress has the votes to oust him.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Court forces dad to castrate son

Washington Examiner reports:
A jury in Texas returned a verdict on Monday that will prevent a Texas dad from intervening in the gender transition of his 7-year-old son.

Jeffrey Younger had petitioned a court in Texas to grant him sole custody of his twin sons, James and Jude, in part to avoid a plan to infuse James with female hormones.
Do you need any more proof that our society has been taken over by sickos?

If you don't buy into this garbage, then you are bigot. How far will the Left go? Have you had enuf yet?

According to the comments, the dad is the genetic dad, and the mom is not the genetic mom.

Maybe we should return to a system that favors father custody.

Update: The London Daily Mail has the story.

It turns out that the legal mom is a pediatrician who annulled the marriage because she claimed that he exaggerated his resume, and the judge believed her rather than him. She also made domestic violence allegations against him, but those were not believed.

She is obviously a lunatic. She even wants to rename the boy Luna!

Update: It appears that the dad lost the case because he had previously lost some of his parental rights. The judge said he lied about some things many years earlier, and I cannot assess that. Regardless, the court should not be forcing a boy to become a girl. I saw a report that the judge now recognizes this, perhaps because of the adverse publicity, and has given the dad the right to oversee the bogus psychiatric treatment. So maybe the boy will be saved.

Update: This reddit thread has more info about the case, including a juror saying the dad was an unemployed con man, and the legal mom should get custody because she has more money.

Maybe law should say that the parent with more money should win a child custody dispute, but that is not the law we have. The way the system is set up, the parent with less money usually wins such disputes, and the child support/alimony payments are ordered.

The dad supposedly lied about a few things, but if so, I am not sure what is worse. The dad for telling the lies, or the gestational mom for believing such silly lies. No one that gullible should be making big decisions.

The jury was apparently not so crazy because it knew that the dad would have veto power over castration. But it still authorized this lunatic legal mom to raise this boy as a girl.

Monday, October 21, 2019

Mitt Romney is a phony

The Atlantic mag has an article on how much Mitt Romney hates Pres. Trump, and how he is just planning for impeachment instead of trying to advance his legislative goals.
To Romney, Trump’s performance as president is inextricably tangled up in his character. “Berating another person, or calling them names, or demeaning a class of people, not telling the truth—those are not private things,” he says, adding: “If during the campaign you pay a porn star $130,000, that now comes into the public domain.” ...

Romney told me that he does not have an abstract definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and that when it comes to identifying impeachable acts, he follows Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s famous standard for defining hard-core porn: “I’ll know it when I see it.” Asked if he’s seen it yet, Romney told me that he’ll make up his mind once he hears all the evidence at the trial: “At this stage, I am strenuously avoiding trying to make any judgment.”
Okay, but what is the real issue here?
“I think people forget I worked for 10 years as a management consultant,” Romney said, referring to his time at Bain & Company. “Which meant I was able to make no decisions, I was able to get nothing done, and I had to try and convince people through a long process.” In retrospect, it seems, he was destined for the U.S. Congress.
No, we all understand that Romney is all talk and no action. He stumbled into some money opportunities, and got rich off of others. His run for the Presidency showed that he had no vision for the job, and no backbone to get anything done against opposition.

The article omits the elephant in the room -- his Mormon religion. His hatred for Trump is similar to that of other Mormons, like Jeff Flake. They cannot articulate it either.

Mormons are like the mirror image of left-wing Jews who hate trump. Both factions have an irrational hatred for Trump, and want to oust him from office. The hatred appears to be grounded in some religious beliefs, altho they don't explain it that way. It would sound too ridiculous if they admitted that they don't like him because he doesn't wear the right kind of underwear.

Romney probably tells himself that he is honest while Trump is a liar. The truth is more nearly the opposite. Trump tells us where he stands and why. Romney is never so straightforward. The Atlantic reporter says that he has been covering Romney for nine years, and he always seems like he is just saying what his consultants tell him to say. I think that he is one of the most loathsome characters in politics today.

Update: Romney tweets under the name Pierre Delecto (@PierreDelecto).

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Dems add more anti-Russian hysteria

The NY Times editorializes:
In the summer of 1950, outraged by Joseph McCarthy’s anti-Communist inquisition, Margaret Chase Smith, a Republican senator from Maine, stood to warn her party that its own behavior was threatening the integrity of the American republic.
She complained about the "Communist design of 'confuse, divide and conquer.'"

Communism was threatening the American republic. We had commie spies and sympathizers at the highest levels. Spies gave away our atom bomb secrets and undermined our foreign policy.

Now the Russians are no longer commies, and China is more of a threat.

But the deep staters and Dems want to bring back the Cold War. They are preoccupied with weird conspiracy theories about how the Russians supposedly interfered with the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton blames the Russians for her loss, and now claims that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian puppet.

The Russians do indeed have a long history of propaganda seeking to 'confuse, divide and conquer.' But so does the NY Times, Wash. Post, and CNN.

It is funny how the NY Times sides with the Russians as long as they are Commies, and then turns anti-Russian when the Russians reject Communism.

Another NY Times essay:
As a feminist philosopher, I understand our constitutional crisis to be all tangled up with a specific brand of what I call “sovereign masculinity.” Sovereign masculinity is not a real, existent thing. It lives instead in that dimension of human existence Charles Taylor called the “social imaginary,” and is just one of many things that situate me in the world in ways I don’t have to think about. ...

The conservative Harvard political philosopher Harvey Mansfield wrote a treatise praising this kind of manhood in 2006, as an antidote to America’s post-9/11 blues. “The most dramatic statement of manliness would be the one where the man is the source of all meaning, where nothing else has meaning unless the man supplies it,” he wrote. The ultimate aspiration of the sovereign man is to have his speech operate like the speech of a god, where his word instantiates truth.

This is why toxic masculinity is not a separate issue from political authoritarianism generally. The sovereign man is not subject to the law because he is a source of law for others. The spectacles of subservience we have witnessed since Trump was elected are testament to that equivalency. Once obedience to the word of the sovereign sets in, becomes normal, we are on the road to an authoritarian state.

When Marie Yovanovitch stood up straight and walked with unassailable confidence through flashing press cameras to testify before Congress, after being told not to, the spell was broken.
These people are nuts.

Yovanovitch was fired because she was a holdover political appointee who are rumored to be disloyal. Her testimony proves that she is disloyal. I don't know anything about her, but there is not a list of those who complain about being fired by Trump, and their complaints pretty well prove that they should have been fired.

Correction: A comment below suggests that my terminology was a little sloppy. Ambassador is a political job, where the President is entitled to appoint people faithful to his policies. This ambassador was a political appointment in the sense that Pres. Obama moved her from being a career State Dept employee to a political position. She was only fired in the sense that she was re-assigned back to the State Dept. These changes occur with every new administration. That is my understanding.

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Dems seek to control Facebook

The NY Times reports:
Mr. Zuckerberg fought back against the idea that the social network needed to be an arbiter of speech. He said that Facebook had been founded to give people a voice and bring them together, ...

“Zuckerberg attempted to use the Constitution as a shield for his company’s bottom line, and his choice to cloak Facebook’s policy in a feigned concern for free expression demonstrates how unprepared his company is for this unique moment in our history and how little it has learned over the past few years,” said Bill Russo, a spokesman for the presidential campaign of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Later on Thursday, Ms. Warren took aim at the company again in a tweet: “Facebook is actively helping Trump spread lies and misinformation. Facebook already helped elect Donald Trump once. They might do it again—and profit off of it.”
The Democrats got support from about 95% of newspapers, 99% of Hollywood, and 90% of broadcast news in 2016, and still lost. For Biden or Warren to win in 2020, they will need even greater control of the news media.

That is why they endlessly pursue their crazy conspiracy theories about how the Russians or Ukrainians influenced the news in 2016.

A NY Times column argues:
Trump and his supporters are trying to “Pelosify” Schiff. Representative Andy Biggs, an Arizona Republican, is calling for a censure of Schiff for pursuing “a witch hunt in a fantasy land.”

All this is bizarre. Schiff has not even come out for impeachment, saying that such decisions should await the investigation, although he is blunt about describing Trump as a danger to the country. Schiff was chosen to lead the impeachment inquiry precisely because of his reputation not as a bomb-thrower but as a reasonable lawyer who will oversee a meticulous inquiry.
Schiff has been pro-impeachment for a year. Pursuing “a witch hunt in a fantasy land” is a good description of what he has been doing.

The House has not even authorized impeachment hearings. Schiff has been holding secret hearings.

Zuckerberg's sister is busy trying to defend the Classics from the Red Pill:
Zuckerberg prefers to tag these alt-right groups with a name they have given themselves, particularly those on the social-networking site Reddit: the Red Pill. ...

The Red Pill, Zuckerberg says, believes that multiculturalists, globalists, feminists, and political-correctness scolds keep our society in a similar state of slavery. Like the characters in the film, members of the Red Pill believe that only they can see things as they really are, often with the guidance of classical authors. The Red Pill forum had 260,000 members before Reddit “quarantined” it last September for its offensive content. Zuckerberg, citing self-reported surveys, says members are predominantly white, heterosexual American men between the ages of 18 and 35, politically conservative, and with no strong religious affiliation.
Of course the site is only quarantined because leftists do not want you to learn Red Pill wisdom.

Friday, October 18, 2019

Einstein did not consider himself European

Linh Dinh writes:
In 2018, the publication of Albert Einstein’s travel diaries was greeted by newspaper headlines lamenting his politically incorrect views of Asians, particularly the Chinese.

Most egregious was Einstein’s verdict on Chinese women, “I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess that enthralls the corresponding men to such an extent that they are incapable of defending themselves against the formidable blessing of offspring.” ...

To show that Einstein’s view on the Chinese was complex, and not just negative, Rosenkranz quotes from his 1919 letter to another Jewish physicist, Paul Ehrenfest, “I get most joy from the emergence of the Jewish state in Palestine. It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun ‘bandits.’”
It is interesting that Einstein did not consider himself European. I thought that it was a Nazi thing to consider Jews non-European, but apparently Einstein had that opinion long before the Nazis.

Einstein is usually described as non-religious, but he very much identified with the Jews and worked towards Zionism all his life. He became an American citizen, but he also belonged to Commie front organizations, so he probably did not consider himself American either.

I am not trying to hold Einstein's private diary comments against him. He was entitled to his opinions. But Einstein is always held out as a great source of wisdom, so we should be clear on how he thought that his values were grounded.

Meanwhile, the NY Times has published the most pro-Hitler article I have ever seen. Weird. Another article by its chief film critic says Hitler comedy can be very funny, but now that Trump is President, we shouldn't laugh at it. Maybe we should ignore his stupid movie reviews.

Thursday, October 17, 2019

Ronan Farrow is damaged creep

What is the deal with Ronan Farrow? He is the son of Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, and famous for writing MeToo stories. Allen is the world's most famous neurotic Jew, who described his peculiar sexual attitudes in his movies. Nutty as he is, he is a model citizen compared to the lunatic Mia Farrow.

Ronan Farrow's new book says he is gay, and "engaged" to his 8-year boyfriend, a Jewish Hollywood writer. He had a bizarre childhood, and may never have been on a date with a girl. Yet somehow he is the one to pass judgment on what male-female sexual relations are supposed to be.

Ronan appears to be severely psychologically damaged. He refuses to say whether Woody is really his father. His mother induced his adopted sister to invent a wildly implausible allegation against Woody, in order to support her child custody dispute in court. He says:
FARROW: So one of the threads that runs through the book is my sister's courage in maintaining her claim year after year, including at times when people really refused to hear her out, ... And, you know, I wanted to be honest and vulnerable, Terry, about the fact that I was not always heroic in my conversations with her, you know? ...

But over the course of this book, I do come to an understanding that I was wrong and she was right. And her claim was credible.
How does he figure out who was right by writing a book on another subject 25 years later?

If you want the sordid details, read Wikipedia on Woody Allen sexual assault allegation. I think that it is obvious that Allen is completely innocent, but decide for yourself.

But Ronan doesn't seem to be even talking about what really happened. He seems to be just saying that the girl told a plausible story, and others were wrong not to validate her feelings.

So now he is on the warpath against heterosexual Jews like his father, and Harvey Weinstein.

Ronan did not start MeToo, as that is credited to Tarana Burke. She is a 46-year-old black woman with her own rape stories. There do not seem to be any police reports, so it is not clear whether she was a victim, or if she just believed in saying "me too" as a way of supporting other women with rape stories.

She is another damaged weirdo with her own personal issues.

Maybe I should call them jokers, after the recent movie about a crazy man who never recovers from a disturbing childhood.

What these jokers have in common is that they do not distinguish fact from fiction, rape from sexual harassment, and sexual harassment from bad dates. They pass judgment on the behavior of others, while they seem to have no idea what normal human relations should be.

Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Jew insists on all-Jewish panel

The Forward magazine has the slogan "Jewish. Fearless. Since 1897." It reports:
I Was Protested At Bard College For Being A Jew
By Batya Ungar-Sargon

I was invited to host a breakout session of my choosing, and I proposed a workshop on navigating other people’s opinions in the age of Trump – a topic of deep importance to my work as Opinion Editor of The Forward, where we insist on representing the full gamut of legitimate opinion.
She goes on to say that the panel was all Jewish, and that there was no need for any non-Jewish opinions.

Some left-wing students protested that this was a one-sided panel. She got mad and walked off the stage.
Yet polls show that more than 95% of Jews in America have a favorable view of Israel. The debate over whether Zionists are human and deserving of human treatment will have to be held in the absence of Jews of conscience. In 2019, no Jew should be forced to debate their humanity, their right to exist independent of anti-Semitism. ...

But as I know all too well, the most important factor in hosting the full gamut of legitimate opinion is knowing where the red lines are. And if you think allowing Jews to be protested for being Jews does not represent a red line, I have nothing more to say to you, and nothing I want to hear.
So she is all in favor of expressing legitimate opinions, except for certain red lines. Jews must totally control certain subjects.

Note that this is entirely a dispute between left-wing Jews and left-wing non-Jews. I would not be surprised if I have more agreement with the left-wing Jews than the left-wing non-Jews, on the underlying issues. But those issues were not discussed.

I am just posting this as an example of how Jews think.

Imagine if a college sponsored a panel discussion on White Genocide, and only allowed KKK members on the panel. Imagine if a White Christian said that discussing threats to the White race with non-whites is a red line that must not be crossed.

There are left-wing Jews who say that support of Israel is anti-semitic, because of some disagreemnt about the governance of Gaza and the West Bank. Here they harass a pro-Israel congressman:
A Jewish activist group has called out Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise over what the group says is anti-Semitic and white nationalist rhetoric from the Republican party.

Two members of the progressive Jewish activist group IfNotNow confronted the congressman at a town hall event in Louisiana Monday. ...

The congressman said he has fought anti-Semitism, focusing on Republican efforts to officially condemn Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar for a series of allegedly anti-Semitic tweets. ...

Oliff-Lieberman then asked about President Donald Trump's claim that Jews who support Democrats are "disloyal Jews," to which Scalise appeared to smile while replying "I don't know when you had that meeting with him."

When asked to condemn anti-Semitism among Republicans, Scalise instead said he condemns "all of it," and encouraged Oliff-Lieberman to condemn anti-Semitism "on the Democrat side." ...

"I gave him the opportunity to practice Teshuva this morning, the Jewish tradition of repairing harm that has been done. ...

"Donald Trump calls me a disloyal Jew and you say nothing. You stay silent. It's a trope that literally sent my grandfather to Auschwitz, Jews being called disloyal in Germany," Newman said to Scalise.
It is really sick the way some Jews will bring up the Holocaust to harass whoever happens to be their political enemies at the moment. They support Palestinian Arabs and fight Republicans, but it is the Palestinian Arabs who attack the Jews, not the Trump Republicans. It is obvious that these Jews just hate Trump and Scalise because they are White Christians.

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Start brainwashing at age 6 months

I posted research that 5-year-old kids have an understanding about racial differences, and now NPR Radio says that White parents should start brainwashing early:
Even when parents do talk about social identity, according to the survey, many wait until their kids are 10, 11 or even 12 years old. Jennifer Kotler Clarke, who oversaw the Sesame survey, says parents seem to think younger kids don't notice these differences, though "there's all sorts of research that suggest that children very early on notice definitely physical differences between different people and they make meaning of those differences. And there's discrimination very early on."

How early on? Try six months old.
It says that non-white parents talk to their kids about racial identity all the time, but White parents don't. Apparently liberals have persuaded Whites into raising a color-blind generation, but the kids notice race anyway.

Obviously color blindness is not good enough for the social justice warriors. That was also showed by the recent Harvard admissions trial, where the judge said that Harvard could go on with its twisted racial preferences forever.

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Little kids already know who is smart

The London Daily Mail reports:
Children associate being ‘brilliant’ with white men, but not black men, a shocking new study suggests.

Researchers surveyed 200 children and found that, regardless of their own race, they linked the stereotype of intelligence with white men much more than white women.

However, by contrast, the stereotype wasn’t applied to black men, as black women were seen by the children as smarter. ...

For the study, published in the Journal of Social Issues, the team recruited 200 five and six-year-olds from public elementary schools in New York City. ...

The team says that policies that help children understand what ‘intellectual ability’ is might ‘reverse this inequity’.
The full paper: The acquisition of gender stereotypes about intellectual ability: Intersections with race.

This is funny. It is like professors writing an academic paper on whether the emperor has no clothes. All the adults agree that he is wearing clothes, but the 5-6yo children say he is naked. So the professors recommend policies for brainwashing the kids into thinking that the emperor is wearing clothes.

Even tho the academic paper has a section on "limitations" of their work, they never address the possibility that the kids could be right. I am sure that they would just cite an authority to show the kids wrong, if they could.

No, it is pretty clear that this paper is about brainwashing kids to unlearn the truth.

Another Daily Mail article says that a Kenyan used laser-guided Nike shoes and an army of pacers to run a sub-2-hour marathon. No one accepts this as a record, because of the obvious cheating involved.

Joanna Schroeder writes in a NY Times op-ed:
Racists Are Recruiting. Watch Your White Sons.

Parents need to understand how white supremacists prey on teen boys, so they can intervene. ...

The first sign was a seemingly innocuous word, used lightheartedly: “triggered.”

As my 11- and 14-year-old sons and their friends talked and bantered — phones in hand, as always — in the back seat of the car, one of them shouted it in response to a meme, and they all laughed uproariously.

I almost lost control of the car. That’s because I know that word — often used to mock people who are hurt or offended by racism as overly sensitive — is a calling card of the alt-right, which the Anti-Defamation League defines as “a segment of the white supremacist movement consisting of a loose network of racists and anti-Semites who reject mainstream conservatism in favor of politics that embrace implicit or explicit racism, anti-Semitism and white supremacy.” People associated with this group are known for trolling those who disagree with them, and calling critics “triggered” is a favorite tactic.
No, this is just crazy Jewish propaganda. The alt-right is not a white supremacist movement, and "triggered" is not a codeword. The word is in common use by right and left wingers.

Again it appears that kids have a firmer grasp on reality than adults writing for the NY Times.

the “white genocide” — which the Anti-Defamation League defines as the white-supremacist belief that the white race is “dying” because of growing nonwhite populations and “forced assimilation.”

But of course, it’s not just that we want to prevent our sons from becoming perpetrators of mass shootings. We want to raise them to be the kind of men who would never march with the neo-Nazis who chanted “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville before one of them killed a counterprotester, Heather Heyer.
More Jewish propaganda. Apparently she thinks that being a killer neo-Nazi is the same as not wanting Jews to commit genocide against Whites.

The term "genocide" was popularized by Jews, and defined by them to be broader than killing an ethnic group. An accepted definition of genocide is:
the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
Today there are those who are actively working towards white genocide, and those working against it. White supremacists want whites to be supreme, while others merely oppose its destruction. There is a difference.

By publishing articles like this, the NY Times shows that it is firmly on the side of destroying whites.
Many of these spots are created and promoted by organizations like PragerU, which, Dr. Duffy notes, is not an accredited university but a propaganda machine that introduces viewers to extremist views via video.
This is more crazy name-calling paranoia. I have watched a bunch of PragerU videos, and none of them are extremist. Prager is a religious Jew with mainstream conservative views. His videos are some of the least radical political videos you can find.

Google may lead them to white nationalist outlets like The Daily Stormer, where hate and harassment are normalized. Often, they have no idea which sources are reputable.

They may also find videos by more mainstream figures, including members of the so-called intellectual dark web like Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist and professor at the University of Toronto, whose conservative perspectives on feminism and gender are very popular among young men and often are a path to more extreme content and ideologies.
I have also watched a bunch of Peterson videos, and they are all completely innocuous. He has rules for life like petting a cat and cleaning up your room. He is quite centrist in all his views. He is not a right-winger, and never expresses any extreme views.

On the other hand, The Daily Stormer does believe in triggering people. It offends like the new Joker movie offends. It shocks you into re-examining your beliefs. If you want to stay in your comfort zone, then don't watch the movie and don't view the web site.
Parents also need to encourage our sons how to think critically about the things they’re hearing online. One term I’ve debunked in this way for my kids is “snowflake.” An insult embraced by moderate conservatives and the alt-right alike, it’s used to dismiss people who complain about racism, sexism or homophobia as laughably delicate.
She misunderstands the term.
Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions. ...

It is popularly believed, but not proven, that each actual snowflake has a unique structure. ...

1996 novel Fight Club, which contains the quote: "you are not special, you are not a beautiful and unique snowflake".
The point of the metaphor is that snowflakes are supposed to be beautiful and unique, not delicate.
Who is more of a delicate snowflake? The person who wants people to stop racial slurs or mocking of gay people or the person who is upset and offended by the use of the phrase “Happy Holidays” — a common talking point during Fox News’s infamous War on Christmas segments?
Again, she misunderstands. No one is upset and offended by "Happy Holidays". Fox's Bill O'Reilly merely disagreed with what had been a campaign to eliminate "Merry Christmas". It was the leftist non-Christians who were triggered by "Merry Christmas", and who sought to marginalize Christian expressions.

Yes, there really are campaigns to diminish the power and influence of Whites and Christians. Just read the NY Times, where it publishes anti-White and anti-Christian propaganda every day.

Friday, October 11, 2019

In the shadow of Hollywood

Netflix stock is falling out of favor, and I wonder if it is partially due to its offensive content. It regularly shows black men defiling white girls.

The title character of Hanna is a 15-year-old virgin girl who never had a friend. She finally finds a friend, and then some black guy shows up and deflowers her.

In the Shadow of the Moon is a movie where a black girl from the future comes back in time to kill white people, in order to facillitate future non-whites subjugating whites. Supposedly there is a civil war in the future between the whites and non-whites, and the non-whites can win extinguish some influential whites. The protagonist is a white cop who chases her to kill her, but then lets her go when he discovers that she is her granddaughter. His blond daughter had a baby with a black man.

We are supposed to believe that exterminating white people is a good thing.

Most of the Netflix movies have some gratuitous gay or interracial sex. To avoid it, you have to watch Russian movies, or something from another era like Downton Abbey.

Non-Netflix Hollywood productions also push gay and interracial sex. There is a new Nancy Drew (2019 TV series), and the title character is an 18-year-old white girl who secretly has sexual relations with black guy who just got out of prison.

Face it, Hollywood produces propaganda directed at white genocide.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Penn State officials were framed

The most controversial thing I have ever said on this blog is that I believe Jerry Sandusky was innocent. The case against him was just obvious nonsense.

I said similar things in the McMartin Preschool and Duke Lacrosse cases. The public eventually came out to understand that these were false accusations. But almost no one defends Sandusky or Penn State.

Jerry Coyne says Malcolm Gladwell mentions the issue, without defending Sandusky, but notes:
1.) “The boy in the shower”, the linchpin of the case against Sandusky, swore in a written statement to Sandusky’s attorney that no sexual contact had occurred. After he hired a lawyer, the boy (now older) recanted. This may be because he wanted a slice of the generous settlement offered by Penn State to Sandusky’s victims — a settlement that turned out to be about $140 million, making any claimed victim a multimillionaire.

2.) None of the eight boys who eventually said they were molested by Sandusky ever told anyone about his misconduct before they spoke to police, and many continued to associate with him in the interim.

3.) Some of the accusations, like Sandusky locking a boy in the basement for three days and repeatedly raping him, with Sandusky’s wife, one floor above and oblivious to the screams, strain credulity.

4.) Some or all of the boys (it’s not clear from the piece) were subject to “recovered memory therapy”, and didn’t remember the molestations until therapists “helped” them remember the details.

The above is only a sample of other exculpatory data offered by Crews.
There was probably better evidence against the Salem witches.

All of the accusers invented their stories after being offered millions of dollars in Penn State settlement money. Some, such as the slimeball Mike McQueary, were obviously lying for their personal gain.

Don't expect a reasoned judgment from Gladwell. He sees himself as more of a storyteller than a truthteller.

Wednesday, October 09, 2019

Impeachment rationale is a Jewish joke

Harvard Psychology professor Steven Pinker writes in a NY Times op-ed:
Two decades ago the impeachment of a president hinged on what the meaning of “is” is. This time it may depend on the semantics of “I would like you to do us a favor though.” ...

His supporters insist he should be taken “seriously but not literally.” Yet this time it may be the nonliteral meaning of his words that proves his undoing. ... The word “though” signals a violated expectation.
No, Clinton's impeachment did not hinge on the meaning of "is". That was just how he obfuscated a question.

This time it appears to be about the word "though", and this Jewish joke:
Announcing an undesirable state of affairs is a classic stratagem for asking the hearer to rectify it without the rudeness of an imperative. In an old joke, a couple is lying in bed and the wife says, “Murray, it’s cold outside.” Murray gets up, closes the window, and says, “So now it’s warm outside?”
I am not sure what makes this a Jewish joke, but I will accept Jewish authority on this. (Pinker describes himself as a Jewish atheist.)

Chief Trump persecutor Adam Schiff has his own goofy paraphrased interpretation of Trump's words.

So Trump is to be put on trial, not based on what he said or did, but on how his words can be translated into Jew-speak?

Pinker and Schiff seem to be arguing that whenever someone talks, there is always an ulterior motive, there is always a quid pro quo, and there is always an attempt at personal profit. They do not even recognize the possibility that Trump wanted information to be public for the good of everyone.

I guess I need to learn more Jewish jokes to understand this thinking.

According to the transcript, Trump said "I would like you to get to the bottom of it." To most people, that means Trump wants him to get to the bottom of it.

Almost everyday, the NY Times gives some bogus re-interpretation of Trump's words. Sometimes it gives the exact quote, so you can see for yourself that the newspaper is lying about the plain meaning of the words.

Trump is hated by Jews on the Left, and Mormons on the Right. Maybe next I will address why Mormons hate Trump.