A medical journal published my email letter to the editor, along with an author rebuttal. I think I was too easy on him. He ignores the Google Directory, which has balanced information, and probably always did. Also, the conclusion doesn't even agree with the paper. The abstract says that 43% of hits for "vaccination" and "immunisation" were antivaccination. But Table 1 says it was 43% for vaccination and 6% for immunisation (or immunization). So the combined percentage is only 24.5%.