America’s Fertility Rate Crisis

WSJ reports:

In April, the federal government reported that America’s total fertility rate — the number of children a woman is statistically expected to have over her lifetime — had dropped to 1.57. The alarm was immediate, with lawmakers and pundits invoking the specter of a graying, shrinking America unable to fund its elders. ...

The explanations for why Americans are having fewer children, or having them later, aren’t mysterious. They follow from changes most people wouldn’t want to reverse.

Goldin points to women’s agency as the main variable. In virtually every country where fertility has fallen, she says, women have gained increased access to education, careers and the ability to invest in their own futures.

In other words, teach women that they have the unilateral power over birth control and abortion, and they will stop having babies.

The article discusses financial difficulties and how IVF could be used more. But the poor are having more babies than the middle class, and people have reproduced for millennia without ivf.

There is, of course, one obvious answer to the worry that there won’t be enough young workers to support an aging population, and that is immigration. Bring in working-age people and a populace can rebalance the retired old with the productive young without waiting 20 years for babies to grow up.

The WSJ is conservative on some issues, but it is always finding excuses to import foreign labor. No, that is not a solution.

Google is Anti White

If you doubt that Google is anti-White, try googling American inventors. Or google white moms.

The inventors are mostly Black. The images for white moms are mostly with half-Black babies. Even the articles are on topics like CDC Reports High Out-of-Wedlock Births for White Moms with Black Fathers. This is what you are being brainwashed to accept.

Consider this comparison of Pepsi ads, from recent and 50 years ago. The people look like they are from different countries.

NY Law abolishes terms Father, Mother

Snopes says this is true:

New York lawmakers passed a bill changing the words "mother" and "father" to "gestating parent" and "non-gestating parent" in parts of state law.

The reasons given do not even make any sense.

Under the updated text, "gestating parent" refers to a person who carries and gives birth to a child, while a "non-gestating parent" does not — such as the father or the non-carrying woman in a lesbian relationship. While parents share a legal bond with their children, they do not always share a biological one, as seen in cases of surrogacy or adoption.

We have had child adoption for centuries, so there is nothing new about parents not having a biological bond. Furthermore, in the case of surrogacy, the gestating parent is the pregnant surrogate, and not the legal parent.

Trying to Stop Whites from Living with other Whites

The NY Times is on the warpath against Return to the Land, a small private Arkansas community. It just podcast a very favorable interview of a woman suing because she was not admitted.

Michelle considers herself white. If you look at her, she looks white. She is a practicing Christian, but by blood, she’s Jewish. Her mom’s family is Jewish. According to the “Return of the Land,” she is not a Christian, she’s a Jew. And in addition, Michelle is married to a Black man, and they share three biracial children. ...

Yeah, she saw it as a real estate investment, pure and simple. ...

They also asked questions about things like gay marriage. They asked her what her thoughts are on the COVID vaccine. They asked her how she feels about abortion. ... They even asked her what her thoughts are on the Roman Empire. ...

The legal experts that I’ve spoken to say that her case is extremely strong for a number of reasons.

It is funny how these leftist Jews are so much against freedom of association. Jews have survived as a distinct ethnic identity for centuries largely because they have been allowed to associate with other Jews.

It is hard for me to understand why anyone would be offended at a very small community that chooses to live with like-minded people on an undeveloped Arkansas plot of land.

The NYT interviewer, Debra Kamin, used to live in Tel Aviv, so I assume she is a Jew.

Meanwhile the Southern Poverty Law Center has been indicted again, with more facts supporting the charge that the Klu Klux Klan, American Nazis, and other supposedly racist groups were really just fund-raising fronts for rich Jewish leftists:

[The National Socialist Party of America leader] used [SPLC] donors' money to, among other things, travel to extremist rallies, host extremist rallies, donate money to leaders of other extremist organizations, recruit new members into his extremist organization, publish racist and extremist material for the purpose of recruiting new members, both inside and outside of prison, and create racist paraphernalia to sell at rallies to raise more money for his extremist organization.

How England Cops Killed Henry Nowak

Wikipedia:

On 3 December 2025, Henry Nowak, a white 18‑year‑old British university student, was murdered by Vickrum Digwa in Southampton, England. Digwa, a 23-year-old British Sikh man, cut and stabbed Nowak five times with a dagger. When police officers from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary arrived, Digwa accused Nowak of assault, and officers handcuffed Nowak. Police body‑worn camera showed Nowak repeatedly telling officers that he had been stabbed and pleading for help. He died shortly after being handcuffed. ...

The jury convicted Digwa of murder on 28 May 2026.

Britain has imported Third World migrants, and given Sikhs special permission to carry deadly knives.

Here is the part that is hard to understand. Apparently a non-white can attack a White boy, and when the cops show up, the non-white can cry racism, and the cops will arrest the White. In this case, the White boy bled to death as the cops were handcuffing him and reading his rights.

People are comparing to George Floyd. Like Nowak, Floyd died while being arrest, with video evidence posted. But Floyd was guilty of a crime and dying of drug overdose, and cops had called an ambulance to get him medical care.

By contrast, Nowak was an innocent victim, and cops ignored how he was bleeding to death while they believed the racist accusations from his killer.

Nobody ever showed that the Floyd cops had any racial animosity. A couple of them were not even White. But Nowak was arrested for being accused of racism, and only Whites are arrested for that.

60 years ago, Britain was an all-White nation. Now the non-whites apparently know that they can accuse Whites of racism, and possibly get away with murder. Britain has betrayed its own citizens, and adopted an assortment of anti-White laws and policies.

Elon Musk tweeted:

The West has created an utterly evil state religion where an accusation of “racism” is the gravest offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder!

So if police show up at a crime scene and a British boy is bleeding out and an immigrant says the British boy is racist the cops will cuff the dying British boy.

Democrats reject Womens Museum being for Women

AP reports:

What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits. ...

One change added a mission scope that states, “The Museum shall be dedicated to preserving, researching, and presenting the history, achievements, and lived experiences of biological women in the United States.”

It also adds a prohibition which states, “The Museum may not identify, present, describe, or otherwise depict any biological male as a female.”

It is amazing that the Democrats are now 100% to honoring women, but only if they include men who call themselves transgender.

Canada may ban Residential school denialism

Canada has no free speech, and criminalizes facts:

Bill C-9 amended to criminalize "residential school denialism"

On Monday evening, a Senate committee added a controversial amendment to criminalize "residential school denialism" with a penalty of up to two years in prison.

Never heard of it? Wikipedia has a whole article on it:

Residential school denialism is negationist ideology that trivializes, downplays, or misrepresents the effects of the Canadian Indian residential school system. Despite decades of recognition and acknowledgments, denialist claims remain a factor within Canadian society. Residential school denialism often includes claims that the number of reported deaths has been inflated by the "reconciliation industry", that there were only isolated cases of child sexual abuse, and that many survivors are untrustworthy or are merely seeking compensation.

It ends with an example:

In 2025, Dallas Brodie made posts on X that read in part: "The number of confirmed child burials at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School site is zero. Zero. No one should be afraid of the truth. Not lawyers, their governing bodies, or anyone else." The Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs responded with a statement condemning the posts and calling on Brodie to apologize "for promoting abhorrent rhetoric which minimizes the harms of Residential Schools and for misleading and emboldening the public against Indigenous people". On March 7, 2025, Brodie was removed from the Conservative Party of BC caucus as a result of her decision to publicly mock and belittle testimony from former residential school students.

It is true that the number is zero. Even if any are found, they are almost certainly from children who died of natural causes. The whole story is known as the "Mass Grave Hoax".

What went Wrong with Polygenism

I read that polygenism is pseudo-science, so I looked up some definitions:

Polygenism is a theory of human origins which posits the view that humans are of different origins (polygenesis).

Polygenism is the theory that the human races originated from multiple independent ancestral lines rather than descending from a common progenitor population.

So why is this wrong? Apparently because it competes with Out of Africa.

The Out of Africa theory is really two theories. The original Out of Africa I, which is considered disproved. And Out of Africa II, which is commonly accepted.

I found the explanations confusing and contradictory. Here is what I could figure out.

The human races did develop separately on separate continents, and racial differences are attributable to this separate development. To this extent, polygenism is true. Where it goes wrong is to say that human similarities are from convergent evolution. It is believed that those similarities are from common genes, as inherited from common ancestors.

Humans are believed to have descended from African apes who lived 5 million years ago. Out of Africa I said that all humans are direct descendants from Africans who migrated out 200K years ago. This cannot be right because of genetic evidence of interbreeding with European Neanderthals and Asian Denisovans.

Out of Africa II scales these claims back, and says that humans have mostly African ancestry, from a migration about 50K years ago. This is an attempt to salvage some of the Out of Africa I theory. Maybe 60% of your ancestry came from that migration, we do not know.

These theories are interesting to the extent that they help define what it means to be human, but they leave a lot of questions unanswered.

Africa appears to have had some apes walking upright, but those were not really human.

The main point of the Out of Africa theories was to explain (1) why humans have all the same potential; (2) why other human species like Neanderthals went extinct; and (3) why there has been no human evolution in the last 50K years. But all of this is now known to be false.

We still do not know why human ancestors evolved language and intelligence. It appears that Neanderthals evolved big brains about 1M years ago, long before the Out of Africa II migrations. And there appear to be some fossil gaps and population bottlenecks in the last 1M years. That may be when our ancestors became distinctly human.

We also do not know if it means anything to be mostly of African descent. The Neanderthal-African hybrids seemed to be more successful than either the Neanderthals or the Africans. So it is unknown which genes were more important.

Some people who write on this subject want to emphasize human similarities, and even similarities with apes. Others want to emphasize differences. We need both for an accurate scientific picture.

Chicago Sends Black Dads to Jail

The Chicago Sun-Times reports:

For parents navigating family court in Cook County, falling behind on child support and other court-ordered payments can carry consequences that extend far beyond mounting debt.

It can mean going to jail.

Over the past decade, more than 2,500 people — nearly all of them men — have been locked up after Cook County judges found them in what’s called indirect civil contempt.

Most were detained for failing to comply with court-ordered payments to children or former spouses, according to Cook County sheriff’s records.

Those jailed spent an average of eight days in custody. But about 100 people were held for 50 days or longer. Of them, about 25 were locked up for more than 100 days, according to sheriff’s data from April 2016 to the end of March 2026.

One man, Steve Fanady, has been in jail for nearly four years.

A Chicago Sun-Times analysis of sheriff’s records exposes what some say is a punitive side of a system that civil rights advocates and some court observers say offers little legal help to those unable to afford a lawyer.

Unlike criminal defendants, people accused of violating support orders in civil court aren’t automatically entitled to legal representation even though they might face incarceration.

In Cook County’s sprawling domestic relations court system — which handles roughly 40,000 divorce and child-support cases each year — advocates estimate that at least half of the litigants come to court without a lawyer. Most are Black.

For nearly add debts, jail is not a possibility. A debtor can declare bankruptcy.

It is not so well known that child support is not required to be spent on the child. The mom can spend it as she pleases. In many or even most of these cases, the debt is not even to the mom, but to a welfare agency.