Trump is censored for retweeting CDC data

I posted last week some updated CDC data on COVID-19, and noted that a 6% figure stuck out to me. Now Pres. Trump has been censored for saying essentially the same thing.

CNN TV reports:

Twitter on Sunday took down a tweet containing a false claim about coronavirus death statistics that was made by a supporter of the baseless QAnon conspiracy theory -- a post that President Donald Trump had retweeted earlier in the day.

The tweet -- which has been replaced with a message saying, "This Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules -- from "Mel Q," copied from someone else's Facebook post, claimed that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had "quietly" updated its numbers "to admit that only 6%" of people listed as coronavirus deaths "actually died from Covid," since "the other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses."

That's not what the CDC said. ...

The CDC's latest regular update to a public statistics page on the pandemic -- there was nothing especially "quiet" about it -- said that for 6% of the deaths included in its statistics, "Covid-19 was the only cause mentioned" on the deceased person's death certificate.

That is not at all the same thing as saying only 6% of reported Covid-19 deaths "actually died" from Covid-19. It simply means that the other 94% were listed as having at least one additional factor contributing to their death.

No, I am not "Mel Q", and I don't know whether Mel Q reads my blog. You

Twitter, CNN, and everyone else in the mainstream media say that our claim is false. But my blog, Mel Q, and Trump's retweet explicitly and accurately explained the meaning of the 6%, and that the other 94% of reported COVID-19 deaths had additional causes. We even quoted and linked to the CDC web page, so anyone can verify the claim for himself.

I guess Twitter and the others are pretending that they are doing a public service by scaring the people into thinking COVID-19 is more dangerous than it is, so that they will be more cautious. But it is a facts that the deaths are almost entirely elderly folks with multiple other co-morbidities. The CDC explains this on their web pages, buried in their medical data. It is no secret, and it ought to be more widely disseminated, so that everyone understands who is at greatest risk.

For Twitter, CNN, and everyone else to make an issue out of this just shows their extreme bias, and their willingness to lie about the virus to manipulate public opinion.

Biden-Harris are a threat to this nation

Jean Guerrero, author of a book on how much she hates White people, writes this NY Times op-ed

Over the past week, the Republican National Convention sought to conjure a “radical left” hellscape.

Speakers conflated anti-racist protesters with deranged criminals out to destroy the country. Donald Trump Jr. called Joe Biden “the Loch Ness monster,” while the conservative activist Charlie Kirk praised Donald Trump as “the bodyguard of Western civilization.” In his speech on Thursday, the president denounced “mob rule.” “Your vote will decide whether we protect law-abiding Americans, or whether we give free rein to violent anarchists and agitators, and criminals who threaten our citizens,” he said.

The language at the convention comes from the “white genocide” conspiracy theory, which warns, among other things, that brown and Black people will destroy white civilization with the help of their anti-racist allies. It echoed that of the racist-dystopian novel “The Camp of the Saints,”

All that is mostly correct. This November election is between Trump protecting Western civilization and law-abiding Americans, and Biden-Harris and other Democrats who openly support destructive criminals.

In July, Mr. Miller told Tucker Carlson that the federal crackdown on anti-racist protesters in Portland, Ore., was about “the survival of this country.” In an interview with the radio host Larry O’Connor that month, he said the priority of the administration was protecting America from the dangers of “cancel culture,” which he described as “a very grave threat to American freedom.”

Calling them "anti-racist protesters" is inaccurate. There are no racists in Portland being protested. They are just rioters and criminals.

The Trump campaign’s strategy is to cast the president’s opponents as an existential threat to the nation.

They are an existential threat to this nation. They are openly trying to destroy it.

The term “cancel culture,” used throughout the Republican convention, lumps together and demonizes critics of white male supremacy, in an attempt to silence them. The use of the term in this context allows the far right to dictate the terms of the conversation, as does the news media’s reluctance to call Mr. Trump and his chief adviser what they are ...

Now this is just lunacy. No critics of white male supremacy have been silenced. It is the Left that has been systematically getting people fired, ostracized, and de-platformed for expressing right-wing political views. No left-wingers are being canceled, unless you count left-wing feminists who do not fully accept the transsexual agenda.

This obsession with the supposed dangers of people of color, particularly immigrants or left-wing extremists, ignores reality. Right-wing extremists have committed the most terrorist attacks in the United States since the 1990s.

Officials say that a 17-year-old named Kyle Rittenhouse opened fire on people during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., on Tuesday, killing two and wounding a third.

No, Rittenhouse is not a right-wing extremist. More and more, it appears that he fired on an angry mob of criminals who were trying to kill him. The NY Times should not even be publishing his name, since he is a juvenile.

Rittenhouse may well go to jail, and I am not saying that all of his shots were justifiable. We do not have enough info here. But the larger picture here is that Jacob Blake was resisting a legitimate arrest, and provoked the police into using a forceful response. Democrat politicians, from Kenosha officials to the governor to Joe Biden, encouraged the riots. Rittenhouse was just trying to help maintain order, because the police were not doing their jobs.

“Trump knows that if we find real solidarity, it’s a wrap,” said Aida Rodriguez, an Afro-Latina activist. “We’re all waking up to it, and you’re going to see it in November.” These alliances are a real-life manifestation of the mob of Mr. Miller’s nightmares.

She finally agrees that if the anti-Whites gang up on the Whites, it will be a nightmare for Whites, just as some Trump supporters have predicted.

Just to be clear, I am not encouraging anyone to take guns to riot scenes. That is foolishness. We need to vote for elected officials who will use police to restore order.

Update: As proof of right-wingers not having the ability to cancel anyone, consider the new book title "In Defense of Looting". It was favorably reviewed on the NPR site. See some criticism here. It is every bit as bad as it sounds. The author is a man named Willie Osterweil who published the book under the name Vicky Osterweil. The book advocates illegal violence against peaceful innocents, but it is selling well on Amazon. Not cancelled.

Update: AmRen lists numerous additional NY Times errors.

Apple computer company joins the Black racism

The Apple CEO tweeted:

We stand with those who refuse to accept the status quo. The WNBA, NBA, and all of those who will not tolerate another Jacob Blake. Another Emmett Till. We must do better — lives depend on it. — Tim Cook (@tim_cook) August 28, 2020

Till died in 1955. Kamala Harris and others are tweeting about Blake and Till also. It is funny how they celebrate basketball players who identify with Black criminals who resist arrest. This Kenosha incident makes me think we are headed towards Civil War 2.0. Kenosha is an ordinary midwestern town, with about 10% Blacks. It is Middle America. If it can be destroyed by race riots, then no Middle American town is safe. It is clear that the Democrats and Blacks have little interest in facts. They did not care about George Floyd's cause of death either. These incidents are just excuses to hate White people. They are out to destroy White civilization.

Professor gets canceled for harmless joke

Inside Higher Ed reports:

A professor of marketing at the University of Missouri at Columbia told students he’d been relieved of his teaching duties after comments he made to a student from Wuhan, China, about the need for a face mask during an online class meeting were widely circulated on social media. ...

The university confirmed that the marketing professor, Joel Poor, remained employed and “has been assigned to other duties.” Missouri referred the incident to its Office for Civil Rights and Title IX, which has opened an investigation.

Some students have called for Poor’s firing, while others have taken to his defense, saying his comments were meant jokingly and there was no malicious intent.

Watch the video. It was obviously a harmless joke. No sane person would take offense to this.

This may seem silly, but it is just another aspect of the civil war that we are degenerating to. Look at Kenosha. It is only about 5% Black, but it now has race riots. A Black man resisted arrest, and got shot. A couple of rioters got shot. I am not sure yet who might have committed crimes, but it is clear that we have a govt that encouraging riots.

I am reserving judgment on Kenosha until more facts are in, but there is a pattern to these stories. Black man with a long criminal history gets arrested again. He resists arrest, and police use necessary force. Antifa types create outrage on social media. Blacks identify with the criminal. Jews dominate the mainstream with talk of racism and White privilege. An investigation shows the Black man was entirely at fault. Jews continue to blame Whites, and Blacks complain about criminals being treated like criminals.

The great pandemic is mostly over

The US CDC released weekly COVID-19 mortality update. There is a lot of data there, but a couple of things stuck out to me. First, there have been no significant excess COVID-19 deaths in any age group for about 3 months. Yes, there are still people dying of the disease, but it is mostly people over age 70, and they are dying at the rate that they would be dying anyway. Second, it says:

For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.

The official US death toll is about 182,000, but that includes deaths with multiple causes. The CDC has data about excess deaths but it is tricky to interpret directly. It uses a model that says deaths should have been going down since Jan. 1, 2020. The current death rate, from all causes, is about the same as what was predicted for Jan. 1, 2020, so the CDC says that there are still excess deaths. It appears to me that the number of deaths that can be fairly attributed to COVID-19 is maybe half the official figure.

Pelosi says all must support Israel

The Hill reports:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s Republican National Convention address from Jerusalem “appalling” on Tuesday. The House Speaker told MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” that Pompeo’s convention speech, which was pre-recorded in Israel during official diplomatic travel, violated State Department rules for employees not to participate in partisan activities. “Now he's doing just that thing, and then, of course, really sadly, discoloring our bipartisanship in terms of our support for Israel, which has always been bipartisan, and we always want it to be,” she said. “The image is something that's going to say, look at us, we're here in Israel making a speech to the Republican National Convention, violating our values in terms of the bipartisanship and our support for Israel, violating in many ways what he told his own employees,” she added. ... A State Department spokesperson told The Hill on Monday that no department resources would be directed toward Pompeo’s address and no staff have been involved in preparing for the speech.

She is trying to say that the Jews own the Democrat and Republican parties, and she doesn't want to get into a competition over who can be more pro-Israel. This is a sensitive issue for the Democrats because they get 80% of their fund-raising from Jews, but are increasingly dependent on votes from Moslems who hate Jews, and on Leftists who hate Israel. Meanwhile, Trump has been the most pro-Jewish and pro-Israel President in decades.

Yes, disease and death are acceptable

Leftist-atheist-evolutionist Jerry Coyne writes:

Reader Charles called my attention to a CBS/YouGov poll showing the disparity between Republicans and Democrats in whether they see the number of American deaths from coronavirus acceptable or unacceptable. The results were frightening:

Note that the latest toll of Americans killed by coronavirus, reported in the Hili dialogue this morning, is 176,694. That is more than three times the number of Americans killed during the Vietnam War (total 58,220, of which 47,434 were killed in battle). Only 10 % of Democrats find that total acceptable, but 57% of Republicans do, while 90% of Dems find the total unacceptable compared to 43% of Republicans. Two-third of Independents find the total unacceptable, about halfway between Dems and Republicans.

Now it’s not clear what “acceptable” means, but given that quicker and more stringent action would have saved more lives, and that the Trump administration—and a lot of Republican governors—have hardly taken the lead here, I think the objective assessment is “unacceptable”, meaning, “could have been reduced strongly with better action.”

This is a professor who regularly posts about how no one has the free will to anything different from what happens. For example:

I’m a “hard determinist” and get out of bed every day, and I realize that my “agency” is illusory even though I feel that it’s real.

And this:

Sam [Harris] (who does define his terms) is talking about libertarian free will: the mistaken feeling we have that we have agency and could have decided other than how we did. ...

I, of course, accept neither free will in the way Sam construes it, nor the idea that we are “morally responsible” (rather than just “responsible”) for our actions. The word “morally” adds nothing save the misconception that we could have made a choice that was either more or less moral, and that’s not true.

So he firmly believes that neither Pres. Trump nor anyone else had a choice about what to do about the Wuhan coronavirus. The death total could not have been reduced by different policies.

I disagree with Coyne about free will, but I do think that he has put his finger on a big difference between right and left wingers. Right-wingers accept reality. There will be disease and death. Left wingers pretend to live in an imaginary world where people are all equal, kind, healthy, and thinking good thoughts at all times.

Here, Coyne very strongly believes that no one could have chosen a policy to reduce the coronavirus deaths, and yet the deaths are still unacceptable. This is like saying gravity is unacceptable.

Who took over the Democrat Party?

Audacious Epigone writes:

The extent to which the preference of older black Americans override the preferences of the many other factions of the Democrat electoral coalition is difficult to overstate:

It’s not predominantly the party of working people or the party of immigrants or the party of government or the party of peace. More than anything else, it is the black party.

It might seem that way, all the officials talking Black Lives Matter all the time. He gets this response:

Nah, it’s the Jewish party (in reality, both parties are the Jewish party), with blacks simply used as proxies, cat’s-paws, janissaries and biological weapons in the eternal and unceasing war of the Jews against White Europeans and Christendom —...

Blacks are just a handy pocket-knife in this ludicrous and unnecessary struggle. Nobody on earth, no nation, no people, no civilization, actually takes blacks seriously.

The convention talked about Blacks a lot, and didn't mention Jews at all. But I think the commenter is correct. The Democrat Party hardly does anything for Blacks. It is almost entirely financed by Jews and Jewish fund-raising, and promoted by Jewish media. Blacks are not paying the bills or calling the shots.

In one of its regular news stories, not an opinion column, the NY Times reports:

a surprising problem for the president: his struggle to attract and retain a reliable stable of millionaires and billionaires willing to write seven-figure checks, despite his takeover of the Republican Party and a policy agenda that largely serves the interests of America’s ultrawealthy....

But the president’s sagging popularity, driven by his erratic and divisive behavior during the coronavirus crisis, has prompted some of the wealthiest Republicans — the heavy artillery of modern politics — to delay, divert or diminish their giving, just as Joseph R. Biden Jr. has begun to tap a rich vein of Wall Street and Silicon Valley support, party operatives and donors said in interviews.

The NY Times and the rest of the Jewish news media have an obvious anti-Trump bias here, but it admits that Biden is the candidate of the super-rich, and Trump is getting all his support from ordinary middle class Americans.

It is the super-rich who want to replace the American White middle class with cheap foreign labor. They want this for the same reasons that they have wanted to bust the labor unions.

The Democrat Party is not the party of the working man anymore. It is the party of the super-rich, the White-haters, and the welfare class. It has no appeal to anyone else.

As for the Jews, you might point out that neither Biden nor Harris are Jewish. That is correct, but Jews have infiltrated their families. The Jewish Daily Forward reports:

In fact, all three of Biden’s children — Beau and Hunter, his sons with his first wife, Neilia Biden, and Ashley, his daughter with current wife Jill Jacobs biden — married members of the tribe. Here’s a rundown of the Jewish members of the Biden clan. ... Ahead of their wedding, which took place on the roof deck of Cohen’s Los Angeles apartment, Hunter got a bicep tattoo to match one Cohen already had: the word “Shalom,” written in Hebrew letters.

They also explain Harris is married to a Jew:

One evening in November 2017, United States Senator Kamala Harris stood facing Jerusalem’s Western Wall.

It was her third visit to Israel, but the first time she’d come with a special escort: Her husband Doug Emhoff.

Though he is Jewish, Emhoff, then 53, had never visited Israel. So Harris, whom he’d married in 2014, invited him to accompany her on an official congressional delegation organized by the Senate. ...

But when pressed about her son’s Jewish upbringing, she demurred: “We’ve been sworn to secrecy,” she said. “We were told not to talk to anybody.” ...

In 2017, Harris delivered a keynote speech at AIPAC Policy Conference, where she recounted a childhood memory of collecting money for the Jewish National Fund. “I never sold Girl Scout Cookies,” Harris said at AIPAC, “but I raised money to plant trees in Israel.”

More than any other national candidates in recent memory, it is clear that Biden and Harris are just puppets. They have no control over their policy positions, and do not even appear to understand them. They are owned by others.

Update: I see that Richard Spencer and a lot of Deep State warmongers are endorsing Biden. They complain that we didn't go to war in Syria, among other things. The election is really revealing a lot of anti-Americans.

Laura Loomer is dangerous

Laura Loomer has won a Republican primary election for Congress, and is widely de-platformed, including by Facebook, Venmo, Twitter, Instagram, Uber, Lyft, Uber Eats, PayPal, GoFundMe, Medium, TeeSpring, and Chase Bank. I tried to find out what she did that was so offensive, and found this:

Facebook Inc. asked a Miami federal judge to throw out a lawsuit by conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, saying her ban under its “dangerous individuals and organizations” policy wasn’t defamatory because “reasonable minds can disagree” about whether she’s dangerous.

“While Ms. Loomer may not believe she is ‘dangerous’ or has ‘promoted hate,’ others disagree — as demonstrated by her admission that online platforms have widely banned her,” the tech giant says.

And what makes her so dangerous? I found:

In 2017, she tweeted "how many more people need to die before everyone agrees that Islam is cancer & we should never let another Muslim into the civilized world?"

Loomer is Jewish. It seems to me that most people recognize that a follower of one religion can disagree with a rival religion. To believe in one religion is to reject all the rival religions.

For the most part, Jews believe that Islam is a cancer on the world, and Muslims believe that Judaism is a cancer. Israel has a policy of not letting more Muslims in.

The USA responded to the 9-11-2001 attacks by importing millions of Muslims. This was done without any open public debate on this issue. Anyone who raises these issues gets ostracized.

Bad racist ideas, funded by Twitter

Reason reports:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced on Thursday that he was donating $10 million to Boston University's Center for Antiracist Research, a project recently launched by the antiracist scholar Ibram X. Kendi.

Kendi is the author of the 2019 book How to Be An Antiracist, one of two books that attracted renewed attention following the death of George Floyd. (The other is Robin DiAngelo's White Fragility.) In a tweet, he thanked Dorsey for the grant, which came with "no strings attached." ...

In a 2019 piece for POLITICO magazine, Kendi proposed a constitutional amendment that would prohibit racism. Here is his idea in full:

To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with "racist ideas" and "public official" clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) ...

This would be the end of freedom. This would be worse than slavery.

News Flash: Hollywood likes beauty

Yale professor Theodore Kim writes on SciAm:

The Racist Legacy of Computer-Generated Humans ...

Computer-generated imagery is supposed to be one of the success stories of computer science. ...

Alas, this technology has an insidious, racist legacy all its own. ...

This technical obsession with youthful whiteness is a direct reflection of Hollywood appetites. As in real life, the roles for computer-generated humans all go to young, white thespians. ...

The racist legacy of computer-generated imagery does not cost people their lives, but it determines whose stories can be told. And if Black Lives Matter, then the stories of their lives must matter too.

His complaint is that computer rendering young beautiful long-haired White women is technically much more difficult than doing Black Africans with short kinky hair. If Hollywood had chosen to use Black Africans for their big stars, then it could have done a better job of tricking us with computer animations.

I guess he is Korean-American and identifies as non-white, but computer graphics technology was 98% created by White people. And the people buying movies tickets are not that eager to see a lot of computer-generated short-haired Black folks.

All this sounds like a joke, but it is not. Neither is this article on The Unintentional Racism Found in Traffic Signals. The world is going mad.

Here is another attack on beauty:

The director of the Tour de France, Christian Prudhomme, has indicated that pretty girls will no longer be handing over winning jerseys at the end of each stage.

The protocol was deemed “sexist” by women’s rights activists. For decades, pretty girls have been giving away different jerseys at the end of the Tour de France stages. In 2019, however, a petition was signed by 38 000 people to denounce this tradition, stating that women “are not objects, not rewards”.

Soon Hollywood will be required to hire only ugly actresses. That may have happened to Netflix already, as some of their big shows feature ugly actresses.

Democrats stoke racial animosity

Thomas B. Edsall writes for the NY Times:

Even with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris at the top of the Democratic ticket, the importance of ethnicity and race in American politics is growing, not diminishing. ... With virtually all opinion polls suggesting that the Biden-Harris team is at present positioned to win

The Democrats are preoccupied by ethnicity and race. Biden only got the nomination because of his ability to win Black votes. Harris was only appointed because of her ethnicity and race.

This is not just my opinions. My articles by Democrat strategists say the same thing.

Fanning the flames of racial animosity lies at the core of Trump’s election strategy, as it did in 2016.

No, that is crazy. The Democrats fan the flames of racial animosity about 100 times as much as Republicans.

Trump and the Republicans offer essentially the same message to all ethnic groups and races, and avoid animosity as much as possible.

The Democrat Party has become the hate-Whitey party. They rarely offer any other reason to vote for them. Just look at the NY Times article on Democrat convention. Every single article shows an obsession with ethnicity and race.

Wash. Post attacks White Christian America

Jennifer Rubin is supposed to be the Wash. Post's token conservative columnist, but she is Jewish, and not conservative. Here is a recent column where she attacks American Christianity as being racist.

If you want to know why White Christian ideology is the best predictor of racist attitudes (a shocking revelation for the author and likely many readers), the book is essential reading.

Apparently the newspaper is still struggling with whether "White" should be capitalized. The NY Times and AP say it must be lower-cased, because Whites have no acceptable culture.

[quoting favorably the book author] Trump’s response to the neo-Nazi demonstrations in 2017 was also a turning point for me. Trump waited 48 hours to issue any statement, and when he did, he equivocated, stating there were “very fine people on both sides.” And I was stunned that Trump’s inability to flatly condemn neo-Nazis — who were chanting “Blood and soil!” and “Jews will not replace us” and who murdered a person protesting that hatred — had no discernible impact on his White Christian support.

Not this again. It is just fake news. It is fair to deduce that Rubin is a Jewish supremacist who wants to replace Whites with non-whites.

It’s important to note that the Republican Party has a decades-long history of deploying, in various degrees, what has been dubbed “the Southern Strategy,” a racist dog-whistle politics that fuels white grievances and exploits racial divisions to win elections.

This is even more deranged. The Democrat Party exploits racial divisions at least 100 times the Republican Party. Just look at all the attention given to Kamala Harris, where the Democrats primarily talk about her race and sex.

I think the phrases “family values” and “values voters” were one of the most successful, durable — and disingenuous — political branding operations in my lifetime.

Jews particularly hate these terms because they suggest a common endorsement of American values that Jews do not share. Yes, I know Jews appear to be pro-family, but they have their own family ideals. They commonly despise those who favor "family values".

Support for Kamala Harris is all identity politics

The NY Times reports:

Joe Biden’s selection of Senator Kamala Harris to be his running mate is historic. She is the first Black woman and the first person of Indian descent to be on a major-party ticket and, should Biden win, stands that much closer to becoming the first female president in our nation’s history. It’s no surprise that many Americans are emotional about her being chosen. We asked readers what seeing Senator Harris on the Democratic ticket meant to them. “She looks like me!” and “It’s about time!” punctuated the most enthusiastic responses. Others talked about the importance of seeing a Black woman in high office after years of experiencing discrimination and racism themselves. A selection of their responses follows. They have been edited for length and clarity.

Sure enough, no one like her for her competence, intelligence, policy position, ability to be President, or anything else important. She is only praised for being symbolic of anti-white-male identity politics. I wonder whether democracy has a future.

A NY Times editorial celebrates the 100th anniversary of the 19th amendment guaranteeing the vote to women, but it cannot point to any benefits, and it mostly complains about Black stuff.

Harris has promised to prosecute Donald Trump if she is elected, but that is just the start. A vote for her is a vote to exterminate White people.

Kamala Harris exposed

Facebook and Twitter are actively blocking pro-Trump and anti-Biden-Harris comments, but some are leaking thru, and now the NY Times has a whole article trying to debunk them:

On Thursday, Mr. Trump himself encouraged one of the most persistent falsehoods, a racist conspiracy theory that Ms. Harris is not eligible for the vice presidency or presidency because her parents were immigrants.

No, her parents appear to have been on student visas, not immigrant visas. The argument has nothing to do with race or immigration. See articles here, here, and here on why Harris is not a natural born citizen, as required to be a VP.

According to the rumors about Ms. Harris, she is tied to the conspiracy because her sister was invited by John Podesta, Ms. Clinton’s presidential campaign manager, to a “Hillary pizza party” in 2016.

So was she invited or not? We still have not gotten an explanation as to what was going on at those Podesta parties.

“Kamala Harris is not an American Black,” said one tweet that collected 2,300 likes and shares after it was first posted on Wednesday. “She is half Indian and half Jamaican. She is robbing American Blacks of their history. Kamala is as Black American as Obama.”

That is correct. She has more slaveowners than slaves in her ancestry. She is not an American Black.

One of the most convoluted lies that has spread on social media involves the actor Jussie Smollett and the baseless allegation that Ms. Harris is his aunt and knew in advance that Mr. Smollett was planning to stage an assault against himself early last year. ... Ms. Harris did initially condemn the news of the apparent attack on Mr. Smollett, but when the police said the assault had been staged, she put out a new statement saying she was “sad, frustrated and disappointed” by the development.

So she did help promote the hoax. Sure, she was sad that she got busted, but it shows her warped view of the world that she supports this and every other anti-white-male hoax. This article is just getting started. It does not even get into her religion, her Jewish husband, her life as mistress to a Black married man, her career prosecuted people who should not be prosecuted, etc.

Kamala Harris is not a natural born citizen

The NY Times has gotten so leftist that it news stories sometimes read like opinion columns. See this news story:

Trump Encourages Racist Conspiracy Theory About Kamala Harris President Trump said he heard that Ms. Harris, the presumptive Democratic vice-presidential nominee born in California, was not eligible for the ticket, repeating a theory that is rampant among his followers. Constitutional scholars quickly called his words false and irresponsible.

President Trump in effect revisited an old tactic on Thursday: spreading a race-based and anti-immigrant crusade he began nearly a decade ago, when he began sowing distrust in the background of President Barack Obama, who was born in Hawaii.

 WASHINGTON — President Trump on Thursday encouraged a racist conspiracy theory that is rampant among some of his followers: that Senator Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic vice-presidential nominee born in California, was not eligible for the vice presidency or presidency because her parents were immigrants.Mr. Trump, speaking to reporters on Thursday, nevertheless pushed forward with the attack, reminiscent of the lie he perpetrated for years that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

“I heard it today that she doesn’t meet the requirements,” Mr. Trump said of Ms. Harris. “I have no idea if that’s right,” he added. “I would have thought, I would have assumed, that the Democrats would have checked that out before she gets chosen to run for vice president.” 

That assertion is false. Ms. Harris is eligible to serve.

The article calls Pres. Trump a racist four times before even saying what the issue is. Trump's point doesn't have anything to do with race or immigration. Neither Trump nor anyone else says that Harris's race matters, or that it matters that her parents were immigrants. 

The US Constitution requires that she be a natural born citizen, and a legal authority defines that as "those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." Harris's parents were not citizens when she was born.

Mr. Trump, speaking to reporters on Thursday, nevertheless pushed forward with the attack, reminiscent of the lie he perpetrated for years that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya. “I heard it today that she doesn’t meet the requirements,” Mr. Trump said of Ms. Harris.

“I have no idea if that’s right,” he added. “I would have thought, I would have assumed, that the Democrats would have checked that out before she gets chosen to run for vice president.”

Trump raised legitimate questions about Obama's birth, and some of those are still unresolved.

But Mr. Trump was in effect revisiting an old tactic: spreading a race-based and anti-immigrant crusade he began nearly a decade ago, when he began sowing distrust in the background of Mr. Obama, who was born in Hawaii.

Again, it is not a matter of race or immigration. Obama's father was not a citizen or an immigrant, raising doubt about whether Obama should qualify as a natural born citizen. There were no immigrants or racial issues involved.

Mr. Eastman’s column tries to raise questions about the citizenship of Ms. Harris’s parents at the time of her birth, and argues that she may have “owed her allegiance to a foreign power or powers” if her parents were “temporary visitors” and not residents. Ms. Harris’s parents received doctorate degrees from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1963 and were working as academics when Ms. Harris was born in 1964.

But constitutional law scholars say that the immigration status of Ms. Harris’s parents at the time of her birth is irrelevant because under the Constitution, anyone born in the United States automatically acquires citizenship. The 14th Amendment makes it clear: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

That is an argument for Harris being a citizen, but not for her being a natural born citizen.

Newsweek in the meantime defended Mr. Eastman’s column, asserting that it had “nothing to do with racist birtherism.” Experts in constitutional law were still quick to disparage the article as dangerous.

Dangerous? If anything, it is dangerous to put someone on the ballot who is unfit to serve.

During the 2016 presidential race, Mr. Trump continuously questioned the citizenship of Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, suggesting that his Canadian roots would be a problem should he win the presidency. Mr. Cruz, who was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father, is a United States citizen.

No, Trump did not question his citizenship, but whether Cruz was a natural born citizen. He was born in Canada, and not qualified to be US President. He was born a citizen of Canada. 

When Harris was born, she might have been claimed as a citizen of USA, Jamaica, or India. Failure to claim Jamaica or India has left her as a citizen of USA, but not as a natural born citizen. Another NY Times news article says:

Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader, said race had been essential to Mr. Biden’s decision. “I think he came to the conclusion that he should pick a Black woman,” Mr. Reid said. “They are our most loyal voters and I think that the Black women of America deserved a Black vice-presidential candidate.”

Yes, that obvious, except that she is not even really Black. They only call her Black because she identifies that way, after being the mistress to a prominent Black married politician. The President and VP should be real Americans, not anchor babies. Maybe they should come from families that had been citizens for several generations. The Constitution has some minimal requirements, and Harris falls short. 

With all the attention given to Harris, the media are skipping some big issues. What is her religion, if any? Why does she pretend she is Black? What is her history of sexual relationships? Her history of illegal drug use? Why doesn't she have any kids? 

Update: I see the other mainstream news media are reciting the same talking points, with AP calling it "a false and racist conspiracy theory". They are not even trying to give an appearance of objectivity. 

It has nothing to do with race, and there is no conspiracy, unless the press is conspiring against Trump. It is simply reading the Constitution, and applying long-accepted definitions.

I think that we are getting to the point where following the US Constitution is racist because it was written by straight White men. Also, the concepts of individual rights, liberty, voting, etc. are White concepts that are not necessarily accepted by people of color.

Harris represents anti-white symbolism

The NY Times reports:

Projecting warmth toward each other, they sketched out a vision of recovery from the nation’s crises surrounding public health, the economy and racial injustice — challenges that, they argued, Mr. Trump has made worse at every turn with an extraordinarily divisive presidency. “We need more than a victory on Nov. 3,” Ms. Harris said. “We need a mandate that proves that the past few years do not represent who we are or who we aspire to be.”

What is missing here is any explanation of how Biden or Harris would do any better. It is funny how so many people say Pres. Trump did a bad job on the Wuhan virus, but they are completely silent on what he should do now. And that is how it has been for months. No one has ever been able to explain how Trump could be doing a better job.

As Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris spoke on Wednesday before a group of socially distanced reporters — not the excited crowd of supporters that would normally greet such an occasion — they each nodded to the symbolism and historic nature of the moment. Wednesday was the third anniversary of the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., at which Mr. Trump claimed there were “very fine people on both sides,” Mr. Biden noted. “I knew we were in the battle for the soul of the nation,” Mr. Biden said. “That’s when I decided to run. And I’m proud now to have Senator Harris at my side in that battle, because she shares the same intensity I do.”

Exactly what symbolism are they referring to? The so-called white supremacists in Charlottesville were the one objecting to whites being systematically replaced by non-whites. So Biden appoints a VP just for her sex and skin color.

The former vice president, Ms. Harris said, was the only person who had “served alongside the first Black president and has chosen the first Black woman as his running mate.” Ms. Harris, the daughter of immigrants from India and Jamaica, is the first woman of color on a major party’s presidential ticket, and she and Mr. Biden argued that possibilities for American success stories abound despite the challenges that the nation confronts. “Her story’s America’s story,” Mr. Biden said.

Notice how it is Black with a capital B, and white with a lower-case w. Obama was only half-African, and Harris is even less. 

No, her story is not America's story. She has no American roots. Her parents were not citizens. She got her start in politics by being a mistress to Willie Brown, an extremely successful Black California politician. 

Update: This Newsweek article explains why Harris is not a natural born citizen. See also this rebuttal by an immigrant law professor. His main argument is that the logic of an 1898 decision would apply to parents on student visas, even tho that case involved citizenship and not Presidential qualifications. (The dissent did mention such qualifications.) The rebuttal does admit: 

For instance, the 1797 edition of the English translation of Emer Vattel's treatise on The Law of Nations (a book that had some influence on the Framers), did say that, "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."

Kamala Harris is Biden VP pick

The NY Times reports:

Joseph R. Biden Jr. selected Senator Kamala Harris of California as his vice-presidential running mate on Tuesday, embracing a former rival who sharply criticized him in the Democratic primaries but emerged after ending her campaign as a vocal supporter of Mr. Biden’s and a prominent advocate of racial-justice legislation after the killing of George Floyd in late May. 

Ms. Harris, 55, is the first Black woman and the first person of Indian descent to be nominated for national office by a major party, and only the fourth woman in U.S. history to be chosen for a presidential ticket.

This is all about identity politics, and nobody pretends anything else. She was picked because she is not male, not White, not Christian, not a parent, and not really an American. Nobody thinks that she is intelligent or competent or even likable. 

She is described as "Black", but she is not descended from slaves. Her father is Jamaican. She probably gets more color from her Indian mother. She may call herself Christian, but her mother was Hindu and her husband is Jewish. There is an argument that she qualifies as a natural born American, but her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth. That means that she could have been considered a citizen of Jamaica or India, and only became American because those citizenships were not claimed.

Her best-known political issues are probably putting parents in jail for truancy and forced racial busing. She is also known for accusing Biden of being a racist and a rapist. I do not believe that there is any merit to her accusations, but it is amusing to see her on the ticket with him.

The consensus is that Biden is a senile old fool who will not last four years. I am sure the Left is excited about the prospect of such an anti-American President.

NY Times discovers the Seattle riots

The NY Times reports:

For 23 days in June, about six blocks in the city’s Capitol Hill neighborhood were claimed by left-wing demonstrators and declared police-free. Protesters hailed it as liberation — from police oppression, from white supremacy — and a catalyst for a national movement. In the wake of the killing of George Floyd by the Minneapolis police, the Black Lives Matter movement is calling to defund the police, arguing that the criminal justice system is inherently racist. Leaders in many progressive cities are listening. In New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio has announced a plan to shift $1 billion out of the police budget. ... Some even call for “abolishing the police” altogether and closing down precincts, which is what happened in Seattle.

It estimates the losses at $200 million. We have now gotten to the point where the police force is considered a symbol of White supremacy. Many of the big city police officers are non-white, but that doesn't matter. Police symbolized a civilized society. White folks who behave themselves actually like the police. The leftist White-haters are now out to defund the police.

Today's Left is nothing like any Right-wingers

A stupid Quillette essay argues:

The Woke Left v. the Alt-Right: A New Study Shows They’re More Alike Than Either Side Realizes

. So its best example is that Bob Dole criticize some hip hop lyrics in 1996 that glamorized violence against police. And this is supposed to be just like the Left today taking pro-police TV shows off the air. Really? The essay sees some similarity here? No, those things are nothing alike. Bob Dole was not Alt-Right. Neither Bob Dole nor the Alt-Right have taken anything off the air. The Right sees police as essential to civilization. So has everyone else for centuries. The Left today is on the side of killing cops. Not similar at all. 

Read this account of the arrest of George Floyd, and tell me what you think that the cops should have done. Floyd was 6'7", muscular, resisting arrest, long-time criminal, junkie, lying, irrational, suffering a drug overdose, and showing excited delirium. The officers tried and failed to get him into the police car. They called an ambulance. They followed recommended procedure. What else could they do?

Floyd passed a counterfeit bill, and was high on illegal drugs while sitting in the driver's seat of a car. Should the police have just let him go? Hit him with the baton? Allow him to endanger others?

I am sure that there are examples of police misconduct, but this is not one. The anti-racism protesters always complain about Ferguson Missouri, which is the same as saying Black criminals should be allowed to kill White policemen. That is what was attempted in Ferguson.

I don't even hear any serious discussion of Floyd's cause of death, or what the police should have done. Floyd was dying of a fentanyl overdose before the police even arrived on the scene. This tells me that those who complain about Floyd's death are just crazy leftists who want to kill cops.

Conservatism is dead

A magazine called The American Conservative might be looking for a new name, because it denounces conservatism:

American Conservatism is Fiddling While Rome Burns ... Conservatism is the seven cheers for capitalism and the deafening silence on demographic change, feminism, and corporate malfeasance. It’s the same tired cast of speakers blathering about limited government almost a century after the New Deal. It’s the platitudinous Reagan quotes and the worn-out Buckley anecdotes. It’s the mindless optimism and the childish exhortations—if something can’t go on forever, it won’t! ... But conservatism is also the endless wars, the nation-building, and the outdated alliances. It’s the free trade fetish. It’s the foolish libertarianism that hates the government more than it loves America. It’s the unconscionable refusal to clamp down on immigration. Worst of all, conservatism is the cowardice and accommodation in the face of leftist hegemony. It’s the long list of enemies to the Right. It’s the court eunuchs and other members of the controlled opposition who offer an echo, but never a choice. It’s the faux grandstanding while living in fear of being called a racist. ... Conservatism may indeed be unsalvageable at this point.

Another article argues:

I’m a conservative but at this point who cares?” said Donald Trump in 2016. “We’ve got to straighten out the country.” ... I am not the first person to point out that conservative political coalitions are mostly just collections of losers, but the point nevertheless bears repeating. Today’s conservatism is merely the name used to categorize the rejects of the post–Cold War order:

I am inclined to agree with this. Most conservatives disgust me.

Whites are inherently White supemacists

From a review of White Fragility:

DiAngelo concludes her book with the blunt assertion that “a positive white identity is an impossible goal. White identity is inherently racist; white people do not exist outside the system of white supremacy.”

The book continues:

This does not mean that we should stop identifying as white and start claiming to be Italian or Irish. To do so is to deny the reality of racism in the here and now, and this denial would simply be color-blind racism. Rather, I strive to be "less white."

For more of what the book actually says, see this summary. This book is probably the biggest selling and most widely accepted statement about race relations today. It has topped the best-seller lists on the NY Times and Amazon. This appears to be the modern consensus. Following this, all Whites are white supremacists. It is inherent, and has nothing to do with whether some White guy has racist views. He is a white supremacist regardless, because of the views of the people of color. 

I do not agree with this terminology, but I do not get to define the language. White supremacy used to mean a belief that Whites should have control over other races, but hardly anyone uses the phrase that way anymore. For example, a NY Times article argues:

As our revived national conversation on race has made clear, the legacies of slavery and white supremacy run wide and deep in American society and political life. One such legacy — which is particularly noteworthy in a presidential election season — has been the survival and preservation of the Electoral College, an institution that has been under fire for more than 200 years.

The Electoral College favored the Republicans in 2000 and 2016, and favored the Democrats in 1992, 1996, and 2004. I don't think that it had anything to do with race in any of those years. By this modern usage, everything about America is White supremacist. That will continue until the Whites are systematically replaced with coloreds. This is not a statement about anyone being treated unfairly or anything like that. It is just a matter of Whites now being defined to be inherently White supremacist. The presence of Whites is synonymous with the presence of White supremacy. 

The current impetus for all this is the death of George Floyd. The Minnesota attorney general is a weirdo Black Democrat convert to Islam, and he said that he was refusing to release the police body cams because they would make it harder to convict the police officers. The London Daily Mail got them anyway. They show that Floyd's bizarre behavior and breathing complaints started before the officers even touched him. He seemed to already know that he was dying of a fentanyl overdose. It is more and more obvious that the police did not contribute to Floyd's death, and that race had nothing to do with it.

The election result may be incalculable

The NY Times continues to say The coronavirus pandemic has taken an incalculable death toll, where it lists the deaths. Apparently they do not know the meaning of incalculable. Separately, it argues that the Presidential votes will not be countable on election night. The mail-in ballots could take weeks to count, and if it is close, the difficulties are likely to be worse than in 2000. The election could get thrown into the House if some states do not declare a winner. In the worst-case scenario, California refuses to accept Trump's reelection, and secedes from the Union. The military is called. They could be right. This election looks like a disaster. The Democrat candidate is too senile to debate. He is about to announce a VP choice who is likely to be an incompetent Black woman. Foogle, Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit are massively interfering by censoring the pro-Trump postings. The voters will not have fair access to info, and we will not have honest and anonymous voting. I expect Dems to be stuffing the mailboxes with doctored ballots. Here is a funny video on Silicon Valley Diversity. Diversity means hiring non-whites who recite Jewish leftist mantras, like hating Pres. Trump.

Yes, we like objective facts

Emphasis on objective facts is a White cultural thing, according to the Smithsonian, and maintaining the anti-White narrative requires shutting down factual sources. Almost no one is willing to tell you the cause of George Floyd's death. Reddit has even shut down commentary on hate crime hoaxes, along with shutting down pro-Trump messages. Now a Jewish publication, The Atlantic, has essay denouncing men who rely on facts. Because women rely on feelings, not facts. Or because facts interfere with the Jewish Leftist narrative. Or both. Her husband once wrote a whole book on how non-Jewish Whites can be tricked into acquiescing to their demographic replacement. 

Also:

Google is launching a new tool that allows businesses to identify themselves as Black-owned through the company’s Maps and Search listings. ... In 2018, Google introduced similar badges for businesses to display if they were either “Women-Led” and/or friendly to members of the LGBTQ+ community.

Wow, I am looking forward to similar labels for Whites, Jews, Moslems, Republicans, and Communists. 

Yahoo Sports reports:

Orlando Magic forward Jonathan Isaac chose not to join his teammates in protest Friday. While the rest of the Magic got down on one knee during the national anthem, Isaac chose to stand. Isaac, 22, was the only player to do so. 

Isaac was also the lone player on the court who didn’t wear a Black Lives Matter shirt. Instead, he wore his Magic jersey and warmup pants during the anthem. Jonathan Isaac is the first player during the restart to stand for the National Anthem. All the remaining coaches, players, and members of both teams took a knee.

He will not be canceled, because he is Black. All White players must demonstrate subservience to the new Black world order.

To learn who rules over you

The Times of Israel reports:

This post by the head of Philadelphia's NAACP chapter has drawn calls for him to step down. (Facebook) Jewish groups in Philadelphia have called for the firing of the head of the local NAACP, Rodney Muhammad, who posted a known anti-Semitic meme on his public Facebook page. ... The meme on Muhammad’s Facebook page included photos of Ice Cube, DeSean Jackson and Nick Cannon, Black celebrities who recently posted anti-Semitic comments on social media, and the quote “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” falsely attributed to French philosopher Voltaire. The quote originated with Kevin Strom, an American neo-Nazi.

According to Wikipedia, Strom said something vaguely similar in 1993. Maybe Voltaire didn't say the exact quote, but I find it hard to believe that no one said anything similar until 1993. It is an obvious truth, and it has probably been said 100s of times. Now Jews are saying that you are not allowed to use this quote, because it criticizes the Jews while suggesting that Jews do not allow criticism! The Jews as might as well say, "We Jews run the world, so we can stop you from telling anyone that we run the world." The guy being accused of anti-Semitism is some Black man named Mohammad. So it is a good bet that his religious beliefs are distinctly different from Judaism. He ought to be free to express his religious beliefs, without being silenced by another religion. You might think that it is crazy to say that Jews rule over us, but the NY Times curently have an article about how, if Joe Biden is elected, White non-Jews will systematically humiliated on public television. They will be told that they must confess to the racism of themselves and their ancestors, or face imprisonment. The confessions will be broadcast on all the major TV network. This is one of the most offensive articles I have ever read, and it is in the NY Times. I don't think that the Soviet show trials were this bad. A vote for Biden is a vote for Blacks to destroy you.

Black women demand dismantling colleges

Here is a letter to Nature, the top British science journal:

Elite institutions are well positioned to set the standard on how to dismantle systemic racism and discrimination. As African American and Black women working at [Stanford Medicine] ... Immediate actions should include making all institutions of learning teach compulsory courses on the Black diaspora for all degree programmes. A diverse range of faculty members should be hired ... Advancement and tenure should be tied to excellence in diversity efforts.

If they really want diverse professors, then colleges should hire some with this view:

The deadliest question is how to accommodate blacks. One mustn’t say what everyone knows, that blacks are the least educable, least productive, most criminal, most violent, most dependent, and least assimilable of the population. If anything can be done about any of these, it won’t be, because no one is permitted to name the problem. No one is in charge.

I am not saying that view is correct. I am saying that colleges should not be held hostage to a radical political agenda, that colleges should teach the truth, and that a genuine diversity of opinions should be presented. The only "systemic racism and discrimination" in colleges today is in favor of promoting less competent Blacks and women. I would bet that the three Black women writing this are substantially less competent than their colleagues. Nobody can even give an example of a college mistreating a Black woman. Normally if someone in a scientific journal claims "systemic" anything, their would be citations to data to back up the claim. Not here. It is all a big hoax.