Monday, July 01, 2024

France's First Lady could be a Man

Newsweek reported in March:
Conservative commentator Candace Owens said she would bet her career that French President Emmanuel Macron's wife Brigitte is a man.

"After looking into this, I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man," Owens wrote in a Tuesday post on X, formerly Twitter. "Any journalist or publication that is trying to dismiss this plausibility is immediately identifiable as establishment. I have never seen anything like this in my life. The implications here are terrifying."

Owens spoke in depth about the longstanding conspiracy theory during Monday's episode of her podcast, arguing that if Brigitte really wanted to debunk those claims, she could simply release photos from the first 30 years of her life. Analyzing a rare family photo of Brigitte as a baby, Owens said Brigitte was a "dead ringer" for her brother, and thus, they were really the same person.

This is kooky, and a Snopes article says it is false. The Macrons have even taken legal action to try to shut down the rumors.

Owens is sticking to her position, and has bet money on it.

There have also been rumors that Michelle Obama is a man, and Barack Obama is a woman.

I have no idea, but a couple of things seem odd. If the Macrons really wanted to shut down this story, then Brigitte Macron could simply appear in public with her brother.

The official story is pretty bizarre also. Brigitte first met Emmanuel when she was a 39-year-old teacher, and he was a 15-year-old student.

Wouldn't the press figure this out, and expose it if it were true? No, they would not. The press has a strict policy against outing homosexuals, and against dead-naming transgenders. The press would keep the secret.

So what reason is there to believe that Mrs. Macron is woman? Because the press says so? The press would say so, whether true or not.

1 comment:

CFT said...

Yes yes yes... let's trust the same press who also claimed:

*Covid 19 couldn't be a lab leak (until they found Fauci's own emails said otherwise)
*Trump is a Russian collaborator (until they admitted it was Hillary's oppo-narrative)
*Trump was supporting Nazis with his 'many fine people comment' (kudos to Snopes finally figuring this one out, it only took them over seven years to watch a video recording)
*Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian hoax (until the FBI admitted they had the laptop since 2019)
*Jan 6th was far worse than 911 or Pearl Harbor (until Tucker Carlson showed the security tape)
*Joe Biden is in good mental health and all video evidence to the contrary is a 'cheap fake' (until just about anyone watched the last presidential debate)

And that's just over the last five years. 'Remarkably incurious' is how I would describe the main stream media in two words. They just really don't want to be bothered doing that passe 'reporting' thing anymore.

Due diligence apparently isn't something reporters know how to define anymore, along with the highly mysterious word 'woman' (they are utterly mystified by this word). Why bother to research or question anything at all when you can just copy and paste the AP or take your facts from Karine Jean-Pierre, the first historically famous gay press secretary (if she does say so herself).

"[Con] men have long known . . . that their job is not to convince skeptics but to enable the gullible to continue to believe what they want to believe."
Thomas Sowell

"Always remember that as long as other people are gullible, there's no limit to what you can achieve."
Scott Adams