The Defense … moved to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under a pseudonym or their first names only…. The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion.She is going to get convicted by anonymous witnesses before a biased judge for things that supposedly happened 25 years ago, but no one can say when or where they happened.
She probably did cover up some crooked behavior, but this is just a show trial that seems to be also covering up what Jeffrey Epstein did. Strange.
Post a Comment