The killer was a smart student, but a dumb criminal.
Utah has a reputation as a conservative state, but the Mormons have been corrupted by the transgender lobby.
The killer was brainwashed by propaganda that Kirk was an evil extremist. In fact he was a normie, with mainstream Christian Republican views.
The crime has exposed a lot of evil on the Left. Many are cheering his death.
Some are saying that Kirk was killed for expressing his free speech views. This is not correct. The killer was from a family with views not much different from Kirk's, and it is not clear that he had any violent opposition to those views. Instead he had been convinced by the Leftist press that Kirk was evil.
The killer is a mixed-up kid whose thinking may never be understood.
The real issue is how we have let the Leftist press demonize normies to the point where this book-smart kid thought that normies were evil. Or how he thought that roomming with a transgender furry lover was acceptable.
The kid was an adult, limiting the ability of his parents to help him. Maybe kids should not be adults until age 25.
All the talk of federal prosecutions is crazy.
Kirk was very pro-Israel, but was starting to say stuff like this:
"Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open borders, neoliberal quasi Marxist policies"
-Charlie Kirk
It seems that we have the whole story, but see Who Ordered The Hit On Charlie Kirk? | Candace Ep 237. She points to some fishy aspects. In particular, the Jews had been financially threatening Kirk, and the transgender roommate may be more involved that he admits.
She also claims the France President Macron's wife is transgender. That seems very unlikely to me, but there are many strange things about that marriage.
I see the NY Times had an article trashing Nick Fuentes as a young radical right-winger with a cult-like following online. Yes, but do not confuse Fuentes with Kirk. Fuentes does say some inflammatory things, and is anti-Trump. Kirk had mainstream normie views. Fuentes has been banned from Youtube, but here is a new interview, and you can judge for yourself. As an example of his inflammatory comments, see his advice to move to a safe White neighborhood. He is mostly hated for his criticism of Israel.
A lot of quotes are circulating supposedly showing that Kirk was an extremist, but factcheck.org shows that most of them are false.
1 comment:
I call bullshit on ANY democrat claiming assassination is 'freedom of speech' in any way.
Easy to prove, and they know it too.
Just ask: Was Martin Luther King's assassination 'freedom of speech'?
Was JFK's assassination 'freedom of speech'?
Was Lincoln's assassination 'freedom of speech'?
Strange that...it seems a democrat's definition of 'freedom of speech' depends more on which way the bullet is flying than any other parameter.
If democrats are going to insist on being incredibly stupid with their definitions of words, they aren't going to like the 'conversation' that is going to follow if they don't pull back on the verbal nonsense and perpetual self delusion.
It's time for them to wake the hell up and get their house in order.
Post a Comment