Dr. Jordan B. Peterson walks the psychological edge, breaking down the personality types of Donald Trump and his coalition of supporters: Elon Musk, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek Ramaswamy, and JD Vance.
On the other hand, Kamala Harris is more of a narcissist. She insists on talking about herself all the time. Her whole campaign message is to say vote for her, because she is a good person. Trump does not talk like that.
Anyone who runs for President must be on an ego trip. Sure. Trump is a narcissist in that sense. But his candidacy is about making America great, not promoting himself. If he wanted an easy life, he could have retired in 2021. He would have been credited as a great President, and not been prosecuted for anything. And not be shot.
Harris has nothing but blind ambition, and a sense of entitlement. A pathological narcissist. She has all of the worst qualities of Hillary Clinton, and none of her better qualities. Harris is like the Hawk tuah girl.
Harris reminds me of this Jack Nicholson quote:
- Receptionist: How do you write women so well?She is like a male candidate, with reason and accountability removed.- Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.
Nothing she ever says shows any ability to reason, or shows any willingness to be accountable for anything.
I am not sure women even notice these deficiencies. A lot of them just seem happy that Harris promises that they will have no accountability for their pregnancies.
Men do. Men see Harris as lacking the necessities for office. From a recent poll:
Eighty-four percent of voters who say that Trump is “completely masculine” also say that they’ll vote for him, compared to just 24 percent of those who say that he’s not completely masculine. Similarly, Trump has 72 percent support among voters who say that he’s not at all feminine, but only 37 percent support among voters who say that he has any feminine traits.So what do the intellectuals say? Yahoo reports:
More than eighty Nobel Prize laureates published an open letter on Thursday declaring that the scientific policies of Vice President Kamala Harris are “vastly superior” to the ones proposed by her opponent, former President Donald Trump.Not exactly. The open letter says nothing about her policies. It has no quotes or referentces. It says:
The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are largely the result of advances in science and technology. Kamala Harris recognizes this ... Should Donald Trump win the presidential election, he would undermine future US leadershipReally? That is the best they can say?
I am not sure what is going on here, but no one would vote for Harris for these reasons. Has Harris ever shown an understanding of anything in science and tech? Any more than Trump? When and where?
Trump was President in 2017-2020. Did he undermine US leadership?
One of the signers was Daron Acemoglu, who just got the Bank of Sweden prize, sometimes called a Nobel. I posted reasons for saying he is a charlatan. He has grand theories for how the world works, but he never shows that they are any better than the obvious competing theories. And now he endorses Harris, without any substantive explanation for how she is better than her rival. Maybe there is a pattern here.
2 comments:
Kamala Harris is not an intelligent or informed person. The woman can not speak coherently, the best she have ever been able to manage is looking serious while reading a teleprompter...badly.
Unless you are curious (and stupid enough) as to wonder what would happen to the world if Chauncy Gardner or a middle-aged Barbie actually became president, I would not recommend voting for Kamala Harris.
If you still decide to do so, the next movie character you will probably be hearing about is Doctor Strangelove.
Donald Trump's brain is turning to mush, based on the things he has said at his rallies and in interviews. Scary times ahead I predict.
Post a Comment