Half of Immigrants on Welfare

The argument is often made that immigrants are good for the USA economy. But a new study shows:

Of households headed by non-citizens, 47 percent use one or more traditional welfare programs. This rises to 54 percent when eligibility for payments from the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) or the Additional Child Tax Credit are added. The corresponding figures for U.S.-born households are 28 percent and 31 percent.

The immigrants are parasites. Your tax money is funding them.

Senate Votes on Girls Sports being for Girls

The USA Senate just voted on this bill:

Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(d)(1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.

``(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.''.

All Republicans voted Yes, and all Democrats No, so it dies by a Democrat filibuster.

Apparently this defines our political divide more than anything else. For at least a century, there was universal agreement that girls sports were for females. Now it is down to Pres. Trump and his supporters.

People are allowed different views on the war, taxes, and other subjects. But politicians have to stick to the party line on this. Future historians will have a hard time explaining why anyone wanted boys to play girls sports.

More Black Roles Coming

A big budget movie version of Homer's Odyssey will soon be released, and the rumor is that a Black Kenyan Mexican will play Helen of Troy. The producers will only say that she is on the movie.

They have confirmed that a half-Black actress will play the goddess of wisdom, Athena.

I did not watch the Oscars, but I read that they gave some prizes to Black and anti-White movies.

A new video asks: Why aren't characters iconic anymore? It is a good explanation of how modern movies do not work anymore.

See the video Hollywood's PATHETIC Blackwashing of History, for how Netflix distorts history, or this Nature article.

Shakespeare to be Decolonized

The London Daily Mail reports:

William Shakespeare's birthplace will be de-colonised over fears that portraying his success as the 'greatest' playwright 'benefits the ideology of white European supremacy'. ...

It comes amid an ongoing backlash against the writer. Some productions of his works have been slapped with trigger warnings for misogyny, racism and 'problematic radicalised dynamics' that link whiteness to beauty.

In 2022, a research project between the trust and Dr Helen Hopkins at the University of Birmingham postulated that the idea of Shakespeare's 'universal' genius 'benefits the ideology of white European supremacy'.

This is because European culture is portrayed as the standard for high art and the playwright as a symbol of British 'superiority', according to The Telegraph. ...

'Shakespeare's works are full of problematic, outdated ideas, with plenty of misogyny, racism, homophobia, classism, anti-Semitism and misogynoir,' she wrote, with the last word referring to a hatred of black women.

I did not know there was a word for not liking Black women.

Yes, the study of great works of literature, art, science, math, architecture, etc. is all to the benefit of White supremacism.

Sweden and Germany go Anti-Democracy

Swedes believe that America is no longer a democracy:

Democratic backsliding is advancing in the developed world. The annual report from Sweden’s V-Dem Institute leaves no room for doubt: almost a quarter of the world experienced democratic backsliding, or a shift towards autocratization, in 2025, and six of the 10 newly regressive countries identified in the research are located in Europe and North America, including G-7 powers such as Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

But the most unsettling conclusion reached by the Swedish institute is that the United States — once a proud beacon of the more or less free world — is no longer a liberal democracy and is now on a par with countries like Hungary or Turkey, thanks to President Donald Trump.

No, this is crazy. Polls in the USA and most of Europe show that big majorities believe that they are getting too many immigrants. And yet the countries that try to limit immigration are those accused of losing democracy.

Tweet:

Berlin has just imposed INSANE immigration quotas on the judiciary system.

Now 40% of candidates for judges and prosecutors must have an immigrant origin.

Is that so they can just let all the migrant criminals off easily without any repercussions at all?

How the hell is this not a systematic version of racial replacement of Germans?

Do the Germans ever plan on fighting back?

6:32 AM · Mar 18, 2026 · 745.1K Views

Don't the Germans have any pride in who they are? It appears that the government wants Germany to be ruled by foreigners.

This is not democracy. I very much doubt that the people want this.

No Harmful Ideologies of the Sex Binary

Biology professor Jerry Coyne writes:

Ecology Letters, which I thought was a reasonably respectable journal, has now accepted a “viewpoint” article arguing that there is no consensus on biological sex, and that a definition based on gamete size—a consensus if ever there was one—is just viable as “multivariate” definition that incorporates a combination of chromosomes, genetics, and morphology.

They’re wrong and misguided in many ways, ...

But they add that the “rigorous research” they propose be done “also challenges simplistic and harmful ideologies of the sex binary”.

One of the paper's more ridiculous arguments is that female hummingbirds sometimes have bright colors, making them look more like male birds. No, bird colors do not refute sex being binary.

The Plot for World Domination

Wyatt Peterson writes:

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, that controversial document which came to light in the early 20th century, continues to prove extraordinarily prescient. ...

The basis for the claim that the Protocols are a ‘forgery’ dates back to 1920, when Jewish journalist Lucien Wolf penned an article for a Jewish Board of Deputies newsletter claiming that the text is a plagiary of the mid-19th century works of Maurice Joly and Hermann Goedsche.[5]

I guess that when the Jews plotted to take over the world, they plagiarized the plan from some other group planning to take over the world.

No, I do not take the book's authenticity seriously. It is just amusing to compare what was written to what has unfolded.

Ariana Grande may be an Impostor

Is Ariana Grande for real?

It used to be that you could spot an AI fake image by counting the fingers. Now the AI image generators are much better, and they get the fingers right. But Vogue published a picture of her with six fingers on her left hand!

She used to be a pretty girl, but now she looks like the wicked witch she played in a movie. I do not know whether it is the extreme weight loss or all the ugly tattoos or maybe some plastic surgery, but she looks like a freak.

The Decline of Hollywood

Bloomberg posts Why Hollywood Is Facing a Very Unhappy Ending. Maybe it is coincidence, but this New Rule: Oscars So Wrong | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) explains that Hollywood went woke about ten years ago, and has been flooding us with anti-White and queer propaganda.

Supposedly Hollywood was making up for a long history of racism, but actually Blacks had been overrepresented in movies and even in the Oscars.

At any rate, it appears that AI generated Youtube videos are replacing movie theater blockbusters.

The Rise and Fall of TED Talks

A new video explains:

What happened to TED? How did one of the most influential idea platforms in the world go from cultural authority to internet punchline?

This video explores The rise and fall of TED, from its founding in 1984 by Richard Saul Wurman as an elite intellectual gathering for technology, entertainment, and design, to its explosive global growth under Chris Anderson and the Sapling Foundation. After TED put its talks online for free in 2006, including Sir Ken Robinson’s legendary lecture on creativity, the brand crossed 1 billion views and became a defining force in internet culture.

But scale changed everything.

Through the launch of TEDx in 2009, more than 44,000 events and 233,000 talks flooded the internet. The tight curation that once made TED a trusted brand weakened. Pseudoscience slipped through. Elizabeth Holmes pitched Theranos on a TED stage. A comedian exposed the lack of oversight with a fake, absurd talk. Meanwhile, flagship conference tickets climbed to $12,500 and $25,000 donor tiers, shifting perception from ideas-first to elite networking.

This Company Name documentary-style business breakdown analyzes how format rigidity, over-scaling, brand dilution, changing attention spans, and political controversy reshaped TED’s reputation. As long-form podcasts and short-form TikTok content reshaped media consumption, TED’s 18-minute format became stuck in the middle.

For founders, operators, and entrepreneurs, this is a case study in platform strategy, brand trust, and the hidden risks of growth. The story of TED is not just about conferences — it’s about curation, scarcity, and what happens when distribution outpaces quality control.

That is all true, but there is another factor not mentioned. The Ted Talks are Leftist propaganda.

TED has a diversity of speakers, so you might expect a diversity of views. Nope. There has never been a right-wing speaker. No speaker is pro-Trump, pro-Brexit, pro-Christianity, or pro-MAGA. Many are non-political, but the political views are all globalist and leftist.

There are still a lot of good Ted Talks, freely available online. They always have very polished deliveries. Just remember that you are getting leftist propaganda.

The Silicon Valley AI Tyrants

Online comment:

I care deeply about the existential risks posed by AI, which is a primary reason why I voted for Trump over Biden, who had no clear plan surrounding AI alignment.

The companies and the tech gurus creating AI will become enormously wealthy and powerful, beyond our wildest dreams.

This is why it horrifies me—terrifies me—that control of this nascent super-technology is in the hands of woke leftist radicals.

Think about how powerful AI could be. And think about the reality that the software engineers and tech nerds who control it are woke leftists who are confused about what gender they are, have “polycules” (vomit), think white straight males are responsible for all the evil in the world, think age-gap relationships are evil, think America is a settler colonialist state, think Christianity is wrong and evil, want to force experimental dangerous vaccines on everyone, want to mutilate confused young women and men by brainwashing them into thinking they’re the other gender, want to blanket the country in “gay pride” flags and valorize anal sex between males as beautiful while condemning normal straight men.

This is the set of values which rules Silicon Valley. And Silicon Valley is now controlling the most powerful (potential) technology in the history of the human race. It is awful. It is utterly terrifying. For a technology as transformative and powerful as AI, we CANNOT allow it to be controlled by these communist freaks.

Thus, nationalizing all these companies is the best possible choice. Better for AI to progress slower, as long as it remains under sane and reasonable leadership, instead of woke freaks in Silicon Valley.

This is on the blog of a Jewish ex-Openai researcher/professor. He is a big Trump-hater, but also very much in favor of Trump's pro-Israel policies. He sometimes complains about the Left canceling him because he only agrees with them 98% of the time.

Openai and Anthopic talk a lot about how AI LLMs will take over all our lives, but not to worry because they have some engineers working on alignment. No thanks. I do not want their alignment.

NYC Mayor Sides with Islamic Terrorist

Newsweek reports:

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani wrote on X Sunday: "Yesterday, white supremacist Jake Lang organized a protest outside Gracie Mansion rooted in bigotry and racism. Such hate has no place in New York City. It is an affront to our city’s values and the unity that defines who we are. What followed was even more disturbing. Violence at a protest is never acceptable. The attempt to use an explosive device and hurt others is not only criminal, it is reprehensible and the antithesis of who we are. ...

No, he does not speak for "who we are". He is a Mohammedan born in Uganda to Asian-Indian parents.

The bomber shouted Allahu Akbar, meaning the Islam god is greater than the Christian God.

Lang was protesting the Islamification of New York. He is notable for being a pardoned J6 protester, but not for being a White supremacist.

More and more, I am see immigrant politicians stake their positions on being anti-White. You would think that a mayor could denounce a bomber without coupling it to an anti-White statement.

Most of the news reports about this incident tried to blame the anti-Islam protest for the bombs. No, the bombers were Mohammedan immigrants, trying to kill Whites.

Update: CNN had to delete this post:

“Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather,”

“But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs.”

No, they were not Penn. teenagers. They are ISIS terrorists trying to bomb Christians.

OpenAI and Anthropic are Menaces to Humanity

Openai and Anthropic brag that their AI LLMs will soon have AGI, and they will essentially take over thw world and disrupt 100s of millions of jobs. And they must be trusted to do it safely and responsibly.

See this podcast on why Sam Altman should not be trusted for anything.

The head of Anthropic is almost as annoying as the head of Openai. His main argument is not that he is opposed to autonomous weapons, but that Claude is not sufficiently reliable yet. How does he know?

3 USA F-15s were shot down by friendly fire. Was that error by a human or an autonomous system? They are not telling us. Either way, an AI LLM might be able to improve what we have, and Amodei has no clue.

Here is his lawsuit against the War Dept, and an amicus brief from Openai and Google researchers. The brief argues:

Every smartphone continuously broadcasts location data to carriers and dozens of applications. Credit and debit cards generate a timestamped record of nearly every commercial transaction Americans make. Social media platforms log not just what people post, but what they read, how long they browse, and what they posted before deleting it. Employers, insurers, and data brokers have assembled behavioral profiles on most American adults that are already, in many cases, available for government purchase without a warrant. What does not yet exist is the AI layer that transforms this sprawling, fragmented data landscape into a unified, real-time surveillance apparatus. Today, these streams are siloed, inconsistent, and require significant human effort to connect. From our vantage point at frontier AI labs, we understand that an AI system used for mass surveillance could dissolve those silos, correlating face recognition data with location history, transaction records, social graphs, and behavioral patterns across hundreds of millions of people simultaneously.

The mere existence of such a capability in government hands — even if never activated against a specific individual — changes the character of public life in a democracy.

That is a description of the Google business model. It collects that data to use AI to make 100s of billions of dollars targeting ads, effectively selling mass surveilance data to marketers.

The Google brief complaint is not that such AI systems exist, but that they might end up on government hands. I am much more worried about what private companies are doing with such systems.

The brief also argues:

. A child’s tricycle can physically be driven on an interstate, but we do not allow it because of the risks of using the technology in that environment. Mass domestic surveillance and autonomous lethal weapons systems are the equivalently reckless domain for today’s frontier models. The considered judgment, shared widely across the AI development community, is that these applications of current AI technology carry risks so severe, and threaten harm so impossible to repair after the fact, that some kind of guardrails — whether contractual or technical — are necessary to constrain them in the absence of robust, genuinely effective governance frameworks.

The analogy to a child's tricycle is weird. A tricycle is not a dangerous technology, except that it gets in the way of other vehicles. I would expect an analogy about a toxic chemical truck on the highway, or something like that. No one worries about tricycles.

I do not think that there is any such consensus in the AI development community. They worry about AI LLMs taking over the world, or releasing dangerous info like bomb-making recipes, or tricking people into doing foolish things. They do not worry about military units doing their jobs more efficiently.

Openai and Anthropic are both planning to go public this year, with a combined market value of about a trillion dollars. And yet they run by lunatics with untenable business models. There has never been a situation before with so much at stake with such flaky companies.

Conflict of interest disclosure: Anthropic has promised to pay me $3000 to compensate for training Claude on a pirated copy of my book.

The Corrected Signs of the Zodiac

SciAm explains:

Astrology is currently experiencing a remarkable renaissance—especially on social media, ...

Toward the end of the fifth century B.C.E., Babylonian astronomers divided the ecliptic into 12 equal sections of 30 degrees each, analogous to their calendar’s 12 months of 30 days each. In doing so, they developed the first known astronomical coordinate system. They assigned each section a constellation located in the night sky along the ecliptic at that time of the year.

The language of Astrology leads people to believe that if their sign was Aries, then Aries would be visible overhead on their birthday.

This is wrong for a couple of reasons. If Aries is your sign, then the Sun would be blocking that constellation on your birthday. So you would not see it because of the brightness of the Sun. It is also wrong because the Earth has shifted, and so the alignment of the stars, in the last 3000 years. Also, there are 13 signs of the Zodiac.

The above article tells you the true calendar of the constellations.

Criminals are Born That Way

It is common to attribute crime to poverty, absent fathers, or poor education. Someone will notice that a lot of prisoners were fatherless, and decude that huge social problems could be solved encouraging fathers or funding school programs. Maybe, but it does not follow.

This essay explains:

The Blank Slate, the idea that differences in human personality and behaviour are entirely the result of that person’s experiences earlier in life, is utterly dominant in swathes of the social sciences, including sociology, criminology, and anthropology. Left-leaning academics adhere to the blank slate because it implies that humans are fully malleable. If a person’s behaviour, good or bad, is entirely the result of how they have been treated, then one can fix all of society’s problems by re-engineering society to give everyone an idyllic upbringing and so produce a utopia. Indeed, the failure to have done that already can only be attributed to the iniquity of the capitalists who thus need to be overthrown and deposed.

We’ve known for decades that this is utterly wrong. By far the biggest influence on a person’s personality and behavioural traits is their genes [1]. Twin studies, corroborated and supported by adoption studies and other types of study, tell us that about 50% of the variation in behavioural traits is attributable to differences in genes. Everything else – including biological randomness in embryonic development, the influences of families, schools and communities, and all the other influences and experiences specific to each person – only adds up to the other 50% [2].

The heritability of criminality is about 40–50%, which means that whether or not a child is likely to grow up to have a criminal record depends primarily on the genes he was born with, and less than that on his upbringing and childhood environment [3]. So why is this totally ignored in most discussions of the causes of crime?

Last month, a fatherless Canadian male transgender dropout shot and killed 6 in a school. It seems obvious that a deranged mom and a missing dad were major causes. Probably so. But we cannot know for sure in an individual case. We can research this by aggregated cases and measuring statistics. When that is done, the genetic causes are apparent, and the others are not.

European Civilizatoin required many Centuries

Hot tweet:

.@StephenM : "The West only achieved the place that it did in human history because it spent previous centuries eradicating the criminal elements within it’s territories. The West that we came to know that had the great music and architecture and science and the most powerful economy had spent centuries previous to that establishing order first."

He has made this point before. Europe executed mayb 1-2% of its population every generation for centuries.

Elon Musk retweeted this:

Stephen Miller is 100% right here

The high culture that made the West so superior to everywhere else on Earth only came because Western Europe executed ~1% of each generation for centuries

In weeding the crime gene out of the population through centuries of capital punishment for everything from larceny to murder, Western Europe made itself a paradise, and blossomed into the greatest high civilization the world has ever seen over the 18th and 19th centuries

So, as he said, "The West only achieved the place that it did in human history because it spent previous centuries eradicating the criminal elements within it’s territories. The West that we came to know that had the great music and architecture and science and the most powerful economy had spent centuries previous to that establishing order first."

That is 100% true. High civilization requires order, and requires the pruning of the tree of civilization to achieve it

So it was a eugenics program that worked. Or maybe you will attribute the changes to Christianity, or legal institutions.

Regardless, it took many centuries to make the European and American people what they are today. There are no known shortcuts. It cannot be done with immigrants.

Texas Politician turns out to be a Nut

Democrat James Talarico just won a Texas primary against a radical Black woman, and the news media treats him as a moderate. He is not.

The NY Post reports:

“White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus,” Talarico’s full post read. “But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.”

I do not know what this means.

The goofiest stuff is that he talks about religion a lot, and has weird beliefs.

Justifying the Iran War

Why are we at war with Iran? To end its nuclear program? To get its oil? To improve the human rights of its citizens? To stop Iran from exporting terrorism?

Unfortunately, the Trump administration has made statements implying that Israel started this war, and we have to be on its side.

There is another reason that people do not want to say. Iran was becoming a China puppet, and maybe this war is to limit China's allies and oil supply.

The NY Post has an op-ed:

Beijing’s slick sales pitches convinced the Iranians to spend their oil billions buying China’s military and telecommunications equipment — like the “state-of-the-art” radar systems that now lie in smoldering ruins after failing to detect the incoming American airstrikes.

But the decapitation of Iran’s leadership and the destruction of its Chinese-made defense arsenal aren’t the worst of Beijing’s Middle East woes.

It goes on to argue that China is the real long-term threat. We are afraid to fight China directly, so we have proxy wars.

See also this interview.

Meet a UK Health Ambassador

Athika Ahmed is a member of the Cardiff and Vale Health Youth Board and said her Bangladeshi heritage and traditional values are partly what inspired her to get involved with the Youth Board and aspire to become a doctor. 

Athika Ahmed is a 23-year-old health ambassador in Wales, known for her advocacy in women's health and her efforts to educate young people about health issues.

Athika Ahmed is a medical student at Cardiff University and has been involved in health advocacy since she was 16 years old. She has worked as a health ambassador, focusing on raising awareness about women's health issues, including endometriosis, menopause, and menstrual health. Her work aims to break the stigma surrounding these topics, particularly among young Muslim girls, and to promote better health education in schools.

This looks like a joke, but it is not. This is Britain today.

Nigeria is Repopulating the World

The world is not prepared for this reality. Soon Africans will be taking over the world, and using up all the resources.

California Schools Overruled

Some conservatives announce:

U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Historic, Groundbreaking Victory for Parental Rights, Dismantles California’s Secret Gender Transition Regime

Supreme Court rules that California cannot hide children’s gender transitions from parents; landmark decision protects parental rights nationwide

It was amazing that California had a policy of secretly transgendering minor students, and concealing it from the parents.

The 6-3 Supreme Court decision is here.