London Guardian op-ed:
We won’t stop speaking out about Gaza’s suffering – there is no climate justice without human rights ...Based on the pronouns, it appears that controlling CO2, killing Jews, and neutering humans are all related somehow.Advocating for climate justice fundamentally comes from a place of caring about people and their human rights. ...
We are now seeing a sharp increase in antisemitic and Islamophobic statements, actions and hate crimes in Sweden and the world. ... We unreservedly condemn all forms of discrimination, including antisemitism and Islamophobia. ...
Silence is complicity. You cannot be neutral in an unfolding genocide. ...
This article was written by:
Greta Thunberg (she/her), a Swedish activist who inspired Fridays for Future, a movement of school strikes against global climate inaction
Alde Nilsson (all pronouns), a global development student and climate justice activist with Fridays for Future Sweden
Jamie Mater (they/them), a researcher and climate justice activist with Fridays for Future Sweden
Raquel Frescia (she/they), a writer/researcher and climate justice activist with Fridays for Future Sweden
If she really thinks this, then she should be speaking out against White Genocide also. Her Sweden is being destroyed by Moslem migrants.
There is no social justice until there is justice for Whites.
1 comment:
Roger, Greta's parents are known attention seeking shysters. Why anyone would listen to their mouthpiece daughter repeating generic global warming hysteria is a mystery. Why would a child who basically skipped high school be in any position to know anything useful? Is she supposed to be psychic or something?
There is no social justice at all for anyone, it's just racism favoring a minority, which is not justice, just vengeance. You can't approach justice from blaming one group of people solely for their genetic heritage from being born, it's stupid.
There also is no hate crime either. To be tried by the crime of 'hate' means that emotions are under the auspices of government regulation, well, they aren't. I also notice that any time anyone wants to invoke hate crimes, they only apply to white people, which is once again, clearly and overtly racist in nature and has no place in the legal system. If a minority of any kind feels harsh language is a threat, I suggest they grow tougher skin before a stray insult they overhear causes them to spontaneously combust.
I am far more comfortable with people expressing themselves honestly even if offensively, than being verbally and emotionally regulated by a government that seems utterly mystified by the first amendment, and is clearly terrified of people having their own opinions, especially opinions that disagree with their own.
Post a Comment