The Kalergi Plan

Wikipedia reports:

The Kalergi Plan, sometimes called the Coudenhove-Kalergi Conspiracy,[1] is a debunked far-right, antisemitic, white genocide conspiracy theory.[2][3] The theory claims that Austrian-Japanese politician Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, creator of the Paneuropean Union, concocted a plot to mix and replace white Europeans with other races via immigration.[4] ...

The conspiracy theory stems from a section of Kalergi's 1925 book Praktischer Idealismus ("Practical Idealism"), in which he predicted that a mixed race of the future would arise: "The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes[a] will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."[1][8] Modern far-right individuals seek to draw relationships between contemporary European policy-making and this quote.[1]

See, for example, Practical Idealism In Action - The Kalergi Plan.

Israel and China Control VPN Services

People get talked into using VPN services, as a necessary tool for privacy. But a lot of them are controlled by Israel:

ExpressVPN is one of the biggest VPNs in the world. Millions of people use it to hide their online activity, stay safe, and protect their privacy. But there is a major problem. ExpressVPN is owned by an Israeli-linked company with deep ties to the Israeli military and the surveillance industry.

That means when you use ExpressVPN, your money could be helping fund the same system of occupation and violence that is starving and bombing Palestinians in Gaza.

Here is everything you need to know.

In 2021, ExpressVPN was bought for $936 million by Kape Technologies, a London-based company with strong Israeli roots.

Kape is not a small player in the market. It is owned by Israeli billionaire Teddy Sagi, one of the richest men in Israel. Kape has also bought CyberGhost, Private Internet Access, and ZenMate, making it one of the largest VPN empires in the world.

So when you think you are choosing between different VPNs, you may actually just be choosing between products controlled by the same Israeli company.

And many of the others are controlled by China.

If you get your internet from Concast, then it has the ability to spy on you. A VPN might be worse.

OpenAI to Spend Trillions

Axios reports:

OpenAI has committed to spend about $1.4 trillion on infrastructure so far, equating to roughly 30 gigawatts of data center capacity, CEO Sam Altman said on Tuesday. ...

That total includes the already announced deals with AMD, Broadcom, Nvidia, Oracle and other partners.

Yes, but: That's just the starting point, Altman said. Over time, the company would like to have in place a technical and financial apparatus that would allow it to build a gigawatt of new capacity per week at a cost of around $20 billion per gigawatt.

It is hard to imagine that he will get the money, or that he can get the gigawatts.

Maybe he already has artificial super-general intelligence, and can use it to get what no one else can.

Ideas too Toxic for Wikipedia

Wikipedia claims to be not censored. As if to prove that, it has a List of ethnic slurs, including notorious ones that I avoid here.

But there are certain views that are considered so toxic that they are not permitted. Not only that, but people holding any of these views can be permanently banned from Wikipedia.

I am not just saying that editors cannot express these opinions on Wikipedia. If someone is editing a Wikipedia on tiddlywinks, and he expresses one of these views elsewhere, then he can be doxed and banned from Wikipedia.

Here is the current list of toxic opinions.

• That white people are more intelligent than non-whites.
• That white people are more industrious than non-whites.
• That white people are more physically adept or attractive than non-whites.
• That white people are morally and ethically superior to non-whites.
• That the various cultures of white people are better than the cultures of non-white people.
• That white people have the right to live in a white-only nation.
• That, in majority-white countries, a large majority of crimes are committed by non-whites due to genetic factors.
• That violent, abhorrent or deceptive actions are justified in the pursuit of these beliefs.

...

• That Jews present an existential threat.
• That there exists a massive or even global conspiracy to enrich Jews at the expense of others.
• That white people are being systemically killed, out-bred and otherwise forced into a minority status.
• That Jews are the true perpetrators of Nazism, or hold an ideology that is worse or morally equivalent.
• That minority groups are seeking to destroy Western culture.
• That the Holocaust never happened, was greatly exaggerated, or that historians have inflated the death toll.
• That the Holocaust was morally justified (or, if they deny it, that it should have happened).
• That the groups persecuted by the Nazis brought it upon themselves, and that the Nazis merely acted in self-defence.
• That the wrong side won in World War II (or, the wrong side won the Great Patriotic War).
• That Adolf Hitler was a great leader for the German people, despite (or even because of) Nazi Germany's innumerable atrocities.
• That non-whites hold back white progress.
• That non-whites intend to kill whites.
• That non-whites should be slaves.
• That white people are more oppressed than other groups.
• That non-whites shouldn't have basic human rights.
• That Islam or Muslims are the overwhelming source of terrorism.
• That groups of people should be wiped off the face of the planet, or systematically "repatriated" to the lands or continents they supposedly originated from.
• That Jews are responsible for the creation of communism and/or capitalism.
• That the concept of free speech entails the freedom to post or write race-, gender-, or identity-based slurs, insults, or the promotion and glorification of hate and violence, without any consequence whatsoever, and that any consequence brought upon them is an act of censorship.
• That the Globalists are plotting to destroy Western civilization.
• That there exists a Jewish or "elite" cabal as purported in any of a variety of implausible conspiracy theories, such as QAnon, the New World Order, the white genocide, or the Great Replacement.
• That the human population has an overall genetic quality which can be improved through selective breeding, often targeting individuals considered undesirable for sterilization or elimination.
• That disabled individuals or those with mental health issues should be forcibly sterilized or killed, as part of a so-called "euthanasia" program.

So Wikipedia itself claims the free speech right to post racial slurs, but if anyone else claims that right, he will be banned from Wikipedia.

Some of these are matters of fact. Some are opinion. Many are subject to interpretation.

These bans are foolish. For example, I certainly think that the good guys won WWII, but how can I hold that view if the contrary view is suppressed? The winners write the history books. My opinion is meaningless if I am unable to learn the opposing views. I often go to Wikipedia to get unpopular views. More and more, I use AI for that.

It goes on to say:

The very existence of a "white race" is a pseudo-scientific idea that has been rejected by the scientific community since the late 1960s – shortly after the discovery of molecular genetics.

It is funny how these people can lodge all these complaints against the White race, and then claim that no such race exists. Actually, consumer dna services will tell you your racial makeup, based on dna.

Jefferson did not Enslave Anyone

NPR reports:

For example, students must understand the Declaration of Independence and why it remains a seminal visionary document. But they must also be exposed to history's complexity and contradictions, including that Thomas Jefferson, while declaring all men are created equal, enslaved more than 600 people in his lifetime.

No, Jefferson did not enslave anyone. He did own slaves, but they were mostly inherited, and already slaves when he inherited them.

The dictionary definition of "enslave" is as a one-time act of forcing a free person into bondage, and that is how the term has been used since 1605.

As a result of Barack Obama, George Floyd, The National Park Service, and various woke historians, terminilogy has been changed to place greater blame on White slave owners.

I asked AI whether Jefferson enslaved 600 people. Google Gemini AI said yes, based on evolved word usage by historians. Grok AI said no.

I do see moral distinctions between (1) subjugating free people into slaves; (2) the trans-atlantic slave trade; and (3) continuing to participate in an economic system that relied on slaves. Men saw these distinctions 200 years ago, as enslaving people and importing slaves were banned long before banning ownership of slaves.

Here someone on NPR says "students must understand" something that is a deliberate distortion of history. It is just more anti-White propaganda.

Woman to Head English Church

London Guardian news:

Dame Sarah Mullally, 63, who has been named as the 106th archbishop of Canterbury, has been described as a “theological liberal” who will ordain men and women to the priesthood, but also supports the inclusion of those who reject the ordination of women. ...

In a 2012 blog post, Mullally said of abortion: “I would suspect that I would describe my approach to this issue as pro-choice rather than pro-life, although if it were a continuum I would be somewhere along it moving towards pro-life when it relates to my choice and then enabling choice when it related to others.”

As bishop of London, she chaired a body framing the church’s decision on whether to bless same-sex marriages. She described the eventual decision to finally allow priests to bless same-sex couples in 2023 as “a moment of hope for the church”.

This may be causing a split in the church.

Religion-haters Opposed to Free Speech

I posted about a pending Supreme Court case, so here is a contary view, from a woman presenting as non-binary lesbian:

Instead, the tenor of the oral argument was one of “if you’re speaking, it’s speech, regardless of the context.” ...

I want to be very clear here that we are talking about children being subjected to a form of “care” that has been consistently debunked as pseudoscience, and is most frequently religious preaching that can be billed to insurance companies. The Alliance Defending Freedom made great hay out of the fact that counseling is an evidence-based practice, which it is, without mentioning the inconvenient fact that the specific type of counseling Chiles seeks to provide is not evidence-based. There is no reputable study, no mainstream medical organization, that endorses conversion therapy. In fact, the general medical consensus on the topic is that it is deeply harmful to those who fall victim to it, which is why more than 20 states have banned its use for minors. ...

Conversion therapy is fundamentally different from other forms of youth-focused psychology and psychiatry. Pediatric psychiatry can be life-saving, evidence-based, scientifically sound medical care. Conversion therapy is not that. It is also fundamentally different from its mainstream converse, gender-affirming care, because gender-affirming care is evidence-based and backed by reputable medical organizations, despite the concerted misinformation campaign to the contrary.

The terminology is confusing. What she calls "conversion therapy" is actually affirming sex, and teaching kids to learn to live with their innate sexual identities.

And "gender-affirming care" is teaching kids to adopt a gender identity opposite to their actual sex.

The fact that reputable medical organizations are on one side of this issue is scary.

This is a larger pattern, primarily pushed by the religious right, to ensure that misinformation, pseudoscience and fearmongering rule the day. Truth is one of our greatest defenses against fascism, something that the Christian nationalist movement knows it cannot withstand. LGBTQIA+ rights have provided it with a convenient foothold to test the limits and boundaries, and to drop stones in the constitutional pond that will ripple out to everyone, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation.

It is funny to hear her talk of truth. The Bible says in John 8:31-32:

31 So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, 32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

She stands in favor of laws to stop kids from learning the truth.

Man Overboard, or Person in Water

News:

The Royal Yachting Association (RYA) has issued a clarification after several newspapers reported that it had labelled the term ‘man overboard’ offensive.

Numerous media outlets picked up a story published by The Telegraph on 13 September 2025, titled “‘Man overboard’ is offensive term, says Royal Yachting Association”.

The original article stated that the RYA has deemed the phrase man overboard “an offensive term that should be avoided” to “honour and value” women and non-binary people, and has suggested it should be replaced with “person in water”, a term from its inclusive language guide.

Gates Gives $200 Billion to Africa

Announcement, from a couple of months ago:

ADDIS ABABA (June 2, 2025) – In an address today in Nelson Mandela Hall at the African Union, Gates Foundation Chair Bill Gates urged African leaders to seize the moment to accelerate progress in health and development through innovation and partnership, despite current headwinds. He announced that the majority of the foundation’s $200 billion spend over the next 20 years will go to Africa with a focus on partnering with governments that prioritize the health and wellbeing of their people.

“I recently made a commitment that my wealth will be given away over the next 20 years. The majority of that funding will be spent on helping you address challenges here in Africa.”

It is possible that Bill Gates will cause more human misery than any other individual in the 21st century.

He has reduced child mortality and fueled an African population explosion. More development will cause global warming. Africa will not be able to feed itself. When Africa has a billion excess population, there will be a worldwide refugee crisis.

Transgender People are Crazy and Dangerous

Quillette reports:

Gender dysphoria is comorbid with a number of serious mental health conditions. One large 2023 Danish study, for instance, found that trans-identified individuals were five times more likely to exhibit at least one psychiatric comorbidity than were members of a non-trans control group. And recent years have witnessed many horrifying crimes committed by trans-identified individuals. Some examples include:

In 2018, a biologically female drug-store worker named Snochia Mosley shot and killed three co-workers in Aberdeen, Maryland. Friends shared messages with the media indicating that Mosley felt “the world was against her,” and that she’d begun identifying as a transgender male (and discussing hormone treatments) two years earlier.

The following year, Maya McKinney—a biologically female student who asserted a male gender identity and had begun calling herself “Alec”—opened fire at a Colorado school, killing one and wounding eight, in retaliation for alleged transphobic bullying.

Last year, a girl identifying as a boy was expelled from Les Paul Middle School in Wisconsin after she was caught plotting a school shooting. A forensic search of her phone revealed chilling queries such as “trans kill hit list.”

In 2023, “Audrey” Hale, an emotionally disturbed woman who identified as male, killed three children and three staff members at The Covenant School in Nashville. In the months leading up to the attack, Hale wrote in her journal: “My penis exists in my head. I swear to god I’m male.” Other statements included, “So now in America, it makes one a criminal to have a gun or be transgender or non-binary,” “God I hate those sh*thead politicians,” and “I need a trans doctor… This female gender role makes me want to not exist.”

Young Women Identify with Being Crazy

Skeptic magazine reports:

72% of GenZ women (i.e., those born between 1997-2006) believe “mental health challenges are an important part of my identity.”7 ... (27%) of Baby Boomer men

The women are not just crazy, they identify with being crazy.

Refugee Policy to Favor American Interests

The NY Times reports:

The Trump administration is considering a radical overhaul of the U.S. refugee system that would slash the program to its bare bones while giving preference to English speakers, white South Africans and Europeans who oppose migration, according to documents obtained by The New York Times.

The proposals, some of which already have gone into effect, would transform a decades-old program aimed at helping the world’s most desperate people into one that conforms to Mr. Trump’s vision of immigration — which is to help mostly white people who say they are being persecuted while keeping the vast majority of other people out. ...

The proposed changes would put new emphasis on whether applicants would be able to assimilate into the United States, directing them to take classes on “American history and values” and “respect for cultural norms.” ...

Critics say the plans exposes the president’s vision for what America should look like.

“It reflects a preexisting notion among some in the Trump administration as to who are the true Americans,” said Barbara L. Strack, a former chief of the refugee affairs division at Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations. “And they think it’s white people and they think it’s Christians.”

We should be taking those who are likely to become good Americans, as opposed to the world's rejects. We have been sending Somalians to Minnesota, even though they did not even fit in in Somalia.

The NY Times appears to be horrified at this.

Billionaire Cat-lady went Bankrupt

This is old news, but I missed it. Check out this biography:

Jocelyn Wildenstein[a] (née Jocelyne Alice Périsset; (7 September 1940[b] – 31 December 2024) was a Swiss socialite[5] known for her extensive cosmetic surgery, which created a cat-like facial appearance; her 1999 high-profile divorce from billionaire art dealer and businessman Alec Wildenstein;[6][7] and her extravagant lifestyle and subsequent bankruptcy filing. ...

Wildenstein received $2.5 billion in her divorce settlement (although this amount has been rumored to be as high as $3.8 billion[29]) and $100 million each year for the following 13 years.

I do not understand how anyone could squander that much money. She went broke after the $100M payments stopped.

An American in the Year 2025

Vivek Ramaswamy lectures us:

Because we are the country where regardless of your race, your gender, your sexuality, 31:50 your religion, or your lineage, you can still be a citizen of this nation so 31:56 long as you subscribe to and live by our national creed. So what does it mean to be an American in the year 2025? It 32:03 means we still believe in those ideals of 1776. It means we believe in merit. 32:09 That the best person gets the job regardless of their genetics.

I agree with some of what he says, but who appointed him to define what it means to be an American?

He is mainly describing ideals of 2025, not 1776. I don't think anyone back then said that you are an American based on your beliefs in the national creed.

Demographic Feminization leads to Substantive Feminization

Video lecture: Helen Andrews | Overcoming the Feminization of Culture | NatCon 5.

She argues that the great feminization of the last 50 years was one of the most important trends in all of human history.

But a 8:33 political system in which men 8:35 predominate will tend to operate 8:37 according to rules of facts and 8:39 objectivity. And one in which women 8:42 predominate will tend to operate by the 8:44 rules of emotions and subjective facts, 8:47 even if there are individual men and 8:50 women who fall on the opposite side of 8:52 those camps. ...

feminization is not 10:08 just an interesting new development that 10:11 has had some pluses and minuses. It's 10:12 that feminization in the case of many 10:14 important institutions is a bad thing. 10:17 In a few cases, it is so bad as to be, 10:20 you know, to threaten the end of 10:21 civilization.

She points out that there are huge differences between men and women, and everyone agrees to that, so it is inevitable that feminization will have pluses and minuses. Indeed, people talk about the supposed pluses all the time, but it is politically incorrect to name the minuses.

I believe 13:19 demographic feminization does inevitably 13:21 lead to substantive feminization.

That is, she thinks it is fine that there are a lot more women in the elite professions, except that she does not like the consequences for society.

NY Mag criticizes her opinions on Civil War Reconstruction.

Update: She has a new essay on the subject.

Trump-hating DA gets Indicted

News:

New York Attorney General Letitia James admitted a Virginia property was an “investment” on financial disclosure forms while allegedly making false statements to a bank to secure a more favorable loan that prohibited its use as a rental, putting her at risk of spending decades behind bars. ...

If convicted on both counts, she faces a maximum sentence of 60 years in prison and fines of up to $2 million.

Her first appearance in federal court in Virginia is scheduled for October 24. According to experts, James could rack up as much as $10 million in legal bills defending herself from the charges.

She got elected on promised to prosecute Pres. Trump, which she did on dubious technical charges. Now Trump is getting his revenge.

I am struck by the harsh nature of federal charges. This is really a minor offense, almost as minor as the ones against Trump. But look at the penalty! 60 years in prison. Okay, she would never get sentenced to that, but it could still cost her $10 million to get acquitted.

Rich Jewish Donors Pressured Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk was very pro-Israel, but had soured on Israel shortly before his death. There were conspiracy theories that Israel killed him. That is extremely unlikely, and apparently proven false by the arrest of the shooter.

But the London Daily Mail confirms that Jewish donors were pressuring Kirk, and withdrawing funds:

A friend of Charlie Kirk released more text messages from a leaked group chat where the Turning Point leader raged about 'bullying' Jewish donors.

Prior to his death, Kirk fumed in a group chat that he was considering leaving the 'pro-Israel cause' because Jewish donors were pulling funding over his links to Tucker Carlson.

The text messages were leaked by Candace Owens early this week, with Turning Point spokesman Andrew Kolvet later confirming the authenticity of the screenshots.

The Donors can do what they want, but this is revealing.

It suggests that a lot of Isreal support is fake, and driven by secret Jewish power brokers.

And it suggests that Israel is losing conservatives and young people. Conservatives have always been pro-Israel, and it should not have taken much to retain their support.

New Taylor Swift Album

The NY Post reports:

Taylor Swift’s new album “The Life of a Showgirl” is barely three days old, and already woke killjoys are tearing it apart, finding offensive lyrics where there are none.

Overly online social media critics of Swift apparently instantaneously decided the new album is rife with racism and homophobia, as well as secret messages of support for the patriarchy, eugenics, and Donald Trump.

Forensic “investigations” have uncovered “dog-whistles,” but only woke detectives themselves are capable of hearing them. ...

In her song “Wishlist,” Swift says she wants to have a couple kids and get “the whole block lookin’ like you.” Some went as far as to suggest this is an allusion to eugenics, a truly astonishing leap.

One TikTokker claimed to see a subtext, which she read as, “I want to have your white babies, and I actually want our entire neighborhood to be racially homogenous.” She continued, “Now Taylor’s calling y’all childless cat ladies because she’s about to pop out some kids.”

As someone said, if you are hearing dog whistles, you are the dog.

Taylor Swift is 35 years old. Almost 36. She wants to get married and have kids.

Not weird. This is the most normal thing she has done.

Free Speech Right to Align Identity to Sex

The US Supreme Court just heard oral argument on Chiles v. Salazar

Chiles v. Salazar, Docket No. 24-539, is a pending United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of Colorado's Minor Conversion Therapy Law (MCTL), which bans conversion therapy for minors by licensed mental health professionals. The ban was challenged on violating the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, though the state had constrained the ban to licensed professionals and only as with respect to their professional duties. The ban was upheld in lower courts.

Many briefs are posted.

Here is the argument against the law:

This law harms gender dysphoric kids 1:40:41 because the statistics that we've cited in our verified complaint as well as in 1:40:46 the uh brief that we cited with this court indicate that 90% of young people who are struggling with gender dysphoria 1:40:53 before puberty work their way through it and realign their identity with their sex. But if one of those children go to 1:41:00 a counselor and they specifically say that is the help I want realigning my identity with their sex, they cannot 1:41:07 receive that help from someone like my client. Moreover, if they're continuing 1:41:12 down the path of transition, then unfortunately they get locked into that path and eventually it leads over 90% of 1:41:21 the time once they start down the path of social transition. It will lead to the route of medicalized transition 1:41:27 which the Cass report tells us comes with a lot of harm and devastation.

Conversion therapy applies to homosexuality, and has become more controversial when it is applied to transgender identity. About half the states have similar laws, so a psychotherapist can counsel a patient to go homosexual, but not to go straight.

I am struck by all the bogus language in this case.

The argument in favor of the law is that there is a "medical consensus" on the "standard of care" that "conversion therapy" is not supported by "evidence-based practice". The therapy is "ineffective" and "potentially harmful". Changing sexual preferences is impossible because they are "innate" and "immutable". Homosexuality and transgenderism have been determined to be not pathological, so there can be no legitimate treatment to change them. Any such effort is harmful because, among other things, it can cause "family alienation". No reputable medical society or expert testimonty supports such therapy.

This is all so crazy I don't know where to stert. All psychotherapies are ineffective and potentially harmful. Say you go to a shrink or any other medical professional because you are obese and want advice getting to a healthier weight. The vast majority of people getting such advice do not lose weight. That means the advice is ineffective. Many patients get angry or depressed or develop other unhealthy habits. That means the advice is potentially harmful.

The easy way out for the therapist is the affirm the fatness, and tell the patient to stay fat. Perhaps the studies would categorize such therapy as more successful, because the patient is happier in the short term, by avoid the struggle to lose weight.

All the medical societies need to do is the announce that fatness is not pathological. Maybe also that it is innate and immutable.

This might seem like an artificial example, but it is not. People see psychotherapy for all sorts of problems, including depression, alcoholism, and personality disorders. All of these are heritable, and cannot be changed without a lot of hard work. Most psychotherapy does not work. Some people do change, with help and motivation.

Our medical societies have been corrupted to where they refuse to help kids who need help. Saying that there is a consensus is just proof of how the system has been politicized. The field of Psychology hardly ever has a consensus on anything. For something as controversial as transgenderism, a healthy profession would have a diversity of opinions on what to do about it. Maybe they would accept scientific evidence, but there is no proof that affirming transgenderism has ever benefited anyone.

I think the Supreme Court ducked the issue of conversion therapy for homosexuals, but required licensed psychotherapists to tell small kids to change gender identity is too much. I expect the Colorado law to be struck down. Such laws should have been struck down ten years ago.

Update: The strange thing is that the whole idea of conversion therapy harm is that it can be frustrating to change what you really are. But the approved transgender affirmation therapy does exactly that.

Examples of Mass Hysteria

Mass hysteria, also known as mass psychogenic illness, is when a threat (real or imagined) causes physical symptoms or bizarre behavior to spread among a large number of people.

Here are some notable examples from history:

The Dancing Plague (1518): In Strasbourg, France, a woman began dancing uncontrollably in the street. Over the next month, hundreds of others joined her, dancing until they collapsed from exhaustion, and some died. It's believed to be an example of mass psychogenic illness, possibly triggered by severe psychological distress and social strain common in the Middle Ages.

The Salem Witch Trials (1692–1693): In Salem Village, Massachusetts, a series of trials and executions took place after several young girls experienced convulsions and fits and accused members of the community of witchcraft. This panic led to the accusation of about 200 people, with 19 people being hanged.

The War of the Worlds Radio Broadcast (1938): A radio adaptation of H. G. Wells' novel The War of the Worlds, narrated in a news bulletin format by Orson Welles, caused panic among thousands of listeners who believed that an actual Martian invasion was taking place in the United States.

Tanganyika Laughter Epidemic (1962): Starting in a mission-run boarding school for girls in modern-day Tanzania (then Tanganyika), a fit of laughter spread, affecting hundreds of people in the area for months and forcing schools to temporarily close.

June Bug Epidemic (1962): At a U.S. textile factory, 62 workers experienced symptoms like nausea and dizziness. Rumors of a bug infestation that caused the illness spread, but no evidence of such a bug or environmental cause was ever found; the incident was attributed to mass hysteria, likely fueled by stress and the power of suggestion.

The Satanic Panic (1980s): A widespread moral panic in the U.S. and other parts of the world was centered on the belief that groups were ritually abusing and exploiting children as part of Satanic cults. While there was virtually no evidence to support these claims, the panic led to numerous unproven accusations and trials.

Here are some examples of mass hysteria, aka mass psychogenic illness, in modern times.

Institutional child abuse. From Penn State, Catholic Church, Boy Scouts

MeToo accusations.

Pretending men are women, and vice versa.

Idolizing George Floyd and other Black criminals. There were even cops kneeling before Blacks.

Covid-19. The world shut down over what turned out to be a bad flu season.

After 9-11-2011, importing millions of Moslem and Arabs. What was the purpose of that?

DEI.

Indians took over many of our top tech companies. Who thought that was a good idea?

Talk of harm and safe spaces. Almost every day I see someone complain about some triviality, such as some minor political opinion, and argue that it causes real harm.

New Self-help Red-pill Videos

I stumbled into this Youtube channel:

Welcome to PsycheDepth – where psychology meets philosophy, and the surface gives way to the unseen.

We journey into the deep structures of the mind, exploring the hidden forces that shape your thoughts, identity, beliefs, and reality itself. Through timeless philosophical ideas and cutting-edge psychological insights, our content uncovers the truths most people never question. This isn’t just self-help. It’s self-discovery at its core. If you’re ready to explore what truly drives you—and how to take conscious control of it—subscribe and start the descent into the depths of your psyche.

I am not sure if it is brilliant self-help lessons, or AI slop.

There are many dozens of videos, with new ones appearing every day. They appear to be entirely AI generated, but they are much more insightful than what I expect from AI.

If they are AI generated, I wonder about the training corpus. A lot of it might have been common sense in textbook psychology a few decades ago, but now it is politically incorrect and red-pilled. That is, they recognize psychological and behavior differences between men and women.

It would be alarming if an AI understands humans this well.

Medical Journal goes Extreme Leftist

The (British) Lancet, one of the top five medical journal, has gone fully woke. Here is the latest editorial:

The far-right and health: an evolving political crisis

Across Europe and North America, racism, xenophobia, and far-right nationalism have become normalised in public and political discourse, leading many people to feel anxiety and fear of violence, discrimination, and hatred. This developing political crisis is having a pervasive and devastating impact on the health and wellbeing of health workers and scientists, as well as the general population. Two major drivers have intensified these forces. First, increasing public support for and visibility of populist nationalist politics across Europe and the USA. Second, the aftermath of the Oct 7, 2023, Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Israel and subsequent genocide in Gaza has fuelled substantial increases in antisemitism and islamophobia. Furthermore, white Europeans are also experiencing xenophobic attacks from far-right political parties who favour ethnic nationalism and are opposed to policies that foster European or global collaboration. These developments, together with anti-migrant sentiments across much of the West, have produced a perfect storm. Racism, xenophobia, and discrimination are fundamental determinants of health and contribute to an array of health inequities. In this volatile political climate, it is important for the medical community to acknowledge this public health threat — and respond.

This is bizarre. Conflicts between Jews and Moslems in the Middle East go back decades, if not centuries. Why is this now an issue for a medical journal?

People are being called far right for opinions that were considered centrist 20 years ago. Ethnic nationalism describes what most of the world has been for millennia.

Britain has adopted policies of importing millions of Third World migrants. The effects on Britain, both medical and otherwise, have been overwhelmingly negative. Usually medical societies and journals stay out of political debates.

The journal could give arguments in favor of the migrant policy. But no, it just uses name-calling against the other side. This is the behavior of partisan fanatics with no solid medical or scientific backing for its opinions.

Obama's Wife Hates the Way He Chews

I am always amazed when some rich and famous woman goes public with some very petty complaint about her widely-admired husband. It happens a lot.

Page Six reports:

Michelle Obama can’t stand the way Barack Obama chews his food.

The former first lady addressed her husband’s irritating eating noises while discussing their marriage with couples therapist Dr. Orna Guralnik on Wednesday’s episode of her “IMO” podcast. ...

“Because how many times does somebody ask, ‘What are you thinking about?’ And you’re like, ‘Well, let me make up a thing,'” Michelle said, adding, “Because I don’t actually want to tell you what I was thinking about, which is like, ‘The way you’re chewing makes me want to smack you upside the head.'”

She has a good life, and I would think that she has nothing to complain about. But no, she has to make a public complaint to a couples psychotherapist about something extremely trivial.

The weird thing is that she is only famous for being Barack Obama's wife, and only admired to the extent that she supports her husband. I would think that a women in that position would do everything to make her husband look good. But no, she acts as if she resents him, and wants to lower his reputation.

How Somalis Invaded Minnesota

The NY Post reports:

This week, federal officials made an astounding announcement: Nearly half of all immigrants in greater Minneapolis were found to have committed some form of immigration fraud.

The fraud, uncovered in a September sweep, came in all kinds — sham marriages, fake death certificates and “other bizarre schemes,” as US Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Joseph Edley put it.

But the revelation was no great surprise to those of us who have followed the settlement of some 100,000 Somali immigrants in Minnesota over the past three decades.

As far back as 2008, the State Department temporarily suspended one of the family reunification programs used by Somali immigrants when DNA testing of applicants found that 80% of all its claimed family relationships were fake.

How many people were in on this scam?

Who ever approved sending Somalis to Minnesota in the first place? Why did anyone think that was a good idea?

Britain is Going Bust

The London Economist magazine reports:

Britain's net public debt has climbed from 35% of GDP in 2005 to 95% today. The government is borrowing over 4% of GDP annually despite no emergency comparable to the financial crisis or pandemic that drove much of the earlier increase. The belt-tightening needed to stabilize debt levels amounts to about 2% of GDP. The Labour government holds a 157-seat majority in Parliament and has four years until the next election.

Britain spends about 6% of GDP supporting pensioners, an increase of over a third this century. Some 15% of the working-age population now claims jobless allowances following a surge in disability claims since the pandemic. Labour attempted to reduce spending on pensioners and welfare this year but reversed both reform plans after political outcry from within the party.

This tracks Britain importing millions of non-whites.

Brexit does not seem to have mattered much directly. Many voted for Brexit in the hopes that it would slow the foreign invasion. Just the opposite. Importing low-IQ high-crime foreigners accelerated.

Freedoms are declining. Besides paying more taxes, Britains are routinely being jailed for expressing online opinions. Some have even been arrested for saying silent prayers.

Matt Walsh rants:

Public Health “Experts” Want To Legitimize This Barbaric Practice In The Name Of Multiculturalism

43,514 views Premiered 4 hours ago The Matt Walsh Show Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the so-called public health experts in the UK have decided that actually maybe incest isn’t so bad after all. Welcoming the third world through mass migration means welcoming third world practices. This is just the latest example. ...

2:19 It would be extraordinarily timeconsuming, if not impossible, to even attempt to list all the ways that Public Health “Experts” Want To Legitimize This Barbaric Practice In The Name Of Multiculturalism 2:25 Christianity is responsible for the creation and development of Western civilization as we know it. Christianity 2:31 is why the West is literate. It's why we had the industrial revolution. It's why we have a functioning legal system. All 2:38 of these achievements of course trace to many different individual causes, contributions of many individual 2:44 Christian nations, leaders, monasteries, universities, the Crusades and so on. 2:51 But there was one Christian innovation that all by itself had a direct observable and enduring impact on the 2:58 trajectory of Western civilization. And while this particular innovation isn't discussed very much, or at least it 3:04 hasn't been discussed very much in recent history because we haven't had to discuss it. Um, well, that's about to 3:09 change. I'm talking about the Catholic Church's decision around the sixth century to ban marriages between first 3:16 cousins. And once the church banned first cousin marriages in the Middle Ages along with marriages among step 3:23 relatives, in-laws, and godparents, the West began rapidly pulling ahead of the 3:29 rest of the world. And make no mistake about it, the church's influence was indeed the primary reason why Europeans 3:34 stopped marrying their relatives. The other major religions were expressly endorsing all kinds of incestuous 3:41 relationships. And this the statistics bear this out.

He shows British immigrants with birth defects from genetic diseases, and how British public health authorities approve. Meanwhile, Connecticut is banning cousin marriage.

What if an Orangutan is Driving the Train

This is one of the great quotes in US Supreme Court history.

ABC News reports

The Court's senior conservative suggested that some members of the Court over the years have blindly followed prior judgments, comparing them to passengers on a train.

"We never go to the front see who's driving the train, where is it going. And you could go up there in the engine room, find it's an orangutan driving the train, but you want to follow that just because it's a train," Thomas said.

Sometimes we need an unreconstructed conservate to call a spade a spade.

Human Ancestors were Not Out of Africa

This New Scientist video argues that the theory about humans being out of Africa is false.

The new evidence is a Chinese skull that was previously thought to be Homo Erectus, but has been re-analyzed to be a million-year-old Denosivan. This is surprising because it was thought that Homo Sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denosivans only split 600k years ago. Now it is thought that they must have split more than a million years ago, maybe 1.3M years ago. That split is said to be form "Ancestor X", the presumed common ancestor.

The video is confusing in places, because it refers to Homo Sapiens as "us", but all three of those human groups are ancestors to today's non-African humans. Also, it is still thought that human ancestors left African 60k years ago, and interbred with Neanderthals and Denosivans.

Okay, but if this Denosivan lived in China, then maybe Ancestor X did also, and large brains could have evolved in Europe or Asia, not Africa. Then perhaps Ancestor X migrated to Africa, and descendants later migrated out.

There are missing pieces to this story, so it will probably get revised again.

BBC reports

The earliest known evidence for early Homo sapiens in Africa is 300,000 years ago, so it is tempting to conclude that our species might have evolved first in Asia.

It is also tempting to think that China artifically expanded the fossil skull to make it look like humans evolved in China.

This podcast claims that there are humans in Africa today that would be considered a different species, if humans were categorized by other animals.

You might wonder why anyone cares about this stuff. It seems to say something about what it means to be human.

Later on the video attacks Pres. Trump and says:

It's truly heartbreaking to know that these actions will put children, pregnant people, and 23:08 vulnerable groups in harm's way.