Monday, February 22, 2016

Hillary Clinton hired another hater

A justice site posts:
Hillary Clinton has hired Zerlina Maxwell. Do you remember her?

Maxwell has written this: “Ultimately, the costs of wrongly disbelieving a survivor far outweigh the costs of calling someone a rapist.” Maxwell said that false accusations "can be undone by an investigation that clears the accused, especially if it is done quickly."

Yep, she actually said that. And her views mirror those of her new boss, who recently said that rape accusers should be believed until evidence proves the accusation is false.

Yes, friends, if Hillary is elected, we will enter into a feminist nirvana, where women never lie about rape unless the accusation is lobbed at Bill Clinton; where due process for men and boys accused of rape is a luxury we can afford but won't bother to extend; and where it's Salem, Massachusetts, 1692, all the time, at least when it comes to men and boys.
Maxwell's comments are even worse in context. Her next sentence is:
Even if Jackie fabricated her account, U-Va. should have taken her word for it during the period while they endeavored to prove or disprove the accusation.
No, no one should have believed Jackie. She claimed that U-Va fraternity gang rapes were part of normal and accepted fraternity hazing rituals, but that somehow everyone had been tricked to keep quiet about it. This was not plausible.

Maxwell also cites the Duke lacrosse rape story, but that was similarly a wildly implausible accusation. Yes, some action should be taken if either of these were true, but you could say the same about space alien abductions or doomsday prophets.

Maxwell is a black woman, and has joined the leftist hatred for white males.

If accusers were believed, then Bill Clinton would have never been elected President, and Hillary would be living a quiet retirement in Arkansas.

Instead, she is leading a campaign of feminist and ethnic hatred. She is a disgrace.

And the news media joins here. Buzzfeed openly refuses to hire white males.

The Republicans have their anti-white influences also. The NY Times reports that the vast majority of campaign financing has come from anti-white wealthy donors, in a failure so far:
The outcome is a rebuke to the party’s traditional donor class, which poured record-breaking amounts of money into the race last spring and summer in the hope of grooming a nominee with broad national appeal and a chance at winning over more Hispanic and other nonwhite voters.
The financial interest of those wealthy donors is to destroy the white Christian middle class.

No comments: