Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Today is Cesar Chavez Day in California

It has been renamed:
California lawmakers voted Thursday to rename César Chavez Day as Farmworkers Day in an effort to reconcile the Latino labor icon's legacy with explosive sexual abuse allegations before the state holiday on March 31.
I listened to the NY Times podcast on this, and the accusations come from women who kept quiet for 50-60 years. Chavez has been dead for 30 years. The main accuser was angry that she had been kicked out of the Chavez organization for being a heroin addict, and for bringing heroin to others. There was no corroboration of any of the accusations.

I am not trying to defend Chavez. I am merely saying that there is no way to know what happened 50 years ago. We do not even have Chavez's side of the story. I tend to doubt heroin addicts, and those who wait until they cannot be contradicted. But believe what you want.

Canada Schools Teach Paganism

Physics professor Larry Krauss writes:
In the early 2000s, I spent much of my time over the course of several years fighting the incursion of religion into science classes in the United States. ...

We were very successful, culminating in a famous court case in Dover, Pennsylvania, where a local school board had tried to replace a high school science text with an intelligent design textbook. After testimony from numerous scientists, the judge wrote a remarkable 139-page judgement describing ID as religion, rather than science, and therefore not appropriate for discussion in high school science classes.

Actually the judge did not write it. The ACLU wrote it, and the judge rubber-stamped it. The decision relied on the Lemon Test, which has since been reversed by the US Supreme Court. The judgment no longer has value.
You may wonder how religious fundamentalism could so effectively creep into the curriculum in a progressive place like British Columbia. The answer is simple. The religious nonsense being inserted into the curriculum has nothing to do with Christian fundamentalism; rather, it is Indigenous religious nonsense. And in the current climate, Indigenous “knowledge” is held to a different standard from scientific knowledge — or, rather, to no standard at all.

The B.C. Curriculum resorts to a phrase that was utilised by the New Zealand government when they too distorted the high school science curriculum in that country by arguing that Indigenous “Ways of Knowing” should be taught alongside conventional science and treated as an equally valid way of understanding how the world works.

The Catholic Church and the other mainstream Christian churches teach regular science, and not the stuff he complains about.

Monday, March 30, 2026

UN Vote demands Slave Trade Reparations

AP reports:
The U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday adopted a resolution declaring the trafficking of enslaved Africans “the gravest crime against humanity” and calling for reparations as “a concrete step towards remedying historical wrongs.” ...

The vote in the 193-member world body was 123-3, with 52 abstentions. Argentina, Israel and the United States were the three members voting against the resolution. The United Kingdom and all 27 members of the European Union were among those that abstained.

The USA Constitution did abolish the slave trade. So the slave trade was a crime in the 1800s. An amendment later abolished slavery itself.

The Africans were enslaved by other Africans, and sold to international slave traders. So maybe Africa should pay reparations.

See The case against reparations for slavery and colonialism, by Coel Hellier. It details the absurdities on many levels.

But didn't the USA profit from the slave trade? No, it did not. The slave trade was an economic disaster for the USA. The USA would be much richer if it never happened.

And the USA has been paying trillions of dollars in reparations already. Collectively Black Americans get much more in government mandated benefits than the taxes they pay.

For annother view, see The Four Kinds of Black Americans-Andre Williams. He has some harsh advice for his fellow Blacks.

Democrat Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal has called for the USA to pay reparations to illegal aliens, because they have been traumatized by ICE enforcement.

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Academia cannot Tolerate linking Race and IQ

Maarten Boudry writes:
Two separate statements have recently been issued by members of Ghent University, in Belgium, calling on the university to rescind the appointment of Nathan Cofnas as a postdoctoral researcher. One claims that his views “violate the university’s code of ethics and are morally beneath contempt”.
Cofnas is hated for this:
Any realistic path to victory over wokism requires widespread acceptance of hereditarianism among the elites. As I explained in “Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem,” wokism is what follows from taking the equality thesis seriously, given a background of Christian morality. If all races and sexes have the same innate distributions of psychological traits, disparities in socioeconomic status must be due to environmental factors. In practice, that means differences in outcome favoring whites or men will be attributed to past or present white racism or sexism. This triggers an all-consuming crusade against the hidden forces of discrimination. That’s what wokism is. Smart people are disproportionately attracted to the woke left because the mainstream right accepts the equality thesis but fails to recognize its implications. Woke law and woke institutions are primarily effects rather than causes of elites being woke. Undermining the equality thesis destroys the intellectual basis of wokism and gives the elites a reason to join the right.
According to this paywalled article, Cofnas is threatened with arrest in Belgium.

This is all taboo. Here is the logic. Some people are more intelligent than others. Intelligence is measured by IQ tests. All evolved human traits must be heritable. Numerous studies have shown IQ to be heritable. Heritable traits are very likely to have average differences over groups. Race is real and measurable. Self-identified race is nearly always the same as that identified by DNA tests. There are likely to be racial and sex differences in IQ, with a largely genetic origin.

This information could be used to justify discrimination.

Often this is addressed by attributing differences to culture or discrimination. If so, there could be some legal remedy. But those remedies have never worked.

So the response is to deny that race exists. Or deny that IQ exists. Or deny that human genetic differences exist. Or prohibit anyone from talking about the subject.

Saturday, March 28, 2026

AI LLMs are already Sentient

New Quillette essay:
Most of today’s “artificial intelligence” is better described as artificial autocomplete than artificial mind. Large language models are vast pattern-recognisers: they have learned statistical regularities in text, and they are extremely good at reproducing them.

As neuroscientist Christof Koch points out, tools like ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Perplexity can only “regurgitate what other people” have written.

The AI LLMs have more intelligence that the people making these comments.

Artificial general intelligence has been achieved. The latest models are smarter than any individual human.

Friday, March 27, 2026

How to Label a Criminal Illegal Alien

Apparently newspapers have to be sensitive about how they describe killers.

Yahoo News reports:

The Loyola Phoenix, the student newspaper of Loyola University Chicago, has issued an editor’s note apologizing for an Instagram post calling the alleged killer of 18-year-old student Sheridan Gorman an "illegal immigrant."

"On March 23, a post on The Phoenix’s Instagram page carried the following headline: ‘Immigrant Man Charged in Murder of Sheridan Gorman, DHS Involved,’" the editor’s note, posted below a Sunday article about Gorman’s murder, read.

"That headline didn’t reflect the most important elements in the story, and it was taken down minutes later to prevent any further harm to affected community members," the editor’s note continued.

"Additionally, in the body of the original post, we described the man who was charged as an ‘illegal immigrant,’ using language provided by the Department of Homeland Security," it went on. "That language does not align with Associated Press style, nor does it align with the values of this newspaper."

A Sunday press release from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called the alleged killer, identified as Jose Medina-Medina, a criminal illegal alien from Venezuela.

So the editor is lying about using DHS language, as it called him a criminal illegal alien.

I actually agree with avoiding the term "illegal immigrant". An immigrant is someone who comes to the USA on an immigrant visa, or is a naturalized citizen, or is in the process. Most of those called illegal immigrant entered the SUA illegally, or on some other visa. It would be better to call them illegal aliens, or deportable foreigners, or something like that.

Update: This story got covered on White Liberal News Repeat After Us ep 143.

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Tucker Carlson Accused of Heresy

Rich Lowry of National Review today posted Why is Tucker Carlson promoting a Christian heresy?

The supposed heresy is Marcionism, an ancient obscure dispute about what books should be included in the Bible. Marcion like Paul, but not the Old Testament.

It is amusing to see political attention to old theological disputes. Apparently National Review sees its mission as policing right-wingers, and stopping them from annoying the Jews.

Carlson has become anti-war, much to the annoyance of Pres. Trump and pro-Israel factions. But I do not see that he said anything supporting Marcionism.

Carlson is simply taking the mainstream Christian view that the Gospels supersede the Old Testament. He disagrees with those who say Christianity is subordinate to Judaism.

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Nelson Mandela Ruined South Africa

A South African explains You Were Lied to About Nelson Mandela.

The short version is that he was a Communist terrorist, and turning power over to him destroyed the country.

While puncturing heroes, check out The Helen Keller story doesn't add up. She was not evil like Mandela, but her story is surely exaggerated.

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Covid-19 may have Started in California

There is still a lot of attention to the origin of covid-19, but one thing puzzles me. Everyone says it started in Wuhan China, and spread to California in late Jan. 2020. The Wikipedia article on Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in California says:
The following is a timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in California.
2020
January–February
On January 26, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed the first case in California, the third case in the U.S. The person, a man in his 50s, who had returned from travel to Wuhan, China, was released from the hospital in Orange County on February 1 in good condition to in-home isolation.
And yet the Red Cross published proof that it was in California in 2019:
A study by the American Red Cross and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), entitled “Serologic testing of U.S. blood donations to identify SARS-CoV-2 reactive antibodies: December 2019-January 2020,” was recently published in the Clinical Infectious Diseases journal. This study aimed to determine when the virus might have first appeared in the United States by using archived samples from routine blood donations collected by the Red Cross. The non-identifiable blood samples used in the study—from donors in nine states between Dec. 13, 2019 and Jan. 17, 2020—demonstrate one way that blood donation helps scientific research.

In the U.S., the first COVID-19 infection was reported on January 19, 2020 in a traveler returning from China. These study results show that it’s possible COVID-19 may have been present in the U.S. in December 2019, earlier than previously recognized.

The findings of this study indicate that that it is possible the virus that causes COVID-19 may have been present in California, Oregon, and Washington as early as Dec. 13-16, 2019, and in Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin as early as Dec. 30, 2019 - Jan. 17, 2020.

Here is the published paper.

I asked an AI LLM why the authorities promote a Wuhan China origin theory, in spite of this evidence. It gave these arguments for the prevailing wisdom:

  • The China health authorities genome-sequenced the virus, while the California authorities did not.
  • The covid-19 antibodies were only found in 2% of the Jan. 2019 California samples, indicating it was not yet widespread.
  • The California samples were anonymized by the time they got to the Red Cross, so there was no followup on symptoms.
  • Many medical papers blame racoon dogs and other animals at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan China.
  • Studies in journals like Science, Cell, and Nature (including molecular clock analyses) consistently place the origin in Wuhan, with circulation undetected for at most ~1–2 months before the December cluster.
  • Nobody noticed excess hospital cases or deaths in California in Dec. 2019.
  • People were traveling out of China at the time, not into China.

    I do not see how any of this rebuts a California origin theory. Yes, everyone wanted to blame that Wuhan animal market, but we now know that there was a conspiracy to cover up the possibility of a Wuhan Lab leak.

    People were certainly traveling from California to China. Apple computer alone was sending dozens of managers back and forth everyday.

    China was much better at responding to the epidemic than the USA. Yes, they did testing while the USA dithered.

    I was in California at the time, and people certainly did notice the outbreak of an unusually bad flu-like virus.

    All this does not prove covid-19 started in California. Maybe it started somewhere else, spread to California, and spread to Wuhan. There is some evidence of a Wuhan lab leak, and some are convinced by that. Maybe it started with a Wuhan lab leak in Oct. 2019, spread to California, and back to Wuhan. That would be consistent with the genomic papers.

    But I think it does prove that the official timeline is wrong. Covid-19 was in California in 2019. It also proves that those who blame China for not responding faster to the epidemic are also wrong. China acted much more promptly than California.

    The 2019 California outbreak was blamed on the flu. By Feb. 2020, nothing was blamed on the flu, and all flu-like symptoms were blamed on covid-19. The flu disappeared from official reports.

    This makes no sense to me. Covid-19 was a flu-like virus. It could have been called the 2019 flu, but for political reasons. Some flu viruses are worse than others. Covid-19 was particular bad on elderly people with multiple comorbidities, like diabetes and obesity. We should have just called it the flu, and tried to protect the elderly.

    There are a lot of covid-19 controversies that were never fully resolved. Did the virus come from pangolin/bat, or a lab leak. If a lab leak, was it accident or deliberate. And was the virus made worse by "gain of function" research. Why was all the advice so bad, regarding hand-washing, masks, social distancing, etc. Why were the schools shut down. Why was the vaccine info so bad. Why don't we have answers, six years later.

    Besides all that, no one is even asking about the California outbreak. How is that the covid-19 was so serious that California closed the beaches, but the Dec. 2019 outbreak, whether it was covid-19 or something else, was completely ignored.

  • Monday, March 23, 2026

    Half of Immigrants on Welfare

    The argument is often made that immigrants are good for the USA economy. But a new study shows:
    Of households headed by non-citizens, 47 percent use one or more traditional welfare programs. This rises to 54 percent when eligibility for payments from the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) or the Additional Child Tax Credit are added. The corresponding figures for U.S.-born households are 28 percent and 31 percent.
    The immigrants are parasites. Your tax money is funding them.

    Sunday, March 22, 2026

    Senate Votes on Girls Sports being for Girls

    The USA Senate just voted on this bill:
    Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the following:

    ``(d)(1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.

    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.''.

    All Republicans voted Yes, and all Democrats No, so it dies by a Democrat filibuster.

    Apparently this defines our political divide more than anything else. For at least a century, there was universal agreement that girls sports were for females. Now it is down to Pres. Trump and his supporters.

    People are allowed different views on the war, taxes, and other subjects. But politicians have to stick to the party line on this. Future historians will have a hard time explaining why anyone wanted boys to play girls sports.

    Saturday, March 21, 2026

    More Black Roles Coming

    A big budget movie version of Homer's Odyssey will soon be released, and the rumor is that a Black Kenyan Mexican will play Helen of Troy. The producers will only say that she is on the movie.

    They have confirmed that a half-Black actress will play the goddess of wisdom, Athena.

    I did not watch the Oscars, but I read that they gave some prizes to Black and anti-White movies.

    A new video asks: Why aren't characters iconic anymore? It is a good explanation of how modern movies do not work anymore.

    See the video Hollywood's PATHETIC Blackwashing of History, for how Netflix distorts history, or this Nature article.

    Friday, March 20, 2026

    Shakespeare to be Decolonized

    The London Daily Mail reports:
    William Shakespeare's birthplace will be de-colonised over fears that portraying his success as the 'greatest' playwright 'benefits the ideology of white European supremacy'. ...

    It comes amid an ongoing backlash against the writer. Some productions of his works have been slapped with trigger warnings for misogyny, racism and 'problematic radicalised dynamics' that link whiteness to beauty.

    In 2022, a research project between the trust and Dr Helen Hopkins at the University of Birmingham postulated that the idea of Shakespeare's 'universal' genius 'benefits the ideology of white European supremacy'.

    This is because European culture is portrayed as the standard for high art and the playwright as a symbol of British 'superiority', according to The Telegraph. ...

    'Shakespeare's works are full of problematic, outdated ideas, with plenty of misogyny, racism, homophobia, classism, anti-Semitism and misogynoir,' she wrote, with the last word referring to a hatred of black women.

    I did not know there was a word for not liking Black women.

    Yes, the study of great works of literature, art, science, math, architecture, etc. is all to the benefit of White supremacism.

    Thursday, March 19, 2026

    Sweden and Germany go Anti-Democracy

    Swedes believe that America is no longer a democracy:
    Democratic backsliding is advancing in the developed world. The annual report from Sweden’s V-Dem Institute leaves no room for doubt: almost a quarter of the world experienced democratic backsliding, or a shift towards autocratization, in 2025, and six of the 10 newly regressive countries identified in the research are located in Europe and North America, including G-7 powers such as Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    But the most unsettling conclusion reached by the Swedish institute is that the United States — once a proud beacon of the more or less free world — is no longer a liberal democracy and is now on a par with countries like Hungary or Turkey, thanks to President Donald Trump.

    No, this is crazy. Polls in the USA and most of Europe show that big majorities believe that they are getting too many immigrants. And yet the countries that try to limit immigration are those accused of losing democracy.

    Tweet:

    Berlin has just imposed INSANE immigration quotas on the judiciary system.

    Now 40% of candidates for judges and prosecutors must have an immigrant origin.

    Is that so they can just let all the migrant criminals off easily without any repercussions at all?

    How the hell is this not a systematic version of racial replacement of Germans?

    Do the Germans ever plan on fighting back?

    6:32 AM · Mar 18, 2026 · 745.1K Views

    Don't the Germans have any pride in who they are? It appears that the government wants Germany to be ruled by foreigners.

    This is not democracy. I very much doubt that the people want this.

    Wednesday, March 18, 2026

    No Harmful Ideologies of the Sex Binary

    Biology professor Jerry Coyne writes:
    Ecology Letters, which I thought was a reasonably respectable journal, has now accepted a “viewpoint” article arguing that there is no consensus on biological sex, and that a definition based on gamete size—a consensus if ever there was one—is just viable as “multivariate” definition that incorporates a combination of chromosomes, genetics, and morphology.

    They’re wrong and misguided in many ways, ...

    But they add that the “rigorous research” they propose be done “also challenges simplistic and harmful ideologies of the sex binary”.

    One of the paper's more ridiculous arguments is that female hummingbirds sometimes have bright colors, making them look more like male birds. No, bird colors do not refute sex being binary.

    Tuesday, March 17, 2026

    The Plot for World Domination

    Wyatt Peterson writes:
    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, that controversial document which came to light in the early 20th century, continues to prove extraordinarily prescient. ...

    The basis for the claim that the Protocols are a ‘forgery’ dates back to 1920, when Jewish journalist Lucien Wolf penned an article for a Jewish Board of Deputies newsletter claiming that the text is a plagiary of the mid-19th century works of Maurice Joly and Hermann Goedsche.[5]

    I guess that when the Jews plotted to take over the world, they plagiarized the plan from some other group planning to take over the world.

    No, I do not take the book's authenticity seriously. It is just amusing to compare what was written to what has unfolded.

    Sunday, March 15, 2026

    Ariana Grande may be an Impostor

    Is Ariana Grande for real?

    It used to be that you could spot an AI fake image by counting the fingers. Now the AI image generators are much better, and they get the fingers right. But Vogue published a picture of her with six fingers on her left hand!

    She used to be a pretty girl, but now she looks like the wicked witch she played in a movie. I do not know whether it is the extreme weight loss or all the ugly tattoos or maybe some plastic surgery, but she looks like a freak.

    The Decline of Hollywood

    Bloomberg posts Why Hollywood Is Facing a Very Unhappy Ending. Maybe it is coincidence, but this New Rule: Oscars So Wrong | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) explains that Hollywood went woke about ten years ago, and has been flooding us with anti-White and queer propaganda.

    Supposedly Hollywood was making up for a long history of racism, but actually Blacks had been overrepresented in movies and even in the Oscars.

    At any rate, it appears that AI generated Youtube videos are replacing movie theater blockbusters.

    Saturday, March 14, 2026

    The Rise and Fall of TED Talks

    A new video explains:
    What happened to TED? How did one of the most influential idea platforms in the world go from cultural authority to internet punchline?

    This video explores The rise and fall of TED, from its founding in 1984 by Richard Saul Wurman as an elite intellectual gathering for technology, entertainment, and design, to its explosive global growth under Chris Anderson and the Sapling Foundation. After TED put its talks online for free in 2006, including Sir Ken Robinson’s legendary lecture on creativity, the brand crossed 1 billion views and became a defining force in internet culture.

    But scale changed everything.

    Through the launch of TEDx in 2009, more than 44,000 events and 233,000 talks flooded the internet. The tight curation that once made TED a trusted brand weakened. Pseudoscience slipped through. Elizabeth Holmes pitched Theranos on a TED stage. A comedian exposed the lack of oversight with a fake, absurd talk. Meanwhile, flagship conference tickets climbed to $12,500 and $25,000 donor tiers, shifting perception from ideas-first to elite networking.

    This Company Name documentary-style business breakdown analyzes how format rigidity, over-scaling, brand dilution, changing attention spans, and political controversy reshaped TED’s reputation. As long-form podcasts and short-form TikTok content reshaped media consumption, TED’s 18-minute format became stuck in the middle.

    For founders, operators, and entrepreneurs, this is a case study in platform strategy, brand trust, and the hidden risks of growth. The story of TED is not just about conferences — it’s about curation, scarcity, and what happens when distribution outpaces quality control.

    That is all true, but there is another factor not mentioned. The Ted Talks are Leftist propaganda.

    TED has a diversity of speakers, so you might expect a diversity of views. Nope. There has never been a right-wing speaker. No speaker is pro-Trump, pro-Brexit, pro-Christianity, or pro-MAGA. Many are non-political, but the political views are all globalist and leftist.

    There are still a lot of good Ted Talks, freely available online. They always have very polished deliveries. Just remember that you are getting leftist propaganda.

    Thursday, March 12, 2026

    The Silicon Valley AI Tyrants

    Online comment:
    I care deeply about the existential risks posed by AI, which is a primary reason why I voted for Trump over Biden, who had no clear plan surrounding AI alignment.

    The companies and the tech gurus creating AI will become enormously wealthy and powerful, beyond our wildest dreams.

    This is why it horrifies me—terrifies me—that control of this nascent super-technology is in the hands of woke leftist radicals.

    Think about how powerful AI could be. And think about the reality that the software engineers and tech nerds who control it are woke leftists who are confused about what gender they are, have “polycules” (vomit), think white straight males are responsible for all the evil in the world, think age-gap relationships are evil, think America is a settler colonialist state, think Christianity is wrong and evil, want to force experimental dangerous vaccines on everyone, want to mutilate confused young women and men by brainwashing them into thinking they’re the other gender, want to blanket the country in “gay pride” flags and valorize anal sex between males as beautiful while condemning normal straight men.

    This is the set of values which rules Silicon Valley. And Silicon Valley is now controlling the most powerful (potential) technology in the history of the human race. It is awful. It is utterly terrifying. For a technology as transformative and powerful as AI, we CANNOT allow it to be controlled by these communist freaks.

    Thus, nationalizing all these companies is the best possible choice. Better for AI to progress slower, as long as it remains under sane and reasonable leadership, instead of woke freaks in Silicon Valley.

    This is on the blog of a Jewish ex-Openai researcher/professor. He is a big Trump-hater, but also very much in favor of Trump's pro-Israel policies. He sometimes complains about the Left canceling him because he only agrees with them 98% of the time.

    Openai and Anthopic talk a lot about how AI LLMs will take over all our lives, but not to worry because they have some engineers working on alignment. No thanks. I do not want their alignment.

    Wednesday, March 11, 2026

    NYC Mayor Sides with Islamic Terrorist

    Newsweek reports:
    New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani wrote on X Sunday: "Yesterday, white supremacist Jake Lang organized a protest outside Gracie Mansion rooted in bigotry and racism. Such hate has no place in New York City. It is an affront to our city’s values and the unity that defines who we are. What followed was even more disturbing. Violence at a protest is never acceptable. The attempt to use an explosive device and hurt others is not only criminal, it is reprehensible and the antithesis of who we are. ...
    No, he does not speak for "who we are". He is a Mohammedan born in Uganda to Asian-Indian parents.

    The bomber shouted Allahu Akbar, meaning the Islam god is greater than the Christian God.

    Lang was protesting the Islamification of New York. He is notable for being a pardoned J6 protester, but not for being a White supremacist.

    More and more, I am see immigrant politicians stake their positions on being anti-White. You would think that a mayor could denounce a bomber without coupling it to an anti-White statement.

    Most of the news reports about this incident tried to blame the anti-Islam protest for the bombs. No, the bombers were Mohammedan immigrants, trying to kill Whites.

    Update: CNN had to delete this post:

    “Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather,”

    “But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs.”

    No, they were not Penn. teenagers. They are ISIS terrorists trying to bomb Christians.

    Tuesday, March 10, 2026

    OpenAI and Anthropic are Menaces to Humanity

    Openai and Anthropic brag that their AI LLMs will soon have AGI, and they will essentially take over thw world and disrupt 100s of millions of jobs. And they must be trusted to do it safely and responsibly.

    See this podcast on why Sam Altman should not be trusted for anything.

    The head of Anthropic is almost as annoying as the head of Openai. His main argument is not that he is opposed to autonomous weapons, but that Claude is not sufficiently reliable yet. How does he know?

    3 USA F-15s were shot down by friendly fire. Was that error by a human or an autonomous system? They are not telling us. Either way, an AI LLM might be able to improve what we have, and Amodei has no clue.

    Here is his lawsuit against the War Dept, and an amicus brief from Openai and Google researchers. The brief argues:

    Every smartphone continuously broadcasts location data to carriers and dozens of applications. Credit and debit cards generate a timestamped record of nearly every commercial transaction Americans make. Social media platforms log not just what people post, but what they read, how long they browse, and what they posted before deleting it. Employers, insurers, and data brokers have assembled behavioral profiles on most American adults that are already, in many cases, available for government purchase without a warrant. What does not yet exist is the AI layer that transforms this sprawling, fragmented data landscape into a unified, real-time surveillance apparatus. Today, these streams are siloed, inconsistent, and require significant human effort to connect. From our vantage point at frontier AI labs, we understand that an AI system used for mass surveillance could dissolve those silos, correlating face recognition data with location history, transaction records, social graphs, and behavioral patterns across hundreds of millions of people simultaneously.

    The mere existence of such a capability in government hands — even if never activated against a specific individual — changes the character of public life in a democracy.

    That is a description of the Google business model. It collects that data to use AI to make 100s of billions of dollars targeting ads, effectively selling mass surveilance data to marketers.

    The Google brief complaint is not that such AI systems exist, but that they might end up on government hands. I am much more worried about what private companies are doing with such systems.

    The brief also argues:

    . A child’s tricycle can physically be driven on an interstate, but we do not allow it because of the risks of using the technology in that environment. Mass domestic surveillance and autonomous lethal weapons systems are the equivalently reckless domain for today’s frontier models. The considered judgment, shared widely across the AI development community, is that these applications of current AI technology carry risks so severe, and threaten harm so impossible to repair after the fact, that some kind of guardrails — whether contractual or technical — are necessary to constrain them in the absence of robust, genuinely effective governance frameworks.
    The analogy to a child's tricycle is weird. A tricycle is not a dangerous technology, except that it gets in the way of other vehicles. I would expect an analogy about a toxic chemical truck on the highway, or something like that. No one worries about tricycles.

    I do not think that there is any such consensus in the AI development community. They worry about AI LLMs taking over the world, or releasing dangerous info like bomb-making recipes, or tricking people into doing foolish things. They do not worry about military units doing their jobs more efficiently.

    Openai and Anthropic are both planning to go public this year, with a combined market value of about a trillion dollars. And yet they run by lunatics with untenable business models. There has never been a situation before with so much at stake with such flaky companies.

    Conflict of interest disclosure: Anthropic has promised to pay me $3000 to compensate for training Claude on a pirated copy of my book.

    Monday, March 09, 2026

    The Corrected Signs of the Zodiac

    SciAm explains:
    Astrology is currently experiencing a remarkable renaissance—especially on social media, ...

    Toward the end of the fifth century B.C.E., Babylonian astronomers divided the ecliptic into 12 equal sections of 30 degrees each, analogous to their calendar’s 12 months of 30 days each. In doing so, they developed the first known astronomical coordinate system. They assigned each section a constellation located in the night sky along the ecliptic at that time of the year.

    The language of Astrology leads people to believe that if their sign was Aries, then Aries would be visible overhead on their birthday.

    This is wrong for a couple of reasons. If Aries is your sign, then the Sun would be blocking that constellation on your birthday. So you would not see it because of the brightness of the Sun. It is also wrong because the Earth has shifted, and so the alignment of the stars, in the last 3000 years. Also, there are 13 signs of the Zodiac.

    The above article tells you the true calendar of the constellations.

    Sunday, March 08, 2026

    Criminals are Born That Way

    It is common to attribute crime to poverty, absent fathers, or poor education. Someone will notice that a lot of prisoners were fatherless, and decude that huge social problems could be solved encouraging fathers or funding school programs. Maybe, but it does not follow.

    This essay explains:

    The Blank Slate, the idea that differences in human personality and behaviour are entirely the result of that person’s experiences earlier in life, is utterly dominant in swathes of the social sciences, including sociology, criminology, and anthropology. Left-leaning academics adhere to the blank slate because it implies that humans are fully malleable. If a person’s behaviour, good or bad, is entirely the result of how they have been treated, then one can fix all of society’s problems by re-engineering society to give everyone an idyllic upbringing and so produce a utopia. Indeed, the failure to have done that already can only be attributed to the iniquity of the capitalists who thus need to be overthrown and deposed.

    We’ve known for decades that this is utterly wrong. By far the biggest influence on a person’s personality and behavioural traits is their genes [1]. Twin studies, corroborated and supported by adoption studies and other types of study, tell us that about 50% of the variation in behavioural traits is attributable to differences in genes. Everything else – including biological randomness in embryonic development, the influences of families, schools and communities, and all the other influences and experiences specific to each person – only adds up to the other 50% [2].

    The heritability of criminality is about 40–50%, which means that whether or not a child is likely to grow up to have a criminal record depends primarily on the genes he was born with, and less than that on his upbringing and childhood environment [3]. So why is this totally ignored in most discussions of the causes of crime?

    Last month, a fatherless Canadian male transgender dropout shot and killed 6 in a school. It seems obvious that a deranged mom and a missing dad were major causes. Probably so. But we cannot know for sure in an individual case. We can research this by aggregated cases and measuring statistics. When that is done, the genetic causes are apparent, and the others are not.

    Saturday, March 07, 2026

    European Civilizatoin required many Centuries

    Hot tweet:
    .@StephenM : "The West only achieved the place that it did in human history because it spent previous centuries eradicating the criminal elements within it’s territories. The West that we came to know that had the great music and architecture and science and the most powerful economy had spent centuries previous to that establishing order first."
    He has made this point before. Europe executed mayb 1-2% of its population every generation for centuries.

    Elon Musk retweeted this:

    Stephen Miller is 100% right here

    The high culture that made the West so superior to everywhere else on Earth only came because Western Europe executed ~1% of each generation for centuries

    In weeding the crime gene out of the population through centuries of capital punishment for everything from larceny to murder, Western Europe made itself a paradise, and blossomed into the greatest high civilization the world has ever seen over the 18th and 19th centuries

    So, as he said, "The West only achieved the place that it did in human history because it spent previous centuries eradicating the criminal elements within it’s territories. The West that we came to know that had the great music and architecture and science and the most powerful economy had spent centuries previous to that establishing order first."

    That is 100% true. High civilization requires order, and requires the pruning of the tree of civilization to achieve it

    So it was a eugenics program that worked. Or maybe you will attribute the changes to Christianity, or legal institutions.

    Regardless, it took many centuries to make the European and American people what they are today. There are no known shortcuts. It cannot be done with immigrants.

    Friday, March 06, 2026

    Texas Politician turns out to be a Nut

    Democrat James Talarico just won a Texas primary against a radical Black woman, and the news media treats him as a moderate. He is not.

    The NY Post reports:

    “White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus,” Talarico’s full post read. “But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.”
    I do not know what this means.

    The goofiest stuff is that he talks about religion a lot, and has weird beliefs.

    Thursday, March 05, 2026

    Justifying the Iran War

    Why are we at war with Iran? To end its nuclear program? To get its oil? To improve the human rights of its citizens? To stop Iran from exporting terrorism?

    Unfortunately, the Trump administration has made statements implying that Israel started this war, and we have to be on its side.

    There is another reason that people do not want to say. Iran was becoming a China puppet, and maybe this war is to limit China's allies and oil supply.

    The NY Post has an op-ed:

    Beijing’s slick sales pitches convinced the Iranians to spend their oil billions buying China’s military and telecommunications equipment — like the “state-of-the-art” radar systems that now lie in smoldering ruins after failing to detect the incoming American airstrikes.

    But the decapitation of Iran’s leadership and the destruction of its Chinese-made defense arsenal aren’t the worst of Beijing’s Middle East woes.

    It goes on to argue that China is the real long-term threat. We are afraid to fight China directly, so we have proxy wars.

    See also this interview.

    Wednesday, March 04, 2026

    Meet a UK Health Ambassador

    Athika Ahmed is a member of the Cardiff and Vale Health Youth Board and said her Bangladeshi heritage and traditional values are partly what inspired her to get involved with the Youth Board and aspire to become a doctor. 

    Athika Ahmed is a 23-year-old health ambassador in Wales, known for her advocacy in women's health and her efforts to educate young people about health issues.

    Athika Ahmed is a medical student at Cardiff University and has been involved in health advocacy since she was 16 years old. She has worked as a health ambassador, focusing on raising awareness about women's health issues, including endometriosis, menopause, and menstrual health. Her work aims to break the stigma surrounding these topics, particularly among young Muslim girls, and to promote better health education in schools.

    This looks like a joke, but it is not. This is Britain today.

    Tuesday, March 03, 2026

    Nigeria is Repopulating the World

    The world is not prepared for this reality. Soon Africans will be taking over the world, and using up all the resources.

    Monday, March 02, 2026

    California Schools Overruled

    Some conservatives announce:
    U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Historic, Groundbreaking Victory for Parental Rights, Dismantles California’s Secret Gender Transition Regime

    Supreme Court rules that California cannot hide children’s gender transitions from parents; landmark decision protects parental rights nationwide

    It was amazing that California had a policy of secretly transgendering minor students, and concealing it from the parents.

    The 6-3 Supreme Court decision is here.