Wednesday, April 17, 2019

It’s O.K. to be white

From a NY Times op-ed:
In October, senators voted in favor of a One Nation motion incorporating the white supremacist slogan “It’s O.K. to be white.” The government later blamed an administrative error for the vote, after having initially trumpeted the move as evidence of its opposition to “racism of any kind.”

The kindest interpretation of all this is that the coalition has been sloppy and inattentive to the problem of extremism, ...
Really? Saying “It’s O.K. to be white” is considered to be white supremacist and extremist!

Here is a video of Joe Biden saying that it is a good thing that massive non-white immigration is reducing whites to being a minority. The other Democrat presidential are taking more extreme anti-white positions, such as advocating whites paying reparations to non-whites.

Politics used to be aligned on a Right v. Left axis. Now it is Nationalist v. Globalist. Or between those who say it is okay to be White, and those working to exterminate Whites.

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Charlize Theron is shockingly available

People mag reports:
Charlize Theron is looking to date but is only interested in those brave enough to ask.

The 43-year-old actress spoke about her dating life to Entertainment Tonight while at CinemaCon in Las Vegas on Thursday. Theron, who was promoting her upcoming film Long Shot, admitted finding a date wasn’t as easy as it looked.

“I’ve been single for 10 years, it’s not a long shot,” Theron said. “Somebody just needs to grow a pair and step up.”

She added, “I’m shockingly available.”
She was prime mating material, when her eggs were still good, and she was one of the most beautiful and popular stars in Hollywood. Now she is infertile and has two adopted black African kids, and is ashamed to travel with them in the USA.

One of the black African kids is a boy being raised as a girl.

Step up? No, she is discovering that she is just not that desirable anymore.

You might think that at least she gets the approval of her fellow leftists by adopting black African kids. Not necessarily:
The most blatantly racist people I have personally known are white parents who adopted black children. ...

The concept of transracial adoption is predicated upon the idea that we (the white adopters, in this case) have something that the parents of the children we are adopting lack. ...

In both cases, there exists a deprecating tone of white rescue — the new colonialism.
I am not sure about that, but there is something very strange about wanting to purchase kids of another race from another country.

CH tells her the brutal truth:
And she lies to herself and everyone around her when she says stuff like this:
“Once you have children, that’s who you are. There is no way around that. That’s who I am,” she explained back in 2017. “Once I had my kids, the first two years you’re so, you turn into such a mom. Your body almost switches off. It’s like I had no desire to date or anything.”
Charlize, dear, you didn’t have children. You adopted two random babies from the third world. You never gave birth. Your body never sustained life. Your vagina never expelled an infant of your own blood and soul. Your body didn’t “almost switch off” because your body never went through the childbirth process and your kids aren’t your own, which everyone including yourself knows but will never say out loud. You “love” your alien-looking kids marginally more than you love a complete stranger. You “turned into such a mom” only in your head, where your fantastical self-conception demanded that you be the mom which in your heart you don’t really feel you are.

You had no “desire to date” because no man who could meet your standards wanted to date a headcase single mom, so you hamsterly rationalized to yourself that it was your choice to drop out of the dating market.

Naturally, now that your once-hsmv is plummeting through the floor and your increasingly haggard face is made uglier by the swarthlets nipping at your heels, you have trouble finding a worthwhile man who will put up with your mental instability and District 9 home life. And just as naturally, you lash out at men and demean their manhood for not ignoring their own desires to placate your desire, which only adds to the reasons why men don’t want to be within a parsec of you after dropping a perfunctory protein torpedo in your infertile exhaust port.

And that is the truth I hope hurts you badly, because you deserve it.

If you want to know why Theron is so fucked in the head, here’s your reason:
She grew up on her parents’ farm in Benoni, near Johannesburg. On 21 June 1991, Theron’s father, an alcoholic, threatened both teenaged Charlize and her mother while drunk, physically attacking her mother. Theron’s mother then shot and killed him. The shooting was legally adjudged to have been self-defence, and her mother faced no charges.
It always comes back to daddy issues. Beta daddies, alcoholic daddies, violent daddies, weak daddies…..the West is in the midst of a Daddy Crisis, and our traitorous, mentally rekt women are the symptom.
Wow. She appears damaged beyond repair.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Israeli rocket crashes on the Moon

The London Guardian reports:
An Israeli spacecraft has crashed into the lunar surface, ending the first privately funded attempt to land on the moon.

About the size of a washing machine, the 585kg (1,290lb) robotic lander experienced an engine and communication failure in the last seconds of touchdown. ...

Its frame held a time capsule of digital files the size of coins containing the Torah, children’s drawings, dictionaries in 27 languages, Israeli songs, as well as memories of a Holocaust survivor.
Is this a joke? This Jewish stuff is too weird for me sometimes.

In 1969, the USA sent a man to the Moon to plant an American flag. Hollywood made a movie about it, but left out the flag. Now Israel crashes a washing machine robot with coins and Jewish Holocaust propaganda into the Moon!

Here is what Jewish atheist computer science professor Scott Aaronson says:
I was saddened about the results of the Israeli election. The Beresheet lander, which lost its engine and crashed onto the moon as I was writing this, seems like a fitting symbol for where the country is now headed. Whatever he was at the start of his career, Netanyahu has become the Israeli Trump ...

The original Zionist project — the secular, democratic vision of Herzl and Ben-Gurion and Weizmann and Einstein, which the Nazis turned from a dream to a necessity — matters more to me than most things in this world, and that was true even before I’d spent time in Israel and before I had a wife and kids who are Israeli citizens. It would be depressing if, after a century of wildly improbable victories against external threats, Herzl’s project were finally to eat itself from the inside. Of course I have analogous worries (scaled up by two orders of magnitude) for the US — not to mention the UK, India, Brazil, Poland, Hungary, the Philippines … the world is now engaged in a massive test of whether Enlightenment liberalism can long endure, or whether it’s just a metastable state between one Dark Age and the next. ...

I’m happy that my good friend Zach Weinersmith (legendary author of SMBC Comics), as well as the GMU economist Bryan Caplan (rabblerousing author of The Case Against Education, which I reviewed here), have a new book out: a graphic novel that makes a moral and practical case for open borders (!).
This is so deranged that it is hard to unravel.

If you google Aaronson, you will find that almost all of the attacks on him are from the Left. His views are about 99% the same as what you would expect from a Jewish atheist leftist academic, but he is slightly more centrist on some issues, so he is attacked mercilessly by SJWs.

But he learns nothing from it.

Even tho he is a non-religious American, he obvious identifies with Jews, Israel, and Zionism much more than America. He wants open borders for America, and a Jews-only policy for Israel.

The arguments for open borders belong in a comic book, they are so ridiculous. They only make sense if you are an America-hating and Trump-hating Jew who is planning to exit to Israel anyway. He does not need to make America better for his kids, because his kids are Israeli citizens.
I’m happy that Greta Thunberg, the 15-year-old Swedish climate activist, has attracted a worldwide following and might win the Nobel Peace Prize. I hope she does — and more importantly, I hope her personal story will help galvanize the world into accepting things that it already knows are true, as with the example of Anne Frank (or for that matter, Gandhi or MLK). Confession: back when I was an adolescent, I often daydreamed about doing exactly what Thunberg is doing right now, leading a worldwide children’s climate movement. I didn’t, of course. In my defense, I wouldn’t have had the charisma for it anyway — and also, I got sidetracked by even more pressing problems, like working out the quantum query complexity of recursive Fourier sampling. But fate seems to have made an excellent choice in Thunberg. She’s not the prop of any adult — just a nerdy girl with Asperger’s who formed the idea to sit in front of Parliament every day to protest the destruction of the world, because she couldn’t understand why everyone else wasn’t.
So she is a nerdy Asperger girl with the charisma to lead a worldwide children’s climate movement in the example of Anne Frank?! He seems to be trolling us with his weirdo nerdy Jewish views, but I am pretty sure that he is completely serious.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Genetically modified monkeys are smarter

Science news:
Scientists in southern China report that they've created several transgenic macaque monkeys with extra copies of a human gene suspected of playing a role in shaping human intelligence. "According to their findings, the modified monkeys did better on a memory test involving colors and block pictures, and their brains also took longer to develop -- as those of human children do," reports MIT Technology Review. "There wasn't a difference in brain size."
This has a lot of potential. The latest estimate of world IQ is 82.

China is in the process of colonizing Africa, but is frustrated that the locals are not smart enough to follow their orders. China is probably planning on genetically engineering better slaves.

Friday, April 12, 2019

The Great Awokening

Vox essay:
The Great Awokening

A hidden shift is revolutionizing American racial politics — and could transform the future of the Democratic Party.

By Matthew Yglesias on April 1, 2019 9:25 am

For all the attention paid to the politics of the far right in the Trump era, the biggest shift in American politics is happening somewhere else entirely.

In the past five years, white liberals have moved so far to the left on questions of race and racism that they are now, on these issues, to the left of even the typical black voter.

This change amounts to a “Great Awokening” — comparable in some ways to the enormous religious foment in the white North in the years before the American Civil War. It began roughly with the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri, when activists took advantage of ubiquitous digital video and routine use of social media to expose a national audience in a visceral way to what otherwise might have been a routine local news story.
I think that this is correct. We have seen a huge awokening on the far left, but not the far right.

He is using "white liberals" to include Jews. He is 3/4 Jewish himself, with a non-Jewish name.

Siding with the Ferguson protesters was really an extreme anti-White position. It meant siding with a black thug trying to kill a white cop. The protests were fueled by blacks, the Obama administration, and Jewish news media.

The whole thing leads me to believe that we could be headed for Civil War II. I don't see how there can be any compromise with millions of people who think that it is okay to attempt to murder white cops.

There are people who falsely blame Trump for identity politics. He plays identity politics far less than most politicians. The trends to identity politics were firmly in place before he entered politics. His political success was largely caused by voters being disgusted with the identity politics of the Democrats.

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Pope wants to receive values from migrants

There is only one plausible reason for elite-managed Third World invasion: demographic aggression against Europeans in retaliation for the horrors of WWII. For centuries, whites were subjected to evolutionary selective pressures that maximized the prevalence of beneficial traits, but removed maladaptive traits from the gene pool. Not only did IQs rise, but high trust cultures fostering social cohesion and co-operative behavior were established. As a result, Europeans were able to rapidly recover from tragedies like the Mongol invasions and the Black Death. In fact, if Europe had been destroyed by a devastating thermonuclear war, the surviving whites would have still been able to recover because of their enormous social and human capital. After a few generations, the population would return to replacement levels of fertility and Western civilization would flourish once again.
Is it possible that Mongol invasions, Black Death, and World War II were actually good things?

Yes, millions died, and these events are rated among the most terrible of all time.

So was the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs.

We only got to modern civilization by systematically killing criminals and fighting bloody wars.

I don't want to see another WWII, but what if it is essential to civilization?
Interestingly enough, the greater internal weaknesses of communist regimes like the Soviet Union made them far less dangerous than their globalist counterparts. The centrally planned economy’s inability to efficiently allocate resources, as well as military expenditures vastly in excess of consumer goods spending, among other reasons, led to Soviet collapse in 1991. Cultural Marxist propaganda combined with neo-liberal capitalism is far more economically sustainable than Soviet communism; this makes it far more dangerous. At least communist ideology did not ruin ordinary Russians by destroying their way of life and culture. The Soviet version of multiculturalism, the ethnofederal model, never dissolved Russian ethnic identity to replace it with a deracinated, faceless Homo sovieticus. On the other hand, the purpose of globalist multiculturalism is total destruction of Europe by erasing its indigenous culture and reducing indigenous whites to a minority, finally wiping them out through miscegenation and race war. If there is no anti-globalist revolution in the near future, this policy will continue indefinitely, until whites one day go extinct.
Maybe we are living thru a disaster on the level of the Mongol invasions. Will today's Europe recover?

Breitbart reports:
“Migrants are those who always bring us riches. Europe itself was made by migrants! The barbarians, the Celts…,” he said. “All these came from the north and brought their cultures with them. Europe grew in this way, with the contrast of cultures.” ...

“If I have a racist heart, I have to examine why and convert,” Francis said. “Migrants must be received, accompanied, integrated. Let them receive our values and let us receive theirs, an exchange of values.”
Does he think the same about the Mongol and Islamic invaders? Previous popes were opposed to Islamic invasions.

The current Pope just wants to surrender. I don't see how he can believe in Catholicism and also believe in submitting to the values of Islamic invaders.

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Fired for bringing beer to husband

Think that Ben Shapiro and The Federalist are conservative? Look at why they fired a conservative writer,
here and here.

In brief, she got a lot of very hostile attacks on Twitter because of the way she said that she fetched her husband a beer while he was watching a basketball game on TV. Then she pushed back at one of her gay critics, suggesting that he is the one with peculiar ideas about sexual relationships.

So even conservative political organizations will fire you for so-called homophobia.

This form a political correctness is now called virtue signaling. Even tho Shapiro is against homosexuality and same-sex marriage, he has to prove that he is not a bigot by firing heterosexuals for their biased opinions. This shows how far conservative organizations have sunk.

They are also ostracizing Congressman Steve King by calling him "a longtime promoter of white supremacy". This is mainly because of Jewish groups that disagree with his political opinions to limit immigration.

Monday, April 08, 2019

Keep out all Muslim refugees

NPR Radio news reports:
Despite a global refugee crisis, the United States is closing its doors. Refugee resettlement is near record lows, even for minorities whose plight the Trump administration has highlighted. ...

Muslim refugees are down by 90 percent. Jenny Yang of World Relief says the sharp reduction in refugee admissions contradicts the administration's commitment to religious freedom.
They argue that Trump says he believes in religious freedom so he should import a lot more Moslems into the USA, because some say they suffer persecution.

It is crazy to even use Islam and religious freedom in the same sentence. Islam is the opposite of religious freedom. If you want to let Moslems be Moslems, the only way to do that is to leave them in Moslem countries. Bringing Moslem refugees into the USA is just a scheme to destroy Christian religious freedom.

Speaking of religious freedom, there is an organization that thinks what we really need is anti-religious freedom, and it promotes itself with a new ad:
In the ad, Pinker urges viewers to join the FFRF in its fight to prevent religion from creeping into U.S. government. Pinker has served as FFRF’s first honorary president since 2013.

“Hi, I’m Steve Pinker. In mhey book, Enlightenment Now, I show that the world has become a better place as reason has been overcoming superstition and tribalism. But the values of the Enlightenment are under attack. That’s why I’m a proud member of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the nation’s largest association of freethinkers, working to keep the state and church separate. Please join me in supporting the Freedom From Religion Foundation to ensure that our government is driven not by religion, but by reason.”

Pinker is one of the world’s premier intellects and cognitive psychologists, and serves as the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. He’s been named on the Time 100 list of the world’s “Most Influential People.” Among his other best-selling books are The Blank Slate, The Language Instinct and How the Mind Works.
Okay, but the "values of the Enlightenment" are White Christian values. They are not Jewish, Islamic, Oriental, Indian, or African values. Pinker's message is essentially the same as that of the White supremacists. If he meant what he is saying, he would get on the Trump train, and work to keep all the Moslems out. Instead, he presents himself as a Jewish atheist Canadian leftist Harvard professor.

Pinker's latest NY Times op-ed says:
The world’s best hydro sites are already dammed.

Small wonder that a growing response to these intimidating facts is, “We’re cooked.”

But we actually have proven models for rapid decarbonization with economic and energy growth: France and Sweden. ...

They did this with nuclear power. ...

This is a realistic solution to humanity’s greatest problem.
That is "dammed", not "damned". Remember, he is a religion-hating leftist atheist.

But again, this is a White supremacist message. He wants to run the world on nuclear energy, and it goes without saying that White people should be running the program.

Saying "humanity’s greatest problem" is just a metaphor. Remember, Pinker is a psychologist, not a climate or energy scientist. Humanity's greatest problem is the threat to Western Civilization from Islam and Third World population growth and migration. Pinker is saying that Whites need to take charge and run the show.

Sunday, April 07, 2019

Jews will not replace us

The Jewish NY Times has another article whining about anti-semitism and blaming Whites:
Swastikas daubed on a Jewish cemetery in France. An anti-Semitic political campaign by Hungary’s far-right government. ...

The accumulated incidents in Europe and the United States have highlighted how an ancient prejudice is surging in the 21st century in both familiar and mutant ways, fusing ideologies that otherwise would have little overlap. ...

President Trump himself embodies the contradictions of the moment. Mr. Trump has openly courted white nationalists, saying they include “some very fine people,” even as they marched in the style of the Ku Klux Klan, gave stiff-armed Nazi salutes and chanted slogans like “Jews will not replace us.” ...

At the same time, the president has boasted close relations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and offered full-throated support to Israel, including moving the United States Embassy to Jerusalem, even absent progress toward a settlement with the Palestinians.
An essential part of the Jewish religion is constant whining about how Jews are persecuted.

These stories are almost entirely hoaxes, like the Jussie Smollett story. Jews are the most privileged ethnic group in the world.

Even tho Trump is an extremely pro-Jewish President, the Jews attack him with slander and fake news at every opportunity. Just look at the above. Trump never said that white nationalists include some very fine people. You can google the quote to check for yourself. He referred to people who were peacefully protesting the removal of some war monuments.

And of course the NY Times and other Jewish news media has been telling us for two years that Trump is going to be impeached for Russian collusion.

If there is an increase in anti-Jewish activities around the world, you have to ask what the Jews are doing to provoke it. Nobody picks on a small minority for no reason. The article does not address the root causes.

Apparently a lot of people have become convinced that there is a systematic Jewish plot to marginalize White Christians, and to replace them with non-whites and non-Christians. Resistance to such a plot is the meaning of the slogan “Jews will not replace us.”

Not all Jews, of course. It is mainly the 80% of them who vote Democrat, and the 95% in the news media who have Trump derangement syndrome.

With articles like this, the NY Times shows that it is firmly on the side of Jews replacing the White population. Anyone who objects to the program is to be ostracized in strongest way. That is why the NY Times and other Jewish publications are still complaining about those Charlottesville protests, a couple of years after the fact.

Here is another complaint about Jewish persecution:
The Jerusalem Post
reports that, during the sad but risible “Israel Apartheid Week” held annually at Columbia University, left-wing flyers appeared showing Israeli soldiers as devils with horns. This equation of Jews with Satan, depicted with horns, hooves, and deformities, is, of course a medieval anti-Semitic trope of which the students must surely have been aware. Or perhaps not, given their profound ignorance of “apartheid” and their kneejerk anti-Zionism. Wikipedia says this:
The portrayal of Jews as historic enemies of Christianity and Christendom constitutes the most damaging anti-Jewish stereotype reflected in the literature of the late tenth through early twelfth centuries. Jews were often depicted as satanic consorts, or as devils themselves and “incarnation[s] of absolute evil.”
The flyer does not even show the Israeli soldier as a devil with horns. This is just another example of weirdo Jewish paranoid beliefs about how they are being persecuted.

If Jews and Christians are enemies, it is because of Jews, not Christians. Polls consistently show Christians to be supportive of Jews and Israel. The Columbia Israel-haters are leftist non-Christians. It is the Jews who seek to undermine Christianity at every opportunity.

Beyond all that, there is nothing wrong with portraying a rival religion as being aligned with the devil. The religions have very different beliefs. To believe in one is to reject the other. Freedom of religion to affirm one's beliefs necessarily includes the freedom to say that the alternatives are devilish.

Saturday, April 06, 2019

Preparing for Civil War II

CH speculates:
SunBakedSurburb: [Following a separation of Red and Blue America], Bluestans will also be characterized by constant ethnic friction, continued middle class white flight, Byzantine and corrupt governments, and eventually implosion. Here in California, I see your prophecy at work.

I agree with this, btw. Bluestans would be wealthier…for a while…until the low trust society that typically characterizes Diversitopias eats away at that blue-hued human and social capital. If Redstans encourage their Divershitty to abscond for Bluestans, and Bluestans continue clinging to their virtue signaling for social status points, then it wouldn’t take long for Bluestans to get overrun by dysfunction and overwhelmed by high taxes to pay the Danegeld to their vibrancy. The Bluestans would start richer, become poorer, and finish collapsed, while the Redstans would maintain an even keel of moderate economic health and very high social health. ...

This is why I predict that if there is a blood-drenched Civil War II, it will be the fault of White libs who won’t tolerate White cons attempting a peaceful separation from them. And, unlike Civil War I when White libs had a facsimile of moral high ground to prevent secession, this time around all the moral justification will be with the FreeWhites who just want to get out from under the yoke of White lib tyranny.
A Civil War II would be a disaster, and I hope everyone tries to avoid it.

That being said, the USA is being split in ways that will not get resolved anytime soon. The war could be red states v. blue states, or whites v. non-whites, or Christians v. non-Christians, or nationalists v. globalists, or traditionalists v. reformers. If the war comes, many will have to choose sides, even tho they do not entirely agree with either side.

Friday, April 05, 2019

Judge says marital rights are fundamental

RT reports:
A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

“I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.
Apparently the husband, wife, and judge see nothing wrong with the marriage, but some social service agency does. How did we get to this point, where govt busybodies actively use the courts to intervene into the most intimate part of a marriage?

A legal dictionary defines:
marital rights
n. an old-fashioned expression for the rights of a husband (not rights of a wife) to sexual relations with his wife and to control her operation of the household. (See: consortium, loss of consortium)
This right is not mentioned in the Wikipedia article on Rights and responsibilities of marriages in the United States. There is a lot of gay stuff instead. Apparently feminists and gays have rewritten marriage law to make it all about receiving govt monetary benefits. Surveys show that young people are less sex than ever.

Thursday, April 04, 2019

Evolutionist acknowledges sex differences

Leftist-atheist-evolutionist Jerry Coyne writes:
The answer to the ideological “sexes-must-be biologically-identical” argument is simple. We should, and must, give both sexes (and all ethnic groups) complete equality of opportunity as a moral principle — for such equality is the foundation of a good society. Average differences in behavior are just that — average differences — and do not justify differential treatment of individuals, whether their groups be based on sex or ethnicity. Somehow the “blank slaters” can’t grasp that simple principle.

To be fair, blank-slaters base their ideology on biological determinism being used in the past by bigots to suppress groups, but let us remember that blank-slateism remains not science but ideology, an ideology that is not only biologically misguided but whose fears can be overcome by changes in morality.
Yes, blank-slateism is an unscientific ideology, but I question his analysis of what blank-slaters do and do not grasp.

Some feminists argue against even the possibility of men being better than women at some brain functions, and then point to research saying that women are better than men at some things. Obviously such an argument is not following science, but just some sort of female advancement ideology.

Leftists have a blind spot when they say, "complete equality of opportunity as a moral principle ... is the foundation of a good society." They take this on faith, and it often leads them to socialist ideas if taken to logical conclusions. They never really explain how such a society is better than some other society that might be better at creating wealth or happiness.

Coyne endorses this book review:
So are female and male brains the same or different? We now know that the correct answer is “yes”: They are the same or similar on average in many respects, and they are different, a little to a lot, on average in many other respects. The neuroscience behind this conclusion is now remarkably robust, and not only won’t be going away, it will only grow.

The book is downright farcical when it comes to modern animal research, simply ignoring the vast majority of it. The enormous power of animal research, of course, is that it can establish sex influences in particular on mammalian brain function (such as sex differences in risk-taking, play behavior, and responses to social defeat as just three examples) that cannot be explained by human culture, (although they may well be influenced in humans by culture.) Rippon engages in what is effectively a denial of evolution, implying to her reader that we should ignore the profound implications of animal research (“Not those bloody monkeys again!”) when trying to understand sex influences on the human brain. She is right only if you believe evolution in humans stopped at the neck.
Coyne does make a point that it is counter-productive to tell girls that they are just as smart as boys. Since men greatly outnumber women among successful scientists, it only convinces them that career advancement in the sciences is thwarted by misogyny, sexism, and harassment. So they drop out for that reason. It would be better to just tell them the truth.

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

Closeted support for eugenics

The Slate Star Codex Jewish psychiatrist blogger writes:
RJ Zigerell (h/t Marginal Revolution) studies public support for eugenics. He finds that about 40% of Americans support some form of eugenics. The policies discussed were very vague, like “encouraging poor criminals to have fewer children” or “encouraging intelligent people to have more children”; they did not specify what form the encouragement would take. Of note, much lack of support for eugenics was a belief that it would not work; people who believed the qualities involved were heritable were much more likely to support programs to select for them. For example, of people who thought criminality was completely genetic, a full 65% supported encouraging criminals to have fewer children.

I was surprised to hear this, because I thought of moral opposition to eugenics was basically universal. If a prominent politician tentatively supported eugenics, it would provoke a media firestorm and they would get shouted down. This would be true even if they supported the sort of generally mild, noncoercive policies the paper seems to be talking about. How do we square that with a 40% support rate?
He goes on to argue that this is a good reason to censor pro-eugenics views.

Jews are preoccupied with eugenics:
Eugenics is alive and well in Israel, although the word ‘eugenic’ is typically avoided. Glad cites an expert suggesting that the first human clones will probably be in Israel; this will occur with the support of Orthodox Jews. Yael Hashioni-Dolevshows that Israeli geneticists and the Israeli public strongly favor eugenic practices. Israeli women are “heavily pressured to engage in selection of their embryos, or, in the ultra-Orthodox community, to marry according to ‘genetic compatibility.’” This can be seen as an aspect of racial Zionism that dominates contemporary Israeli political culture. ...

The fact that Jewish activists have dominated the anti-eugenics movement in the West and that they tend to hold hostile views toward the traditional people and culture of the West suggest that their opposition to eugenics may also have another motive lurking in the background besides their hatred for anything associated with National Socialism: facilitating the genetic decline of the West as an outgroup. Jewish promotion of massive non-White immigration may also be similarly motivated, although the negative effects of non-White immigration extend far beyond a population decline in IQ (e.g., loss of political power of Whites, less willingness to contribute to public goods like health care, increase in social strife and political alienation).
This is why Jews do not want anyone talking about eugenics.

Also from that source, there are attempts to censor Australian politician Fraser Annings for talking about the root causes of the New Zealand shooting.

Europe was violently invaded, 4k years ago

The London Daily Mail reports:
A brutish tribe of people who lived in the Neolithic era more than 4,000 years ago is being touted as the most violent and aggressive society to ever live.

A growing body of evidence is convincing archaeologists that the Yamnaya society ruthlessly massacred opposing societies.

It is believed the primitive society capitalised on disease, warfare and famine and unceremoniously swept through Europe, destroying entire civilisations and leaving destruction in their wake.

DNA evidence from several prehistoric burial sites has revealed hoards of these tall, muscular and violent warriors would overwhelm other societies on horseback.

They would murder men and sire their own children so that within a few generations the presence of the previous societies is all but eradicated. ...

They made their way to Britain and within a few generations there was no remains of the previous inhabitants who built Stonehenge in the genetic record
This is only the most violent because we don't have written records of the other invasions.

Yes, the invaders killed the men and raped the women. That is what invaders do.

The NY Times version of this story is that peaceful "egalitarian" "Iberian farmers" accepted immigrants in a "political process", including "intermarrying" with nomads.

Remember that the next time you read a NY Times story about a political process for assimilating immigrants and letting them intermarry with the natives. The newspaper might have a little different idea about how these things work.

Tuesday, April 02, 2019

Why Asian men are NOT seen as attractive

I just watched: Blackpill 101- The REAL reason why Asian men are NOT seen as attractive.

I was going to say that it was eye-opening, but maybe that would be offensive. Actually, the whole video is offensive.

It is about Orientals. It does not discuss those from Russia or India.

A lot of people see a White man with an Oriental woman, and assume that White men prefer Oriental women. As this video explains, the truth is the opposite. It is the Oriental women who prefer the White men.

The video is entirely about physical characteristics, but that is only part of the story. There are reasons of personality, family, and culture.

I have heard women say something like:
I would never marry a Chinese man. If you marry a Chinese man, you marry his whole family. His parents will move into the house. Nothing you do will ever be good enough for them. Your in-laws will run your life. It is better to marry some American white man who has abandoned his parents.
I suspect that this perception is a much bigger factor than those facial characteristics.

Monday, April 01, 2019

Latino rejects white women

A Latino of some sort writes a NY Times essay:
O.K., let me just get to it. I think I broke up with my last girlfriend because she’s white. Actually, no, I definitely broke up with her because she’s white. ...

But the real reason I think I can no longer date white women isn’t any of that. It’s because in today’s hashtag-woke society, there is mad pressure to be hashtag-woke. To be aware of the implications of whom you’re attracted to and why. Which means that in the eyes of others, the color of the women I date is a big deal. Like I’m the problem. Like I’m betraying my people if I date white women. ...

I started reading James Baldwin, Ta-Nehisi Coates and other black and brown authors looking for guidance, a road map, help on what it means to be a brown man in the world. Like: Yes, our bodies have been colonized. Yes, I am a child of blackness. ...

Before I was born, my mother told my father she was pregnant at 3 a.m. on a New York City subway platform. She and my pops made a commitment to give us children everything they never had, to strive and achieve and provide for us, and in response to their aspiration, some in their world thought they were leaving their roots behind and trying to become something else. Those folks said to them, “You trying to be white now?”
Increasingly, the word "woke" means anti-White.

Note that there is no mention of the damage he has done to whites by defiling their women. His only allegiances are to brown people.

The NY Times is always looking for ways to generate racial conflicts. It also has an editorial on how blackface "underwrote a white supremacist impulse that metastasized into every aspect of American life." No, this is just crazy Jewish propaganda to create racial divisions between blacks and whites.