The USA was not Founded on Judaism

If this were a Jew, I would say it is understandable that someone thinks that his religion is more important than others. But it is almost certainly a Christian Zionist, as no Jew would make this diagram.

You might say the USA was founded on Christianity, as well as the Roman Empire, Greek philosophy, English Magna Carta and common law, and many other European influences. But not Judaism. The founders paid no attention to Judaism, except to reject it. Even Israel gets its political system from Britain, not Judaism.

Here is Mike Huckabee defending Christian Zionism, and attacking his Tucker Carlson interview. He defines it as following Jesus and also believe the Jews have been brought to their homeland in fulfillment of Scripture. He claims that recent Catholic Popes have been Christian Zionists.

I asked an AI LLM if he is correct:

No, Mike Huckabee's recent claim that several recent Catholic Popes were **Christian Zionists** is not accurate. Christian Zionism is a theological and political viewpoint primarily associated with evangelical Protestantism (especially in the U.S.), which interprets biblical prophecies as requiring support for the modern State of Israel as a fulfillment of God's promises to the Jewish people, often tied to end-times eschatology. It typically affirms that the Jewish people have a divine right to the land, sometimes extending to expansive biblical borders.

The Catholic Church, including under recent Popes like John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis, has explicitly rejected a theological basis for Zionism—that is, the idea that the modern State of Israel fulfills biblical prophecy or that Jews have a divine scriptural right to exclusive sovereignty over the Holy Land. The Church views the ancient covenants with the Jewish people as irrevocable (per Romans 11 and Vatican II's Nostra Aetate), affirms the Jewish people's enduring bond with God, and supports Israel's right to exist securely as a modern state on political and humanitarian grounds (e.g., self-determination, safety from antisemitism). However, this is not rooted in Christian Zionist theology.

Recent Popes have:
- Supported a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
- Recognized both Israel (diplomatic relations in 1993 under John Paul II) and Palestine (agreements in 2000 and 2015 under John Paul II and Francis).
- Advocated for justice, peace, and reconciliation for all in the region, including Palestinian Christians.

The heads of churches in the Holy Land (including Catholic leaders) have repeatedly condemned Christian Zionism as a "damaging ideology" that harms Christian unity and the local Christian presence, as in statements from 2006 and January 2026.

Huckabee, as a self-described Christian Zionist and U.S. Ambassador to Israel, made statements in January 2026 defending the term and questioning why any Christian wouldn't be a Zionist, in response to those church leaders' criticisms. He has expressed bewilderment that not all Christians share this view, but this reflects his evangelical perspective, not Catholic teaching.

Your impression that Catholics historically wanted the Holy Land for Christians aligns with pre-20th-century views (e.g., during the Crusades or earlier papal opposition to Zionism, partly due to concerns over holy sites and Christian communities). But modern Catholic policy prioritizes peace, dialogue, protection of holy places for all faiths, and rights for Palestinians (including Christians) alongside Israel's security—without endorsing Christian Zionist theology.

In short, while recent Popes have supported Israel's existence and condemned antisemitism, they are not Christian Zionists in the sense Huckabee uses the term. The claim appears to be an overreach or misunderstanding from a Protestant evangelical viewpoint.

The bizarre thing to me is that Huckabee seems to not even understand why a Christian would not be a Zionist. Here is a hint: Christianity and Judaism are two different religions.

He is the USA ambassador to Israel. Most Americans are pro-Israel, but do not buy into his theology.

An orthodox Jew law professor has posted another rant on how Catholics must not be permitted to say that Jews killed Jesus or to reject Zionism. He says the Catholic faith has been corrupted by the world's oldest hatred. No, this is crazy anti-Christian hatred. Jews like to tell stories about how they are supposedly being persecuted. They are not. Jews are the most privileged people in the world.

I see that Jews have just outbid Netflix to buy Warner Bros. Discovery. This keeps more of the mainstream media under Jewish control. See this video, if you doubt that the buyers are loyal to Israel.

Medical Societies Flip on Transgenderism

I have posted many times on how the major medical organizations have been corrupted, especially on political and LGBTQIA issues.

Now a NY Times op-ed announces:

As GLAAD puts it on its website, “Every major medical association supports health care for transgender people and youth as safe and lifesaving.” But something confounding has happened in the last few weeks: Cracks have appeared in the supposed wall of consensus. ...

The next day, the American Medical Association — which has long approved of such procedures — announced that “in the absence of clear evidence, the A.M.A. agrees with A.S.P.S. that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.” ...

The documents, separated by about a year and a half (and, perhaps as significantly, one presidential election), straightforwardly contradict each other. The A.P.A. in 2024 argued that there is a “comprehensive body of psychological and medical research supporting the positive impact of gender-affirming treatments” for individuals “across the life span.” But in 2025, the group argued that “psychologists do not make broad claims about treatment effectiveness.”

What changed? Was there new evidence?

No, the biggest change was the election of Donald Trump.

There were a lot of complaints about the President's State of the Union address. But the Trump 47 Presidency has been a return to sanity. Someday people will wonder about how the world went so crazy about transgenderism and other issues.

Update: The NY Times reports that the world's most wanted criminal was captured and killed in Mexico, largely as a result of Trump administration intelligence and pressure.

Carlson Questions Christian Zionist

Tucker Carlson interviewed Mike Huckabee, and they argued about whether today's Jews have a legitimate Biblical claim to control the nation of Israel. There were two parts to this: whether today's Jews are the same people as those in the Bible, and whether a historical background entitles people to political power today. Huckabee is a Christian Zionist who believes the Jews have a Biblical right to Israel and surrounding areas.

Most mainstream Christian Catholics and Protestants regard Christian Zionism as a heresy.

Matters of ancestry are usually settled by DNA, but DNA tests are illegal in Israel, with certain exceptions, such as court orders and medical screening. DNA tests can used to help prove that a Jew is entitled to Israel citizenship. Regular consumer DNA tests are illegal, as in Germany and France. They are cheap and legal in the rest of the world.

It baffles me how the people of those three countries can put up with such a ban. Everyone should have a right to know who he is. DNA gives identifying info that cannot be obtained in any other way.

In France and Germany, the purpose of the ban is to cover up a mother's infidelity. In Israel, the ban is also to cover up many Jews not really having Jewish ancestry.

Update: The UK BBC tries to explain Carlson:

6:52 Well, the thing that Tucker, and he did this at Fox, too. Um he's he's doing this still. He he's very good at taking fringe ideas, ideas that exist on the far far far far right often times, you know, on the internet. Um, taking those ideas and smuggling them into the mainstream and presenting them in such a way he makes them more palatable. ...

the 7:22 most sort of famous instance of this is the great replacement theory. this idea that um elites, oftentimes Jews, are bringing immigrants into the United States to replace white voters and therefore support the Democratic party. I mean, this is this is a theory that has been bumping around on the far far far right for for decades.

Not far far far far right. An obvious fact.

Islamic Subjugation or Dogs

Tweet:

Muslim preacher who lives in San Diego, California:

"Islam will enter every house. Their children will be Muslim, let them yap all they want. If you fight Islam, I will fight you. Muslim bans won't stop us."

Islam has been saying this for a millennium.

Jewish Congressman Fine tweeted:

"If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one."

He defends it:

“Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of many who called this, quote, ‘one of the most disgusting statements’ she’d ever seen. Congressman, I’d just like to give you an opportunity to respond to the congresswoman there.”

The congressman replied:

Well, I appreciate that. Look, here’s my view. It’s not enough for Democrats to think anyone who wants to come here illegally should be able to do that. They also think they should be able to get whatever free stuff they want. Now they are demanding that we change our values and how we live as Americans. My post is in response to a major Muslim leader saying dogs should be forbidden from New York City because to some Muslims it bothers them. Well, if they’re gonna make us choose between our dogs and them going home, the choice is easy and people should know Democrats like AOC are saying, “We are going to get rid of your dogs.” Americans need to keep that in mind when they go to vote in November.

Another Jim Watson Obituary

From an obituary of the famous biochemist Jim Watson:

In the late 1990s, Watson gave seminars, notably at the University of California Berkeley, where he expanded on research on the hormone POMC and related peptides and made inappropriate and incorrect observations about women. In October 2007, he made racist remarks about the intelligence of people of African descent, and, damagingly for his fellow employees at CSHL, stated that while he hoped that everyone was equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.” The CSHL Board of Trustees dissociated the institute from Watson’s comments, and he was forced to step down from his administrative position as Chancellor. The matter resurfaced in January 2019 when Watson was asked if his views on race and intelligence had changed. His answer was unequivocal: “No, not at all.” The Laboratory’s response was immediate, relieving him of all his emeritus titles. Watson and his family, however, continued to live on the CSHL campus.

A reader comments:

But was it necessarily bigotry? Might he have seen himself as making a best-efforts and good-faith evaluation of the evidence, and following that evidence, even if it leads to an unpopular and heretical conclusion?

If the reply would be along the lines that, no, the evidence showing he was wrong is so available and clear cut that no good-faith scientist could arrive at his conclusions, so it must have been bigotry, then could someone do the world a favour and point everyone at the available and clear-cut evidence showing he was wrong? (Note that the various denunciations of him don’t actually do that, they just denounce him.)

If there were a reliable scientific study proving Watson wrong, then the reviews would cite it.

Watson could be shown wrong if intelligence is not real, or if it is not measurable, or if all groups have the same average scores. But IQ is measurable, and group averages could be significantly different.

There still could be multiple explanations for those differences. One reason for disagreement is that differences attributable to identified genes are much smaller that what is indicated by twin studies. I do not know whether Watson took a stand on this, but he was an enthusiast of genetic explanations, so he was probably inclined in that direction.

Regardless, no makes any specific criticisms of Watson. They just call him a racist.

New CNN Special on Christian Nationalism

CNN reports:

The Whole Story with Anderson Cooper, a six-time Emmy® Award-winning CNN Original, returns with “The Rise of Christian Nationalism” with CNN Anchor and Chief Investigative Correspondent Pamela Brown premiering Sunday, February 22 at 8pm ET/PT. The hour will stream on demand the next day for subscribers of CNN’s streaming offering.

In this hour, Brown examines the growing influence of Christian nationalism, an ideology rooted in the belief that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and that its laws and institutions should reflect Christian values.

Good. It defines the term. It is not an attempt to radically change American government, but to affirm its history.

A previous CNN story:

Many Trump administration actions have blurred the lines between church and state. In the days before Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University, Trump delivered a speech at the privately funded Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, where he promised to protect prayer in public schools through forthcoming guidance from the Department of Education.

“To have a great nation, you have to have religion,” Trump said. “I believe that so strongly. There has to be something after we go through all of this — and that something is God.”

A federal court just upheld a Louisiana law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in the schools.

Plaintiffs present no historical evidence that remotely suggests that our Founders would have regarded a passive display of the Ten Commandments as an impermissible “establishment of religion.” ...

Plaintiffs present no historical evidence that remotely suggests that our Founders would have regarded a passive display of the Ten Commandments as an impermissible “establishment of religion.” U.S. Const. amend I. See, e.g., Kennedy, 597 U.S. at 537 & n.5 (noting the “hallmarks of religious establishments the framers sought to prohibit when they adopted the First Amendment”) (citing, inter alia, Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 596 U.S. 243, 285–86 (2022) (Gorsuch, J., concurring)). To the contrary, our Nation’s history proves precisely the opposite.

Our Nation’s Founders didn’t just permit religion in education — they presumed that there would be religion in education. Indeed, our Founders firmly believed that our Constitution wouldn’t work without a religious people.

John Adams famously observed that “[o]ur Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams, Letter to the Massachusetts Militia (Oct. 11, 1798). John Jay similarly wrote that “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country, to one united people, . . . professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government.” The Federalist No. 2, at 9 (John Jay) (J. Cooke ed. 1961). The Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, contained in the 1780 Massachusetts Constitution, proclaimed that “the happiness of a people, and the good order and preservation of civil government, essentially depend upon piety, religion and morality.” Mass. Const. pt. I, art. III.

Given the centrality of religion in our Founders’ conception of good citizenship, it’s not surprising that religion was a cornerstone of American education from the beginning. The First Congress understood religious instruction to be a necessary element of education, providing in the Northwest Ordinance of 1789 that “[r]eligion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” 1 Stat. 50, 52 (1789).1

Those founders did not necessarily agree about their religious views, but they all believed in Christian education.

New Wuthering Heights Movie

The 1847 novel Wuthering Heights is considered one of the great English novels, and a 2007 British poll presented it as the greatest love story of all time. Now it has been made into a 2026 movie.

I have not seen it, but you should be warned. It is a porno movie. The female lead is a 35-year-old woman playing a teenager. None of the characters are likeable.

It is not really a love story. A girl falls for a bad boy, and cannot forget him even after she marries a much better man.

I thought that these stories of reckless female loyalties were a more modern phenomenon, but apparently female readers have been eating this up since at least 1847. The book does not have the porno scenes, but it does have Heathcliff being a nasty guy.

King has Prince Andrew Arrested

The Jeffrey Epstein madness continues. The King of England had his brother arrested:

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the younger brother of Britain’s King Charles III, was arrested on his 66th birthday following revelations about the former prince’s relationship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

After an early morning police raid at his home in Sandringham, Mountbatten-Windsor became the first member of the UK royal family to be arrested in modern history.

His arrest – on suspicion of misconduct in public office – prompted Charles to express his “deepest concern,” while stressing that “the law must take its course.”

After spending more than 10 hours in a police station in Norfolk, near his new home, Mountbatten-Windsor was released “under investigation” late Thursday evening and pictured leaving a police station.

So there is no charge, and no specific allegation. The potential sentence is life in prison.

They did not disclose what led to Andrew’s arrest, but previously said they were assessing whether he shared confidential information with Epstein during his decade as a UK trade envoy.

The royal, who was then the Duke of York, was forced to step down from his role in 2011 over his friendship with Epstein, who had been convicted in 2008 for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

The former prince has denied all accusations against him and insisted he never witnessed or suspected any of the behavior of which Epstein is accused.

Are you kidding? This is like the N. Korea dictator having his uncle executed.

Maybe the prince should not have been friends with an American Jew who had once solicited a 17-year-old prostitute. But this is a crazy overreaction.

Whiteness is an Imaginary Thing

So says Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. From WABC:

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is facing criticism after comments resurfaced in which she said there is no “rich cultural heritage” that goes along with “whiteness.”

The New York Democrat made the remarks during a broader discussion about race, identity, and systemic power structures in the United States. Ocasio-Cortez argued that “whiteness” is not a cultural identity in the same way that specific ethnic identities are, but rather a social construct historically tied to power and exclusion.

Others say that there is no such thing as race, but that is not what she is saying.

I am wondering why anyone would say something so ridiculous.

Here is Rich Lowry trashing AOC.

Here is a girl who explains how she learned in college that IQ is meaningless and not studies anymore, and that some nations do better than others for reasons that have nothing to do with race and IQ. She is not happy saying it is culture either. It is the political system, or the money institutions, or the patriarchy.

This is wrong. A lot of national differences are attributable to race and IQ. IQ is measurable and useful. No doubt most of her generation has been brainwashed with falsehoods.

189 Bombings in Sweden Last Year

Sweden used to be a peaceful country. Then it started importing Mohammedans. Peter Sweden reports:

Now the numbers are in for last year and it is not good. There was a whopping 189 bombing attacks in Sweden in 2025, up from 136 in 2024. ...

The population in Sweden is only about 10.6 million people. And there has been 750 bombing attacks in Sweden the last 5 years.

You can also find the data on Wikipedia.

What happened? Their national survival depends on expelling the Mohammedans. Will it be done? I doubt it.

The Epstein File Hoax Continues

The world continues to go crazy with the Epstein files. It is all a hoax.

The files have turned up no evidence of pedophilia, sex trafficking, rape, victims, spy agencies, or blackmail.

Epstein was convicted of soliciting from a 17-year-old prostitute, and served a 13-month sentence. This was not a lenient sentence. It would not even be a crime in many places. For example, Colorado has introducd a bill to legalize prostitution, and the age of consent is 17 there.

Some say that he committed worse crimes, but they were covered up. Maybe so, but the crimes could not be that obvious, if 100s of investigations over 20 years failed to find the proof.

Now a great many people are being blamed for being mentioned in the Epstein files. Everybody says that they should have refused to communicate with him.

If no one can prove any of these charges today, with the mountain of evidence and publicity, how was anyone supposed to know 20 years ago?

This another example of the world gone mad. If someone really thinks that anyone seeing a prostitute should be ostracized, then I could understand, but no one says that. It is all based on a presumption that Epstein somehow committed much worse crimes, and somehow everyone knew about it. No, no one knows about any worse crimes.

PBS TV Pushes Black Hockey

The PBS tv audience is almost entirely, and most of them are not sports fans. Today it celebrates finding a Black woman hockey player. It promotes:

A group's quest to make ice hockey more diverse

This follows an HBO tv attempt to make hockey more queer.

It is funny to hear the Black Girls Hockey Club try to explain why Blacks do not like winter sports.

The Youtube comments are turned off. PBS calls itself public tv, but it does not want public comment on its idiotic and biased stories.

Christian Fired from Religious Liberty Commission

A Jewish law professor announces:

The meeting garnered attention because Carrie Prejean Boller, a commissioner, asserted that her Catholic faith is incompatible with Zionism. She said, "Catholics do not embrace Zionism, just so you know." You can see the fireworks around the 1:30:00 mark at C-SPAN.

He attacks her, and she got booted:

Carrie Prejean Boller has been removed from President Trump's Religious Liberty Commission. No member of the Commission has the right to hijack a hearing for their own personal and political agenda on any issue. This is clearly, without question, what happened Monday in our hearing on antisemitism in America. This was my decision. ...

Dan Patrick
Lt. Governor of Texas
Chair of the President Trump's Religious Liberty Commission

Apparently she also said that Israel is a foreign country. The point of dispute was whether it was anti-semitic to not embrace Zionism. Most of the Jewish members said yes.

She is a beauty queen who once got into trouble for saying that marriage is between a man and woman.

This is bizarre. There are factions of Christianity that believe in Zionism, but they are a distinct minority, and mainstream Catholics and Protestants consider it a heresy.

It was a "hearing on antisemitism", so it was completely fair for her to ask whether a mainstream Christian view should be considered antisemitic.

Patrick seemed to get flustered when Boller said that Israel is a foreign country.

I regularly see Jews complaining about increases in anti-semitism. This includes leftists and Mohammedans who want to kick Jews out of Israel. Or those who hold Israel up to some higher standard. Or those who say Israel retaliation against Gaza has gone too far. Or those who do not endorse Zionism.

Some of these complaints have some merit. But they go too far when they say that Christians must submit to the superiority of Judaism. The Jew law professor demands that Christian leaders repudiate their beliefs:

For now, religious leaders who are experts in doctrine need to speak up, and do so loudly, to prevent their faiths from being hijacked down a road we have sadly traveled far too many times.

This is like a Christian professor saying that Jews should admit that they killed Jesus, and convert to Christianity.

The Jew law professor has another post attacking Prejean Boller for refusing to comment on some Candace Owens claims. It cites an article in the Jewish magazine The Atlantic also attacking her for the same thing.

Owens says a lot of crazy stuff, and is frequently denounced in the Jewish press. But why does anyone else need to comment on them? Eg, I think it is pretty wild to suggest that Emmanuel Macron's wife is a man, but I do not know enough to comment on the evidence. So I would refuse to comment. Let others figure it out.

The pattern here is that the Jew law professor does not just go after his enemies, but after anyone vaguely associated with his enemies.

Pictures showing South African Decay

South Africa was turned over to the Blacks, and the whole world cheered. Here are pictures of the results.

People are fascinated with the ruins of once-thriving civilizations.

That's a timelapse of Booysens Train Station in Johannesburg from 2014 to 2025. Within 11 years, what was once a clean, functional rail station was stripped for parts and reclaimed by nature.

This is happening all over South Africa, and you can see it on Google Maps:

There are many more pictures on the site. This what happens if you turn over a nation to foreign Third World migrants.

You might say that at least the country is democratic, but that is not even true. It has had one-party rule ever since the Blacks took over.

Smart People Support President Trump

Sam Harris has yet another interview on Why Smart People Don't See What's Wrong With Trump.

Pres. Trump is the most transparent and populist President in decades. He does what people want, and he clearly explains everything.

The USA Presidency is the most important job in the world, and Trump is actually doing it. Last year, he made maybe 200 decisions that had to be made by him and that could not be delegated.

In the previous administration, it is not known that Biden made any decisions. We still do not know who was running the White House.

Kamala Harris has been on a book tour, where her main points are that Biden was competent to be President, but incompetent to run for re-election. Being President is 100x more difficult than campaigning, so this only makes sense if she intended to be a puppet like Biden.

Her campaign was based mainly on prosecuting grocery stores for price gouging, and giving free sex-changes to illegal aliens.

Lots of intellectuals and rich people supported Biden-Harris and Harris-Walz, but none would admit that they are clowns unfit for the job.

You might disagree with some Trump policies, such as the deportations, but Trump is addressing a real problem and trying to do what people want. Large majorities say legal immigration is too high, and illegals need to be deported.

I have listened to Sam Harris rant about Trump many times, but he never has any intelligent criticism. Harris merely complains that he does not like Trump's personality. When it comes to specific Trump policies, Harris often agrees.

Sam Harris often talks about the J6 protest. The facts are that Biden was only elected in 2020 because the voting rules were changed to favor him, that Trump had legitimate reasons to contest the count, and that Congress had to approve or reject the electoral count.

Marijuana Legalization was Oversold

Politico reports:

The New York Times editorial board walked back its yearslong support for marijuana legalization in a Monday editorial, writing that the U.S. “has recently gone too far in accepting and even promoting its use.”

In the piece, the editorial board conceded that some of its past positions on legalization no longer hold up, including its initial assessment that marijuana addiction and dependence are “relatively minor problems, especially compared with alcohol and tobacco.”

The surprising thing is that the NY Times admits that it duped us.

The past decade has seen huge increases in marijuana and gambling use. The effects have been overwhelmingly negative.

What next? An admission that transgenderism was oversold? There was just another transgender mass shooting in Canada.

The police superintendent later described the shooter as a “gunperson” in a press briefing.

Your Face Reveals You

This article claims that personality traits, and hence employment market value, can be deduced by AI scanning photos of faces.

I don't know if this is accurate or not, but what if it is? If schools and companies adopted this, then your future could be determined by your picture and IQ.

Apparently your face controls your voice:

Seedance 2.0, an AI video generation model developed by ByteDance, has recently gone viral in China but is now raising concerns over technical controversies. The model reportedly demonstrated the ability to generate highly accurate personal voice characteristics using only facial images, even without user authorization.

Other research showed it possible, such as this.

Kirk's Last Words about Jews

Charlie Kirk was very pro-Israel until about a month before he was killed. He said:

1. "Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against Whites that they claim Whites to stop using against them."

2. "The philosophical foundations of anti-Whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country".

Another Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

News:

It was a story that received blanket media coverage in March 2021. It alleged that white middle schoolers in Plano, Texas, viciously "tortured" SeMarion Humphrey, their black classmate, forcing him to drink their urine at a sleepover as they shot him with BB guns. A Black Lives Matter activist group charged the local public school district with doing "nothing" to stop "this racially motivated hate crime" as violent protests broke out outside the home of Asher Vann, the white child alleged to have organized the brutal attack.

Major media outlets, including NBC, CBS, CNN, Business Insider, People magazine, the Daily Mail, and the Dallas Morning News, pounced on the story as Humphrey, his mother Summer Smith, and their attorney Kim Cole, embarked on a media tour where they called Vann "evil." The trio appeared on Good Morning America, where ABC host Linsey Davis promoted a GoFundMe account that raised nearly $120,000 to help pay for Humphrey’s "therapy and private schooling."

Yes, it has now been determined to be a big hoax.

Ever since Pres. Obama, the press has been full of these racial hate crime stories, and they are nearly all hoaxes.

Winter Olympics are too darn white

The NY Post reports:

The Associated Press is naming and shaming majority-white European nations competing in the Winter Olympics for their apparent lack of diversity, insisting the recent influx of migrants into the countries should be instantly represented among their most elite athletes.

“At the Milan Cortina Winter Olympics, Sweden is sending a team made up almost exclusively of ethnically Swedish athletes,” the article states, noting NHL player Mika Zibanejad, whose father is of Iranian descent, is a standout exception in the Scandinavian country’s contingent.

“That hardly reflects the diversity of the Nordic country: About 2 million of its 10 million residents were born abroad, about half of them in Asia or Africa,” AP scolds, citing Statistic Sweden’s demographic figures.

“The Olympic rosters of France, Germany, Switzerland and other European winter sports nations look a lot like Sweden’s: overwhelmingly white and lacking the immigrant representation seen in their soccer or basketball teams.”