Defining the Alt-Right

Thomas Dalton writes:

Enter the alt-right, otherwise known as the dissident right. In one sense, it is the natural outgrowth of paleo-conservatism: a kind of return to classical ideas of nationalism and political self-sufficiency. But it adds new angles as well: an emphasis on biological realism, in which evolution and genetics are seen as strongly influential in determining human characteristics; an explicit defense of White interests and White European civilization; and an explicit and active critique of Jews and Judeocentric policies. And indeed, these can be seen as the three main pillars of the alt-right:

(1) Biology is destiny,
(2) Whites and White culture deserve to be protected and defended, and
(3) Jews pose an overriding threat to White interests.

(Jews, incidentally, like all Latinos, are not White — not in any relevant sense given genetic differences and, more importantly, their lack of identifying with White European civilization.) Among the wide-ranging dissident right, we see additional points of concern and variations on these themes, but in general, we can roughly define the alt-right movement as centered on these three concepts. The first, on biology, is proven more and more true by the day; new studies repeatedly show that, to a very large degree, biology and genetics determine what we loosely call ‘human nature,’ and that these phenomena have a corresponding effect on society and culture. The second is straightforward and obvious: if Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Muslims, and so on each have a right to their cultures and ethnic integrity, so do Whites. The third becomes clear whenever one takes a look at the objective data regarding Jewish presence and Jewish influence in academia, government, media, Hollywood, and high tech. Jews are massively over-represented in all these fields, and constitute a force in themselves; with their highly-effective ingroup strategy, they manage to reinforce their own wealth and power. In fact, this becomes their overriding priority: an increase in Jewish wealth and power.

I don't think that the alt-right has any particular animosity towards Jews, except when they do things like try to impeach President Trump.

Trump is very pro-Jewish and pro-Israel. So are most right-wingers. But this impeachment may change some opinions. This is the closest thing to a coup that the USA has ever had.

Tyler O'Neil writes:

The Amazon show The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel attacked the late Phyllis Schlafly, a pivotal conservative leader and the founder of Eagle Forum, echoing a decades-old accusation of anti-Semitism based on the notion of "code words."

Really? I haven't seen that episode yet.* This is just Jews using Hollywood shows to smear Christians and right-wingers.

See also here:

As Mark Steyn wrote in 2012, “On the matter of those racist dog whistles all these middle-age white liberals keep hearing, the Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto put it very well: ‘The thing we adore about these dog-whistle kerfuffles is that the people who react to the whistle always assume it’s intended for somebody else,’ he wrote. ‘The whole point of the metaphor is that if you can hear the whistle, you’re the dog.’”

and here:

Mrs. Maisel, however, is a potty-mouthed obnoxious comedienne who traipses through Manhattan life dressed to the nines. The daughter of a Columbia University professor who’s always been an academic and a trust fund heiress of a rich oil family, Midge’s life was turned upside down by her husband’s infidelity, and she turned to stand-up comedy as a career.

Of course her father’s a communist. ...

Enter Saul Alinsky.

To make a long story short, the characters repeatedly describe Mrs. Schlafly as a MONSTER, in righteousness and outrage. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. And drive the point home. I doubt most viewers had heard about Phyllis before this, but now they know her as a MONSTER.

You can’t even watch a miniseries without your medicine.

It’s ironic, however, that a series about a woman finding her voice stoops to demonizing a woman who had a voice.

The Jews are the ones using code words to launch personal attacks and advance a political agenda. Charging anti-Semitism is just a dishonest tool.

Phyllis Schlafly was of course an anti-feminist, and "feminist" is considered a code word or a dog whistle for a Jewish woman, as the American feminist movement was almost entirely led by Jews. But her concerns about feminism had almost entirely to do with the 98% of the population that is not Jewish. (Her organization also had many Jewish members.)

Ronan Farrow, alienated son of Woody Allen, writes in his new book:

Harvey Weinstein was inescapable in that conversation, too: he had essentially invented the modern Oscar campaign. Weinstein ran his campaigns like guerrilla wars. ... Weinstein orchestrated an elaborate smear campaign against rival film A Beautiful Mind, planting press items claiming the protagonist, mathematician John Nash, was gay (and, when that didn’t work, that he was anti-Semitic).

So the Jews who control the Hollywood Oscars would blackball a movie if a Jewish producer spread a rumor that a schizophrenic character in the movie was adapted from a real-life schizophrenic mathematician who once interpreted an Old Testament Bible story contrary to common Jewish beliefs? The whole thing is bizarre. Is this really how Oscars get decided?

The whole Trump impeachment seems like just a Weinstein-like guerrilla war. The leaders are all Jewish, the promoters in the news media are all Jewish or Jewish stooges, the witnesses, lawyers, and other players are mostly Jewish, and the arguments sound like the nonsensical and authoritarian stuff that Jewish rabbis say. 95% of the testimony is just opinions about how things ought to be, or what someone could be presumed to be thinking. The impeachment vote will be like an Oscar vote. This is a raw display of Jewish power and influence. Those who point this out get blocked from Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter.

* Wow, I just watched this episode. It portrays Jews as crazy, neurotic, and willing to do anything for money. Except that the Jewish woman is willing to give up a check to support some Jewish anti-Christian ideological attack. That is from the show, not my opinion.