Maryland Schools Grooming their Kids

The US Supreme Court is about to rule on a public school dispute in Maryland:

One of the “storybooks” about which the parents are complaining is called Pride Puppy and is typical of the six books advancing the LGBTQ+ cultural agenda. This book is said to be for children three to five years old. In Pride Puppy, parents bring their children, including the family puppy, to a gay pride parade. The puppy gets lost and is later reunited with his family. The illustrations show the participants in the parade, along with rainbow signage, dress, and flags.

Pride Puppy purports to be helping preschoolers learn the alphabet. One of the key pages contains an activity called “Search and Find Word List.” The children are prompted to look for images in the pride parade that begin with certain letters of the alphabet. Some of the words in the lists are innocuous. However, one finds, for example, that under the letter “Q” there are only two choices and one of them is [drag] Queen. The same is true for “K” where we find [drag] King. (The brackets appear in the book.)

One of the choices in the list of “M” words is the name of a person whose picture and name appear on a placard held by a parade participant. It bears the name “Marsha P. Johnson.” Johnson was “a self-identified drag queen and prominent gay liberation activist who co-founded the Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries.” Since she had “difficulty finding employment she turned to sex work.” That is only one of the six books.

To make matters worse, the school board proposed various responses for teachers to use in dealing with questions in class from students. Here is just one: Suppose a student asks what “transgender” means?  Here is the suggested response from the board: “When we’re born, people make a guess about our gender and label us boy or girl based on body parts. Sometimes they’re right and sometimes wrong. Body parts do not decide our gender. Our gender comes from our insides.”

The court is probably only going to find that religious parents have a right to be notified about this curriculum, and maybe to opt out.

I will look to see if any of the justices detail what is really wrong here. This is a story about perverts using mandatory public school to groom small children into LGBTQ. A kindergarten story about a child losing and finding a puppy at a Gay Pride Parade? This is textbook example of psychological manipulation. No one should be allowed to manipuate schoolkids in this way.

Ask yourself: Why are schools doing this? Why are they so adamant that this must be done without the parents knowledge? Why are they litigating this all the way to the US Supreme Court?

The only answer is grooming and indoctrination of small schoolkids into the LGBTQ lifestyle.

Update: Here is the decision. 6-3 against the forced LGBTQ indoctrination. A dissent appendix has a bunch of pages from one of the sick books. See for yourself.