1. A man lies to his wife about where they are going in order to get her to a place where a surprise birthday party has been organized.I thought that I would be more likely to justify lying that some philosophy columnist showing off his ethics, but I found the opposite.
2. A young child is rescued from a plane crash in a very weakened state. His parents have been killed in the crash but he is unaware of this. He asks about his parents and the attending physician says they are O.K. He intends to tell the truth once the child is stronger.
3. Your father suffers from severe dementia and is in a nursing home. When it is time for you to leave he becomes extremely agitated and often has to be restrained. On the occasions when you have said you would be back tomorrow he was quite peaceful about your leaving. You tell him now every time you leave that you will be back tomorrow knowing that in a very short time after you leave he will have forgotten what you said.
4. A woman’s husband drowned in a car accident when the car plunged off a bridge into a body of water. It was clear from the physical evidence that he desperately tried to get out of the car and died a dreadful death. At the hospital where his body was brought his wife asked the physician in attendance what kind of death her husband suffered. He replied, “He died immediately from the impact of the crash. He did not suffer.”
5. In an effort to enforce rules against racial discrimination “testers” were sent out to rent a house. First, an African-American couple claiming to be married with two children and an income that was sufficient to pay the rent would try to rent a house. If they were told that the house was not available, a white tester couple with the same family and economic profile would be sent. If they were offered the rental there would be persuasive evidence of racial discrimination.
6. In November of 1962, during the Cuban Missile crisis, President Kennedy gave a conference. When asked whether he had discussed any matters other than Cuban missiles with the Soviets he absolutely denied it. In fact, he had promised that the United States would remove missiles from Turkey.
7. A woman interviewing for a job in a small philosophy department is asked if she intends to have children. Believing that if she says (politely) it’s none of their business she will not get the job, she lies and says she does not intend to have a family.
8. In order to test whether arthroscopic surgery improved the conditions of patients’ knees a study was done in which half the patients were told the procedure was being done but it was not. Little cuts were made in the knees, the doctors talked as if it were being done, sounds were produced as if the operation were being done. The patients were under light anesthesia. It turned out that the same percentage of patients reported pain relief and increased mobility in the real and sham operations. The patients were informed in advance that they either would receive a real or a sham operation.
9. I am negotiating for a car with a salesperson. He asks me what the maximum I am prepared to pay is. I say $15,000. It is actually $20,000.
10. We heap exaggerated praise on our children all the time about their earliest attempts to sing or dance or paint or write poems. For some children this encouragement leads to future practice, which in turn promotes the development–in some — of genuine achievement.
(2) and (4) are cruel, and ought to be contrary to medical ethics.
(5) is entrapment, and it ought to be illegal to build a case against someone this way.
(6) is treasonous, and ought to be grounds for impeachment. I could understand keeping a secret from the public if there is a national security purpose in keeping from the Russians. But here, the enemy knows the info, and the American citizens do not. No excuse.
(7) involves an illegal question.
(8) is also a violation of medical ethics, if it involves a lie. If proper protocols are followed, then there is no need to lie.
(10) is harmful to the kid.
Update: The philosopher tries to justify the lies.
4 comments:
"4" is cruel?
Yes, (4) is cruel. The widow deserves the truth, and not some manipulative and dishonest physician trying to control her feelings.
I don't think it's "cruel," which implies that the doctor is out to gratuitously be mean to her.I think these situations have to be handled on a case by case basis, with the doctor taking the widow's mental health, stability etc into account. Honesty is USUALLY the best policy, though.
I do think that the physicians is being gratuitously mean to her. The scenario does not explain his motives, so maybe he was trying to be easy on her, or easy on himself, or doing what he was taught, or whatever. Even if he was trying to be easy on her, he ought to find a truthful way. He could say, "He died from the crash. If you really want the gruesome details, I can explain them."
Post a Comment