I.e., if you were a Trump voter watching the above on TV and someone called from the kitchen to ask what was going on, you would be literally correct in saying that “a bunch of Jews are trying to undo my vote”.A comment adds:
The average white person is slowly beginning to realize that a) the entire system of schooling, media, finance, and government has been set up to destroy them – and that it is working quite well, as Whites have shrunk from 28% of the world’s population in 1950 to 12% today – and b) this system of destruction is disproportionately filled with Jews.Many Jews are happy to join White Christian America, but nearly all the visible ones are openly seeking its destruction.
So while one can debate whether Jews are behind the destruction of traditional White Christian America (my belief is no) it’s simply impossible to argue that many have not enthusiastically participated in it. This pattern has repeated itself many times, which is why Jews keep getting kicked out of Western nations. Despite his pro-American/white nationalist reputation Trump is actually incredibly pro-minority, pro-gay, and pro-Jewish in practice,
The impeachment leaders and witnesses hate Trump, hate White Christians, and hate American constitutional law. They give stupid arguments that don't even make any sense.
By limiting the articles of impeachment to the two counts, they have effectively exonerated Trump of all the other previous accusations. Before, they charged treason, bribery, tax evasion, campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice, collusion with Russians, etc. The remaining counts are not even crimes, and not things that anyone previously thought were wrong.
This is essentially their argument:
We are Jews. We have the power and influence to destroy White Christian America. Donald Trump stands in our way, and his election was not according to our plan. Earlier plans to oust him have failed. This is our last chance to get rid of him, so that voters never again have a chance to vote on him. So we have taken some policy differences, and called them high crimes, even tho no one ever said they were crimes before.The NY Times editorial in favor of impeachment complains largely that he has stood up against Jewish demands. It admits that the Dems have no shown any violation of an actual crime, and that they have tried to impeach him "since the moment he entered the Oval Office", but argues he can be impeached for "severe violations of the public trust by a high-ranking official, not literal crimes." And it relies heavily on this Jewish opinion:
As the constitutional scholar Noah Feldman testified before the Judiciary Committee last week, “Without impeachment, the president would have been an elected monarch. With impeachment, the president was bound to the rule of law.”This is just Jewish code-speak for saying we cannot have a popularly elected leader, unless he follows Jewish orders. Because "rule of law" does not refer to any laws passed by Congress or the people, but rather to what Jewish Leftists think that the law ought to be.
It also argues:
President Donald Trump abused the power of his office by strong-arming Ukraine, a vulnerable ally, holding up hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid until it agreed to help him influence the 2020 election by digging up dirt on a political rival.This is just crazy. Ukraine is not an ally, and has never done anything for us. It just happens to be the recipient of American weapons because the Deep State wants them used to kill Russians and revive the Cold War. Trump was absolutely right to hold up such aid, as many other Presidents have done in similar situations.
It is also pretty crazy to say "help him influence the 2020 election". The phone call transcript was made public. Trump just asks for some investigation on what appears to be some obvious corruption. There is nothing ever wrong with asking for info. If it exposes Biden as a crook unfit for the White House, then we are all better off with that knowledge.