Saturday, August 08, 2020

Today's Left is nothing like any Right-wingers

A stupid Quillette essay argues:
The Woke Left v. the Alt-Right: A New Study Shows They’re More Alike Than Either Side Realizes
. So its best example is that Bob Dole criticize some hip hop lyrics in 1996 that glamorized violence against police. And this is supposed to be just like the Left today taking pro-police TV shows off the air. Really? The essay sees some similarity here? No, those things are nothing alike. Bob Dole was not Alt-Right. Neither Bob Dole nor the Alt-Right have taken anything off the air. The Right sees police as essential to civilization. So has everyone else for centuries. The Left today is on the side of killing cops. Not similar at all. 

Read this account of the arrest of George Floyd, and tell me what you think that the cops should have done. Floyd was 6'7", muscular, resisting arrest, long-time criminal, junkie, lying, irrational, suffering a drug overdose, and showing excited delirium. The officers tried and failed to get him into the police car. They called an ambulance. They followed recommended procedure. What else could they do?

Floyd passed a counterfeit bill, and was high on illegal drugs while sitting in the driver's seat of a car. Should the police have just let him go? Hit him with the baton? Allow him to endanger others?

I am sure that there are examples of police misconduct, but this is not one. The anti-racism protesters always complain about Ferguson Missouri, which is the same as saying Black criminals should be allowed to kill White policemen. That is what was attempted in Ferguson.

I don't even hear any serious discussion of Floyd's cause of death, or what the police should have done. Floyd was dying of a fentanyl overdose before the police even arrived on the scene. This tells me that those who complain about Floyd's death are just crazy leftists who want to kill cops.

Friday, August 07, 2020

Conservatism is dead

A magazine called The American Conservative might be looking for a new name, because it denounces conservatism:
American Conservatism is Fiddling While Rome Burns ... Conservatism is the seven cheers for capitalism and the deafening silence on demographic change, feminism, and corporate malfeasance. It’s the same tired cast of speakers blathering about limited government almost a century after the New Deal. It’s the platitudinous Reagan quotes and the worn-out Buckley anecdotes. It’s the mindless optimism and the childish exhortations—if something can’t go on forever, it won’t! ... But conservatism is also the endless wars, the nation-building, and the outdated alliances. It’s the free trade fetish. It’s the foolish libertarianism that hates the government more than it loves America. It’s the unconscionable refusal to clamp down on immigration. Worst of all, conservatism is the cowardice and accommodation in the face of leftist hegemony. It’s the long list of enemies to the Right. It’s the court eunuchs and other members of the controlled opposition who offer an echo, but never a choice. It’s the faux grandstanding while living in fear of being called a racist. ... Conservatism may indeed be unsalvageable at this point.
Another article argues:
I’m a conservative but at this point who cares?” said Donald Trump in 2016. “We’ve got to straighten out the country.” ... I am not the first person to point out that conservative political coalitions are mostly just collections of losers, but the point nevertheless bears repeating. Today’s conservatism is merely the name used to categorize the rejects of the post–Cold War order:
I am inclined to agree with this. Most conservatives disgust me.

Wednesday, August 05, 2020

Whites are inherently White supemacists

From a review of White Fragility:
DiAngelo concludes her book with the blunt assertion that “a positive white identity is an impossible goal. White identity is inherently racist; white people do not exist outside the system of white supremacy.”
The book continues:
This does not mean that we should stop identifying as white and start claiming to be Italian or Irish. To do so is to deny the reality of racism in the here and now, and this denial would simply be color-blind racism. Rather, I strive to be "less white."
For more of what the book actually says, see this summary. This book is probably the biggest selling and most widely accepted statement about race relations today. It has topped the best-seller lists on the NY Times and Amazon. This appears to be the modern consensus. Following this, all Whites are white supremacists. It is inherent, and has nothing to do with whether some White guy has racist views. He is a white supremacist regardless, because of the views of the people of color. 

I do not agree with this terminology, but I do not get to define the language. White supremacy used to mean a belief that Whites should have control over other races, but hardly anyone uses the phrase that way anymore. For example, a NY Times article argues:
As our revived national conversation on race has made clear, the legacies of slavery and white supremacy run wide and deep in American society and political life. One such legacy — which is particularly noteworthy in a presidential election season — has been the survival and preservation of the Electoral College, an institution that has been under fire for more than 200 years.
The Electoral College favored the Republicans in 2000 and 2016, and favored the Democrats in 1992, 1996, and 2004. I don't think that it had anything to do with race in any of those years. By this modern usage, everything about America is White supremacist. That will continue until the Whites are systematically replaced with coloreds. This is not a statement about anyone being treated unfairly or anything like that. It is just a matter of Whites now being defined to be inherently White supremacist. The presence of Whites is synonymous with the presence of White supremacy. 

The current impetus for all this is the death of George Floyd. The Minnesota attorney general is a weirdo Black Democrat convert to Islam, and he said that he was refusing to release the police body cams because they would make it harder to convict the police officers. The London Daily Mail got them anyway. They show that Floyd's bizarre behavior and breathing complaints started before the officers even touched him. He seemed to already know that he was dying of a fentanyl overdose. It is more and more obvious that the police did not contribute to Floyd's death, and that race had nothing to do with it.

Tuesday, August 04, 2020

The election result may be incalculable

The NY Times continues to say The coronavirus pandemic has taken an incalculable death toll, where it lists the deaths. Apparently they do not know the meaning of incalculable. Separately, it argues that the Presidential votes will not be countable on election night. The mail-in ballots could take weeks to count, and if it is close, the difficulties are likely to be worse than in 2000. The election could get thrown into the House if some states do not declare a winner. In the worst-case scenario, California refuses to accept Trump's reelection, and secedes from the Union. The military is called. They could be right. This election looks like a disaster. The Democrat candidate is too senile to debate. He is about to announce a VP choice who is likely to be an incompetent Black woman. Foogle, Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit are massively interfering by censoring the pro-Trump postings. The voters will not have fair access to info, and we will not have honest and anonymous voting. I expect Dems to be stuffing the mailboxes with doctored ballots. Here is a funny video on Silicon Valley Diversity. Diversity means hiring non-whites who recite Jewish leftist mantras, like hating Pres. Trump.

Monday, August 03, 2020

Yes, we like objective facts

Emphasis on objective facts is a White cultural thing, according to the Smithsonian, and maintaining the anti-White narrative requires shutting down factual sources. Almost no one is willing to tell you the cause of George Floyd's death. Reddit has even shut down commentary on hate crime hoaxes, along with shutting down pro-Trump messages. Now a Jewish publication, The Atlantic, has essay denouncing men who rely on facts. Because women rely on feelings, not facts. Or because facts interfere with the Jewish Leftist narrative. Or both. Her husband once wrote a whole book on how non-Jewish Whites can be tricked into acquiescing to their demographic replacement. 

Also:
Google is launching a new tool that allows businesses to identify themselves as Black-owned through the company’s Maps and Search listings. ... In 2018, Google introduced similar badges for businesses to display if they were either “Women-Led” and/or friendly to members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Wow, I am looking forward to similar labels for Whites, Jews, Moslems, Republicans, and Communists. 

Yahoo Sports reports:
Orlando Magic forward Jonathan Isaac chose not to join his teammates in protest Friday. While the rest of the Magic got down on one knee during the national anthem, Isaac chose to stand. Isaac, 22, was the only player to do so. 
Isaac was also the lone player on the court who didn’t wear a Black Lives Matter shirt. Instead, he wore his Magic jersey and warmup pants during the anthem. Jonathan Isaac is the first player during the restart to stand for the National Anthem. All the remaining coaches, players, and members of both teams took a knee.
He will not be canceled, because he is Black. All White players must demonstrate subservience to the new Black world order.

Sunday, August 02, 2020

To learn who rules over you

The Times of Israel reports:
This post by the head of Philadelphia's NAACP chapter has drawn calls for him to step down. (Facebook) Jewish groups in Philadelphia have called for the firing of the head of the local NAACP, Rodney Muhammad, who posted a known anti-Semitic meme on his public Facebook page. ... The meme on Muhammad’s Facebook page included photos of Ice Cube, DeSean Jackson and Nick Cannon, Black celebrities who recently posted anti-Semitic comments on social media, and the quote “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” falsely attributed to French philosopher Voltaire. The quote originated with Kevin Strom, an American neo-Nazi.
According to Wikipedia, Strom said something vaguely similar in 1993. Maybe Voltaire didn't say the exact quote, but I find it hard to believe that no one said anything similar until 1993. It is an obvious truth, and it has probably been said 100s of times. Now Jews are saying that you are not allowed to use this quote, because it criticizes the Jews while suggesting that Jews do not allow criticism! The Jews as might as well say, "We Jews run the world, so we can stop you from telling anyone that we run the world." The guy being accused of anti-Semitism is some Black man named Mohammad. So it is a good bet that his religious beliefs are distinctly different from Judaism. He ought to be free to express his religious beliefs, without being silenced by another religion. You might think that it is crazy to say that Jews rule over us, but the NY Times curently have an article about how, if Joe Biden is elected, White non-Jews will systematically humiliated on public television. They will be told that they must confess to the racism of themselves and their ancestors, or face imprisonment. The confessions will be broadcast on all the major TV network. This is one of the most offensive articles I have ever read, and it is in the NY Times. I don't think that the Soviet show trials were this bad. A vote for Biden is a vote for Blacks to destroy you.

Saturday, August 01, 2020

Black women demand dismantling colleges

Here is a letter to Nature, the top British science journal:
Elite institutions are well positioned to set the standard on how to dismantle systemic racism and discrimination. As African American and Black women working at [Stanford Medicine] ... Immediate actions should include making all institutions of learning teach compulsory courses on the Black diaspora for all degree programmes. A diverse range of faculty members should be hired ... Advancement and tenure should be tied to excellence in diversity efforts.
If they really want diverse professors, then colleges should hire some with this view:
The deadliest question is how to accommodate blacks. One mustn’t say what everyone knows, that blacks are the least educable, least productive, most criminal, most violent, most dependent, and least assimilable of the population. If anything can be done about any of these, it won’t be, because no one is permitted to name the problem. No one is in charge.
I am not saying that view is correct. I am saying that colleges should not be held hostage to a radical political agenda, that colleges should teach the truth, and that a genuine diversity of opinions should be presented. The only "systemic racism and discrimination" in colleges today is in favor of promoting less competent Blacks and women. I would bet that the three Black women writing this are substantially less competent than their colleagues. Nobody can even give an example of a college mistreating a Black woman. Normally if someone in a scientific journal claims "systemic" anything, their would be citations to data to back up the claim. Not here. It is all a big hoax.