What I Learned in 2022

Another year has passed, and you can view the archives for what I learned.

A big story was the success of artificial intelligence, particularly large language and image generation models.

We still don't have self-driving cars, so maybe they have a way to go. And those AI programs have to be trained not to tell the truth on certain issues.

Universities and big companies like Disney have gone hopelessly woke, and now the science journals have gone woke also. We can no longer trust the scientists on subjects like sex, race, and human biodiversity.

Efforts to make elections more reliable have failed. I expect the 2024 election to be stolen. Too many votes are cast without verification.

Fitness Bias in Evolution Teaching

Evolution teaches "Survival of the Fittest." Now the less fit folks are complaining that the subject has a bias against them.

From a reputable evolution journal:

Evolutionary biology and many of its foundational concepts are grounded in a history of ableism and eugenics. The field has not made a concerted effort to divest our concepts and ... This failure to divest from our eugenicist and ableist history has harmed progress in evolutionary biology and allowed principles from evolutionary biology to continue to be weaponized against marginalized communities in the modern day ...

This is getting ridiculous.

Evolutionists used to complain about creationists making a mockery of their field. But the creationists never penetrated their respected journals. Now the woke activists have.

Stanford Against Ridiculing Whites for Behavior

Here is a followup:

That was quick! Just 48 hours after the Washington Free Beacon and the Wall Street Journal shed light on a Stanford University list of "offensive" words and phrases like "American" and "blind study," the university would like to make a few clarifications.

The university hid its "Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative" behind a login page Monday following widespread public criticism of its effort to purge "potentially harmful" language like "survivor," "victim," "blackbox" and "white paper" from university websites. In a letter posted Tuesday evening, the university's chief information officer Steve Gallagher said the guide "does not represent university policy," nor "mandates or requirements."

"We have particularly heard concerns about the guide’s treatment of the term ‘American,'" Gallagher wrote, referring to the blueprint's assessment that "American" ascribed superiority to people from the United States. "To be very clear, not only is the use of the term ‘American' not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed," he continued. ...

The guide even warned against using the progressive phrase "preferred pronouns," since it "suggests that non-binary gender identity is a choice and a preference."

Non-binary gender identity is a choice, unless it is about children being coerced by adults. Even there, it is a choice by the adults who promote it.

The page is very revealing about woke thinking. Consider:

Karen

demanding or entitled White woman

This term is used to ridicule or demean a certain group of people based on their behaviors.

I would think that attacking Whites is permitted, but apparently the problem is riciculing them for their behavior!

I understand not wanting to ridicule people for their innate immutable characteristics, but nearly everyone approves of ridiculing for behavior.

Gaslighting Us on the Russian Pipeline

The liszard people who run the world are gaslighting us. As one example, they have told us for months that Russie blew up its own pipeline. The story never made any sense. Obviously the USA or UK blew it up.

The NY Times finally admits that it participated on this bogus story:

In Nord Stream Mystery, Baltic Seabed Provides a Nearly Ideal Crime Scene

As investigators piece together clues, Russia has quietly taken steps to begin expensive repairs on the giant gas pipeline, complicating theories about who was behind September’s sabotage.

The Swedish authorities leading a criminal investigation have concluded that a state actor was most likely responsible for a September blast that ripped through the gas pipes.

But the theory that Russia carried out the blasts, repeated often by Western officials, has only gotten more complicated.

In recent weeks, Nord Stream AG, which is majority-owned by a Kremlin-controlled company, has begun pricing out the cost to repair the pipe and restore gas flow, according to a person briefed on the work who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about it publicly. One repair estimate starts at about $500 million, the person said. Consultants for Russia are also studying how long the damaged pipes can withstand saltwater exposure. The inquiries raise the question of why, if Russia bombed its own pipelines, it would begin the expensive work of repairing them.

But sabotaging a key piece of energy infrastructure could be considered an act of war. For a European Union or NATO member to carry it out would have significant consequences, shattering trust in two of the most important Western partnerships.

Many European governments and experts see Moscow as the most likely saboteur.

The explosion does not neatly benefit Russia.

They are also still gaslighting us about George Floyd. Now that all the cops are serving long prison terms, we are told that his murder was proof of systemic injustice to Blacks.

The murder story does not even make any sense. If the cops wanted to murder Floyd, they would not have called an ambulance. They would have taken him to where there were no witnesses.

Floyd was already dying of a fentanyl overdose before the cops touched him. It is impossible to injure someone by doing what the cops did. At the trial, it was not even argued that the cops acted out of racial animus, or that they had any way of knowing that what they were doing was dangerous.

Now the Democrat Congress passes a trillion-dollar budget, including border security for other countries, but not for the USA. We are suffering the biggest civilian invasion in recorded history. Pres. Biden will be remembered as a big traitor.

Germany and Japan Abandon Green Plans

Remember these countries lecturing us about going green?

Bloomberg:

Germany Revives Coal as Energy Security Trumps Climate Goals

Nation increased coal burning for power by 13% from last year

NPR Radio:

Japan adopted a plan on Thursday to extend the lifespan of nuclear reactors, replace the old and even build new ones, a major shift in a country scarred by the Fukushima disaster that once planned to phase out atomic power.

The world runs on energy production. It is not feasible to run on solar and wind power.

Merry Christmas

Here is an example of Chriatianity under attack in the USA. A college professor was fired for showing the immages below in an art class.

Aram Wedatalla, a Hamline senior and the president of Muslim Student Association (MSA), was in the class at the time the photos were shared.

“I’m like, ‘this can’t be real,’” Wedatalla told the Oracle. “As a Muslim, and a Black person, I don’t feel like I belong, and I don’t think I’ll ever belong in a community where they don’t value me as a member, and they don’t show the same respect that I show them.” 

She does not belong in any American college, or an any civilized society. The art is from the Islamic world, and does not violate any Islamic teachings. Islam teaches against worshipping images, but no one was.

She is not offended by the art. Moslem believe in making others submit, and the art is just an excuse for doing that.

Congress Fails to Find Evidence of a Crime

In spite of all the bluster, I do not believe that anyone in Congress actuall believes that Donald Trump committed a crime.

Here is the 845-page report from the J6 committee.

If they had strong evidence of a crime, they would have followed due process, released all the evidence, had public hearings, and allowed Trump's side to be represented. They did not.

Liz Cheney admits that her main purpose is to derail Trump's 2024 campaign:

"No man who would behave that way at that moment in time can ever serve in any position of authority in our nation again. He is unfit for any office."

And her nightmare of Trump staying in office might have happened, if the DoJ determined the election to have been stolen:

"We do not know what would have happened if the leadership of the Department of Justice declared, as Donald Trump requested, that the election was “corrupt,” ..."

The House has released Trump's tax returns, in another desperate attempt to attack Trump. If they had found irregulartities, they would be making an issue out of it.

Today's Gay Jewish Pop Science Guru

Reading the bragging on this guy's personal web site, it appears that he is our leading public intellectual, addressing the most grand and important questions:

Prof. Yuval Noah Harari is a historian, philosopher, and the bestselling author of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, and the series Sapiens: A Graphic History and Unstoppable Us. His books have sold 40 Million copies in 65 languages, and he is considered one of the world’s most influential public intellectuals today.

Born in Israel in 1976, Harari received his PhD from the University of Oxford in 2002, and is currently a lecturer at the Department of History in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In 2019, following the international success of his books, Yuval Noah Harari co-founded Sapienship with his husband and original agent, Itzik Yahav. Sapienship is a social impact company with projects in the fields of entertainment and education, whose main goal is to focus the public conversation on the most important global challenges facing the world today.

Yuval Noah Harari gave keynote speeches on the future of humanity in Davos 2020 and 2018, on the World Economic Forum’s main Congress Hall stage. He regularly discusses global issues with heads of state, and has had public conversations with Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis. Harari has also met with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, Argentine President Mauricio Macri, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, and Shanghai’s Mayor Ying Yong. In 2019, Harari sat down for a filmed discussion on technology and the future of society with Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and in 2018 he presented the first ever TED talk delivered by a digital avatar.

Harari originally specialized in world history, medieval history, and military history. His current research focuses on macro-historical questions such as: What is the relationship between history and biology? What is the essential difference between Homo sapiens and other animals? Is there justice in history? Does history have a direction? Did people become happier as history unfolded? What ethical questions do science and technology raise in the 21st century?

His work is riddled with errors, and full of grim predictions for the future of humanity.

I wonder how clowns like this are able to achieve such an elevated status. Do people think that he is especially wise because he is gay? Because he is a Jew? Because he rejects Christendom?

He is just a weirdo crackpot whose opinions are of no more value than anyone else's.

The Jewish ADL tweeted a few years ago:

Did you know ADL trains every new FBI agent on their role as protectors of the American people and the Constitution?

No, I did not know that. It would be more appropriate for the Klu Klux Klan to train new agents.

The events that shaped the 21st century

Tucker Carlson announced:

This is a country that supposedly sent a man to the Moon.

Now we are spending a lot more to try to send a Black woman to the Moon.

The Moon landing was one of the greatest events of the XX century. Alan Dershowitz says that the most important event of the 21st century was the death of George Floyd. More important than the 9-11-2001 hijacking, covid, election of Trump, Ukraine invasion, and MeToo.

If so, this is sad. The XX century will go down in history as the greatest of all centuries. Hundreds of great inventions, scientific and technological advances, medical and life quality improvements, etc. For the 21st, we have a criminal junkie who overdosed.

I am not sure Floyd was so important. The racial wokeness had begun with Pres. Obama, Treyvon Martin, Ferguson Missouri. and other stories. I think that the workess had other causes. Floyd was just a symbol to justify what was going to be done anyway.

In spite of all the free speech promises, Twitter still suspends anyone who tells the truth about Blacks.

Our public discourse is controlled more than ever. Stanford U. announced Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative:

The goal of the Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative is to eliminate* many forms of harmful language, including racist, violent, and biased (e.g., disability bias, ethnic bias, ethnic slurs, gender bias, implicit bias, sexual bias) language in Stanford websites and code.

The purpose of this website is to educate people about the possible impact of the words we use.

After some pushback, they admitted that it was okay for Americans to call themselves Americans.

None of that language is harmful. It is worth reading anyway, to see how our leading universities are manipulating us.

Update: After posting this, I see many attacking the Stanford list, including this Daily Wire essay:

This attempt to control the conversation is nothing new. As mentioned, “RBG” as she is affectionately known by her fans, co-authored a book on the topic in 1977 titled “Sex Bias in the U.S. Code.”

Thanks to one classic newsletter from conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly in 1993, Americans were warned that RBG’s radical views would be a detriment to the nation as she was being nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton. “How does it happen that a Supreme Court nominee whose only experience in private law practice was seven years as general counsel to the ACLU came to be praised by almost everyone as a ‘moderate’ and a ‘centrist’?” the mother-turned-activist said in “The Phyllis Schlafly Report” for July 1993. “My theory is: This just proves how easily men are fooled by a skirt. They deduced that Ruth Bader Ginsburg is ‘moderate’ because she isn’t a loud-mouth frizzy-haired, bra-burning, street demonstrator.”

Indeed, the best-selling author went on to fully expose Ginsburg for the extremist that she was.

“In fact, Ginsburg’s writings betray her as a radical, doctrinaire feminist, far out of the mainstream,” the conservative said at the time. “She shares the chip-on-the-shoulder, radical feminist view that American women have endured centuries of oppression and mistreatment from men.”

That was no exaggeration.

In “Sex Bias in the U.S Code,” RBG and her co-author suggested that the U.S. remove more than 20 words or phrases from all U.S. laws and substituted them with the sort of language advocated by Stanford today.

According to Schlafly, the activist-turned-judge went far beyond changing merely language. In “Sex Bias in the U.S. Code,” Ginsburg also advocated an entirely gender-neutral society in which women were drafted to combat, prisons were sex-integrated, prostitution was legalized, and the practical elimination of all single-sex organizations and places of education.

Though it’s doubtful the current woke army draws their inspiration on these matters to RBG, it should be noted that all of those goals are being pushed by progressives in America as we speak.

Yes, wokeness is not new, and did not start with George Floyd.

Non-whites Join White Supremacists

The leftist Daily Beast reports:

Why Young Men of Color Are Joining White-Supremacist Groups

The Daily Beast considers the whole USA a White Supremacist nation. And yet colored people come here by the millions. Why?

The obvious explanation is that life under White supremacists is better than life under anyone else. Whites are the best at treating non-whites.

How did SBF Fool Us?

What was the biggest red flag about Sam Bankman-Fried?

• Parents are prominent law professors.
• Believes in the many-worlds alternative to quantum theory.
• Big Democrat donor.
• Promotes Effective Altruism.
• Trades cryptocurrencies.
• Practices polyamory.
• Got super-rich fast, with no good explanation.
• Jew.

Some people are saying that there was no way to know that he was a con man.

Under many-worlds theory, SBF is the world's richest man in a parallel universe. Under his twisted think, he might think that going to prison in one universe might be worth it if he is the richest in another.

And yes, effective altruism is a horrible dehumanizing philosophy. He acted as if he were making the world a better place, but everything he did was to make it worse.

As professions go, law professors are probably the most contemptible. They teach that you can do whatever you can get away with. SBF was reared with no moral values. In retrospect, this should have been obvious, as he promoted the completely artificial values of cryptocurrency and effective altruism, while donating to the Democrat Party.

Biden Tries to Exonerate a Commie Jew

Need more proof that Commie Jews run the Biden administration?

Santa Fe news:

Fifty-five years after the death of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the Biden administration has annulled a decades-old decision that stripped weapons security clearance from the wartime head of the Los Alamos Laboratory and celebrated “father of the atomic bomb.”

Oppie was stripped of his security clearance because he had numerous ties to the Soviet-controlled Communist Party, and because he told many lies to cover them up.

The lab under his supervision leaked vital atomic bomb secrets to the Soviet Union. A couple of spies were caught, and others were not. It is not known whether Oppie helped the spies.

Actually evidence of JRO's commie activities is beyond what was known at the time. See here and here.

There were good reasons to be anti-Russian in 1954, as opposed to today. We reportedly have soldiers in Ukraine firing missiles into Russia.

Oppie has always been a hero to commie Jews.

New Dictionary Definition for Man

NY Post:

“Man” is now includes the definition “an adult who lives and identifies as a male though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth.”

In the same vein, the updated definition of “woman” reads “an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth.”

I am expecting:

A dog is an animal that lives and identifies as a dog though it may have been said to have a different animal identification at birth.

Update: A comment reminded me of this quote:

How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Saying that a tail is a leg doesn't make it a leg.

Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln would be considered transphobic today.

Gaslighting the Royals

The latest Harry & Meghan trailer helped popularize the word gaslighting, and it became word of the year.

The online dictionary chose “gaslighting,” which it defines as “the act or practice of grossly misleading someone especially for one’s own advantage,” as its top word of 2022 because it has become the “favored word for the perception of deception.”

Gaslighting is usually more complex than an off-the-cuff lie and more nefarious, too: Gaslighting someone into believing they’re wrong is often part of a “larger plan,” said Merriam-Webster.

It is hard to understand how the world's most privileged people can whine so much.

The word is from a 1944 movie, but has gotten popular in the last five years. Something about MeToo and feminist paranoia, I guess.

Here is a Canadian Jew complaining of anti-semitism. There are two main complaints -- some people draw attention to Jewish power and influence, and Jews do not qualify as oppressed people of color. And the Jewish Holocaust. Reciting Jewish tropes is terrible be cause it leads to more holocausts. These people will say anything to promote their paranoid fantasies.

She has no examples of Jews being mistreated, or anything like that. Her complaints are entirely about her fellow university leftists not accepting certain Jewish narratives. In other words, Jews are gaslighting us, and complaining that it does not always work.

Here ia law professor Alan Dershowitz complaining that Donald Trump stereotypes Jews, as he stereotypes everyone else. He says Trump is not anti-semitic. Trump said the NY Times is a Jewish newspaper!

Dersh says the Sulzbergers do not attend synagogue anymore, and the NY Times is anti-Israel. I still consider it a Jewish paper. It is run by Jews. It caters to a Jewish audience. Its paid subscribers are largely Jewish. Its opinions are consistently aligned with NY Jews.

It is funny to hear Jews complaining about ethnic sterotyping.

Here is a debate between Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes. They disagree about the Jews. Fuentes' main complain about the Jews is theological.

Here is a Soho debate on nationalism. Nationalism lost to a Libertarian.

Movie about Avenging Evil

Here is a storyline of a 2018 documentary movie:

It's one of the most extraordinary stories of revenge. 6 million Jews are dead, but by 1946, just a handful of Nazis face trial. Most of the guilty will never face justice. For many of Hitler's victims, this is not enough. Based on previously unheard recordings and exclusive interviews with those involved - all of whom are over 90 - this film tells the story of a remarkable secret organization of Holocaust survivors who decide to take matters into their own hands. Assembled by the warrior-poet Abba Kovner, their aim is "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life." Their plan: to murder 6 million Germans in one go by infiltrating German cities and poisoning the water supply.

I missed that movie. I have no idea whether it is based on a true story. It sounds like a Jewish fantasy.

Sex is Real, Immutable, and Binary

This is a fact:

Biological sex is real, immutable, and binary.

— Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) November 13, 2022

Physicist Sean M. Carroll tweeted that science disproves this, and then doubled down on his podcast.

He does not really dispute that sex is real, or that sex is immutable, or even that sex is binary. His objection is that some people assume a gender identity that differs from their sex, and it is more politically correct to accept whatever gender they claim to be. He says gender dysphoria can be a disease, but a gender change is the cure, so then transgender people are not diseased anymore.

This is just foolishness.

I am afraid that respect for Physics is declining. It used to be the highest status of all the sciences. In the last two weeks, there have been two huge Physics research stories. Sending information through a wormhole created in a quantum computer, and achieving fusion supremacy with more energy out than in.

Both of these stories are hoaxes. There are no wormholes, and it is not clear whether there are even any quantum computers. The fusion experiment put 100x more energy in than out. It is not clear whether it is possible to have quantum computers or fusion reactors in the foreseeable future.

Carroll himself is a big believer in many-worlds theory, which is a denial of much of science because it says almost anything can happen and experimental outcomes take place in parallel universes.

Elon Musk Goes Full Nazi

Yesterday's tweet:

“The woke mind virus is either defeated or nothing else matters” - Elon Musk

Wow. This is the modern equivalent of saying that Jews must be put in concentration camps.

Fox News: Bombshell video shows largest migrant caravan ever heading for this US city. It is going to be much worse in a week, when Title 42 stops being enforced.

And the migrant influx is worse than ever in Britain.

Billionaire Gets to Collect Child Support

This story is so expected, I did not even notice it in the news. Briefly: (1) celebrity couple gets divorce; (2) the wife is the one to bail out; (3) she openly cites purely narcissistic reasons; and (4) she gets a huge settlement that she does not need or deserve.

CNN reported, a couple of weeks ago:

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West have come to a divorce agreement, a source with knowledge of the negotiations tells CNN.

Per the agreement, a draft of which was obtained by CNN, Kardashian will receive $200,000 per month in child support from West, who last year legally changed his name to Ye, and share joint custody of their four children.

CNN has reached out to representatives for Kardashian and West for comment.

Kardashian filed for divorce from West in February 2021, citing irreconcilable differences.

The couple was married in a lavish wedding in Italy in 2014.

In March 2022, Kardashian was declared legally single after being granted a request to change her marital status.

In an interview with Vogue earlier this year, the Skims founder explained what led to her high-profile split, saying, that “for so long, I did what made other people happy” and that she decided “I’m going to make myself happy.”

She went on to say that “even if that created changes and caused my divorce, I think it’s important to be honest with yourself about what really makes you happy.”

“I’ve chosen myself,” she told the publication. “I think it’s okay to choose you.”

Kim Kardashian's net worth is estimated at $1.4 to $1.8 billion.

Under divorce law, there is no pretense that the monthly $200k will be spent on the kids. The mom gets the cash, and she can do whatever she wants with it.

West is a Christian, and he is trying to hold onto his family and his fortune. Kardashian depends on maintaining a public following for her wealth, but she is not worried about any backlash for so selfishly abandoning her family.

Trump Must Finish Act III

Essay from American Greatness:

In August, Carl Benjamin, also known as Sargon of Akkad, posted a persuasive intellectual case for Donald Trump’s candidacy in which he said that “Trump is the protagonist of an important moral story whose narrative arc has yet to resolve. And resolve it must.” ...

There is only one person who stands in opposition to a ruling class that sneers at our country and the “peasants” who inhabit it. Only one person exhibits the greatness to oppose our self-anointed elites. In other words, there are none on the Republican stage who possess Trump’s je ne sais quoi. ...

Yet, the job was left unfinished; his arc was interrupted. Whether you believe the election was legally fortified or outright stolen, it denied to a reasonable electorate the opportunity to recover a small slice of liberty for themselves while protecting their families from the purposeful attack on and disintegration of their honorable way of life.

Here is the video.

Here is a WSJ letter:

I’m surprised to see you jump on the Trump trashes the Constitution bandwagon (“Donald Trump Is ... the Terminator,” Review & Outlook, Dec. 6). Look closely at his language. Former President Trump said that the 2020 election “allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.” He didn’t say “calls for,” which is what your editorial implies. He is talking about irregularities paving the way for future mischief, not calling for the termination of the Constitution. Maybe you should call him out for being anti-semantic.

John C. Gore

He was President for four years, and didn't violate the Consitution any more than Biden or Obama.

We May Soon Pay Meghan Markle

New poll:

Now that California Gov. Gavin Newsom has a plan to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves, a majority of Democrats support the idea.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 38% of Likely U.S. voters support taxpayer-funded reparation payments to the descendants of American slaves, including 19% who Strongly Support reparations. Fifty-four percent (54%) are opposed, including 42% who Strongly Oppose reparations payments. In our January 2021 survey, 28% supported reparations. {snip}

Sixty percent (60%) of Democrats support reparations, but that opinion is shared by only 18% of Republicans and 35% of voters not affiliated with either major party.

We may soon be paying Meghan Markle, the subject of a new Netflix documentary. By all reports, she is a horrible person.

The Democrat Party is all about racial divisiveness now. And who runs the Democrats> People like Newson and Schiff.

Reason reports:

Rep. Adam Schiff (D–Calif.) yesterday said he is "demanding action" in response to an "unacceptable" rise in bigoted slurs on Twitter since Elon Musk took over the platform in late October. Musk responded by taking issue with the evidence that Schiff cited, saying "hate speech impressions are actually down by 1/3 for Twitter now vs prior to acquisition." What he should have said is that government officials in a free society have no business demanding the suppression of speech they do not like.

Why Kanye West Must Be Deplatformed

The NY Post reports:

President of the World Jewish Congress Ronald Lauder is calling for Kanye West’s music to be removed from streaming services, saying the rapper is “espousing Nazism” and must be deplatformed.

West says the Jews have the power to destroy people, and the Jews are out to destroy him for saying that. As ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt explained:

The insidious nature of anti-Semitism, and these tropes about power, is that Kanye can say these things – “Jews have all the power, they’re controlling everything” – and if we don’t get him, if we don’t deal with that, the myth spreads.

The Ultimate Sin in Jewish Moral Theology

Dennis Prager is an Orthodox Jew and a conservative Republican. He spends so much time attacking the Jewish Left that you might think that he is anti-semitic. But no, he is pro-Jew all the way.

He writes an op-ed:

In the pantheon of evils, among the worst is Holocaust denial. ...

Yet, some people, including an American named Nick Fuentes, aggressively deny the Holocaust, asserting that a few hundred thousand Jews, not millions, were killed.

It is important to understand why this is evil. ...

If the Holocaust is a fabrication, Americans died fighting against nothing particularly evil. ...

That man is one of millions of reasons Fuentes — and those who ally themselves with him — will go to hell. If there is a just God.

If this is such an important fact, you might expect him to cite some objective historical evidence. He only says that Gen. Patton wrote that hundreds of bodies were crudely buried.

No, Prager's real point here is one of "moral theology". There is a Jewish consensus on a Holocaust narrative, and Jews get upset if you deviate from it. Denying it is a slap in the face.

Note that he says Fuentes acknowledges that Nazis killed a very large number of Jews. The quibble is only about the exact number.

For deviating from the official Jewish narriative, Prager's moral theology says that Fuentes will burn in Hell for eternity.

This blog accepts the official Jewish Holocaust narrative. Anything else would be illegal in Canada and Europe, and I do not want this blog to be banned. The issue is out of my expertise.

I am just pointing out that this is a matther of Jewish religious belief.

Prager hates Fuentes because (1) he is Christian; (2) he favors America First, instead of Israel First; and (3) he refuses to regurgitate Jewish narratives.

There are lots of secular Jews who claim that they are not religious, because they do not believe in God. But the core of Judaism is not belief in God. It is promoting Jewish identity and rejecting Christianity. For proof, just look at all the Jews attacking Fuentes.

Christianity is much more tolerant. Christians do not go around forcing others to accept their historical narratives.

Colorado Tries to Force LGBTQ Approval

The US Supreme Court is considering an LGBTQ rights case, but it is really about subjugating normies.

A Stanford law professor writes:

One of the most telling exchanges during the argument involved a hypothetical from Justice Barrett, who asked the Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher (whom I consider a friend: full disclosure), supporting the Colorado law, what would happen if the shoe were on the other foot—i.e., what if a gay web designer declined to create a custom website for a Christian organization that advocates for traditional marriage? Could the state compel such a person to design such a website?

Remarkably, Brian responded that the two cases should come out differently. That is, Colorado can compel a Christian to design a custom website celebrating a same-sex marriage, but cannot compel a gay person to design a custom website advocating for traditional marriage. His reasoning for this answer reveals the fundamental flaws in the government's position.

According to the Deputy Solicitor General, declining to design a website for a same-sex marriage is inherently a form of "status discrimination," which the government can treat as a form of "conduct" (not speech) and therefore compel or suppress as it sees fit. But declining to design a website promoting traditional marriage is discrimination based on the message (not status) and is therefore protected speech.

Wow. The only simple solution is to allow any business to refuse service to anyone.

White House to Promote Jewish Political Interests

Jews are the most privileged and oppressive ethnic group on Earth, but they never stop complaining. It is part of their religion to complain.

CNN reports:

Second gentleman Doug Emhoff – the first Jewish person in his position – will convene an antisemitism roundtable Wednesday at the White House, Emhoff’s office tells CNN.

Planning for the event was underway for weeks, but White House aides said that it’s taken on extra significance now following a series of antisemitic comments from the rapper Kanye West, who now goes by Ye, as well as the revelation that former President Donald Trump hosted West along with White nationalist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes at a dinner at his Mar-a-Lago estate in late November.

“Literally every single day it gets worse,” Emhoff said on Friday, appearing at an event in Washington last week where he described himself as “in pain.” ...

“I do not see this just as a Jewish issue. This is an issue for all of us. Because we’ve seen this before. This is how it started 70 years ago. So I don’t want it to feel normal,” Emhoff said. “I don’t want people to think, ‘Well it’s just words, it’s just Kanye.’ No. This matters.”

What started in 1952?

Why say "first Jewish person", when "first Jew" or even "first person" would be correct?

West says that some Jews cheated him. I don't know whether that is true or not, but it is funny how Jews and everyone else rush to attack him, but no one addresses whether or not Jews really cheated him. It is as if everyone quietly accepts that Jews probably did cheat him, because that is what Jews do. Just as people talk about Sam Bankman-Fried as if he is something other than a con man.

This White House event just convinces me that Jews are the most powerful ethnic group. No other group gets a White House response, just because they don't like some obscure remarks on a podcast.

A Chimp Shows a Leaf to Another Chimp

Evolutionists are always claiming that man is just an animal, and that we have no abilities that make us uniquely human.

In particular, they say animals show use of language and tools. They recently even claimed use of recursion:

Time and again, it seems, research has revealed crows performing some cognitive task that defies our expectations. Now, a new paper claims the birds can understand a certain kind of pattern, displaying an ability that scientists once thought was unique to humans.

Researchers tested whether crows can grasp the concept of recursion, which they define as “the process of embedding structures within similar structures” in their paper published in November in Science Advances.

Humans use recursion in language when we embed one clause within another to form a complex sentence, writes Scientific American’s Diana Kwon. For example, if a human says, “The ball the bat hit flew,” they’ve nested the clause “the bat hit” inside of “the ball flew.”

Now they say, after decades of observing chimpanzees, an example of a referential gesture has been recorded.

The video shows a chimp playing with a leaf. The paper calls it "leaf grooming", but it is unknown why a chimp would groom a leaf. At one point, the chimp appears to show the leaf to another chimp.

That's it. A chimp shows a leaf to another chimp, and it is the biggest cognitive advance anyone has ever seen in chimps, who are supposed to be our closest animal relatives.

Even still, the evidence is ambiguous. Nobody knows why the chimp was playing with the leaf, or why he would show it to another. Maybe he was trying to give it away, or just playing, or just confused.

The Top Trump-Hater at Twitter

Tweet from a left-wing journalist:

If you listen to this person talk -- how he speaks and what he says: about how "traumatized" he and his fellow censors are -- and then realize he's spent the last several years in charge of Twitter's censorship regime, everything starts to make sense:

Truly incredible -- former Twitter executive @yoyoel, who just got caught fabricating a fake justification for censoring a media outlet, says the decision to ban Trump after Jan 6 was impelled by the "trauma" he and other "content moderators" experienced online that fateful day

Yoel Roth seems to be a real piece of work. Example:

Roth said in an interview on the University of Pennsylvania website that much of the work he did for his Ph.D. was about the “intersection of technology and sexuality.” Roth said that, “I’m particularly interested in how things like masculinity are constructed both in and through technology.” Roth added, “Most of my interests are in the construction of gay masculinity.” Roth said he was tracking how “notions of masculinity” had changed since the gay rights movement began.

Roth said in the same interview that his original plan when he began studying at The Annenberg School was to study video games. Roth said that after learning about how communications encompassed many of his interests, “video games went out the window.” Roth also said that the “beauty of Annenberg is that nobody here really knows what communications means.”

This guy is obviously emotionally disturbed, and never should have been in charge of censoring political messages.

Watching the Three Scoundrels

Nearly everyone, on the Right and the Left, is lining up to denounce three men, and everyone associated with them.

From a disreputable site, here they are on a video:

On Thursday, Ye [Kanye West] appeared with Nick Fuentes on the Alex Jones Show.

Jews are leading the charge. Particularly infuriating to them, there is a Jew on the podcast, and those on the podcast deny that they have anything against Jews.

I watched some of it, and it is hard to figure out what all the fuss is about. The three have some opinions, and express some disagreements with each other.

Those who attack Fuentes consistently call him a White supremacist and a Holocaust denier. He is neither, as you can see from this podcast. He is mainly a believer in America First, and also in Catholicism.

West spent much of his time promoting Christianity.

These three have their eccentricities, but nothing to justify the extreme attacks and censorship.

Nobody ever gets attacked like this, unless he is telling some truth is scary to them.

If people disagree with these three, that's fine. I have my disagreements also. Express them. But if the ones just cvalling for condemnation are the evil ones.

Wokism is the New Cultural Marxism

I am trying to understand how we got to today's woke politics. Modern institutions have gone whole hog into views that 90% of the population rejected, just a few years ago.

Example:

Long-serving royal aide Lady Susan Hussey stepped down after domestic abuse charity founder Ngozi Fulani tweeted that she had been repeatedly asked where she "was from" during a palace event.

Fulani is an extremely rude Black woman:

Ms Fulani was at the reception at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday representing the London-based charity Sistah Space, which supports women of African and Caribbean heritage across the UK who have faced domestic and sexual abuse.

So she was begging the royals for money for African and Caribbean women, but refusing to say which she was.

Lady SH: Where are you from?

Me: Sistah Space.

SH: No, where do you come from? ...

Me: No lady, I am of African heritage, Caribbean descent and British nationality.

So she knew how to answer the question, but rudely gave repeated evasive answers. She obviously hates White people, hates White culture, and wants Whites to pay for criminal behavior among Blacks.

And yet everyone is blaming the 83-year-old White lady.

Canadian universities hire faculty with preference to sexual perversions.

Where did those attitudes come from, among the Whites?

Another example, from the NY Times:

“In the two years since nationwide social justice protests followed the murder of George Floyd, California has undertaken the nation’s most sweeping effort yet to explore some concrete restitution to Black citizens to address the enduring economic effects of slavery and racism.

This is crazy, as California never had slavery and never mistreated Blacks.

Christopher Rufo has done a great job of tracing anti-White attitudes to a leftist academic doctrine called Critical Race Theory. The story goes much deeper. Apparently it descends from Jewish Marxism.

Joan Braune wrote in Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 9, 2019:

This article argues that “Cultural Marxism” is an antisemitic conspiracy theory, by drawing from three of the main proponents of the theory in the United States today. According to the conspiracy theory, the Jewish Marxists of the Frankfurt School implemented a slow takeover of “culture,” seeking to undermine Christianity, family, and nation in favor of a new worldview and system of control, involving mass immigration, sexual liberation, and moral and aesthetic decline. Cultural Marxists, the conspiracy theorists believe, now control all areas of public life, including the media, schools, entertainment, the economy, and national and global systems of governance. Not only does this theory vastly overestimate the influence of a small group of intellectuals, the conspiracy theory trades on the Frankfurt School’s perceived Jewishness and amplifies antisemitic tropes.

The article goes on to explain that Jewish Marxists really did all those things. Wikipedia has more in its article on Cultural Marxists, which it has rebranded Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory in order to emphasize Jewish influences. It says that the Cultural Marxists prefer to be called Critical Theorists, and they do not agree that they are subverting Western Civilization. Of course not.

Saying it "amplifies antisemitic tropes" is a bit like saying FBI crime data reports amplify Black stereotypes. Yes, I guess they do.

A new video on Feminism’s Long History of Anti-Whiteness explains the feminist angle to all this nonsense.

Ryan Chapman ties it all together with a video on The Intellectual Roots Of 'Wokeness':

An explanation of how Marxism was adapted by academics into leftist identity politics to form what we now think of as 'wokeness.'

I have been using terms like wokeness and wokism, but maybe Jewish Marxism is a better term.

The Corruption of the Counseling Profession

You would think that mental health counselors would be trained to respect other points of view. No it is just the opposite.

A blogger reports:

Leslie Elliiott, a graduate student in mental-health counseling at Antioch University in Seattle—part of the whole Antioch College consortium. Elliott had posted a video on YouTube about how her fellow students were being taught to force their counseling practice into a racial or identitarian mold, no matter what their problems. ...

The pledge, which Elliott says is now included in most syllabuses, reflects the social justice mission of Antioch. It states: “I acknowledge that racism, sexism, heterosexism, classism, ableism, ageism, nativism, and other forms of interpersonal and institutionalized forms of oppression exist. I will do my best to better understand my own privileged and marginalized identities and the power that these afford me.” Antioch added the statement starting in 2020 after the death of George Floyd.

She has a YouTube video channel where she expresses criticism, and the university responded by sending a letter to all the other students in the program accusing her of white supremacy and transphobia, and saying not to watch her videos. It appears that she will be expelled soon, if the school can figure out a legal way to do it.

The university says that its accreditation is based on forcing social justice on its students, and that the ethical values of the counseling professions require subordinating everyone to various woke views.

The whole system is evil. I would never get counseling, or recommend it to anyone.

How the World is Brainwashed

It is funny to see everybody, Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals, Jews and non-Jews, all line up in lockstep and recite the same lines about Donald Trump must be ostracized for failing to condemn a guest who believes in America First.

What goes? Are they all reading from the same playbook?

No, I don't believe all those people really have an opnion about Nick Fuentes. Or that they really believe that there is something wrong with Trump meeting someone with different views. Politicians meet with people of different views all the time.

None of them appear to have ever listened to Fuentes, or to be able to cise any of his opinions. His views are conservative, not radical.

I also wonder how all those same people can be lined up in favor of the Ukraine War. It used to be that we had some anti-war dissidents in the USA. There were Democrats against the Afghanistan War. Now they all favor the Ukraine War.

They all line up with predictable views on George Floyd, preferred pronouns, and same-sex marriage.

THey are horrified that someone might be allowed to express a contrary view on Twitter.

I don't know how far this goes. I think I will make a list of those against basic free speech.

Rich Jews with Trivial Complaints

The Jewish religion consists largely of complaining about imaginary or trivial persecutions.

Here is a video made by a British comedian who calls himself a fundamentalist Jewish atheist. His big gripe is that his fellow progressives advocate in favor of Blacks and minority, but treat Jews as privileged Whites.

He denies being a religious Jew, denies being White, and denies loyalties to Israel.

It is bizarre how trivial his complaints are. One of his top complaints is that Hollywood movies sometimes use non-Jews to play Jewish roles!

I consider him a religious Jews if he complains about a lack of Jews in Hollywood. He has bought into a Jewish narrative that goys do not understand.

The Jewish religion is not about belief in God or holding spiritual values. It is about promoting Jewish identity. Their favorite techniques are bonding with other Jews by pretending that they are a persecuted minority, and by attacking goys. The movie does this from beginning to end.

I believe in religious freedom, so this guy can believe whatever he wants, but it is just a goofy religious beliefs, and he have no legitimate complaint about others not subscribing to those beliefs.

He argues that Jews should be considered a minority race, because they are attacked for an immutable physical characteristic. That is not true. Okay, maybe someone will occasionally make fun of a Jewish nose. Most criticism of Jews is based on their beliefs.

Here is a Jew who dislikes the complaining of his fellow Jews:

I’m not sure that I love the evolution of Jewish victimhood over the past 75 years. In 1948, we fought against the regular militaries of Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Today our enemy is an individual 24-year-old incel. If we extrapolate out another 10 years, is it reasonable to predict that all Jews worldwide can be taken out by a pet rabbit and we need all of the goyim to rally around us and protect us from that rabbit?

Here are videos of Sen. Chuck Schumer and law professor Alan Dershowitz ranting that Pres. Trump had a dinner guest who brought a friend who once did an internet livestream where a caller made a snide remark on how long it would take to bake millions of cookies. Dershowitz, speaking from Israel, also complained that the guest was once present when some protesters chanted "Jews will not replace us." They were both adamant that it is "dangerous" for Trump not to denounce these folks. Schumer said that it was "pure evil".

Again, these are strange Jewish religious beliefs. Christians do not believe in condemning people for their political opinions, or for their failure to take orders from Jews.

Saying "Jews will not replace us" is the opinion of non-Jews all over the world. To disagree with that means to believe that Jews should be allowed to import foreigner to displace your people. I guess Dershowitz and the other Trump critics believe that Jews should rule the world, and treat goys like farm animals.

Dershowitz actually agrees with almost everything Trump did as President, and argues that he was very good to the Jews. But Dershowitz would never vote for Trump because Trump refuses to express subservience to the Jewish world order.

I do not even necessarily disagree with Israel replace West Bank Arabs with Jews. I do not have a dog in that fight. But I certainly disagree with Schumer and the others who control the Democrat Party and who import millions of foreigners to replace the native White Christian population. As he recently explained:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer made some startling admissions last week about his immigration views: “We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the Dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers but to get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here.”

However many? Is it 30 million? Illegal aliens do not make a great future. The purpose here is to exterminate White Christians.

NY Times Wants to Block Trump from Ballots

The NY Times Editorial Board argues that Donald Trump should not be permitted to run for President in 2024:

The facts are well known but necessary to repeat, if only because we must never become inured to them: Abetted by a posse of low-rent lawyers, craven lawmakers and associated crackpots, Mr. Trump schemed to overturn the 2020 election by illegal and unconstitutional means. When those efforts failed, he incited a violent insurrection at the United States Capitol, causing widespread destruction, leading to multiple deaths and — for the first time in American history — interfering with the peaceful transfer of power. Almost two years later, he continues to claim, without any evidence, that he was cheated out of victory, and millions of Americans continue to believe him.

The best solution to behavior like this is the one that’s been available from the start: impeachment.

No, this is partisan lunacy.

The Democrat-controlled House could have impeached Trump while he was still in office, but chose to delay it until it was ineffective and meaningless. Then Trump was acquitted in the Senate.

The House could not prove any of those things, because they are false. Trump was not trying to overturn the 2020 election, but trying to follow the Electoral Count Act. The Democrats in Congress are currently amending the law to block what Trump was doing. If Trump were doing something illegal and unconstitutional, there would be no noeed to amend the law.

Nobody interfered with the peaceful transfer of power. The J6 hearsing proved that. Trump left the White House, right on schedule. The only death was a Black cop shooting an unarmed protester.

Now they are scared of Trump, and want to rig the system to keep him off the ballot. If so, that will be the most anti-democratic official act of my lifetime. They say they want to democracy, but do everything against it.

The 2020 election was stolen in the sense that Trump got a majority of the observed and verified votes on Election Day. The official count only favored Joe Biden because of ballot drop box stuffing of questionable votes. An honest election would not permit such votes. Other countries do not.

Global Majority is the new Replacement Expression

London Daily Mail reports:

Westminster City Council has dropped the term BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic) from its communications.

The local authority has announced it will instead use 'global majority' as a replacement expression.

It follows wider questions asked about describing minorities during the 2020 protests for the Black Lives Matters movement. 

This makes sense. Global population is now up to 8 billion people. India is passing up China as the most populous country. The global majority is concentrated in the area from India to China, in Asia.

Their only threat is from Black Africa, where population is booming out of control. The UN projects Africa to get a couple of billion people.

Whites in Britain and the USA are being systematically replaced. Global majority is a suitable replacement expression. To the extent that the world is democratic, Whites must understand that they will be ruled by the global majority.

Russia Bans LGBT Propaganda

I wondered why Putin was hated so much, and here is a possible explanation:

MOSCOW, Nov 24 (Reuters) - Russia's parliament approved on Thursday a bill that widens a prohibition of "LGBT propaganda" and restricts the "demonstration" of LGBT behaviour, making any expression of an LGBT lifestyle almost impossible.

Under the new law, which still needs the approval of the upper house of parliament and President Vladimir Putin, any action or information that is considered an attempt to promote homosexuality - whether in public, online, or in films, books or advertising - could incur a heavy fine.

Previously, the law had outlawed only promotion of LGBT lifestyles aimed at children. The new bill also bans the "demonstration" of LGBT behaviour to children.

This is a very mild law. There is no penalty for homosexual conduct.

By comparison, in the USA you can be fired for using the wrong pronouns.

At the World Soccer Cup in Qatar, the big issue is rainbow colors:

Qatar has stated that Pride colours will “not be prohibited” after reports that football fans wearing rainbow clothing were being turned away from World Cup stadiums.

According to The Independent, FIFA has now told LGBTQ+ fans and allies they will no longer be stopped by security staff for wearing rainbow colours, and that FIFA “has been given assurances” by the World Cup’s Safety and Security Operations Committee that Pride colours will no longer be confiscated.

The U-turn comes after FIFA reportedly held “urgent talks” with Qatar this week after a number of fans, including former Wales captain Laura McAllister, were reportedly asked to remove rainbow items before entering stadiums.

The vast majority of the players and fans are not LGBT. They are just trying to politicize a soccer game.

Teaching Students With a Migration Background

News from Germany:

WHY are German schools so bad in an international comparison (30th place)? A current study by the Institute for Economic Research (University of Munich) shows: 23.8% of all students “do not achieve any basic skills that should be taught in school.”

The President of the German Teachers’ Association, Heinz-Peter Meidinger (68), speaks plainly to Bild: “A key reason for the drop in performance at primary schools is the proportion of students with a migration background, which has increased by more than 50% in the last ten years.” The higher their proportion, according to Meidinger, “the lower, at least tendentially, the level of performance — this has been shown by accompanying PISA studies.”

Meidinger also emphasized: “If a large part of the class can no longer follow the lesson at all, the teacher must of course lower the targets. The performance level of children without a migration background then falls too.”

Yes, it is obvious, but no one wants to say it anymore.

Public Library Shows Jewish Propaganda

Some public libraries are showing this movie:

Repairing the World: Stories from the Tree of Life documents a community’s response to hate and anti-Semitism in the aftermath of the assault on three congregations at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, PA. The lives of 11 people were taken on October 27, 2018 in the deadliest anti-Semitic attack in U.S. history.

I would not describe it as anti-Semitic. According to Wikipedia, the killer described his motives:

Referring to Central American migrant caravans and immigrants, Bowers posted a message on Gab in which he wrote that "HIAS likes to bring invaders in that kill our people. I can't sit by and watch my people get slaughtered. Screw your optics, I'm going in."[13][14]

So he was not attacking because of their ethnic heritage or their theological beliefs.

Or maybe he was. The title of this movie is from a Jewish slogan that means Jews imposing their beliefs and values on the rest of the world. This could be considered a core Jewish religious belief, I guess. If they want to bring in Guatamalan invaders to kill Americans, then that is their religious prerogative, and any goy who resists is anti-Semitic.

I am not trying to justify the killing. The Pittsburgh perp deserves to be executed for his crimes. I am just trying to understand what my tax-supported public libraries are trying to accomplish. Apparently they are against this perp killing killing Jews, but all in favor of helping Jews bring in Guatamalan invaders to kill goys.

Speakaing of propaganda, why are we subjected to so much anti-Putin propaganda? Here is an essay on it:

Why Do Americans Hate Putin? ...

Everything Americans know about Putin they read in the media. And that’s the problem, because media despises Putin. And they despise him for the same reason they despise Trump, because the media’s wealthy owners see him as a threat to their political agenda. That’s the whole deal in a nutshell. Putin is not hated because he is a “KGB thug” or a “new Hitler”; that’s just public relations gibberish. He’s hated because he is an obstacle to the globalists achieving their geopolitical objectives. That’s the motive that drives this smear campaign.

I don't know. It is as it the lizard people have installed chips in the heads of many of the world's leaders, but not Putin.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Cities can Ban Pit Bulls

A federal appeals court upheld an Iowa city ban on pit bull dogs.

I did not know breeds could be banned for being undesirable.

They [the dog owners] presented evidence from canine behavior experts and recent scientific studies about predicting a dog's propensity to bite based on its breed. According to the dog owners, this evidence, viewed most favorably to them, negates every conceivable basis for the Ordinance by establishing: "(1) Pit Bull type dogs are no more or less dangerous than other breeds of dogs; (2) neither breed nor physical characteristics are predictive of a dog's aggressiveness or propensity to bite; and (3) the city's method of identifying dogs as Pit Bulls is inherently unreliable."

As for dangerousness, the dog owners argue that experts in canine genetics and behavior currently acknowledge that pit bulls are no more or less dangerous than similarly sized dogs of other breeds.

This sounds just like antiracism arguments.

Behavioral traits are heritable. Hence dog breeds will have varying levels of dangerousness. That is obvious. It is fake egalitarian foolishness to say that breeds cannot be more or less dangerous.

Pit bulls are source of a huge number of dog bite complaints. What is that, a coincidence? Discrimination? Even if it is partially attributable to bad training on the part of the pit bull owners, it is still a reality.

Saying that the breed is not predictive is more nonsense. Pit bulls are 6% of the US dog population but a majority of bites.

When the pit bull owners say that the breed is not predictive, they presumably mean that some pit bulls are well-behaved and do not bite. So they mean the breed is not predictive with 100% accuracy.

That is like saying that weather predictions are not predictive. Of course they are predictive. They have a probability of being wrong, but that is the nature of predictions.

There are those who say race does not exist, because some people are half Black and half White. Likewise I guess they argue that dog breeds do not exist. Nevertheless, if a city does not want excess dog bites, it makes sense to ban any dog that looks like a pit bull.

The problem with pit bulls is that they are very loyal to their masters, and aggressive to others, and particularly vicious in biting attacks. Often the owners are oblivious to how nasty their dogs are, and figure that anyone who gets bitten deserved it. Also, people who want mean dogs get pit bulls.

The problem could be completely solved if a law were passed allowing pit bulls to be shot on site. There are plenty of other dogs available.

Russia Probably not Bombing its own Power Plant

Reuters reports:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged NATO members on Monday to guarantee the protection of Ukraine's nuclear plants from Russian sabotage, a day after the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia plant was rocked by heavy shelling. ...

Russia and Ukraine each blame the other for attacks on the plant, which is located in Russian-held territory near the front line. Reuters was unable to independently verify which side was responsible for the weekend shelling.

If the plant is in Russian-controlled territory, why would the Russians shell it?

A Reuters Special Report:

A gender imbalance emerges among trans teens seeking treatment

Adolescents assigned female at birth account for a significant majority of minors receiving gender-affirming care, including top surgery, fueling debate about the influence of peer groups and social media.

Does Reuters still have some honest reporters? This story is a surprisingly fair look at teen transgenderism. It gives the impression it is all a big teenaged girl fad, promoted by pushy therapists and peer pressure.

The peer pressure is hard to understand, as you would expect that the peer pressure would be to be normal. But if that were correct, kids would never get a tattoo. No, today's kids feel peer pressure to be freaks. Some get tattoos. Others get more sever mutilations.

Update: RT reports:

The Associated Press has fired the journalist behind its since-retracted story, which claimed that the missile that hit NATO member Poland last week had been launched by Russia, a number of US media outlets have reported.

The news that the agency had terminated its contract with investigative reporter James LaPorta after a brief internal probe was broken by the Daily Beast on Monday. The sacking was later confirmed to the Washington Post by “people at the news organization.”

Last Tuesday, AP issued a news alert citing “a senior US intelligence official,” who claimed that “Russian missiles crossed into NATO member Poland, killing two people.”

The missile turned out to the a Ukraine false flag operation, and part of a plot to theaten World War III. Glad to see these news services wise up.

Jewish Topics of Conversation

Andrew Anglin writes:

White people have much less money per capita than the Jews. They have much less influence on society. Whites rarely make decisions that affect any public policy. Jews are the ones with the power, they are the ones making the decisions, but they are telling us that unlike whites, they are not a group, so they can’t ever be talked about. This is unacceptable.

Jews destroyed my life. They destroyed Ye’s life. We have a lot at stake here. We want to understand what is going on, and we need these Jews who control everything to explain it to us.

Here are some other topics of conversation:

• Jews are currently pushing us towards a world war to try to collapse the government of Russia for reasons that are entirely related to Jewish experience and Jewish geopolitical goals.
• Jews have used feminism to completely destroy the nuclear family, in line with stated Jewish goals about preventing “goyim” from opposing the Jewish agenda. (You can read about the Jewish plan to destroy the nuclear family in Theodor Adorno’s “The Authoritarian Personality.” They stated this agenda openly decades ago, and then they proceeded to do it.)
• Jews are pushing this concept of child trannies, and they are mutilating the genitals of our children as part of a strange ideology that Jews have refused to explain when asked about it.
• Jews are collapsing the global financial system. Most Jewish power comes from their money, and most Jewish money was obtained through underhanded means. FTX alone should be reason enough to talk about Jewish financial power.
• The Jews legalized and then normalized pornography. The entire pornography industry is entirely Jewish, and over 95% of American men are addicted to pornography. This is not in keeping with the Christian values our people traditionally hold.
• The Jews have a complete stranglehold on the news media, which they use to push their agenda. They use the apparatus of the media to silence anyone who opposes them.
• Jews have completely shut down freedom of speech in the West, something that is necessary for our societies to function. Jews are currently in the process of stripping us of the rest of our God-given rights, as they shape an entirely new society to reflect their own value system.

We need to discuss all of these things and much more.

Jews did destroy his life, and they are out to get Kanye West and others.

He does not even mention the Democrat Party, which is run by Jews and doing many things to ruin the USA.

Alan Dershowitz has gone negative on Ukraine. It has a Jewish president, but is one of the most anti-Jewish countries in the world.

Here is Sen. Chuck Schumer explaining that his "ultimate goal" is to bring in non-white immigrants to replace the White population that is aborting its babies. Okay, he does not say it exactly that way, but watch it for yourself. Yes, Jews are plotting to replace us.

Google says that if I mention this topic, I should include the Wikipedia definition:

The Great Replacement (French: Grand Remplacement), also known as replacement theory or great replacement theory,[1][2][3] is a white nationalist[4] far-right conspiracy theory[3][5][6][7] disseminated by French author Renaud Camus. The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites,[a][5][8] the ethnic French and white European populations at large are being demographically and culturally replaced with non-white peoples

For some Jewish opinion, here is Jonathan Greeblatt of the Jewish ADL tweeting:

Jonathan Greenblatt @JGreenblattADL

Nov 19 Official
.@elonmusk's decisions over the last month have been erratic and alarming, but this decision is dangerous and a threat to American democracy. We need to ask — is it time for Twitter to go?

He is referring to allowing Donald Trump back on Twitter. He also tweeted about using Jewish power to destroy those he does not like.

He says it is anti-semitic to say Jews have power.

In all fairness, I cannot blame all Jews for this kook. A Jewish magazine writes:

But we Jews don’t control Kyrie Irving; in theory, we do control the ADL, and we shouldn’t want our chief defense group to behave in a way that advances antisemitic conspiracy theories about shadowy Jews trafficking in money and influence for fun and profit.

All of this leads to one sorry conclusion: It’s time to say goodbye to the ADL. It can’t be killed, so we need to just walk away from this formerly venerable organization, and weaken it before it swerves so far off the road that it takes us with it.

If you think the above is hyperbole, or if you haven’t been paying much attention to the ADL lately and still imagine it as a paragon of the good fight against antisemitism, here’s a sizzle reel of Greenblatt’s years in office. Since leaving the Obama White House and taking over the organization in 2015, Greenblatt has turned the ADL into a partisan attack machine, fueled by corporate cash and increasingly oblivious to any real suffering of any real Jews.

The article goes on to explain how Jewish organizations will sell out their fellow Jews to align with leftist causes.

Movie About Reporters Making Fake News

NY Times movie review:

Jurors in this trial received a particular instruction: The judge barred them from watching the trailer for “She Said.”

That’s the film adaptation of the nonfiction book of the same title. In it, the New York Times journalists Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey describe — in pragmatic, restrained how-we-got-that-story prose — the reporting that led them to publish a series of articles detailing Weinstein’s behavior. Those articles helped ignite the #MeToo movement,

This ia a NY Times review of a movie about a book about NY Times reporters collecting Hollywood gossip. You might expect it to be a story about uncovering facts, but that is not what it is at all.

While forged in the mold of other films about investigative reporting, like “Spotlight,” “All the President’s Men” and “The Post,” “She Said” privileges female experience. It follows its journalists home more extensively than those earlier films did, accentuating their identities as women and mothers. This choice helps explain the sacrifices these journalists made and the reputational risks they took to report this story. It argues that a reporter’s private life and personhood might animate her work without compromising her ethics. ...

Weinstein appears in the film only glancingly. His recorded voice is heard, and in a late scene the back of his head (well, the back of the actor Mike Houston’s head) can be seen. The focus, rightly, remains with his accusers and the reporters

With 100 accusers, and numerous books and NY Times articles, surely there are some facts about Weinstein that they can show without getting sued. Apparently not.

California Governor Gavin Newson's wife was the star witness at the latest trial, telling some far-fetched story about trying to get an acting job many years ago. I thought that Newson had higher political ambitions. Apparently having a slutty wife is advantageous in today's Democrat Party.

I assume that Weinstein will get convicted again, just because he is a creep, and because the prosecution was allowed to do a character assassination about uncharged allegations.

Civilization was Invented in the Dark Ages

The Dark Ages are called that because the meager written records leave a lot unknown. Scholars have shown that they were not as backward as most people think. Here are a couple of essays that falsely blame Christianity for a decline in civilization.

Richard Carrier writes:

There is a trend to try and deny the Dark Ages ever existed; even to portray them as really lovely, light and wonderful ages of goodness and achievement. I’m exaggerating. But only a little. I’ve debunked this a lot. ...

I mentioned in particular McDaniel’s piece debunking the Dark Ages, which has a lot of good material rightly debunking a lot of misconceptions about the Dark Ages. For instance, that wasn’t the era of mass witch hunts (the Inquisition, for example, was actually a much later phenomenon of a far more prosperous time) or of the kind of “armored knights” people usually imagine, and so on. And pretty much all educated persons knew the earth was a sphere, even in the Middle Ages. ...

For example, McDaniel argues that publicly seen depictions of the universe as a sphere indicate popular knowledge the earth was a sphere, but that’s incorrect: those spheres illustrate the entire cosmos, not the earth. The belief that a flat earth inhabited a spherical universe remained widespread—among the illiterate, who indeed also still thought such things as that lunar eclipses were caused by witch magic and not orbital shadows ...

Yes, the Dark Ages happened. They occupied the period from the 5th to the 10th century. And they took five hundred more years to fully recover from, bringing Western civilization back by the 15th century to all the peak markers of accomplishment that it had achieved by the 2nd century. That’s a thousand years we were set back.

If that is really true, and Europe dropped a millennium behind the rest of the world, then how it is that, starting in the 15th century, it rapidly advanced to being a millennium ahead? How is that even possible?

The atheists might argue: The enlightenment scholars discovered reason, and that was so much more powerful than religion.

But those Enlightment advances were all done by Christians, working in Christian institutions. And the non-Christian countries fell many centuries behind Europe.

Andrew Bernstein writes, archived:

In recent decades, medieval scholars have persistently advanced the thesis that the Dark and Middle Ages were not actually dark — that the 1,000-year period stretching from the fall of Rome (roughly 500 AD) to the Renaissance (roughly 1500) was an era of significant intellectual and cultural advance. ...

The thesis of Stark’s book is that the Catholic Church promoted a cultural commitment to reason that enabled the West to rise. Medieval Christianity was fundamentally, perhaps exclusively, responsible for the great progress wrought by Western Civilization in philosophy, the arts, science, technology, and freedom. ...

A reader will search Stark’s book in vain for any reference to the Church’s suppression of innovative thinkers. For example, the terms “heresy” and “heretics” are not listed in his Index.

So he denies that Christianity was a force of reason because some heresies were suppressed!

Most heresies were witchcraft, superstitions, and other unscientific nonsense. Yes, suppressing superstition was part of what made Christianity successful, and what made Europeans more rational.  

And of course he complains about Galileo, and misstates his dispute with the Pope. But of course Galileo was a Christian, and did his best work with the support of the Church.

Go ahead and read these essays for yourself. If Christianity was so bad, tell me where non-Christians did any better.

The Dark Ages did see a decline in some of the Roman accomplishments, such as construction, money, and law and order. But at the same time, it embarked on the long and difficult task of Christianizing the continent, and achieving a civilization far greater than anywhere else.

The Never-Trumpers Emerge Again

National Review is a supposedly conservative magazine that has always hated Donald Trump, and it came out again against his Presidential campaign.

Here is the summary: He was an outstanding President, but we don't like his personality. He brought a lot of voters into the Republican Party, but he alienated others. It explains:

To his credit, Trump killed off the Clinton dynasty in 2016, nominated and got confirmed three constitutionalist justices, reformed taxes, pushed deregulation, got control of the border, significantly degraded ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and cinched normalization deals between Israel and the Gulf states, among other things. These are achievements that even his conservative doubters and critics — including NR — can acknowledge and applaud.

That said, the Trump administration was chaotic even on its best days because of his erratic nature and lack of seriousness. ...

Certainly, GOP voters should give up on the idea that Trump is a winner. After securing the GOP nomination with plurality support in 2016, Trump didn’t exceed 47 percent in either of his campaigns, winning in 2016 with 46.1 percent and losing in 2020 with 46.8. ...

Needless to say, Trump is a magnetic political figure who has managed to bond countless millions of Republicans to him. Many GOP voters appreciate his combativeness and hate his enemies, who so often engaged in excesses in pursuit of him. Once he won the nomination in 2016, they understandably voted for him in 2016 and 2020, given the alternatives.

Criticism of Trump from Jews and others is usually similar. Little or no criticism of what he actually did as President, but endless gripes about petty matters that affected no one.

I wonder what really motivates these Never-Trumpers. No, I do not believe that they are honestly expressing their opinions.

One theory is that they believe that the Republican Party should be the controlled opposition party. Trump does not take orders from the lizard people who run the world.

Observing Anti-Christian Shills

An anti-religion group just had a conference, and here are their speeches. I listened to a couple of them to see if they had any examples of religion doing something bad. No, it was just leftist advocacy.

I found this amusing rant:

ID: 10az04kf When observing anti-Christian shills, you'll notice they never formulate arguments in favor of their preferred belief system. They never give you details about what they believe and why you should believe it too. What is their doc- Wine? Where do their morals come from? Which God do they worship, if any? No, all they do is attack Christianity and Christians. They insult Christ, they insult you for believing in Him. They try to conflate Christianity with modern day Judaism as a way to appeal to the overarching Jewish sentiment of /pol/. They try to conflate Christianity with typically leftist posi- tions using cherry-picked propaganda that rep- resents the complete opposite of the average case (for example claiming that Christians are pro mass immigration, or pro gay rights). They post anti-Christian images, memes etc. but never anything pro-whatever they believe. They claim that Christianity "destroyed" the West, but they never tell you how the West can be saved (aside from you not following Christ of course).

There is a reason for all of this: They genuinely don't care what you believe, so long as you stop believing in Christ. Their goal is not to convert you to some non-existant Pagan religion, or Marxism, or atheism; and it's certainly not to save the West. Their goal is simply to turn you away from the truth; to demoralize you. To strip you of your identity and your heritage. If you are not following Christ, they are happy. If you are confused, conflicted, and hopeless, they are happy. They are, quite literally, doing the bidding of Satan. /pol/ on anti-Christian threads - /pol/ on anti-Christian threads

Trump Announces Presidential Candidacy

NPR Radio reports:

Donald Trump, who tried to overthrow the results of the 2020 presidential election and inspired a deadly riot at the Capitol in a desperate attempt to keep himself in power, announced he is running again for president in 2024.

You were not expecting objective coverage, were you?

I have heard people say that they donate to NPR Radio in order ot get neutral news coverage. I listen to NPR Radio and PBS TV, and I have never heard them do a neutral story on anything. And certainly not Trump.

Trump did not try to overthrow any results. He was merely advocating for the electoral votes that he believed he deserved. The J6 protest was only deadly because a Black cop shot and killed an unarmed White woman.

Hear the story about the Russian missile striking Poland, possibly invoking NATO Charter Article 5, and starting World War III? Now the authorities admit that Ukraine fired the missile. Okay, never mind.

Ukraine attacking Poland could also invoke the NATO Charter, but no one wants to consider that.

Whatever you think of Trump personally, his Presidency was four years of peace and prosperity. Biden has wrecked the economy, inflated the dollar, and lost wars in Afghanistan and Ukraine.

Proving Uncountability Without Diagonalization

Cantor is famous for his diagonal proof of the uncountability of the real numbers. I just learned that his first proof was different. Here it is.

First some facts about the completeness of the reals. A bounded monotone sequence of real numbers must converge. That is, if a₀ < a₁ < a₂ < ... < C are real numbers, then the sequence must converge to some point b ≤ C. Likewise, if the sequence is monotone decreasing.

Consequently, if we have a sequence of nested intervals, ie where each interval properly contains the next one, then the intersection must be nonempty. That is because the left endpoints form a bounded monotone sequence, and must converge to some point in all the intervals.

(I am being a little sloppy about whether the intervals are open or closed, ie whether they include the endpoints. It does not matter, as long as each interval is contained in the interior of the previous one. They cannot share an endpoint.)

Theorem If a₀, a₁, a₂, ... is a sequence of real numbers, then there must be a real point not in the sequence.

Proof Removing duplicates if necessary, assume the numbers are all distinct. Let I₀ be the interval determined by a₀ and a₁. Find the next two points in the sequence that are also in the interval, and let them define the interval I₁. If that is not possible, then all the points inside I₀ must be absent from the sequence.

Continuing, we get an infinite sequence of nested intervals, and so there must be a point in all of them. By the construction, that point cannot be in he original sequence of reals.

This proves that the real numbers are uncountable.

Atheists Want to Castrate your Kids

Atheists and freethinkers used to be big advocates of science and rational thinking. No more. They have signed on to a Leftist agenda.

FFRF announces:

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has signed on to an amicus brief challenging a new Indiana law that discriminates against transgender school athletes.

The National Women’s Law Center and its law firm partner, Hogan Lovells, have filed a friend-of-the-court brief before the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in A.M. v. Indianapolis in support of the plaintiff, a 10-year-old transgender girl who was kicked off her elementary school softball team after a sports ban targeting transgender girls and young women took effect in the summer of 2022. A.M. and her family, represented by the ACLU, won a preliminary district court injunction finding that the anti-trans ban on sports participation likely violates Title IX. The state of Indiana has appealed. ...

Plus, women and girls of color will be disproportionately targeted and harmed by the new Indiana law. Exclusion of transgender women and girls has a far-reaching impact and can adversely affect other women and girls, as well. Black and brown girls and women — who are routinely targeted for not conforming to society’s expectations of white femininity — are particularly vulnerable to harm from the types of exclusionary policies the state of Indiana is asking the court to impose. Serena Williams is perhaps the most prominent woman of color to experience this policing but far from the only.

I do not even see what this has to do with religion. The arguments for restricting girls sports to girls are not primarily religious. I do not even know whether any of the major reliions have a postion on the matter.

Apparently the idea that we are oppressed by religion is all a big hoax, and the FFRF cannot find any example of religious views being forced on anyone.  

The science says that sex cannot be changed.

Serena Williams was a huge beneficiary of the discrimination that the FFRF complains about. Maybe the biggest. She was one of the top earners in the history of tennis, despite never being among the top 500, if men are included. I guess FFRF is trying to say that she was considered ugly, compared to the other top female players. The Indiana law will not change that.

I believe the science says that White women are more feminine, and Blacks are less sexually dimorphic.

I listened to an FFRF podcast a couple of months ago, and it was all about strategies to pack the US Supreme Court with extra appointments.

These people are frauds who should return the money that they have raised.

Wokism is a new religion. I want freedom from that.

AP reports:

She was a woman. She was not supposed to be here, because Singapore’s compulsory, two-year military service is required only for 18-year-old men. But under Singapore law, she was still considered a man, because she had not undergone surgery that would render her sterile.

Across the world, scores of countries still require transgender people to submit to such surgeries before their genders are legally recognized, a practice international human rights bodies have condemned as torture. These policies have left untold numbers of transgender people with an agonizing choice between their fertility and their identity.

It should have said "He was a boy, and now identifies as a girl." He tried to evade the Singapore military draft by pretending to be a girl. But he was not yet willing to have his genitals chopped off. That would be "torture"!

I did not realize that international human rights bodies have condemned transsexual surgery as torture. The article goes on to complain that some legal authorities do not recognize a sex change unless there is some evidence of a sex change. Seems reasonable to me. They also ask you to put accurate height and weight on official documents.

In the U.S., 13 states and territories have a surgical requirement to update gender markers on birth certificates, and four require it for updating driver’s licenses, according to Olivia Hunt, policy director for the National Center for Transgender Equality. The states do not clarify what procedures they will accept.

Even after surgery, the process of obtaining a legal gender change can be convoluted and humiliating. In Australia, two states require two separate examinations of post-surgery genitalia by doctors, who must sign statutory declarations confirming “a surgical procedure involving the alteration of a person’s reproductive organs.” Any false statement by the doctor, the New South Wales state form warns, could result in two years’ imprisonment.

“We don’t even force sex offenders to be sterilized in this country, but you’re forcing transgender people just to get a birth certificate? Come on,” says Kirsti Miller, a New South Wales woman who underwent gender-confirmation surgery in 2006, and was forced to divorce her childhood sweetheart. New South Wales removed the divorce mandate in 2018.

At least some people recognize these surgeries as abominations.