She argues that the great feminization of the last 50 years was one of the most important trends in all of human history.
But a 8:33 political system in which men 8:35 predominate will tend to operate 8:37 according to rules of facts and 8:39 objectivity. And one in which women 8:42 predominate will tend to operate by the 8:44 rules of emotions and subjective facts, 8:47 even if there are individual men and 8:50 women who fall on the opposite side of 8:52 those camps. ...She points out that there are huge differences between men and women, and everyone agrees to that, so it is inevitable that feminization will have pluses and minuses. Indeed, people talk about the supposed pluses all the time, but it is politically incorrect to name the minuses.feminization is not 10:08 just an interesting new development that 10:11 has had some pluses and minuses. It's 10:12 that feminization in the case of many 10:14 important institutions is a bad thing. 10:17 In a few cases, it is so bad as to be, 10:20 you know, to threaten the end of 10:21 civilization.
I believe 13:19 demographic feminization does inevitably 13:21 lead to substantive feminization.That is, she thinks it is fine that there are a lot more women in the elite professions, except that she does not like the consequences for society.
NY Mag criticizes her opinions on Civil War Reconstruction.
Update: She has a new essay on the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment