“What the Roberts Court is making possible,” @AdamSerwer argues, “is a country where white people can maintain their political dominance at the expense of Americans who are not white.” He examines what to expect following the Voting Rights Act ruling: https://theatln.tc/Pg529ZdASo I figured that whoever is writing this crap must be a Black or a Jew. It turns out he is both!
Serwer has received awards from the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), ... His father is of Polish Jewish descent, and his mother is African-American. ... His work there has focused on white supremacy, race in America, and the Trump administration. ... He practices Judaism and lives in San Antonio, Texas.He refers to a ruling against Louisiana racially segregating Congressional districts. They tried to concentrate the Blacks into two gerrymandered districts, for the explicit purpose of electing two Black Congressmen. The theory was that this was not racism, because it was a remedy for Blacks having to drink from separate fountains, a century earlier.
The magazine is controlled by Jews whose main purpose seems to be to stir up racial animosity.
Non-whites are the chief beneficiaries of White supremacy. All over the world, non-whites are seeking to move to countries with White political dominance. There are not court ruling "at the expense of Americans who are not white."
1 comment:
If I was to immigrate to China (yes yes, I know that isn't a thing) and after a short period I demanded a voting block for white people, I highly doubt I would be received with polite accommodation. If you belong to a minority of some kind, so what? If people the same shade as you were once badly treated a century ago, so what? We have no ability whatsoever to go back in time and change or fix anything no matter how small, and blaming people now for what someone else did is pointless, evil, and against our concept of law and justice...and it STILL won't change a single thing that happened in the past.
Racial grievance is not reconcilable because there is no end to what some descendant can claim as injury from something that can not be changed.
Expectation of fair treatment is good, expectation of special treatment or privileges is not. If the greater population is forced to treat you fairly, you in kind are expected to do the same. The social contract is reciprocal not one sided.
Regardless of your background, If you want to be treated well, don't be a destructively disruptive or dangerous nuisance, no matter how different or rare you are.
Post a Comment