Friday, July 22, 2016

Historians against America First

Some historians announce:
Today, we are faced with a moral test. As historians, we recognize both the ominous ...

Historians Against Trump ... are united by the belief that the candidacy of Donald J. Trump poses a threat to American democracy. ...

Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is a campaign of violence: violence against individuals and groups; against memory and accountability; against historical analysis and fact. ...

Writers On Trump and Citizen Therapists are organizing in defense of the ideals in which their professions are grounded. ...

When Donald Trump accepts the Republican nomination on July 21st, a Grand Old Party born out of the struggle for abolition and justice will have succumbed to snake oil. We are here to say, “No more.”
Someone might think that a "threat to American democracy" with "a campaign of violence" might mean stealing ballots at gunpoint, or something like that.

This reminds me of how, at the end of the Ronald Reagan administration, the academic historians declared Reagan to be the worst President of the XX century. Then someone wrote an essay arguing that he was the best, because he won the Cold War. The historians admitted that they never considered crediting him for that.

You would think that a statement from historians like this would include some historical facts. Nope. Or have some facts about Trump. Nope. Or accurately state some of his policy positions. Nope. Or state teh premises underlying their political opinions. Nope. Or use their expertise to say what we can expect from a Trump presidency. Nope.

The first signatory is an Ethiopian attorney.

If anything, the campaign of violence is coming from Black Lives Matter, and the Democrats. Obama, Clinton, and other Democrat leaders are openly encouraging BLM, and accusing police of systemic racism for doing their jobs.

I am assuming that these historians are smart enuf to make a case against Trump, if they wanted to. So I conclude that they are concealing their true motivation, which is probably hatred of America or of White Christian culture.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Tech star endorses Trump

NY Times columnist Farhad Manjoo
When the technology investor Peter Thiel takes the stage just before Donald J. Trump at the Republican convention this week, he will become the most prominent public face of a species so endangered it might as well be called extinct: the Silicon Valley Trump supporter. ...

On the one hand, an emissary from tech will have a national platform to push the industry’s agenda and, more important, its worldview. By the end of Mr. Thiel’s speech on Thursday night, it’s possible he will have succeeded in showing off an ideology that is rarely encountered in public — the hands-off-my-stuff, techno-libertarian vision that is a hobbyhorse of Mr. Thiel and a few other Silicon Valley bigwigs.
So why are the other Si Valley super-rich reluctant to show those techo-libertarian views in public? Maybe because they are the robber barons of the modern era. Most of them would rather pretend that they identify with the poor and disadvantaged.
Though Silicon Valley has well-known problems with diversity in its work force, people here pride themselves on a kind of militant open-mindedness. It is the kind of place that will severely punish any deviations from accepted schools of thought — see how Brendan Eich, the former chief executive of Mozilla, was run out of his job after it became public that he had donated to a campaign opposed to gay marriage. Mr. Trump’s comments about immigrants, women and so many other groups have made him a kind of kryptonite in Silicon Valley.

Those problems are not widely understand, as in this article:
Facebook has explained away another year of dreadful diversity figures by claiming that there simply aren't enough minorities available for it to hire.

Despite having been at the receiving end of years of criticism for its overwhelmingly white male workforce, the social media giant's latest figures show that only 4 per cent of its workers are Hispanic and just 2 per cent African-American. The percentage of women at the company crept up a single percentage point to 33 per cent.

Despite acknowledging that "we still have a long way to go," the company that is never wrong says it has been "working hard to increase diversity" but has been stymied by the fact that there just aren't enough qualified people that aren't white men.
The article gives the impression that FB hires all white men, but the staff is 38% Asian and 7% LGBTQ. FB hires whites at a lower rate than the whites in the national population.

Most of the Si Valley super-rich support Democrats because they favor the modern day slave trade. They import Asians to do most of their work, and they sell out American interests.

Manjoo continues:
Mr. Thiel, a billionaire known for his unusual positions, does not appear to be too bothered by kryptonite.
Si Valley is very politically intolerant, and Thiel is rich and independent enuf to tell the truth. Twitter just banned Milo Yiannopoulos for criticizing liberals.
“As a black guy in Silicon Valley, I just find it very hard to support a candidate who has been called racist,” Mr. Johnson said.
Si Valley is mostly non-white and non-Christian, and they can be manipulated into voting Democrat by using identity politics. The Democrats just have to call someone a racist, whether it is true or not, and they will get the votes of the white haters.

I mentioned Steve King defending Western Civilization, and Leftist sites like the NY Times and Wash. Post go into hysterics. Vox does not even quote what King actual said, and posts anti-white nonsense:
America was built on the slave labor of black Americans.

There were many famous black inventors throughout US history.

Jesus was possibly brown.
I guess this is what is taught in schools today, but it does not actually contradict anything King said.

I very much doubt that there was any net benefit to building America from the black slave trade. Whatever economic benefits there were before 1860 were surely wiped out by the Civil War.

Maybe blacks invented peanut butter, I don't know. I would rather credit them with jazz, blues, and rap music.

There is no proof that Jesus was brown. I am not even sure that he was of Jewish descent. For all we know, he could have been a blond-haired blue-eyed Roman, as the Romans occupied the Jerusalem area at the time.

Update: Jerry Coyne claims that Milo deserves a ban because he responded to a forged tweet. It seems to me that rooting out forged tweets is Twitter's responsibility, not Milo's.

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

White Christian America is dead

NPR Radio reports:
"The End Of White Christian America" is the provocative title of a new book by Robert P. Jones. He heads the Public Religion Research Institute here in Washington. According to Mr. Jones, the '50s were the apex of white Christian America's power in this country, including the power to choose presidents. But Mr. Jones says, in his book, that has ended. He joins us in our studios. Welcome.

ROBERT JONES: Thanks, I'm happy to be here.

WERTHEIMER: You were so convinced that white Christian America is basically over that you include both an obituary and a eulogy in your book. What happened?

JONES: Yeah. Well, you know, I began to look at both the numbers but also just what I was seeing in public life and began to sort of scratch my head along with a bunch of other people. And, you know, we were getting these numbers from demographers and the Census Bureau saying that 2042 we were going to be a majority, quote, "minority nation." But that still seemed pretty far off.

And when I started to look closer, I realized that we had actually crossed a pretty important threshold in this country, that if we just look back to the beginning of Barack Obama's presidency in 2008, the country was 54 percent white and Christian. That number today is 45 percent.
Here is his NY Times op-ed.

Similar statistics have been reported many times, but nearly always with an air of inevitability, and with a celebration of multicultural progress.

No, these changes were never inevitable, and they are not making America better. They are the result policies designed to transform America into something that is not White or Christian.

Just look at all the headlines from Black Lives Matter, Mohammedan terrorism, and their sympathizers. These are all people who hate White Christians. Some are also cucks.

Corey Savage discusses reasons for counter-defense to Jewish policies:
You can’t talk about Zionism and anti-Semitism without discussing the supposed white genocide and the destruction of the Western civilization. The oft repeated conspiracy is that Jews or Zionists are actively plotting to decimate the white population and destroy Christianity.

Honestly, I just don’t see it. I will briefly summarize why.

First, it is true that historically, the Jews preferred the European societies to be multicultural and tolerant so that they themselves could thrive without persecution. The more influential Jews may have changed the course of the culture, but I don’t see it as a white “genocide.” Especially so today when multiculturalism is already achieved in all the major Western nations. ...

Can it not just be that white population is declining because educated and affluent population prefer to delay marriage and have less children? ...

Ethnic and religious tolerance in the Occident goes back as far as the ancient Rome (which later converted to Christianity and openly invited a horde of foreign invaders to their lands). ...

Instead of obsessing over a specific group, it would be more productive to fight against the tide itself by looking after your own tribe. Because whether you believe in a Jewish conspiracy or not, that’s how they operated to thrive as a group. As it stands, there are more white people engaging in the so-called white genocide than the “Jews” can ever hope to achieve — and constantly pointing to the Jews as the source of all problems will not stop that.
He is right that most of those pursuing a white genocide are not Jewish. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are not Jewish, and they are doing everything they can to flood the USA with non-whites and non-Christians.

It is true that the Roman Empire allowed its enemies to immigrate, and it eventually fell as a result.

White Christians are unusual in that they do so little to promote their ethnic identity interests.

Probably a third of the Trump-haters in the mainstream media are Jewish. I assume that they are just pursuing their perceived ethnic interests, because their arguments make no sense otherwise. But the other 2/3 are not Jewish. Some even claim to be conservative Republicans. So yes, Jews are certainly not the source of all problems, or even all the efforts to undermine America.

The top-read story on the Wash. Post today is this:
"This 'old white people' business does get a little tired, Charlie," King said. "I'd ask you to go back through history and figure out, where are these contributions that have been made by these other categories of people that you're talking about, where did any other subgroup of people contribute more to civilization?"

"Than white people?" Hayes asked, clearly amazed.

"Than, than Western civilization itself," King replied. "It's rooted in Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the United States of America and every place where the footprint of Christianity settled the world. That's all of Western civilization."

The other panelists objected, with Hayes trying to keep the peace. Panelist April Ryan, who is black, asked, "What about Asia? What about Africa?"
Of course Western civilization has contributed more than any other subgroup. Asia and Africa are not close.
For the record, there have been a great number of non-white contributions to human civilization. Civilization first arose in cities in Mesopotamia, in what is now Iraq and Syria. Arabic and Middle Eastern inventors and scientists brought astronomy to the world, which in turn aided innovations in navigation. Critical innovations in mathematics and architecture originated in the same area. The Chinese contributed philosophical precepts and early monetary systems, among other things. The specific inventions that were created outside of the Western world are too many to list: the seismograph, the umbrella, gunpowder, stirrups, the compass.

Oh, and, of course, the non-Western world gave us the numeric system that will be used to tally up the delegates to make Trump the nominee of King's party.
This is comical. Those things go back a millennium or more. Yes, the earliest primitive and barely useful seismograph was in a area that has earthquakes. They are common in China and rare in Europe.

Almost all of astronomy came from Western civilization.

Update: There are good comments on Sailer's blog, and Vox complains that King preaches literal white supremacy on national television.
US Rep. Steve King preaches literal white supremacy on national television

US Rep. Steve King (R-IA) thinks that white people have contributed more to civilization than any other race. And he said it on national cable news.

This is not an exaggeration.
I thought that white supremacy meant whites enslaving or subjugating other races. But I guess it can also mean calling attention to historical facts about the progress of civilization.

Black lives matter, if you ignore the facts

The NY Times philosopher column argues:
The correspondence theory of truth no longer reigns supreme in philosophical circles when it comes to the study of knowledge and judgment. But it remains handy for everyday people, especially citizens. That theory says, simply, a proposal is true if it corresponds to an observation in the world. Not a bad way to go when people are trying to figure out the stuff of democratic living. After a week in which we have seen the unwarranted killing by police of two black men — Philando Castile in Minnesota and Alton Sterling in Louisiana — I’d like to think the correspondence theory of truth would get all Americans on the same page. But this has consistently failed to be the case. Maybe we can figure out why together.

So, I say: In America, black lives don’t matter. You say: That is false. I respond, implicitly invoking the correspondence theory of truth: Just look at the rate at which blacks are killed by the police and the rate at which police officers are exculpated. ...

Chris Lebron is an assistant professor of African-American studies and philosophy at Yale University and the author of “The Color Of Our Shame: Race and Justice in Our Time.” He is at work on a book on the history of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Yale students deserve better than this.

First, there is not enuf public info to determine whether those killings were warranted or not. Previous killings were widely reported to be unwarranted, such as Trayvon, Ferguson, and Freddie Gray having had narrative collapses, and the killers were not to blame.

Second, the rate of black killings says little if not compared to black crime and other black misbehavior.

Third, he is rejecting the idea that facts can illuminate the matter. If blacks feel aggrieved, then whites must do something, regardless of the facts.

Lots of people believe that they are unfairly treated, based on paranoia and subjective impressions. I post this because even Yale students are taught to disregard facts when concluding that blacks are unfairly treated.

The NY Times is run by (((Trump haters))), of course, and here is their latest attack:
But Tony Schwartz, the book’s ghostwriter, who spent 18 months in the 1980s interviewing and shadowing Mr. Trump, says that it is really a work of fiction. ...

“I feel a deep sense of remorse that I contributed to presenting Trump in a way that brought him wider attention and made him more appealing than he is,” Mr. Schwartz said. “I genuinely believe that if Trump wins and gets the nuclear codes, there is an excellent possibility it will lead to the end of civilization.”
If the guy is willing to lie in a book for money, and if he thinks that Trump will end civilization, then I assume that he will tell any lies he can to damage Trump.

Is anyone going to believe this hysterical paranoia?

Hillary Clinton is the biggest warmonger Presidential candidate in many decades. If Schwartz is really worried about war, then he would vote for anyone who might defeat her.

Since he is not rational, I assume that Schwartz has some sort of emotional ethnic hatred for Trump.

Monday, July 18, 2016

There is only true Islam

The NY Times reports:
A Saudi Morals Enforcer Called for a More Liberal Islam. Then the Death Threats Began. ...

Mr. Ghamdi’s colleagues at work refused to speak to him. Angry calls poured into his cellphone and anonymous death threats hit him on Twitter. Prominent sheikhs took to the airwaves to denounce him as an ignorant upstart who should be punished, tried — and even tortured. ...

The first thing many Saudis will tell you about Wahhabism is that it does not exist.

“There is no such thing as Wahhabism,” Hisham al-Sheikh told me the first time we met. “There is only true Islam.”
The view that there is only one Islam is very widespread. Not everyone says it includes killing infidels, but a lot do.

Harvard law professor (((Noah Feldman))) tries to explain Islam in the NY Times:
Muslims have a wide range of different beliefs about what Shariah requires in practice. And all agree that humans are imperfect interpreters of God’s will. But to ask a faithful Muslim if he or she “believes in” Shariah is essentially to ask if he or she accepts God’s word. In effect, Mr. Gingrich was proposing to deport all Muslims who consider themselves religious believers.

Start with a crucial distinction. Shariah doesn’t simply or exactly mean Islamic law. Properly speaking, Shariah refers to God’s blueprint for human life. It is divine and unchanging, reflecting God’s unity and perfection. It can be found in God’s revealed word in the Quran and in the divinely guided actions of the Prophet Muhammad. ...

But almost all faithful Muslims would say that they believe there is a single, truthful answer that lies in Shariah — we just cannot be absolutely sure as humans what that answer is.

In public discourse both in majority-Muslim countries and in the West, Shariah has come to take on other meanings. Advocates of political Islam — roughly, people who buy into the slogan “Islam is the answer” — sometimes use the term to describe a government that complies with the dictates of Islamic law.
There is a problem when people believe that there is a divine and unchanging blueprint for human life. You cannot reason with such people, and such beliefs are not consistent with Western civilization.
A vast majority of Muslims reject the use of Shariah to legitimate terrorism.
Unfortunately, that is not true. Polls show Muslim support for terrorism varies from 10% to 80%, depending on the country and how the question is asked.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Europe censors political views

Israel News reports:
Police in 14 German states reportedly conducted raids on 60 individuals in an attempt to root out the sources of anti-Semitic and other hate postings on the internet.

The raids on Wednesday marked the first time that Germany has conducted a nationwide hunt for internet hate purveyors, according to German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, who said he hoped the operations would send a strong message that criminals cannot hide from the law in the seemingly anonymous internet.

According to German news reports, the raids followed months of observing one Facebook group that glorified National Socialism and broke German laws against promoting hate.

Suspects were accused of posting anti-Semitic, extremist and xenophobic messages, including denial of or relativizing the Holocaust, celebrating aspects of National Socialism and using Nazi symbolism, and calling for attacks on refugees and politicians. Evidence was seized at several locations.
I assume that "relativizing the Holocaust" means comparing the Holocaust to mass deaths, such as from Communism or war, and that such relativizing is now a crime in Germany.

Richard B. Spencer writes that he was banned from Britain for saying this and some similar things:
The ideal I advocate is the creation of a white Ethno-State on the North American continent. Vis-a-vis most contemporary states that are putatively based on the “rights of man” and "democracy," our project would be a new kind of political and social order. It would be a state for the 21 century — or 22nd: reflecting advances in communication and transportation, it would be a home for Germans, Latins, and Slavs from around the world. On one level, it would be a re-constitution of the Roman Empire. The Ethno-State would be, to borrow the title of a novel by Theodor Herzl (one of the founding fathers of Zionism), an > Altneuland> — an old, new country.”
He had already been banned from most of the rest of Europe.

Only the USA has a First Amendment guaranteeing free speech.

I live in the USA, but I do not want to be banned in Europe, or even to have this blog banned in Europe.

I hereby disavow anything the Europeans consider illegal.

If I thought that the Holocaust were the second worst crime in the history of humanity, I would not say it here. The Jews can have whatever beliefs they want about the Holocaust, and it does not make any difference to me. It is outside my expertise anyway.

The Spencer quote is obviously some sort of fantasy. Nothing like that could be achieved except thru a horrible war, and starting such a war would be exceptionally foolish.

Yes, most of the world's nations were created as ethno-states, and the Zionists created one in 1948. But there is way too much hatred of whites today for a white ethno-state.

Ask yourself: why would anyone try to ban philosophical or political ideas? Usually it is because some truth is being suppressed.

I might cite some offensive story like this:
Israeli rabbi who advocated rape of ‘comely gentile women’ during war becomes chief army rabbi
However it should be obvious that I am not saying that all Jews have such views. In this case, I suspect that 99% of Jews disagree with that rabbi. But apparently that rabbi has a following in Israel.

There are probably a lot of Moslems who approve of raping infidel women.

Again, I am not expressing hatred towards these groups or any other. They can have whatever opinions they want. I am just reporting on some controversial views.

Driving while looking like a drug dealer

The (((NY Times))) reports:
His mother, Valerie, who was often called on to help when her son’s car was impounded, believes that the police were stopping Mr. Castile not because of his driving but because of his race. “Driving while black,” she said. ...

Amid the string of traffic stops was one in Maplewood, another suburb of St. Paul, one afternoon in 2008. Mr. Castile had driven a friend’s car, a 1997 black Mercury Marquis, to a Taco Bell for lunch. An officer pulled him over for tinted windows. ...

Mr. Castile’s sister Allysza said her brother’s love of wide-bodied, older-model cars, like the 1997 Oldsmobile he bought for $275 and was driving when he was shot, attracted police officers’ attention.

Ms. Castile was pulled over three times when she borrowed his car, she said, because “those are mostly stereotyped as drug dealer-type cars.”
So how did the officer know that he was black, if the windows were tinted?

It appears that his cars were being profiled, not his race.

I have been pulled over just because my car was unusual for the neighborhood. None of this seems unreasonable to me.
In the six years after he lost his license, Mr. Castile was pulled over another 21 times, repeatedly convicted of driving with an invalid license, fined and ordered not to drive.
This might be police harassment if he never did anything wrong, but maybe the cops were good at spotting scofflaws like him.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

Experts say anyone can be a genius

NPR Radio reported, a couple of weeks ago:
VEDANTAM: Well, we’ve known for a very long time that family income really matters. This could be because schools in richer neighborhoods are better schools. But it could also be that rich parents are able to give their children more learning opportunities outside of school. ...

The researchers find there’s a very strong correlation between family income and these non-cognitive skills. ...

VEDANTAM: Yes. And the question of course is why is this happening? Why are children from richer families demonstrating more of these skills? The most obvious explanation, David, is that poverty creates stresses in people’s lives. If you have Mom or Dad working two jobs to make ends meet, it’s going to be harder for Mom and Dad to be spending time helping children develop these kinds of non-cognitive skills.
No, that is not the most obvious explanation. It would not even be in my top ten.

Many richer families have Dad and Mom both working full time jobs, and often high-stress jobs. I would expect stressed kids to have better non-cognitive skills, all other things being equal.

The most obvious explanation is that the non-cognitive skills are heritable.

Maybe the NY Times is similarly misguided, as a recent essay started:
Talent is equally distributed.
Facebook and Google are investing in Africa because:
"We live in a world where talent is evenly distributed, but opportunity is not. Andela's mission is to close that gap," Zuckerberg said in a statement.
A new book, Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise, by some authors who should know better, argues that everyone has the talents to excel at anything. For proof, he says that some top football players were not drafted in the first round, and some top scientists had low IQ. As examples, he gives R.P. Feynman (of quantum electrodynamics fame) and Jim Watson (of DNA fame).

No, they did not have low IQ. Successful scientists do not brag about their IQ, just as successful NBA basketball players do not brag about their height. They want to be credited with their superior performance, and not with their innate talents.

The NFL teams are actually quite good at picking the college players with the best potential. Sometimes they get it wrong when a very good player becomes a drug addict and drops out, as what happens in the book's biggest example. The man probably would have been a fine player, if the team could have kept him away from drugs.

The book furthermore claims that studies show that IQ has no relation to success in science. They say that scientists tend to have high IQ, because they have to pass exams to get into the field and those exams are correlated with IQ, but once someone passes the exams, his IQ is of no help at all.

Malcolm Gladwell has also written best-selling books with related themes.

I don't know how these guys could write such nonsense. Do you really think that you could have been Tom Brady or RP Feynman if only you had the right training? Nope. So why do they say this stuff? Because it sells books, I guess.

Friday, July 15, 2016

NY Times and neo-nazis agree

A NY Times article quotes a neo-nazi site, and that site agrees:
I agree with the general consensus which is reported in this article:

1.) Donald Trump is not one of us. He isn’t a racialist. He isn’t a White Nationalist. He certainly isn’t a Southern Nationalist. Trump can best be described as a nostalgic American civic nationalist who is driven by instinct and who taps into the racial and cultural grievances of the White majority. Still, Trump is a nationalist of sorts though, and he speaks our language, which is why we relate to him. After decades of cuckservatism, Trump’s message is a breath of fresh air.

2.) The cucks don’t have any principled objection to Trump. They have spent decades tapping into the same vein of racial and cultural anxiety in White America. Their objection to Trump is that they have lost control of their base and can’t harness all that energy and resentment to push their awful economic agenda.

3.) Trump is like an elephant who is trampling all over the boundaries of “mainstream” political discourse. He is breaking the rules and leading a mass movement of millions of White people off the reservation. In that sense, Trump is nothing but a good thing for us and I am going to continue to cheer him on.

4.) Trump has inflicted a fatal blow on the cucks. For that we owe him a debt of gratitude. Everything else that happens in this election cycle is just icing on the cake. The destruction of the cucks has always been the precondition of a nationalist revival.
Yes, it is amazing how much Trump has accomplished, even if he does not win in November. I think that he helped inspire the Brexit vote. He has proved that the Republicans do not need the cucks, the globalists, and the warmongers. He has made it politically acceptable to say that American policy should favor America first. He speaks with common sense about terrorist threats.

This is like Goldwater v LBJ or Reagan v Carter. A choice between a real American and a traitor.

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Republicans recognize parental rights

The (((SPLC)) announces:
The Southern Poverty Law Center strongly condemns the possible inclusion of an anti-gay, conversion therapy plank in the Republican Party platform that will be adopted at the party’s convention next week.

Modern science has entirely and thoroughly debunked conversion therapy – a term used to describe the discredited practices that purportedly can change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. ...

Anti-LGBT extremist groups embrace conversion therapy because it is premised on precisely the same lies that undergird their hate. Indeed, the person responsible for pushing the pro-conversion therapy plank is none other than Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, who has said that pedophilia “is a homosexual problem.”

Last week, we published an account of how hate and extremism has influenced the presidential campaign. This is just one more way.

We urge the GOP to reject the lies of anti-LGBT extremists like Tony Perkins.
It does sound bad to be putting hate in the platform, but here is what they are complaining about:
Language: "We support the right of parents to determine the proper treatment or therapy, for their minor children."
Really? I do not see any hate in that statement. Of course parents should make decisions for their minor kids.

Various psycho and medical organizations do denounce conversion therapy, with statements like this:
“Aversion therapy (a behavioral or medical intervention which pairs unwanted behavior, in this case, homosexual behavior, with unpleasant sensations or aversive consequences) is no longer recommended for gay men and lesbians. Through psychotherapy, gay men and lesbians can become comfortable with their sexual orientation and understand the societal response to it.” -American Medical Association
Okay, but that is a political statement. They probably had gays on the committee, and believe that psychotherapy should be used to encourage homosexuality, but not heterosexuality.

A lot of psychotherapies do not work very well, and none of these statements say that conversion therapy is any worse than any other therapy.

Here is an amusing new article on The 1970s “gay-cure” experiments written out of scientific history. This research was done by a reputable scholar with some positive results, but nobody wants to talk about it anymore.

The Left was laws to undermine parents and the family, including making it illegal to encourage a child to be hetersexual. Those leftists like the SPLC are really sick.

I do not have any opinion about the effectiveness of any therapies, as that ought to be settled by scientific studies. However there are no scientific studies supporting the positions of the SPLC and other leftist-gay organizations. And even if there were such studies, they would not be strong enuf to override the wishes of the parents. In a free society, parents are allowed to make choices that possibly disagree with leftist do-gooders.

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Federal courts enforce Facebook leftism

Facebook is famous for forcing (((their leftist political views))) on us, but at least it is just a free service that you can use or not use as you please. Or so I thought.

Computer crime law professor Orin Kerr writes:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has handed down a very important decision on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Facebook v. Vachani, which I flagged just last week. For those of us worried about broad readings of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the decision is quite troubling. Its reasoning appears to be very broad. If I’m reading it correctly, it says that if you tell people not to visit your website, and they do it anyway knowing you disapprove, they’re committing a federal crime of accessing your computer without authorization.
And if you violate the Facebork terms of service, you could be sent to federal prison.

Explaining immigration politics

The NY Times reports:
What is driving this surge in anti-immigrant populism in Western politics?

Michael Ignatieff has a theory, one rooted in his research as a professor at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, and in his experience as former leader of Canada’s Liberal Party.

According to his argument, what we’re seeing is, in part, an ideological split between cosmopolitan elites who see immigration as a common good based in universal rights, and voters who see it as a gift conferred on certain outsiders deemed worthy of joining the community. ...

Cosmopolitans are perpetually surprised that, A, they’re only 1 percent of the population, and, B, most people don’t think like them. ...

This is a story not just about nationalism. It’s also a story about inequality. The division between cosmopolitans and nationalists is going to define the 21st century. ...

Isaiah Berlin called nationalism the bent twig. Globalization can bend the twig back, but at a certain point it will snap back with renewed force, and that’s what’s happening in Brexit. It’s happening across Europe.
There is some truth to this. But I doubt that many of those elites really believe in universal rights.

Britain may not have solved its immigration problem with BREXIT. Scotland may seccede and join the EU. Britain rejected a woman PM because she had kids to make her more invested in the future, chose a new woman PM with no kids like Angela Merkel.

Human nature makes such women want to submit to foreign invaders.

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Tech companies are anti-white

Apple, Google, and Facebook are firmly invested in anti-white and anti-Christian politics, and here is the latest proof;
It’s probably a good thing that Google got rid of its longtime slogan, “Don’t be evil,” because the company’s been working around the clock on that front for years. Case in point: earlier this week, following NASA’s successful mission to send the Juno spacecraft to Jupiter, Google released a “celebratory” sketch that whitewashed (blackwashed) the ethnicity of the Juno mission team members:
In fairness to Google, its explanation is that it used to credit great discoveries, inventions, and scientific advances based on encyclopedic listings of great accomplishments. Then social justice warriors complained that all the great work was credited to white men.

To make the SJWs feel better, Google now tries to avoid crediting white men, even if it means lying about who was on the Juno space mission.
Nowhere in any of the articles is there any suggestion that the users themselves control their own web pages. The Leftists just assume that FB (and Apple and Google) are tools for elite control of the masses.

If the leftist elites see BLM riots as encouraging a race war that will elect Hillary Clinton, then they will adjust their rules to show inflammatory videos.

NY Times has a rave review of the female Ghostbusters remake:
Sliding into theaters on a river of slime and an endless supply of good vibes, the new, cheerfully silly “Ghostbusters” is that rarest of big-studio offerings — a movie that is a lot of enjoyable, disposable fun. And enjoy it while you can because this doesn’t happen often, even in summer, which is supposed to be our season of collective moviegoing happiness. The season when everyone jumps onboard (whee!) and agrees that, yes, this great goof is exactly what you were thinking when you wondered why they didn’t make summer movies like they used to. ...

Here, she embodies the new “Ghostbusters” at its best: Girls rule, women are funny, get over it. ...

Part of what makes “Ghostbusters” enjoyable is that it allows women to be as simply and uncomplicatedly funny as men, ...
Not likely. The preview was terrible.

Saturday, July 09, 2016

Black prof says whiteness is blindness

Black Georgetown sociology professor Michael Eric Dyson writes a NY Times op-ed:
What White America Fails to See

We, black America, are a nation of nearly 40 million souls inside a nation of more than 320 million people. And I fear now that it is clearer than ever that you, white America, will always struggle to understand us. ...

It is not best understood as black-on-black crime; rather, it is neighbor-to-neighbor carnage. If their neighbors were white, they’d get no exemption from the crime that plagues human beings who happen to be black. If you want interracial killing, you have to have interracial communities. ...

The problem is you do not want to know anything different from what you think you know. ...

Whiteness is blindness. It is the wish not to see what it will not know.

If you do not know us, you also refuse to hear us because you do not believe what we say. You have decided that enough is enough. ...

We are not strangers to terror. You make us afraid to walk the streets, ...
I have listened. I believe that blacks will kill their neighbors whether they are black or white. But then he wants me to believe that white people are making black afraid to walk the streets? No, the truth is more nearly the opposite -- black people are making whites afraid to walk the streets.
You hold an entire population of Muslims accountable for the evil acts of a few. ...

Condemning a culture is not inciting hate. That is very important.
I have heard of people condemning Muslim culture, but not holding an entire population of Muslims accountable for the evil acts of a few.

This guy is trying to speak for all blacks, and to describe a rage that they have against all whites. He wants to hold all whites accountable for the rare cop to pulls a trigger too quickly.

He is a Donald Trump hater, of course. He votes Democrat because that is the anti-white party.

There is no use disagreeing with Dyson. He is expressing a black rage against white people, and he is teaching it to the students at his elite university. And I think that he is right that white underestimate this rage.

Many people thought that electing a black President would reduce this rage. No, it has gotten worse, as Barack Obama himself seems to have encouraged this rage by perpetuating anti-white myths. And now the Democrat Party has bet its whole future on fueling anti-white rage.

Today in Poland, Obama bragged about how the crime rate has been going down, but we need to address the "problem", which is police bias against non-whites and the availability of guns.

No, the violent crime rate has been going up for the last couple of years, and the increase is largely attributable to Obama and other white-haters undermining reasonable police work.

Decline of comic books

Breitbart reports:
“Thor? Are you kidding me? I’m supposed to call you Thor?” Marvel villain The Absorbing Man yells at the new “female Thor” during a vicious street brawl in an issue published last year. “Damn feminists ruining everything!” ...

Marvel isn’t getting the message. Its latest comic book character is — wait for it — a fifteen year-old black female Iron Man. That’s right. Tony Stark, the badass, billionaire playboy businessman who has represented the quintessential white American male since the 1960s is to be replaced by a fifteen year-old black girl with an Afro and hooped earrings. ...

A villain based on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is to appear in “Spider-Gwen Annual #1” this week. The villain, who goes by the name of MODAAK will be seen rounding up “foreign filth”, complete with Mexico jibes, “small hands” jokes, and even Trump’s signature catchphrase “Make America Great Again.” ...

“We’re seeing the worst falloff of Marvel and DC sales in the store’s 38-year history,” complained one comic book store owner in an industry forum. “Both companies are losing established readers who no longer feel that the company’s output reflects the sort of comics they enjoy.
Marvel also killed off Spiderman, and replaced him with a black kid.

The disease is not just with Marvel. It also infects DC comics and Disney products. They have even ruined Superman and Batman.

Even Curious George seems to have converted to Islam. (Yahoo seems to have removed the story, so maybe it was exaggerated.)

Friday, July 08, 2016

Fatherly advice to a son

Here is some amusing advice from another era:
"Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have an entertaining tattle, and sometimes wit; but for solid reasoning, good sense, I never knew in my life one that had it, or who reasoned or acted consequentially for four-and-twenty hours together. ... A man of sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and flatters them, as he does with a sprightly forward child; but he neither consults them about, nor trusts them with serious matters; though he often makes them believe that he does both;" -Lord Chesterfield

"The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. ..." -Schopenhauer, on Women

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

You have eyes but fail to see

Zubin Madon writes in the Huff. Post:
Terror Has No Religion - Debunking the Regressive Left's Cliches

In the wake of recent Islamist terror attacks, the Regressive Left has once again prioritised the defence of an ideology over the lives of its victims. Armchair experts were quick to pin the Orlando massacre on the perpetrator's 'mental health', thereby propounding the widely misconstrued and exaggerated correlation between mental illness and violence. After all, ableist slurs are inconsequential to the all important task of defending religion. While Salon blamed "toxic masculinity", others were busy trying to find anything to insinuate that Omar Mateen was gay, thus absolving religion of having divinely sanctioned homophobia for thousands of years. ...

It is time for true (classical) liberals to stand up and take the fort back from the Left. We must show that it is possible to call out religious ideologies that inspires terror, while at the same time condemn the anti-Muslim bigotry of the far-right. For without identifying the carcinogen i.e. religious extremism, it is impossible to stem the affliction.
He explains that the terrorists are well-educated Muslims who are following the Koran and other Islamic teachings. They are correctly interpreted the verses to kill infidels, and not taking them out of context.

Of course he has to condemn people like Trump who want to address the problem, or else the Huff. Post would not publish him.

While the NY Times is reluctant to criticize terrorists for their religion, it goes out of its way to attack Christians.

Peter Wehner writes a NY Times op-ed:
Dr. Dobson is not alone. Jerry Falwell Jr., the president of Liberty University, has praised Mr. Trump’s life as in many ways exemplary and said that he believes that “Donald Trump is God’s man to lead our nation.” Eric Metaxas, who has written popular biographies of William Wilberforce and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, has rhapsodized about Mr. Trump and argued that Christians “must” vote for him because he is “the last best hope of keeping America from sliding into oblivion.”

And should your conscience tell you that Mr. Trump might not be the right choice, Robert Jeffress, the influential pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, explains that “any Christian who would sit at home and not vote for the Republican nominee” is “motivated by pride rather than principle.”

This fulsome embrace of Mr. Trump is rather problematic, since he embodies a worldview that is incompatible with Christianity. ...

What Mr. Trump admires is strength. For him, a person’s intrinsic worth is tied to worldly success and above all to power. ...

Those who believe this is merely reductionism should consider the words of Jesus: Do you have eyes but fail to see and ears but fail to hear? Mr. Trump’s entire approach to politics rests on dehumanization. If you disagree with him or oppose him, you are not merely wrong. You are worthless, stripped of dignity, the object of derision.
So Trump is not a real Christian because he admires strength, and speaks out against his enemies?

No, Christianity does not require a man to be a cuck. This article is an offensive attack on Christians.

Meanwhile the NY Times has multiple stories on how the Trump campaign is somehow anti-Semitic because a re-tweet had a symbol that could be interpreting as Jews financing Hillary Clinton's campaign.

I infer that Jews are financing her campaign, because the (((NY Times))) does not say that it is false. At least half of her campaign, anyway. She acts as if she is owned by the Jews, as she never speaks out against the Jewish Left and their goals.

Anti-semitism has come to mean Jews hating non-Jews.

I have eyes to see, and ears to hear. The NY Times and the Democrat Party and anti-White and anti-Christian. I agree with Christians pointing out what they see and hear.

Steve Sailer wrote:
The core of the Trump Phenomenon is the question of freedom of expression.

Donald Trump has come to be seen by both his enemies and his supporters as the living embodiment of a potential revival of the American tradition of free speech after the Obama ice age of political correctness. Trump’s backers tend to believe they have more to gain from frank, outspoken debate (whether in pragmatic advantages or simply in entertainment value), while his opponents assume that they, personally, have more to lose from a return to a freer market for ideas. …

In reality, though, Trump’s general worldview appears to be that of a typical New Yorker, only minus the ostentatious virtue signaling.
I do think that we need an open discussion of the demographic interests that are trying to manipulate us.

Tuesday, July 05, 2016

Elie Wiesel died

Elie Wiesel just died. He was famous and universally praised for claiming to be a witness to the Holocaust in his huge selling book, Night.

The book is not a first-hand description of gas chambers, or anything like that. It is a short incoherent novel that was put together by a translator, many years after the war.

Wiesel is often described as a Holocaust survivor, but what did he do to survive? Did he sneak out of the gas chambers? Beat up a camp guard and escape? If the Nazis wanted to kill him, why wasn't he dead in 1945?

Wiesel got a Nobel Peace Prize and a lot of other awards. Maybe I am just ignorant, but I don't see why he is such a hero.

Monday, July 04, 2016

Teaching white hatred in schools

The leftist lizard people figure that they can build their model anti-white society by brainwashing the next generation.

The NY Post reports:
An elite Manhattan school is teaching white students as young as 6 that they’re born racist and should feel guilty benefiting from “white privilege,” while heaping praise and cupcakes on their black peers.

Administrators at the Bank Street School for Children on the Upper West Side claim it’s a novel approach to fighting discrimination, and that several other private New York schools are doing it, but even liberal parents aren’t buying it.

A slide from the Bank School shows the different goals for white children (right) and “kids of color” (left).

They complain the K-8 school of 430 kids is separating whites in classes where they’re made to feel awful about their “whiteness,” and all the “kids of color” in other rooms where they’re taught to feel proud about their race and are rewarded with treats and other privileges.

“Ever since Ferguson, the school has been increasing anti-white propaganda in its curriculum,” said a parent who requested anonymity because he has children currently enrolled in the school.
Those parents are probably paying $100k to have their kids brainwashed.

A Philadelphia newspaper reports:
On June 16, police were called to an unlikely scene: an end-of-the-year class party at the William P. Tatem Elementary School in Collingswood.

A third grader had made a comment about the brownies being served to the class. After another student exclaimed that the remark was "racist," the school called the Collingswood Police Department, according to the mother of the boy who made the comment.

The police officer spoke to the student, who is 9, said the boy's mother, Stacy dos Santos, and local authorities.

Dos Santos said that the school overreacted and that her son made a comment about snacks, not skin color.

"He said they were talking about brownies. ... Who exactly did he offend?" dos Santos said.

The boy's father was contacted by Collingswood police later in the day. Police said the incident had been referred to the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency. The student stayed home for his last day of third grade.
What is CPS going to do with a kid who likes to eat brownies?

I guess CPS will not seize the kid for this. But what did the school think that the cops were going to do? Why did the cops refer it to CPS?

I guess they wanted to investigate whether someone used the word "brown" to refer to skin color, but what if the kid did? Is that a crime? What's wrong with being brown?

Yes, our schools and other institutions are trying their best to raise a generation of white-haters.

Sunday, July 03, 2016

Feminism is not about equality

Cathy Young writes in the Wash. Post:
Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding.

Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.

This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality.
No, the loudest proponents of feminism show very little interest in equality. Her examples prove this.

The anti-feminists are not necessarily interested in equality either. See 7 Reasons Why A Male Cheater Is Better Than A Female Cheater. The arguments are based on human nature, and feminists usually deny human nature.

Saturday, July 02, 2016

Radical Islam's most powerful weapon

Wash. Post blogger David Post complains about the UK BREXIT vote and adds:
This all makes me think that radical Islam has – perhaps inadvertently – uncovered a most powerful weapon in its continuing war on western civilization: make your own people so miserable by your brutality and your cruelty that they will leave everything behind to try to go elsewhere, even with the foreknowledge that the trip is terribly dangerous and likely to lead to some squalid refugee camp or worse; then, open up your borders and let them out and watch Western institutions break under the strain. It would be a terrible shame if this strategy works, but I fear that Brexit is evidence that it might.
It is worse than that. Policies of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and European leaders seem designed to destabilize the Islamic countries and maximize the number of migrants flooding into the West.

It is not inadvertant at all. Radical Islam has pursued a policy of exporting migrants for at least 20 years. It does not have the military force to invade Europe or the USA, but it has found a way to sucker us into accepting invaders.

I don't know why Post complains about Brexit. That is a sign that the West might reinstate national autonomy and stop the invaders.

Pat Buchanan wrote:
In 376 AD, a large band of Gothic refugees arrives at the Empire’s Danube frontier, asking for asylum. In a complete break with established Roman policy, they were allowed in, unsubdued. They revolted, and within two years had defeated and killed the emperor Valens – the one who had received them. What Valens had done was the Christian thing to do, but it had never been the Roman thing to do.
Immigration and Mohammedan invasions ended the Roman Empire.

RT reports:
The Austrian Constitutional Court has ruled that the presidential election must be held again. The vote, which took place on May 22, saw far-right candidate Norbert Hofer narrowly lose by just 31,000 votes, with Alexander Van der Bellen claiming victory.
The globalists stole the election.

Everyone was saying that the stock market dive of a week ago was proof of dire scare stories about BREXIT. Apparently not, as the market has now recovered.

The lizard people will tell everyone that they are smarter than everyone else, and that you have to destroy national borders or else terrible things will happen. I interpret the stock market events of the last week as showing that investors believed them for a couple of days, and then figured out that it was all a big lie. Britain can do just as well outside the EU, and have national autonomy.

I also conclude that the lizard people are strong enuf to steal an election in Austria, but not in England.

Friday, July 01, 2016

Environmentalists shut down clean power

Michael Shellenberger writes in a NY Times op-ed:
CALIFORNIA has a reputation as a leader in battling climate change, and so when Pacific Gas & Electric and environmental groups announced a plan last week to close the state’s last nuclear plant, Diablo Canyon, and replace much of the electricity it generates with power from renewable resources, the deal was widely applauded.

It shouldn’t have been. If the proposal is approved by the state’s Public Utilities Commission, California’s carbon dioxide emissions will either increase or decline far less than if Diablo Canyon’s two reactors, which generated about 9 percent of the state’s electricity last year, remained in operation. If this deal goes through, California will become a model of how not to deal with climate change. ...

Nearly every time a nuclear plant has been closed, its energy production has been replaced almost entirely with fossil fuels, including in California. In 2012, when the San Onofre nuclear plant closed, natural gas became the main replacement power source, creating emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent to putting two million cars on the road. ...

But California already has more solar power than it can use. This is one of the justifications given for closing Diablo Canyon. On sunny days, California solar farms have had to shut down, lest their added generation overwhelm the grid. ...

If Diablo Canyon is closed, California’s dependence on natural gas is likely to become dangerously high. The share of power that California generated in-state from natural gas rose to 60 percent, from 45 percent, between 2011 and 2015, partly because of the closing of the San Onofre nuclear plant, and could easily rise further without Diablo Canyon.
If you think that global warming is a problem, then you should be in favor of nuclear power. It is safer, cleaner, and cheaper than natural gas.

We are not apes

Here is the Wash. Post science explainer:
Dear Science: Why are there no hominins left on Earth? If evolution is ongoing and species are always changing and adapting, shouldn't we see new human-like species evolving from apes, even if the old ones died out?

Here's what science has to say:

We hate to be the ones to break it to you, but you are an ape.

So were the Neanderthals, the Hobbits, Lucy the Australopithecus, the Taung child and Peking man. And while we're at it, so are orangutans, gorillas, bonobos and chimpanzees. All of us evolved from a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago, and together we make up the taxonomic family Hominidae. Also known as hominids. Also known as great apes.

And there are hominins left on Earth — us. "Hominin" is the the technical term for archaic and modern humans — that is, creatures that are more closely related to us than they are to gorillas and chimps. ...

Even if chimpanzees could suddenly develop the traits of an Australopithecus, they probably wouldn't want to.

It's easy to think about evolution as a linear, progressive drive toward greater and greater complexity, something that started with single-celled amoebas and ended with us. But evolution doesn't have a destination, and even if it did, humans are certainly not it. ...

"When we look at our ape relatives today, they're just fine being ape-y," Jablonski said. "They're doing their chimp stuff, their orangutan stuff, their gorilla stuff; they don't need to be more human-like because they're surviving perfectly."
This is the standard line of the leftist-atheist-evolutionists, but it is not a satisfactory explanation.

Humans excel at language, intelligence, tools, social skills, consciousness, and future time orientation. Humans have prospered thruout the Earth. Apes live in particular habitats and are going nowhere.

No one wants to say that humans are distinctive because they have souls. But whatever you call it, humans have advanced in a way that apes and other species have not.

There is currently no accepted scientific theory for this advance. The best they can do is to deny that humans are humans, or to mumble something about adaptation and climate change.

The aquatic ape hypothesis tries to explain some of these things, but it is not accepted.

There is also no accepted explanation for the evolution of white people. Some say that it had to do with UV light, but that is hotly disputed. Nor is there any excepted explanation of what combination of characteristics made civilization possible.

If any layman asks any of these questions, he will be lectured on how he is anti-science for rejecting the modern fact that humans are no better than any other life form.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

White age is 56, Hispanic is 9

The Daily Caller reports:
U.S. Census data of American residents shows that the most common age for white Americans is by far the oldest. The most common age of Hispanics is 47 years younger.

Do You Think America Will Still Be A White Majority Country In 2050?

Yes No

Completing this poll entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The most common age of white American residents is 56 years old, 27 years old for Asian Americans, 25 years old for black Americans, and nine years old for Hispanic Americans, according to June 2016 census data.

It was recently reported that whites were now the minority when it came to births in 2015. Fifty-two percent of births in 2015 were of racial and ethnic minorities. In 2015, whites also became a minority when it came to people under age five. In 2013, the fertility rate among whites was 59 per thousand women of reproductive age. For Hispanics it was 73 births per thousand women aged 15-44.

With current trends, whites are poised to become a minority in the United States during the mid-2040s.
This is not an accident, or the result of some natural or inevitable trend. It is the policy of Democrats and lizard people to systematically replace the white race.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Why Aziz Ansari hates white males

Actor Aziz Ansari writes in the NY Times:
I am the son of Muslim immigrants. ...

Being Muslim American already carries a decent amount of baggage. In our culture, when people think “Muslim,” the picture in their heads is not usually of the Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar or the kid who left the boy band One Direction. It’s of a scary terrorist character from “Homeland” or some monster from the news. ...

There are approximately 3.3 million Muslim Americans. ...
The latest monster in the news is the suicide shooter and bomber at the Constantinople airport. Most people call it Istanbul now, as the Moslem have driven out all the Christians.

Any guesses on the religion of the monster? My news sources did not say, but only Moslems do stuff like that.

Ansari says that he did not cheer the 9-11 WTC attack, because he was too busy worrying about his personal safety in Manhattan.

Okay, I accept that. But he have any understanding of why Americans do not want to import people sympathetic to terrorism? Nope.

Instead, he blames Trump, white males, and the NRA.
The vitriolic and hate-filled rhetoric coming from Mr. Trump isn’t so far off from cursing at strangers from a car window. He has said that people in the American Muslim community “know who the bad ones are,” ... By Mr. Trump’s logic, after the huge financial crisis of 2007-08, the best way to protect the American economy would have been to ban white males.
Does he mean Jewish males? The NY Times would not have printed his op-ed if he said that. No, they all want to blame non-Jewish white males.

Actually, there are a lot of people wanted to prosecute the bankers who could be blamed for that crisis. There are also a lot who blame the people who defaulted on their mortgages, and many of those were non-white.

Comparing terrorist killings to mortgage derivative trading is disgusting. It is just an attempt to make excuses for Moslems murdering people.

He complains that his Moslem background makes people think that he has terrorist sympathies, but if that is not true, then I suggest that he disavow terrorism and jihad. But he does not in the essay.

All I get out of this essay is that Ansari hates white males. America has treated him very well, and he has gotten rich and famous, but he is mad that American white males are not more tolerant of Moslem terrorists.

The essay is titled: "Aziz Ansari: Why Trump Makes Me Scared for My Family". But the only examples of him being scared in the essay are from Islamic terrorism, not Trump or Americans or white males.

The NY Times is trying to scare people into opposing Trump, and it publishes this essay to convince that even moderate non-religious Moslems have good reason to oppose Trump. My reaction is just the opposite. This jerk has no reason to oppose Trump except that he hates white males, and that he wants import millions of more Moslems so that America will become more Islamic.

I am sick of these arguments about how America is bad because of all the terrible things white males have done. White males built America and made it great. This guy is treated better in America by white males than he would be in any Islamic country. We do not need immigrants from Moslem countries or anywhere else. They guy should be grateful to be here, and not trying to start his own jihad against white males.

Fox News reports:
Lone wolf jihadists should target white Americans so no one mistakes their terror attacks for hate crimes unrelated to the cause of radical Islam, Al Qaeda writes in the latest edition of its online magazine.
Even Al Qaeda has figured out that terrorists can target and kill white Americans without being charged with a hate crime.

In response to some geniuses who babble anti-Trump hysteria, I found this comment:
The United States faces an existential threat from a plan that is racist, criminally motivated and treasonous. The Democratic Party wants to give citizenship and the vote to millions of illegal immigrants with the selfish intended goal of capturing a block of votes and stealing elections for decades to come. It’s the same plan with convicted felons. Meanwhile vicious “progressive” bullies want to destroy free thought and free speech in universities and everywhere else. The Left has become overrun with racist sociopathic ideologies and will definitely destroy this country if it can.

I have always regarded myself as solidly left of center, and always will, but for me it is a very easy decision to vote for an only mildly conservative centrist like Trump, (and to hold my nose and vote Republican down the entire ticket despite being vehemently opposed to many of their ideals) because if the Democrats capture the presidency and both houses then this country will be destroyed. By contrast, the absolute worst case I see in a Trump presidency is is mild inconvenience.

By the way, I am a highly educated intelligent person, for the snobs keeping score.
He is correct. Do you want to elect Trump and save the country, or instead worry about hurting the feelings of some first-generation Moslem who hates white people anyway.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Trump is not the authoritarian

A lot of people try to compare Donald Trump to Hitler.

The comparison does not make much sense, but I want to look at one aspect -- the claim that Trump is authoritarian like Hitler. It appears to me that Hillary Clinton is much more authoritarian, as she is the one who wants to ban guns, to start wars, and to support questionable executive action such as the one that the Supreme Court just declared illegal.

The accusation usually comes from Jews who are extremely authoritarian themselves. There is actually decades of social science research on this, where authoritarian is defined to be right-wing authoritarian (the bad Hitler kind), and not left-wing authoritarian (the good kind, according to the professors). This research was initiated by a Jewish group purporting to identify people who might support another Hitler.

Peter E. Gordon writes:
my poll asked a set of four simple survey questions that political scientists have employed since 1992 to measure inclination toward authoritarianism. These questions pertain to child-rearing: whether it is more important for the voter to have a child who is respectful or independent; obedient or self-reliant; well-behaved or considerate; and well-mannered or curious. Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian. Based on these questions, Trump was the only candidate — Republican or Democrat — whose support among authoritarians was statistically significant.
So they consider you authoritarian if you want your kids to be respectful, obedient, well-behaved, and well-mannered?!

Hillary Clinton wrote a whole book on how your kids should be in govt day centers. That is an example of left-wing authoritarianism. Democrats are all about creating a nanny state, and about forcing policies that would not get majority approval. Those right-wing authoritarians just want well-behaved kids.

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Academics accusing Trump of authoritarianism

A lot of people try to compare Donald Trump to Hitler.

The comparison does not make much sense, but I want to look at one aspect -- the claim that Trump is authoritarian like Hitler. It appears to me that Hillary Clinton is much more authoritarian, as she is the one who wants to ban guns, to start wars, and to support questionable executive action such as the one that the Supreme Court just declared illegal.

The accusation usually comes from Jews who are extremely authoritarian themselves. There is actually decades of social science research on this, where authoritarian is defined to be right-wing authoritarian (the bad Hitler kind), and left-wing authoritarian (the good kind, according to the professors). This research was initiated by a Jewish group purporting to identify people who might support another Hitler.

Peter E. Gordon writes:
my poll asked a set of four simple survey questions that political scientists have employed since 1992 to measure inclination toward authoritarianism. These questions pertain to child-rearing: whether it is more important for the voter to have a child who is respectful or independent; obedient or self-reliant; well-behaved or considerate; and well-mannered or curious. Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian. Based on these questions, Trump was the only candidate — Republican or Democrat — whose support among authoritarians was statistically significant.
So they consider you authoritarian if you want your kids to be respectful, obedient, well-behaved, and well-mannered?!

Hillary Clinton wrote a whole book on how your kid should be in govt day centers. That is an example of left-wing authoritarianism. Those right-wing authoritarians just want well-behaved kids.

Saturday, June 25, 2016

Orlando shooter was not gay

The public has probably moved on from this, but I am afraid that some false info has been burned in.

The Democrats and the (((news media))) have been trying to convince us that the Orlando shooter was not a Moslem jihadist, but really a gay suffering from repression by Republicans.

Now the LA Times reports:
Since the shooting at an Orlando nightclub last week that left 49 people dead, reports have emerged that gunman Omar Mateen frequented the gay club, used gay dating apps and had gay lovers.

But the FBI has found no evidence so far to support claims by those who say Mateen had gay lovers or communicated on gay dating apps, several law enforcement officials said. ...

On Tuesday, Univision aired a report in which “Miguel,” a man wearing a disguise to conceal his identity, alleged he had sex with Mateen after meeting him on the gay dating app, Grindr. He said Mateen had sex with other men too, including a threesome with a Puerto Rican who allegedly told Mateen, after having had unprotected sex with him, that he was HIV positive.

But investigators do not consider the man’s account credible, according to one senior law enforcement official with access to the investigation.

In seeking to verify the reports, federal agents have culled Mateen’s electronic devices, including a laptop computer and cellphone, as well as electronic communications of those who made the claims, law enforcement officials said.

So far, they have found no photographs, no text messages, no smartphone apps, no gay pornography and no cell-tower location data to suggest that Mateen — who was twice married to women and had a young son — conducted a secret gay life, the officials said.
Wow. This was just straight Mohammedan terrorism. If the USA had a reasonable immigration policy, Mateen never would have been here.

Friday, June 24, 2016

Another Freddie Gray defendant acquitted

The Democrat race war is based on convincing non-whites that they are being persecuted, as shown by cases like Trayvon Marton, Ferguson Mo, and Freddie Gray. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have personally said things to encourage race riots.

I have always assumed that some blacks are mistreated, by why can't the Democrats and (((news media))) find any examples?

Another genius physicist has joined the Trump-haters:
Letter to My Friends, by Leonard Susskind

I’m watching this thing that’s happening with disbelief, dismay, and disgust. There is a lunatic loose — I’m sure we all agree about that — but I keep hearing people say that they can’t vote for Hillary. ...

The lunatic may be just that — a lunatic—but he is also a master of smear and innuendo. He is a gigantic liar, and he knows that if you keep saying something over and over, it sticks in people’s minds. It’s called the Big Lie, and it works. Say it enough and it sows confusion and distrust, not only among the know-nothings, but even among those who know better.

The lunatic and his supporters are exceedingly dangerous. Tell your friends: don’t be fooled. The only thing between us and the lunatic is Hillary. Get off your ass and vote in Nov.

Leonard Susskind
Director, Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics,
Stanford University
There is no real argument here, except the opinion that everyone agrees that Trump is a lunatic.

(((Susskind))) is a well-respected theoretical physicist, but he is mainly known for work that has no relation to the real world, such as info leaking out of black holes. It is not mathematically rigorous either.

I mentioned other genius Trump-haters, who also rely on simply saying that all their friends are against Trump.

Is this really the best they can do with their 180 IQ?

If he said that an asteroid were going to destroy the Earth, then I would expect some verifiable evidence, and an estimate of the damage. What damage will a Trump candidacy cause?

No explanation is given. My inference is that it is all part of hating white people.

All of the experts, political leaders, globalists, super-rich, and other elites have been telling Britain that it has to stay in the EU. Pollsters and bettors were saying that it would vote to remain. It has now voted to leave. This is amazing. The British people have voted to stand up for their national self-interest, over the advice of the elites who have been selling them out. America needs to do the same in November.

Update: Lenny defends his letter, but only with arguemnts to appeal to brainless leftists.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

What we mean by America First

Donald Trump summarizes what his campaign is about in a speech today:
Our country lost its way when we stopped putting the American people really first. We have to go back to putting our American people first.

We got here because we switched from a policy of Americanism – focusing on what’s good for America’s middle class – to a policy of globalism, focusing on how to make money for large corporations who can move their wealth and workers to foreign countries all to the detriment of the American worker and the American economy.

We reward companies for offshoring, and we punish companies for doing business in America and keeping our workers employed. They get punished!

This is not a rising tide that lifts all boats. This is a wave of globalization that wipes out our middle class and our jobs.

We need to reform our economic system so that, once again, we can all succeed together, and America can become rich again.

That’s what we mean by America First.
This is the essence of why Trump is such a timely and important candidate. Everyone else has abandoned Americanism for globalism.

Putting America First should be the top job requirement for the President. It swamps all other issues. Why vote for a candidate who does not put America First? Hillary Clinton and the anti-Trump Republicans just seem like traitors in comparison.

Why White-haters vote Democrat

A WSJ op-ed asks:
Many of this year’s college graduates will cast a vote in a presidential election for the first time in November. If they are Jewish or Asian-American, as we are, the odds are that they will vote Democratic. Among Jews, 78% backed Barack Obama in 2008, and 70% did in 2012, despite a foreign policy that at best could be described as rough on Israel. Asian-American support for Mr. Obama grew between 2008 and 2012, from 62% to an even more lopsided 73%. What accounts for this overwhelming support for Democrats?
It is funny how people ask this question, and then give a bunch of answers that do not make any sense.

It is real simple. Jews and Asians are extremely ethnocentric. The Democrat Party has become the hate-White-Christian party.

White Christians are the least ethnocentric people on Earth, and even have a hard time understanding how others could be so preoccupied with identity politics. But to most others, it is very important, and to Jews and Orientals, it is nearly everything. Jews will vote for the Jewish party, and Chinese with vote for the Chinese party. Since these groups are too small to have their own parties, they just vote for the anti-white party.

Democrats also get votes from self-hating whites, such this famous German-American moral philosopher. I mentioned this case, and now there is a follow-up:
Yale philosophy professor Thomas Pogge has “engaged in behavior that violates the norms of appropriate professional conduct,” states an open letter signed by over 200 of his peers. “Nothing is more important to our philosophical community than the trust he has betrayed.” ...

The open letter states that Pogge appears to have “engaged in a long-term pattern of discriminatory conduct,” including “unwanted sexual advances, quid pro quo offers of letters of recommendation and other perks, employment retaliation in response to charges of sexual misconduct, and sexual assault.” It notes that other allegations have surfaced since BuzzFeed News’ investigation was published, and that all of the public allegations to date have been made by women of color.
Really? Nothing more important?

Sexual assault would be a crime, but no one has complained to the police. The complaints are pretty lame, from a legal view, as no one suffered any harm. They are troublesome for Yale because of Obama Title IX policies.

It is funny what they choose to complain about. They do not complain about his adultery or his preference for young colored women. Most of all, they do not complain about his horrible moral philosophy, which mainly consists of thinking up of new ways to blame white people for varous real and imagined ills. It is not clear whether he really believes the nonsense he spouts, or if it is just a ruse for fame and fortune in academia, or for seduction of young non-white girls who are impressed by his white hatred.

"Nothing is more important"? No, nothing is more important to academics than blaming white people, as that is how this charlatan got promoted in the first place.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Science of physiognomy

CH argues:
Pman sells the science of physiognomy short. There’s evidence (re)emerging from the labcoats’ mental masturbatoriums that a person’s looks do say something about his politics, smarts, personality, and even his propensity to crime. Stereotypes don’t materialize out of thin air, and the historical wisdom that one can divine the measure of a man (or a woman) by the cut of his face has empirical support.

For instance, facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is a reliable cue to dominant social behavior in men. Another study found that wide-faced men are untrustworthy. You CAN judge a book by its cover: ugly people are more crime-prone.

Shitlibs have a look. Shitlords have a look. And you can predict with better than 50/50 chance which 2016 presidential candidate a person supports based on nothing more than their photograph.

Physiognomy is real. It needs to come back as a legitimate field of scientific inquiry, and the snarling equalists who lied and slandered good men to suppress the investigation of physiognomy should have their faces rubbed in the realtalk. Physiognomy isn’t just an illusion of confirmation bias, or of backwards rationalization of evoked emotions. The connection between facial appearance and character is observable and measurable, not a figment of cognitive self-bias. There are exceptions, of course, but the existence of exceptions should not be used as an excuse to sweep the reality of the rule under the rug.
The CH blog has its own jargon that makes it hard for outsiders to read. Sometimes I think that he does this deliberates, because the typical blue-pill reader will not grasp his points, and be offended by his posts. His jargon is a way of directing his message at those who will get it.

Part of the purpose of Uber and Airbnb is to let the vendors and customers see each other before making a deal.

The leftist egalitarians complain that it is discrimination to judge someone based on appearance. Of course it is. It is also essential to human civilization.

Americans get taught in kindergarten to treat everyone alike, and not to make any judgments based on appearance. This goes against science, and against human nature. Adults who say this stuff are just mindlessly reciting what they learned in kindergarten. It is nearly impossible to reason with such people because they are brainwashed. They have a kindergarten morality that is ingrained like a religion. Most people do not critically examine their religious beliefs. When someone has been sticking to a belief since an early age, even in the face of obvious counterexamples, he will probably not be persuaded by any logical argument.

Monday, June 20, 2016

ABC News bans Christian from show

Here is an opinion from someone calling himself the "friendly atheist":
Here’s an interesting move: ABC News had scheduled Christian hate group leader Tony Perkins (of the Family Research Council) to appear on today’s episode of This Week, then quietly removed him from the lineup after many people complained.

Whether the removal was the direct result of the complaints hasn’t been confirmed, but given Perkins’ previous statements about LGBT people, it’s difficult to see what he would have contributed to any discussion on the Orlando shootings.

Zack Ford of ThinkProgress notes:
FRC has long been identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a prominent anti-LGBT hate-group, and Perkins himself has a notorious reputation for his anti-LGBT vitriol. Though he often tames his rhetoric in mainstream news appearances to sound like his anti-gay views represent all U.S. Christians, he then tells FRC’s audiences things like that homosexuality leads to “eternal damnation” and is “harmful” to individuals “and to society as a whole.”
Writer Laura Bethany Taylor also asked ABC in an open letter, “How tolerant would the national media be of a KKK leader speaking on a massacre of African Americans?”
So why does an atheist care about Christian damnation?

My guess is that most Americans believe that homosexuality is harmful to individuals and to society as a whole. Whether that is true depends on what you mean by harm.

But Moslems commonly believe that homosexuals should be put to death. Many Islamic countries have the death penalty for homosexuals. However offensive Perkins might be, he is a big friend to LGBT folks, by comparison.

I don't watch ABC News, but does it ever have Moslem guests? If so, and if they represent mainstream Islam, then they are 1000x more offensive to LGBT. If they are putting gay Moslems on the air, then they are misrepresenting Islam.

I suspect that they are suppressing the truth about Islam.

I have heard (((SPLC representatives))) on NPR radio, and almost everything they said was based on hatred of whites and Christians. You would think that if he wanted to defend LGBT rights, then then he would criticize the ideologies that favor killing homosexual. Nope. All they want to do is to spread their own hatred.

Florida killer audio censored

One reason we get so many wacky crime stories out of Florida is that it has a very strong open records law. So mug shots, 911 calls, and police evidence are released to the public.

But in the case of the Orlando gay bar shooting, the Barack Obama administration is now censoring the 911 calls from the Afgan-American Moslem killer Mateen. The FBI says that he declares his allegiance to Islam, and the recording might give people the impression that Islam is a religion of violence. So it is being suppressed for the duration of a multi-year investigation.

We have one Presidential candidate who says that Islamic terrorism is a problem, and we have another who says that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism and that we should ban guns instead.

We have a (((mainstream media))) trying to convince everyone that the massacre was caused by guns, Republicans, American schools, homophobia, racism, etc. Maintaining their power depends on keeping people brainwashed.

Ask yourself: Why is it taking years for the FBI to figure out what Donald Trump deduced within an hour of the news of the shooting? The answer is that destroying Christendom requires concealing the motives of the lizard people.

Update: The censored portion has supposedly now been released.

Tech companies go full Leftist

It was widely reported that (((Facebook))) is rigging its system to favor Hillary Clinton, but so are the other big tech companies. See Anonymous - Google manipulating Hillary Clinton, Twitter blocking conservatives, and Apple fighting the GOP.

Apple is always adding gay emojis, but it and Microsoft have now banned the rifle emoji.

I tried watching some video clips of late night comedy shows on Trump and Clinton. They are just pro-Clinton propaganda, and not funny at all. Jay Leno would at least make an effort to make fun of both Republicans and Democrats. The shows today do not do that at all.

These tech companies are all heavily invested in betraying America. They want open borders, and to integrate America with the Third World. They want to import cheap labor, and subsidize foreigners to get hooked on their products. They want socialist control over all of your communications.

If Clinton is elected, look for a special law sheltering Google from liability for self-driving cars. Or maybe a fully-socialized car insurance system. Buying influence gets favors.

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Famous feminist reveals damaged family

The lead book review in today NY Times is of a new memoir by man-hating feminist (((Susan Faludi))).

Previous books have trash her father as embodying all the evils of the patriarchy. Now she decides that he is not so bad, because in his 70s he traveled to Thailand to have his genitals chopped off, and now he is dead.

She says "she was born in Hungary", referring to her father. She says that his/her real name is Friedman, and he/she were from a wealthy Jewish family.

The NY Times caters to a Jewish audience, and celebrates this sort of story. This hits many of their favorite themes: Jewish, leftist, man-hating, emasculated man, family betrayal, social destruction, America-hating, Holocaust reminder, bitter feminist, sordid, etc.

The NY Times promotes this book with an author interview and rave review. Actually I didn't read the review, and I am just judging by the interview. What is so great about this garbage? This is the sad story of mental illness and emotional damage. I think that this is more evidence of control by lizard people.