He writes an op-ed:
In the pantheon of evils, among the worst is Holocaust denial. ...If this is such an important fact, you might expect him to cite some objective historical evidence. He only says that Gen. Patton wrote that hundreds of bodies were crudely buried.
Yet, some people, including an American named Nick Fuentes, aggressively deny the Holocaust, asserting that a few hundred thousand Jews, not millions, were killed.
It is important to understand why this is evil. ...
If the Holocaust is a fabrication, Americans died fighting against nothing particularly evil. ...
That man is one of millions of reasons Fuentes — and those who ally themselves with him — will go to hell. If there is a just God.
No, Prager's real point here is one of "moral theology". There is a Jewish consensus on a Holocaust narrative, and Jews get upset if you deviate from it. Denying it is a slap in the face.
Note that he says Fuentes acknowledges that Nazis killed a very large number of Jews. The quibble is only about the exact number.
For deviating from the official Jewish narriative, Prager's moral theology says that Fuentes will burn in Hell for eternity.
This blog accepts the official Jewish Holocaust narrative. Anything else would be illegal in Canada and Europe, and I do not want this blog to be banned. The issue is out of my expertise.
I am just pointing out that this is a matther of Jewish religious belief.
Prager hates Fuentes because (1) he is Christian; (2) he favors America First, instead of Israel First; and (3) he refuses to regurgitate Jewish narratives.
There are lots of secular Jews who claim that they are not religious, because they do not believe in God. But the core of Judaism is not belief in God. It is promoting Jewish identity and rejecting Christianity. For proof, just look at all the Jews attacking Fuentes.
Christianity is much more tolerant. Christians do not go around forcing others to accept their historical narratives.